Real Madrid 1-1 Barcelona: Real press excellently but tire and allow Barca chances

The starting line-ups
Real pressed effectively in the first half, but Barcelona exerted their dominance after the break.
With various absences, Jose Mourinho was forced to name a makeshift backline – Ricardo Carvalho played alongside Rafael Varane, Alvaro Arbeloa had to play left-back, so Michael Essien deputised on the right. New signing Diego Lopez started in goal, Jose Callejon was in for the suspended Angel Di Maria, and Kairm Benezema got the nod upfront.
Barcelona assistant coach Jordi Roura chose Jose Manuel Pinto in goal, as is customary in the Copa del Rey. Otherwise, the side was roughly as expected – many would say that this is Barcelona’s current strongest XI, with Daniel Alves showing signs of improvement after a poor 2012.
Real were brave with their early pressing and probably had the better of the first half, but Barcelona increasingly found space after half-time.
Real press
The inevitable main question – would Real sit back, or come out and take on Barcelona? After some indecision from Mourinho in his first few Clasicos in this respect, it’s now accepted that Real’s best chance of causing Barcelona problems is if they press in the opening minutes. And ‘opening minutes’ seems the key, because Real have traditionally started very strongly against Barcelona in the Mourinho era – there was Karim Benzema’s goal after 20 seconds of the December 2011 Clasico at the Bernabeu, a match Barcelona eventually won 3-1. Barca need time to get settled and into their passing rhythm.
Therefore, predictably, Real tried to prevent them settling. Again, Real caused significant problems in the very first minute, when Xabi Alonso won the ball from Pedro Rodriguez, released Cristiano Ronaldo, and he was brought down on the edge of the box by Gerard Pique. That set the tone for the opening 20 minutes – Real winning the ball quickly, Barcelona failing to deal with the pressure.
Midfield
Real’s pressing was fairly standard in its implementation. The front four moved forward to press Barcelona’s back four, while Alonso generally looked to Xavi Hernandez and Sami Khedira was often forced to be more aggressive and get tight to Sergio Busquets, although Real looked more comfortable when Benzema or Mesut Ozil prevented passes being played into Busquets’ feet and Khedira could stay deeper, because this prevented them from leaving a huge gap between midfield and defence.
The Real full-backs stayed very tight to the Barcelona wide players – Arbeloa always does that anyway, but in the first half this forced Pedro very deep into his own half, where he fell into Alonso’s pressing zone. Essien, meanwhile, did a fine job against Andres Iniesta – it was a contest effectively between two central midfielders taking place in a wide zone, but Essien was happy to come inside and track Iniesta’s typical drifts inside.
Barca counters
That, however, meant Real sometimes had problems with Jordi Alba’s forward bursts. Callejon is a decent back-up winger, but lacks Di Maria’s defensive abilities, and Alba got in behind for an early volleyed chance that he screwed wide. With Real pushing so many men forward into the opposition half, Barcelona were forced into an unusual counter-attacking approach that generally involved one of the full-backs pushing forward down the flank, and Cesc Fabregas charging forward from his ‘anarchic’ midfield role. Real didn’t really know how to deal with Fabregas, especially when Khedira was drawn upfield, and the former Arsenal midfielder always seems a good option in Clasicos.
Still, Real continued to play the majority of the game in Barcelona’s half, and created some good chances – for Benzema, for example – when winning the ball quickly. Barcelona played one-twos – they always do – but they found it difficult to move the ball forward in doing so. A defender would pass into the midfield zone, then Xavi or Busquets would be afraid to turn, return the ball and Barca would be back at square one. The away side tried to cope by pushing their entire team deep to provide more short passing options, then getting those same players to spin in behind as midfield runners – but by placing so many players within their own half, it limited the space Real had to press, making it easier for them.
Lionel Messi was relatively quiet, dropping increasingly deep from a right-of-centre false nine role. Carvalho has always tried to stick tight to Messi in these games; when Messi was ‘between the lines’ the Portuguese centre-back followed him, but when he dropped past Alonso or Khedira, he was allowed to go free. Meanwhile, Varane was given a ’sweeper’ job, asked to tidy up behind Varane, often to halt the runs of Fabregas or Pedro, and played the role superbly.
