Roma 4-2 Fiorentina: Roma attack three v three

The starting line-ups
An extraordinarily open game at the Stadio Olimpico.
Zdenek Zeman named an unchanged side from the XI which defeated Siena 3-1, which meant Daniele De Rossi was only on the bench after his return from suspension.
Vincenzo Montella was without two key players – Stevan Jovetic and David Pizarro. Adem Ljajic was also out, so Montella surprisingly named Juan Cuadrado as a support striker behind Luca Toni, bringing in Mattia Cassano on the right. Ruben Oliveira replaced Pizarro at the bottom of the midfield.
4-2 wasn’t unfair, but a better reflection of the match would have been 7-4…
Formation battle
This was an interesting battle in terms of the formations. Roma continued with their attack-minded 4-3-3, while Montella persisted with a 3-5-1-1.
Early on, it was evident that Oliveira would be the midfielder with the most amount of time on the ball – Michael Bradley and Alessandro Florenzi tended to press Borja Valero and Alberto Aquilani, while Roma’s forwards had few defensive responsibilities. In a frantic game, Oliveira was the key player, given freedom to dictate the pace and direction of the play. But he had a very disappointing game, mixing poor distribution with indiscipline, and Fiorentina sorely missed Pizarro’s influence from that position.
3 v 3
The key story was that Roma played three-against-three high up the pitch, and in combination with speedy transitions from defence to attack (because of Zeman’s love of verticality and only playing a sideways pass following a forward pass), they simply exposed the Fiorentina back three readily on the break. Fiorentina’s centre-backs generally like sticking tight to their opponents – Facundo Roncaglia, for example, followed Francesco Totti when the Roma captain received the ball in deep positions (conceding the free-kick that resulted in the first goal) – but they simply got dragged out of shape and left too much space in central positions.
The three-on-three situation was obvious, but equally important was the directness offered by Bradley and Florenzi. They burst forward immediately as soon as they got the ball – Bradley’s end product was frequently disappointing, but he was the only midfielder not replaced by Zeman, because his continuous running from midfield to attack was overwhelming Fiorentina on the break. Roma should have scored far, far more than four goals – Mattia Destro’s finishing was very poor, while decision-making on the break wasn’t always up to scratch.
Fiorentina attacks
Fiorentina’s advantage, in theory, was in the centre of the pitch. However, in addition to Oliveira’s aforementioned difficulties, Cuadrado wasn’t suited to the attacking midfield role. He was probably used there to provide pace and energy high up the pitch – Toni has done a good job this season, but against a Roma side that plays a high line and pushes the full-backs high up the pitch, he needed support from a willing runner. The move didn’t really work, however – Cuadrado prompted quick attacks, but often had little support and didn’t have the expertise in possession to create significant chances.
Instead, Fiorentina’s most promising opportunities in the first half came when Manuel Pasqual moved very high up on the left, and received long diagonals from the right side of the pitch, trying to break in behind Ivan Piris – although he was often thwarted by the offside flag. The advanced nature of his positioning, and that of Cassani, meant that Fiorentina were badly exposed on the counter-attack – the wing-backs weren’t contributing because Roma broke so quickly, while Oliveira’s positioning was very poor, and Bradley motored past him.
Roma breaks
Fiorentina became so worried about counter-attacks that they resorted to incredibly blatant tactical fouls – Cassani, Gonzalo Rodriguez and Roncaglia all went into the book for challenges purely intended to stop breaks, while Olivera was booked for a more petulant act – which meant he was in danger of being dismissed if he tried to tackle. It’s also worth noting that both Rodriguez and Roncaglia each made two (successful) ‘last man’ tackles, demonstrating how Roma were breaking without Fiorentina able to get cover in front of, or behind, the centre-backs.
Despite being frantic in open play, set-pieces were a key feature of the game. Gianni Vio, Fiorentina’s set-piece coach, is doing a fine job with attacking at dead ball situations, but Fiorentina’s marking is surprisingly lax in their own box.
Second half
At the break Montella made two predictable changes. Oliveira was replaced, with Aquilani becoming the deepest midfielder – that’s not his favoured position, but it made sense considering the freedom that player was afforded. Mati Fernandez came on in the centre of midfield. Meanwhile, Cuadrado returned to the right-wing-back slot, with Mounir El Hamdaoui going upfront, and scoring with his first touch.
