Shakhtar 0-1 Juventus: Juve’s bravery pays off

The starting line-ups
Juventus were the better side, and won to secure their place in the knockout stages, at the expense of Chelsea.
Mircea Lucescu was without two key players, Luiz Adriano and Tomas Hubschmann. He selected Eduardo upfront.
Antonio Conte was without the suspended Claudio Marchisio so played Paul Pogba in midfield, while Sebastian Giovinco was chosen alongside Mirko Vucinic upfront.
Of course, the interesting factor here was that a draw was a satisfactory result for both. Shakhtar had already confirmed their qualification for the knockout stages, but a draw would ensure them topping the group. Juventus were at risk of going out (with Chelsea winning, as expected, against Nordsjaelland) but a draw would confirm qualification.
Intentions
So was the game contested honestly? Yes, it was – and for a surprisingly long period. What usually happena in these matches (where a draw suits both parties) is an open first half followed by a cagey second period, presumably after instructions from the coaches at the break.
But if anything, this game was most open in the 15 minute period following half-time. Juventus – the side who had more to lose – were the team who really forced the issue in this spell, creating a couple of good chances but leaving themselves exposed to counter-attacks.
Compact
The match was slow to get going. In the first ten minutes, all the forwards had strict defensive responsibilities without the ball. Eduardo and Henrik Mhitarayan dropped off close to the midfield, making sure one was positioned to prevent a pass from the Juve defence into the feet of Andrea Pirlo.
Likewise, Vucinic and Giovinco didn’t press the Shakhtar centre-backs, but blocked a pass into Fernandinho and Taras Stepanenko. Shakhtar instead played through the full-backs, and Fernandinho moved forward into more attacking positions.
Shakhtar approach
The match started with a contrast of styles, based around the formations. Shakhtar dominated possession at the start of the match, pushing both Darijo Srna and Razvan Rat high up the pitch, taking advantage of their lack of direct opponents.
Stephane Lichtsteiner and Kwadwo Asamoah defended deep, in line with their centre-backs and goalside of Shakhtar’s three attacking midfielders, so often it was Arturo Vidal and Paul Pogba forced to shuttle out to close down the full-backs – certainly when the ball was high up the pitch, although when Juventus got men behind the ball in the penalty box, Srna and Rat were allowed space.
Juve’s back three of Giorgio Chiellini, Leonardo Bonucci and Andrea Barzagli were excellent all night, and although there was some good movement from Shakhtar in the first half (particularly when Alex Teixeira or Willian moved central than darted back to the flank, tempting Juve’s outside centre-backs out of position), Lucescu’s side never had the necessary runners to exploit the space, partly because Juve had a surplus at the back and always covered gaps. Eduardo was very poor in the first half, and predictably removed at half-time.
Juventus approach
Juve’s gameplan was very different. Because Rat and Srna went forward at the same time, Giovinco and Vucinic were two-versus-two against the Shakhtar centre-backs, who were clearly concerned about their pace. Olexandr Kucher dived in unnecessarily into the back of Vucinic within the first five minutes, because he didn’t want Vucinic to have space to turn and run.
Juve tried to exploit this situation by hitting long balls to the forwards, who are both excellent at working the channels. One half-chance summed up Juve’s approach – Giovinco drifted right to receive a long ball, then floated it over to Vucinic in the opposite channel, who volleyed over. Juve were playing the numbers game well – conceding space on the flanks because they were confident at defending the box, then breaking quickly at the Shakhtar centre-backs.
The movement of Juve’s front two was very good – it’s nice to see a proper two-man strike partnership in action. By pulling the centre-backs around they created a fine chance for Arturo Vidal, who broke forward from midfield into space behind the defence unmarked, but didn’t realise he had time to bring the ball down.
Second half
At the start of the second half, Lucescu made two significant changes. First, Devic came on for Eduardo and his hold-up play (and work in the channels) was much better, helping Shakhtar to create decent chances – they hadn’t managed a single shot before half-time. But equally important was the full-backs sitting deeper, which meant they weren’t stretching Juventus as much going forward, but were less vulnerable to counter-attacks.