Late in the first half, as Barca had some possession, Alves started to get past Cristiano Ronaldo, forcing the latter to foul the Brazilian on one occasion – risky, as he would have missed the second leg through suspension.
Second half
The second half was played in a different manner – Barcelona’s usual dominance of possession was more obvious, and equally crucial was that they played more of the game in Real Madrid’s half.
An important change, as odd as it might sound, was the fact Barcelona kicked off. Having been rattled in the first minute of the first half by Real (something they never seemed to recover from) Barcelona kept the ball for the first 80 seconds of the second period – going nowhere, knocking the ball around in defence and midfield, happy to slow the game and assert their dominance. That spell was brought to a halt with Essien’s tackle on Iniesta in a typically central position, considering it was a ‘wide’ battle.
Barcelona chances
But still, this half was about Barcelona – partly because Real’s pressing dropped. There was less intensity from the front four, and a significantly lower level of closing down from Khedira and Alonso in midfield, possibly because they’d become increasingly concerned with Fabregas’ freedom.
Barca’s opener came from an atypical event: Barcelona (and more specifically, Messi) winning possession in the opposite half – their pressing was barely noticeable at some points. But the goal did arrive with Fabregas getting in behind the defence, and this became a clear problem for Real – they continued to play a high defensive line, but had no pressure on the ball. At 0-1, Fabregas got in for another chance from a simple through-ball from Iniesta, who had all the time he liked to look up and chip the ball over the defence from a central position (that wouldn’t have happened in the first half). Fabregas was stopped by a superb Varane tackle, but more runners got in behind later – Messi, who was flagged offside to Roura’s disgust, and Pedro, who chipped the ball wide of the far post.
Modric
Mourinho was unable to stop this completely, but he did help the situation by introducing Luka Modric, in place of Callejon. Real were losing the midfield battle, and Ozil wasn’t helping defend, so Modric came on and immediately offered renewed energy and tenacity in the centre of the pitch, winning possession after 30 seconds on the field, and providing another body in a central zone to close down.
Now, the game became very open. Roura failed to change things significantly from the bench, but Barcelona continued to break quickly and exploit the space in behind, and Alves became an attacking threat once again, breaking past Ronaldo to cut the ball back for Fabregas, whose shot shaved the crossbar.
Real created chances too: Ozil went to the right after Modric’s arrival (his control near the touchline was extraordinary at one point) and Real became dangerous down that flank – Ozil played a pass across the six-yard box towards Ronaldo that was brilliantly cleared by Pique, while Essien delivered a great cross to Ronaldo from the far side, too.
In the end, it was a set-piece that got Real back in it – a header from Varane. He was probably the game’s outstanding performer, and it was a fitting end to the game.
Conclusion
Barcelona probably created more clear-cut chances, yet it felt like Real deserved something from this game. They pressed Barcelona excellently in the opening period, although they had two problems – (a) that level of pressing was unsustainable for 90 minutes, and they were always likely to face a backlash in the second half, and (b) they failed to take fully advantage of winning the ball so frequently in the opposition half – Ronaldo and Benzema were both quiet, and Real didn’t score in their period of dominance.
Barcelona’s attacking was forced to be more direct than usual – the full-backs sprinted towards goal to good effect, choosing their moments to venture forward and catching out Real’s wide players. Fabregas, too, was a constant attacking weapon in that roaming free role – his understanding with Messi is brilliant, and against a side leaving space in behind the defence, he becomes very difficult to stop.
Real Madrid 1-1 Barcelona: Real press excellently but tire and allow Barca chances




i feel so honored to be the 1st comment. All of my hardwork and dedication has paid off. Getting the top comment has been a dream of mine for many years, and i would like to thank those who have helped me along the way.
First and foremost i would like to thank god for giving me this opportunity.
Next i would like to thank my parents.
I want to thank my friend fat albert, for being really skinny and always there for me.
I would also like to thank my pet tadpole for surviving against all odds for over a week. Next i would like to thank the squirrel that lives in my backyard for climbing trees because that gives me inspiration that i need to get through the day.