But Fiorentina surprisingly failed to rally after that goal. Despite having more ball-playing midfielders – Aquilani, Borja Valero and Fernandez in the same side after the break – they only managed 51% possession. Whereas Roma’s area of strength was clearly high up the pitch, Fiorentina’s attacks lacked purpose, especially after the break when Roma’s full-backs sat deeper, so Pasqual didn’t get such space in behind Piris.
Aquilani was a better distributor but offered no more defensive protection than Oliveira – he didn’t make a single tackle in the second half, in fact, and was unable to stop Bradley.
Zeman replaced Panagiotis Tachtsidis and Florenzi with De Rossi and Simone Perrotta – and although you wouldn’t ever say a Zeman side was shutting down the game, it brought more structure and discipline to Roma’s midfield. In combination with the deeper positioning of the full-backs, Roma did a fine job in killing Fiorentina’s ability to counter-attack, while still offering an attacking threat of their own, and it shouldn’t have taken until the 88th minute for their fourth goal.
Conclusion
The lesson here is simple, and particularly pertinent in a league now obsessed with a back three. If you attack a three-man defence with three players, and do so directly, and there’s a decent chance of constant chances on the counter-attack. By attacking quickly you essentially take the wing-backs out of the equation – Pasqual and Cassani/Cuadrado might as well have been wide forwards, because they offered nothing without the ball – and by playing three upfront, you can drag and stretch the back three out of shape. With energetic midfield runners, it becomes extremely promising.
There’s always a negative consequence, of course, and Roma were unable to pressure Fiorentina’s deepest midfielder Oliveira, while Cuadrado could have either (a) caused an overload in midfield or (b) helped attack Roma two-versus-two. But neither player was comfortable in their role, and in the absence of Pizarro and Jovetic, Fiorentina lacked the tools to exploit Roma’s weaknesses.





I think this game, also showed that Roma had a plain and simple talent advantage.
Fiorentina – In a game like this it’s tough to play Toni. They are gong to need Jovetic to comeback strong if they want to be in the hunt for a UCL place.
From a Roma prospective, this a talented team. Bradley played well, Totti looked 5 years younger and Lamela their most talented player didn’t even play. Florenzi is 21, Tachtsidis 21, Marquinhos 18, and Destro 21, what great building blocks.
I’m still trying to figure out if Tachtsidis is really this good.
A great analysis for one of the most entertaining matches of the year so far.
A quick look on the stats show that Roma are the best attack in Italy. That was always going to happen with Zeman, but it is still amazing. That coach understands attacking football more than anybody else.
One point of disagreement : it seems that you’re suggesting that with Pizarro and Jovetic, Roma probably wouldn’t have won, or at least things would have been more complicated. This is probably true (after all, they are Fiorentina’s best players) yet I do fell Roma is really maturing.
i think the author is simply implying that roma wouldn’t have won as much if they were playing against pizarro/jovetic
pizarro is a lot more “smarter” than oliveira with his defensive positioning and bradley would not have broken past him as often. jovetic is also 10x more suited to the deep striker role played by cuadrado this match. fiorentina theoretically could’ve scored more thanks to jovetic and conceded less due to pizarro (as well as keep possession better and break better). if you ask me, the game would’ve ended 3-3 if jovetic/pizarro were in the mix
No, I don’t think that – Roma were clearly the better side. *But*, I think the key points were Fiorentina were at the base of midfield, and in the position connecting midfield and attack. Pizarro and Jovetic are the key two players, and they were absent from the key positions…
That said I think Montella chose poor replacements. Easy to say in hindsight, but the second half line-up should have started. Certainly Fernandez, with Cuadrado right. I was unaware of how bad Olivera was…maybe Montella was too…
Knew I should have watched this…
How many sides have dedicated set piece coaches? Never heard anyone with that title before, but surely they exist.
