Russia: Shirokov a huge loss

June 10, 2014

Four ’star men’ dropped out of this tournament in the last fortnight.

Franck Ribery, Marco Reus and Radamel Falcao could all reasonably claim to be their side’s most important attacking player, but while France, Germany and Colombia have adequate replacements, Russia don’t have someone who can play Roman Shirokov’s role. The loss of the dynamic goalscoring midfielder and captain is a huge loss, and means an already unexciting Russia side now appears even more unappealing. It may even force Fabio Capello to change his shape, tilting the midfield triangle to include two holding midfielders rather than one.

Whereas Russia played primarily on the counter-attack at Euro 2012, taking advantage of the strong Zenit connection in the side, Capello has favoured different players and there’s no longer such cohesion about Russia, and little rotation of the midfield triangle. In fact, it’s difficult to understand this side’s specialism – the defensive is underwhelming, they don’t keep possession particularly well, and the counter-attacking threat is no more than decent. When you factor in the suspicion Capello might be building for the 2018 World Cup on home soil, it’s difficult to find reasons to back them.

Forward options

Upfront, Alexander Kerzhakov was widely panned for his goalless Euro 2012 performance, but his excellent movement in that competition, which opened up space for midfield runners, was cruelly overlooked. He was a regular throughout qualifying and could keep his place here – expect some clever darts towards the flanks, dragging opposition centre-backs into poor positions. Others will dart past him into goalscoring positions, although Shirokov was the best at doing this.

Potential Russia XI - although Kokorin could be moved upfront

The biggest goal threat, however, is Alexander Kokorin. There’s a good chance he could be fielded in the striking role, with Yuri Zhirkov coming into the side, although Capello generally sticks by a non-goalscoring striker like Kerzhakov. Kokrorin therefore seems likely to dart infield from the left, where he’s very lively but not consistent with his end product. Aleksandr Samedov will probably start from the right, and is more of a direct winger than a withdrawn forward.

Midfield zone

In the midfield zone, Capello has generally favoured one strict holding player, with two breaking forward. The holding player was always likely to be Denis Glushakov, a slightly strange player as he used to be much more adventurous. He brings more guile than Igor Denisov, who played the holding role at Euro 2012, but could Capello play them both after Shirokov’s injury, allowing Glushakov higher up the pitch?

The other certain starter is Victor Fayzulin, who used to be a winger but now plays more of a workmanlike central midfield role. He’ll tuck into the right-centre midfield position and break forward and must become more of a goal threat in Shirokov’s absence

Then, there’s the Shirokov role. It could be Glushakov in that position, it could be Zhirkov, it could even be Alan Dzagoev, who was brilliant at Euro 2012 but has fallen out of favour under Capello – he’d offer dribbling ability from a central role, but in terms of discipline is unlikely to be trusted. Therefore the more likely candidate is Oleg Shatov, another small tricky dribbler who can shoot from range – although Capello will probably rotate his midfielders throughout the tournament.

Immobile defence

The backline is well organised, as you expect under Capello, but lacks mobility. Russia also have a habit of conceding 90th minutes goals, doing so three times in the qualifiers and twice more in recent friendlies, which is a concern.

Right-back Georgi Shchennikov is nothing more than steady, with Alexei Kozlov another option. Left-sided Dimitri Kombarov is more exciting, gets forward more, and is good technically – although it’s not as exciting as when Zhirkov once played there.

The centre-backs are Sergei Ignashevich and Vasili Berezutski, long-time partners for both Russia and CSKA. They’re not dissimilar – good on the air, but slow on the turn and extremely poor when opposition strikers run the channels, and they’ll struggle massively against pace.

Of course, Capello guards against that by instructing the side to defend deep, which is why his midfield feels so workmanlike, and why Dzagoev is unlikely to claim a starting place. There are, in fairness, some good counter-attacking players in midfield, and Kerzhakov will hopefully get praise for his selfless centre-forward play. But this is a rather unconvincing starting XI, and Capello’s poor showing at the last World Cup doesn’t suggest he can lead his players to victory.

Conclusion

The biggest positive for Russia is that they’re in one of the easier groups in the competition, and are playing matches in the south of Brazil, generally in the evening, so the climate shouldn’t be a huge problem. They are well-organised, and difficult to break down, but there’s no reason to think they can cause an upset.

They don’t have the quality of 2008 or 2012, and are depending upon various young players with minimal continental or international experience. We’ll see you in 2018.

Quick guide

Coach: Fabio Capello – hugely successful at club level, but didn’t impress at World Cup 2010 with England

Formation: 4-1-4-1ish

Key player: Russia need goals, so Kokorin

Strength: Some decent counter-attackers

Weakness: Compared to previous tournaments, not as much individual quality, and a slow defence

Key tactical question: Who plays upfront?


Russia: Shirokov a huge loss

Tags: , , ,