This is a special moment in my life and i would like to thank any of my unmentioned friends and family that have helped me along the way. This moment will be a moment that i will never forget. I just remmembered a few other people i would like to thank; facebook, the fish i caught in the third grade, my light in my room bc i wouldn’t be able to see the keyboard without it, the internet for letting me go on facebook, my house because without it i would be homeless, and last but not least i would like to thank all the people out there that actually took time out of their day to read this.
I cannot stress how much of a big deal to me this is. I have been trying to be the first comment on a post for years. Hopefully my good luck will continue, but this is undoubtedly a rare occasion. If you asked me how i did this, i would say, you can achieve anything u set your mind on.
To all the kids out there reading this, i would like to tell them to follow their dreams. Being the top comment is amazing, thank you everyone
You are so funny! Joke of the day
what
“Callejon is a decent back-up winger, but lacks Di Maria’s defensive abilities”
Is that sarcasm or is Callejon such a bad defender? I have yet to see Di Maria defend with a purpose, as he still is at heart a forward (they way he started in Rosario Central and played in Benfica) a classic Argentinean number 7, let’s say.
I’ve never been convinced on his defensive abilities, as I think he plays this way because of the eventual teams he’s playing for, and the coaches that have star-studded attacks and made him play another position just because they wanted him in. Maradona, Sabella and Mourinho, for example.
The thing is, irrespective of the defending, Callejon is a better offensive winger than diMaria. Faster, more disciplined, better heading, better shooting (right instead of left footed, though). (At least thats my opinion after watching Real Madrid during the last 2.5 years). I guess you can argue about diMaria being better at dribbling, but all in all, I simply prefer Callejon’s style of play.
Really? I think Di Maria is very very underrated, really like him. Has direct play and as you say his dribbling is wonderful, has decent crosses as well.
You’re CRAZY if you think Callejón is better than Di María. Di María is a MUCH more skilled footballer in almost every way. He’s faster, he’s a much better dribbler, he’s incredibly creative (to the point where his teammates and him sometimes aren’t on the same wavelength), he’s very good at hitting the final ball whether it be a through ball or a cross unlike Callejón. Callejón is an incredibly limited player. He’s tenacious, he’s quick, a good finisher (with both feet), but that’s about it. His first touch is decent, his ball control is decent. He’s an overall decent player. Di María’s problems stem from his bad decision-making, his inconsistency and him being incredibly left-footed, but I’d pick him over Callejon in 9/10 games and I think most Madridistas would do the same.
Agreed 100% – Di Maria has the potential to be one of the best wingers, maybe even players on earth.
thats a bit of a stretch…
Well, Di maria is an OK winger. you just went too far
I think ADM’s defensive side of his game is very underrated. He plays significantly deeper than Ronaldo and actually protects his full-back – and it’s difficult to imagine him getting in such a bad position for Fabregas’ goal, as Callejon did.
ADM’s strong defensive abilities and workrate aside, I think you are being a bit harsh in the judgement on Callejon’s involvement in Barca going 0:1. I just rewatched the scene: Callejon is positioned generally defensive, nearly as deep as the defenders’ line of 4, just further out to the wing. He is watching the build-up of Barca, and then seeing and instantly reacting on Messi’s cross – he is quick enough and able to intercept the ball to Alba.
The only problem is that his clearance is a bit uncontrolled and to the middle, and then none of his teammates are able to (are quick-thinking enough to) get that ball before Messi. Of course in that deep position he cancels the offside of Fabregas. Maybe he could have run up high again quicker; though he was probably relying on his 4 central teammates to handle the situation.
But hadn’t he intercepted in the first place, Alba (not offside wrt the 4 defenders) would have been in a 1-on-1 with the keeper. I’d rather blame Alonso/Khedira/Carvalho/… for this goal.
True, true, he plays that way and always backups Arbeloa, because he is not quick enough always to get back, when Ramos played as RB, Di Maria played far more offensive.
“Varane was given a ’sweeper’ job, asked to tidy up behind Varane, often to halt the runs of Fabregas or Pedro, and played the role superbly.”