Once again excellent analysis. The problem with Roma is that Zeman’s tactic proves only some times the good one, the one that wins you matches. Fiorentina is a far better team on the long run, i am sure of that.
both totti and pjanic had amazing games
totti with 2 goals and an assist (which makes him now 2nd all top goalscorer in Serie A). pjanic with the most key passes and through balls out of both sets of players (whoscored stats). pjanic does not like to defend and playing higher up the pitch gives him more creative freedom. it’s too bad his new role conflicts with lamela (our top goalscorer)
as for the destro debacle. it can be looked at two ways
i. The boy missed an awful lot of easy goals, if not sitters.
ii. Twas quite an achievement to get in so many positions which offered the opportunity to score.
Were he 30 or so, former would take priority; at such a young age, it’s the latter.
source: chiesaditotti
Baffling lineup from Montella. Fernandez should have started, clearly; he could have done so where Cuadrado did, as he’s done that job for Chile with success, or he could have started in the midfield with Acquilani being the deepest midfielder as it was after the break. IT’s a shame, because he’s been really solid as a manager so far.
OTOH, another coup for Zeman. Still baffled about Lyon letting Pjanic go, he always seemed so promising for them, but I love the way he’s fit into this Roma team so far.
Michael Bradley being at Roma is the best thing to happen to American soccer/football since Beckham came to the MLS.
What do you think of Roma’s chances (for the Scudetto, the CL) this season and under Zeman in general? Is this his big chance, considering how popular the three-man defence is in Italy now, as you mentioned, and would he fail miserably in Spain or England because of their leagues’ lack of it?
Oh, and thanks for the analysis, always a pleasure!
Excellent analysis, as per usual. Thank you!
I find Bradley’s role in this Roma side particularly intriguing. He isn’t exactly filling-up the stat sheet with assists & goals but whenever I watch him play, either with USA, Chievo, or now, Roma, I get the sense he is really playing a valuable role. At Roma, he is obviously surrounded by some highly celebrated talent – and the ego that comes with it. I wonder if that is making it harder for him to settle in with the team.
I agree that some of his touches in the final third & on the break in this last game left something to be desired. But there is more than just his work rate that sets him apart. Surely Zeman is seeing in him more than just tireless legs.
I love this, ZM. An analyses of my fav team and you did it just great. This Roma team is maturing by every match and they are now with 5 wins in a row after tonights 3-0 against Atalanta. However the players should mature a bit more, especially the leaders, pointing at De Rossi’s red card against Lazio and Osvaldo’s red card against Atalanta tonight.
You did mention something interesting, although I like Taschidis, without De Rossi at the holder position the team looks very shapeless in the mid. Taschidis makes a lot of forward runs, same goes for Castan. Destro, I love his style, but he still has a long way to the deadly striker he could be, hopefully he will learn something from Totti.
What about Pjanic? Since this guy is back, Roma are at unbeaten run. He replaced perfectly Lamela, who is the team’s top scorer. Rummors are that both Tothnam and Barcelona are after Pjanic.
And what a magic from Totti at the age of 36 – 2 goals and 2 assists. He is still the core of the team, the target man, the playermaker, the heart, the brain, the dirigent and the magician.
Roma have 4 very important matches comming up next. If they manage to get a good amount of points I am sure they can fight for the scuddeto. Otherwise a top 3 fight will suit them very well.
And about the conclusion of ZM. This is why I think Juve will go far in UCL. Outside of Italy there is no one that can react so well as Roma, Milan and Inter can to the back 3. Maby only Barcelona, but I still think that they lack directness and quickness in their attacks to make it happen.
Another excellent analysis from ZM. Any chance on Inter – Napoli 2-1.
Thanks a lot
Aldi
These 2 are among 5 most exciting teams in Europe this season. Great game, even though a bit crazy. Fiorentina payed the absences of Jovetic and Pizarro, but also Ljajic.
One thing to consider about Roma – it’s 2nd youngest team in Serie A, after Pescara.
4-5-1 would have been a better bet. Should have put Aquilani at D-mid and Romulo in his spot. Cuadrado should have gone over to track Balzaretti allowing Cassani to drop and form a back four. Bring on El Hamadoui for Toni, a center back comfortable playing left back for Valero and Fernandez for Cuadrado.
ZM, I’m surprised that Pjanic wasn’t mentioned in the analysis. From my vantage point, he’s the bright spot of the Roma side.