Varane played very well, but i fear he didn’t clone himself during the match
Fantastic analysis as usual.
“ The away side tried to cope by pushing their entire team deep to provide more short passing options, then getting those same players to spin in behind as midfield runners – but by placing so many players within their own half, it limited the space Real had to press, making it easier for them.”
A fantastic piece of analysis.
A bit bias against Barcelona, as usual, but nice analysis. I like to read things that I miss during the match. Than you for the effort.
Bias against Barcelona? Haha. I’m guessing you support them…
No, I do not. I admire their play, but I’m fairly neutral.
The bias part I noticed in most of your articles about Barelona’s matches. Every time some other team plays against Barca and doesn’t get trashed, you focus on them and insist they ”deserved” a good result, even though sometimes Barcelona was far superior.
The games with Chelsea, Inter or Valencia come to mind.
…or Celtic
U actually are a wee bit biased against Barca. May be coz u a are huge Jose fan or RM fan. But apart from that nice article.
Cheers mate!
And I´m guessing you support the others? Or is it the other “special one”?
Barcelona had the better chances, Real´s equalizer came after a corner kick that shouldn´t have been a corner and Barca had 62% possession in the Bernabeu. Thank god you´re are not bias against Barcelona. Imagine if you were… But you´re right. Real deserved something. One or two red cards (Essien and Carvalho i.e.)
All in all a great match but the usual dirty play of some players of Real Madrid (especially Alonso, Essien and Arbeloa) went unpunished by the ref once again.
Very good analysis. But the other main reason why Barcelona dominated possession and slowed the game down in the second half is that Roura moved Iniesta from the left wing/midfield to the left/central midfield. This helped Barcelona extremely in my opinion because he was next to Xavi and they two are terrific togethe. Anyway Iniesta is so good with the ball on his feet, you literally can’t take him the ball away. One of the most consistent player in the world for sure. Also after the successfully substitution of Modric Real’s pressing worked better and after Özil moved to the right wing Jordi Alba could not deal with him. By the way Real Madrid’s goal didn’t score through a set-piece, after the corner the ball came to Özil and then he crossed the ball and Varane scored by a header.
Well, Real Madrid’s goal should be considered as coming from a set-piece because there is no way centre backs would go up otherwise.
Question: will Varane replace Pepe or Ramos in the near-future Real Madrid central defence? My bet is on Ramos, so that Ramos can play on the right again…
Nope. He’ll replace Pepe if anyone. Ramos is good at right-back, but he’s built too much muscle and isn’t as quick and agile as he was when he was younger. I’ve been hearing that Real Madrid will be buying back Carvajal from Leverkusen. He’s apparently been playing very good for Leverkusen and was already playing good for Real Madrid Castilla before going to Leverkusen. He’ll be a great addition.
Good point about Carvajal, had not considered him. If he indeed re-joins Madrid, you’ll be probably right. Carvajal was rated one of the best (if not THE best) right defenders in the Bundesliga until winter break…
Sorry but Mr. Cox’s analysis is repeating itself and losing that cutting edge that used to make this site so attrative to people who liked the tactical side of football. Earlier he used to publish pictures marking particular player position vis-a-vis a particular move leading to a pattern of play etc. I guess being mainstream journalist doesn’t allow to be so meticulus. This analysis is no different from standard stuff you get on most of other sites.
“Earlier he used to publish pictures marking particular player position vis-a-vis a particular move leading to a pattern of play etc.” – sorry, I had to stop that for copyright reasons, I was repeatedly warned by the governing bodies about that. No way around it.
They’re dinosaurs, Michael. You’ve done more for the game (and thus the industry) than a building full of suits. Is there some way you could tap your community for the sort of support you’d need to get an account with FAME, or whatnot?
That’s nice, ta, but there’s little way around it. DataCo, for example, are pretty tough to get around, and for reasons of accreditation it doesn’t suit me to piss them off!
Superb! Great one
I just don´t get you saying that Di maria has good defensive skills
Pedro and Sanchez are so bad, feel so bad for Villa, he should have left
The thing is that Villa is a great finisher. However, he can NOT run as much as Pedro and Alexis, to press and to stretch the field.
Micheal you seem to have abandoned your blog since you started writing for soccernet……Anyway hope to see more from you. This used to be the best tactics blog out there…..
Not at all – I’ve been writing for them since October 2010, by the way.
I have less time now, sure, but if I didn’t write for them, I wouldn’t have any money to live and would have to close the blog to get a full-time job. Sorry
Barcelona weren’t “forced” to play more direct than usual. It just takes less to penetrate teams who pressure them.
They weren’t precise enough in this game though, could’ve been a rout if they were.
i felt that barcelona found themselves not committing many/any men forward after they went 1-0 up and it was Madrid dictating the outcome of the match. Had Benzema, Ronaldo or Higuain managed to find a clinical touch, I would suggest Madrid could have won this 2- or 3-0?
Perhaps Barcelona are saving themselves for the home leg, because they looked to me like they were after a 0-0 here.
well, you seeing everything Blanco… Barca had a bunch of chances by Alba, Cesc and Pedro..
Fabregas, I think, was the worst player for Barcelona, because even if he scored one goal he missed so many good chances, also Pedro missed the biggest single chance in the game and Messi didn’t play that well either, this game could of gone 4-0 for Barcelona, 2-0 for Real or even a 3-3 draw.
screw u guys im going home
What Do you think Michael- about Mourinho going 4-2-4- as suggested in various tactics websites. When they were pressing in the first half, they certainly looked 4-2-4 without the ball. And Ozil being more of a forward (central winger) than a central midfielder, it does seem that Madrid are using four forwards than three central midfielders. But can we really call this 4-2-4? Mourinho has always hated 4-4-2. And 4-2-4 suggests Barcelona didn’t have a spare man at the back. But Ozil was tracked by Busqeusts(even out wide) until Modric came on. Would love to hear your thoughts…..
I wouldn’t call it 4-2-4, no. But when you play 4-2-3-1 and ask them to press, your side will inevitably look like a front four with the three attackers pushing forward – I don’t think it was a significant development.
Sorry, ZM. no idea, what is happening here with the comments.
I thought this was the best match played by Real against Barca in the last 3/4 years. They pressed so hard, but also intelligently that every ball cleared by Barca defence went back to a Real player. With any other team, Real would have easily won the match.
As to Barca, this was one of their poorest performance this season. For long periods it looked like their midfield was bloody poor. In spite of all that, three missed chances marked the game of Barca.
Xavi – he had all the space and time to well place the shot, but shot it to the centre, that too on the ground. very poor from Xavi
Cesc – shooting over the top from close range, with lot of space around him
Pedro – he should have scored that one. Forwards always need to preserve some energy for such moments, which will help them not just to shoot, but also to concentrate and place it precisely. Understandable with Pedro, as he is always running.
Whatever it was a brilliant game of quality football.
Apologies for the comments. It’s just one guy who keeps trying to ruin it – I’ve blocked him repeatedly but he changes his IP address…
I agree, I thought Real did really well here. Their main problem was not creating clear-cut chances, perhaps because they’re more accustomed to countering, rather than winning the ball high up.
And agree on the overall quality – was great stuff.
Please Sir, you dont have to apologise.
Sorry, these goal.com guys end up in your classy site too.
By the way, that first comment is excellent. I hope its not the guy who is creating problems.
I wouldn’t categorise this as one of Barca’s “poorest” performances, unless the one thing they did bad in this game results in it being deemed poor compared to the almost faultless previous games this season, then I suppose I’d agree.
But getting away from sounding like a smart-arse, assuming it wasn’t just the poor finishing you thought made it a “poor” performance, I thought Barca played a brilliant game apart from that. They knew Madrid would press loads & Barca don’t cram things up in the middle for the sake of it when there’s space behind to be had. After all, that’s what they always look & try to do; penetrate. Barca join in with the fun & just get runners from everywhere going inbehind; apart from the odd occasion when Madrid did sit a bit deeper.
Madrid pressed really good but as has been said already, they’re not good when they win it high up the pitch. When Barca do, there’s always a sudden surge.
I do not understand the plaudits Fabregas continues to receive for doing very little. He as to be one of the most overrated players in Europe. He serves no purpose and provides no width. I am of the opinion that if he plays then either Xavi or Iniesta should sit, allowing for a Villa or Sanchez out wide on the left. Guardiola gave up a defender to get Cesc on the field and now Vilanova disrupts the front line. Fabregas and Iniesta force everything through the middle and. Ake Barca easy to stop. The only reason Fabregas scored was because he is too slow to get back any quicker and Messi found him during transition. Vilanova uses this line up to hold the ball and lull the opponent to sleep. The game in Madrid was perfect for the wings to get behind the line like Mourinho’s first Clasico. This feels like a loss for Barcelona and Madrid will get a header and a counter and knock them out in March
Yes Iniesta and Fabregas may make barca appear to funnel their play through the centre more, but the purchase pf alba gives them a genuine goal threat down the left and far more mobility than they used to have. Obviously not ideal to make your play predictable but with Alba it will less of a problem than it was last season.
Fabregas is a great player, but I agree that he isn’t suited to this Barca setup. Despite the popular notion that he has “Barca DNA”, he actually lacks the most important qualities Barca players have. He’s terrible under pressure and loses the ball repeatedly trying to play first time, ambitious passes. He’s a very impatient player and I get the feeling that he either doesn’t “get” Barca’s possession game or he just doesn’t like it very much. Pay attention to his body language when his teammates are passing the ball around and notice how he’s always hurrying them to play it forward faster. He constantly gets agitated asking for the ball and looks to pass it forward as soon as he gets it. This is something Iniesta, Xavi and Busquets never do, they look for each other, give each other passing options and they know how to circulate the ball patiently. He said last season that he was finding it hard to learn Barca’s tactical and positional game and that he was sill learning to kick his bad habits, but it looks like he’s given up completely. He just doesn’t know how to play with these Braca players. People talk about Barca being more direct under Vilanova and Fabregas finally finding form but the reality is that Fabregas is just finally feeling free of the shackles Pep tried to put on him and playing like he did at Arsenal. It works against lowly opposition that sits deep and defends but it won’t work against quality sides that press high up where Barca’s flawless possession game is most required. Iniesta was forced to drop to midfield repeatedly against Madrid to try and get a hold of the ball because Fabregas couldn’t do his job and Barca lacked width horribly. I highly doubt that Barca’s coaching staff don’t notice this but I think they’re forced to play him ahead of the unfit Villa and the clueless, out of form Sanchez. I’m not a big Neymar fan mainly because he’s a twat but if he can magically mature and cut the circus act, he’s exactly what Barca is lacking. A quality, pacy winger who can provide real width and a genuine goal threat which Barca has failed to find since Henry left. This may sound crazy and I’ve been mocked for it, but this Barca team has been subject to crazy mismanagement that has squandered its huge potential. Numerous bad player acquisitions and unnecessary tinkering has stopped this team from achieving really extraordinary things.
I completely agree with your analysis. Fabregas is a good player, but he doesn’t fit the Barca system. In midfield, Tiago is much better. Also I agree we lacked the width, we needed the Henry-like pace goalscoring winger. I would have started Sanchez or even Tello before starting Fabregas. Iniesta is really being limited on the left wing there. It’s just crazy really that Barca staff try to impose Fabregas on Barca. Messi needs Neymar to free space for himself. The best attacking tri was Mess-Henry-Eto, and there was a reason for that
I remember after 2:2 on Nou Camp, how one Barca fan loled that RM scored only 2 goals when most of their defence players were injured…
You said : imagine RM without Pepe and Ramos..It would be a disaster..
So, where are you now? Lopez, Essien, Carvalho, Callejon and poor Arbeloa as LB where he is even worse – 4 “B” team players and only 1:1 draw..
ZM, great analysis. One remark – I though Real played a much higher defensive line than usual, at times defending 40 meters from their goal. I found it odd that Barca didn’t try to exploit it in the first half by hitting balls over the top. It’s not so much that Xavi et al didn’t have enough time to pick our runners – there simply were no runners.
In the second this changed, with dangerous runs by Pedro, Alba, Dani Alves and Cesc. It seems likely that this was a deliberate change by Roura. Is it possible that Barca failed to make the logical tactical adjustment on the fly due to not having their head coach on the bench?
It only made sense that Madrid looked decent even though the had a make shift back line, considering that they spent much of the first half pressing with their midfield and front line, which wasn’t that changed. Fittingly, it was callejon who was responsible for barca’s goal. And barca’s horrible set piece defending that lead to the equaliser.
Though I think that more cards should have been shown throughout the match. Some of them looked incredibly cynical, like Arbeloa stepping on Dani Alves’s achillies.
Do you think Arbeloa playing on the left, rather than a more attacking full-back (Marcelo or Coentrao) was one of the reasons Ronaldo had a quiet game? Obviously it doesn’t explain him missing some of the chances that he did, that you’d always expect him to score. But, still: I remember you writing an article in Mourinho’s first season mentioning that Ronaldo is less effective with Arbeloa playing behind him. As you pointed out, it’s one of the major reasons Madrid signed Coentrao with Marcelo already on the books.
Finally someone who makes sense. I watched the match and wondered whether I and the mainstream media saw the same thing. Real’s pressing was impressive. Especially when Valdes had the ball. Even when Barca’s wingers tried to receive the ball, Real’s full-backs were close to them half-way inside the Barca half. The offside trap/high line was risky. But I guess that’s the only way you could compete with Barca. For someone who watches Barca occasionally, I’m surprised how their invincible aura has gone. They don’t even seem to press these days. I heard Mauricio Pochettino comment about the same. Real have taken their place.
I compared the speed of this game to the EPL games going on at the same time. It’s clear only Man Utd in the EPL are as good as these guys. The speed at which Real & Barca play at times is breathtaking. Real especially. I guess both these teams are good at getting things right at high speed. That must be the difference between them and the other teams. Arsenal-Liverpool in contrast was very dull.
Keep in mind that Barcelona did not have Vilanova on the bench. That is a big deal and should not be overlooked.
Fantastic as per, Michael. I deplore (not quite) your analysis on The Guardian website as its too short haha, but when it comes to your own blog you are very articulate. You make blogging enjoyable.
It seems to me Fabregas#4 still poses unresolved formation problems, which in a game like this were tested and exposed. I love Fab#4, no doubt fantastic player, the very highest rating,in the mix of his capabilities, technically , mentally very brave winner and his intelligence and vision are supreme; But the so called ‘anarchic’ joker element comes at a price of speed and width
Did not Barca really miss speed as well as real stretching of wing play?
Barca’s threat from the Left side was minimal for very long periods; this allowed MAdrid to push higher (this is remarkable considering that it was Essien there who should have been attacked). Alba was pinned back, Iniesta drifted inside where he prefers to play naturally becuase his control second to none was needed. Messi was sucked infield or isolated too high. An outlet through a speedster like Tello or Sanchez might have been called for earlier.
One might say all this might not have been an issue if either Fab, Alba or Pedro would have converted their chances. but that is exactly, the problem . Barca deems the best spanish finisher of his generation too slow to play on the left. occasionally Barca needs sometimes that second clinical finisher that they had and miss in Villa. So it is a delicate balancing act, that almost failed in this classico. and might be tested again in an everything or nothing moment. I think Barca ’s assistant coach did not andle it very well. But not sure Tito V. would either.
Hey Michael. Fantastic analysis, as usual. I’m not sure if you still visit the comments section a day or two after you posted a synopsis, but I would love to hear from you about the supposed interchanging between Fabregas and Iniesta this season. To my mind, they are in essence swapping positions constantly. The width on that side is supposed to come from late runs from Alba. So in essence, Alba doesn’t necessarily provide true width, because he appears to hardly run wide down the touchline. It’s understandable in a way, because Barca players lack width to get on the end of crosses. He is more like a wide Fabregas, with Iniesta, or even Messi usually looking to play him in behind the opposition defense.
With Barca playing a little bit more like Spain, with Iniesta on the left instead of a real winger, and with Fabregas extremely difficult to pick up, I can picture them being a bigger threat in the Champions League than last season. The keys are Alba and Fabregas with their late runs. I dare any team to defend deep again against them this year.
It was a nice game to watch with both teams trying to take advantage of their strong sides and diminish their weaknesses. What I am unable to figure though is how the heck it is possible for Barcelona to end the game with just 5 fouls committed and get the same amount of bookings as the players of RM who committed 20 fouls. Once again the cynical play pays off as it remains unpunished. It was the very first attack of RM in the 2nd minute of the game when Pique tumbled dangerously Cristiano on the edge of the box and deservedly got booked. Am I wrong or such an early episode was supposed to set up the ref’s criteria for the remainder of the game? Cause throughout the course of the encounter people like Alonso, Khedira, Arbeloa and Carvalho could’ve seen at leat 2 or 3 yellow cards each if the game was ref-ed correctly.
Again, that cannot erase the quite poor performance that Cesc or Messi showed but, hey, rules are rules, right? And what can we say about the offside that Messi was flagged with at the beginning of the second period? That could have well been a game winner.
I am particularly disappointed with Xabi Alonso, because after all he is a great player but somehow in El Clásico” he would always end up playing dirty and deliberately running around kicking his opponents. The likes of Pepe or Carvalho don’t bother me at all cause they look dumb anyway so I don’t expect anything better from them but Alonso…
ZM,
do it seem to you that Real Madrid under Mourinho in recent Clasicos have a pattern of persistent (the nomenclature is “niggling”, but i hate that word) and intentional fouling, in order to break up Barcelona’s play? or, do you believe that their foul count is merely a byproduct of attempting to press harder in these games without being really adept at it?
if the former, do you think that such a “tactic” has a place in discussion of football tactics in general?
Yes, definitely has a tactic, and it’s definitely a ‘thing’. I think it’s 50:50 between the reasons you suggest, really, although worth pointing out that Barca are amongst the ‘best’ tactical foulers high up the pitch, to prevent opposition counters.
ZonalMarking is gettting lazy. What about the Arsenal-Liverpool game? one tactic review every 3 weeks is not cutting it.
Why the sense of entitlement? He doesn’t owe us anything.
I’m not getting lazy, I have more work on elsewhere. Sorry – this is something I do in my (limited) free time.
I went to Arsenal v Liverpool to write elsewhere about Henderson: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/blog/_/name/tacticsandanalysis/id/802?cc=5739
Much as I love ZM, I like to mix it with work elsewhere. I still try to keep up here, and as much as I 100% appreciate everyone visiting and wanting regular content, I don’t feel obliged to do a particular number of articles per week. I love doing ZM but also like to have some free time and to enjoy other parts of life!
I may be wrong, but not many one-person blogs are updated as regularly as this one, especially over the amount of time I’ve spent on it!
Michael
I for one hope you continue with ZM for years to come, but in the capacity you feel comfortable in. You are a really talented analyzer of games, and as much as I like reading your posts elsewhere, I will always consider ZM your “home”. Because you get to express yourself in exactly the way you want. I guess in a way you can consider the whinging of some of the members in the comments section in a complimentary, albeit negatively complimentary, light: they just can’t get enough of your insights.
No point of replying to them, Michael. How can you be “lazy” if you’re still updating your blog with excellent quality and content that is unrivalled?
Good piece on Henderson, too.
Ha thanks but do like to put the record straight!
unrivalled lol
Don’t come back then! You’ve posted non-stop negative comments for nearly two years now – do something else with your time.
This is my last reply on this particularly topic because I don’t want to derail the quality. You have consistency abused Michael, so why are you coming back? A perpetual, tedious act becomes futile. And as for “unrivalled”, find me ANYONE who does something to the same manner or different that is on par with Michael’s work. There are very few blogs based on tactics because, though very easy to understand, it’s very hard to pay attention to movement in a game and so on, thus sometimes you have to rewatch sometimes (a concept not many indulge in.
If you don’t like it, go away and stop being a pest. Clearly you do rate his work because you keep coming back.
Sorry about this, Michael – didn’t mean to derail the topic.