Juventus upped the pace, and amazingly, became more attacking despite (a) Shakhtar’s famous skill on the break, and (b) the consequences of a loss. Chiellini pushed forward to pass from higher up, Pirlo broke to the edge of the box and hit the post, and Lichtsteiner galloped forward more, with Rat sitting deeper and Willian not tracking properly.
Juve winner
The game’s only goal was remarkably scrappy – an own goal following a deflected Lichsteiner cross – but Juventus created more opportunities and showed more attacking intent, despite being in a more perilous situation. It could have gone the other way – Devic created a good chance for Mkhitaryan, who flashed a shot past the far post, underlining how risky Juve’s strategy was.
From then, Juve reverted to the first half approach – deep defending and long, straight balls. They created the best chance at 0-1, when Vucinic rounded Andriy Pyatov on the break but couldn’t find an angle to finish. Shakhtar were surprisingly tame in the 40 minutes they were behind – especially considering a second concession wouldn’t have changed their situation, and Juve were quite comfortable late on.
Conclusion
Two layers to the tactical battle here – the first was the intention of the sides. How much did each want to win? Surprisingly, Juventus were more ambitious despite having more to lose.
On the pitch, it was all about the Shakhtar full-backs’ positioning. Would their freedom cause overloads and create chances, or would their advanced positioning play into the hands of Juve’s mobile front two? In the end, neither side managed to score from these situations, but the fact that Lucescu told Rat and Srna to play more conservatively was a sign that Juve had the upper hand.





“happena” – one small spelling mistake
How can you call a lineup with 5 defenders 3 dm`s one attacking midfielder and one forward brave?
That’s quite a basic way of looking at it…
Not Celtic v Moscow
Michael, hope you’re not planning a trip to Scotland in the near future!
Would love an article on the Celtic game. Can understand why you opted for this, though, as one of the only other few ties of real significance.
Great to see Juve go for the win in this match. I really feel like they have a good chance of getting to at least the Semi-Finals this season. They just look so solid as a team. Winning this group without losing a game is a great achievement. Maybe they need to buy a striker in January, but their defenders and midfielders are superb.
PS. You have missed Barzagli out on the formation drawing, Bonucci is on there twice.
Two Bonuccis on that diagram !
Got Bonucci twice in the graphic in what i presume was Barzagli’s place?
Interesting to see Shakhtars reliance on the fullbacks though
So there are two Leonardo Bonuccis?
Sometimes there’s little difference between bravery and stupidity, but leaving yourself open to one of the best counter-attacking sides in Europe when a draw will take you through fits under my definition of stupidity.
You can not exploit space with 2 man behind the ball in the defense as it was in this case. You have to put up 3 man aginst them or at least a diamond mid with 2 forwards in order to have a really good attacking threat, just like Inter and Milan did in their matches against Juventus.
“On the pitch, it was all about the Shakhtar full-backs’ positioning. Would their freedom cause overloads and create chances, or would their advanced positioning play into the hands of Juve’s mobile front two?”
I’ve heard this so many times before in matches against Juventus or Italy in the Euros when they used 3-5-2. The thing is that the full backs can not exploit much when the opponents have 3 heavy defenders good in the air standing in the box and marking your one and only forward. All they can do is cross from deep or provide width for a slower attack. There might be some thread if the fullbacks are technically gifted and can cut inside, but how many fullbacks like that there are out there? And on top of that the shuttlers in the mid can really shut down such an inside run.
I am really expecting Juve to reach the final (if no bad luck with injuries) as it seems there is no team outside of Italy that can react adequatly to their tactical approach.
It’s such a fine line between stupid and, uh…
i think the point here is juventus played to win and shakhtar too played the same. both teams had a go at each other. it was fair and square. i don’t think that if juventus played otherwise it would have been better for either teams. good game!
I concur with Terry – maybe that approach was “stupid” for Juve, but they won, and as a consequence of their stupidity fans got to enjoy an entertaining game.
Nice Article ZM,it’s hard to pick the best players as every Juve player played so well.I think Pirlo,Chiellini,Vidal and Giovinco stood out the most.Vucinic was good despite him not been able to finish…..again.Also special mention to Lichinstiener, underrated player who done a good job on Willian and the overrated Hazard.
Yeah, with offside goal.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/9509071/shakhtar_donetsk_juventus_0_1_enrico_zambruno/
Here is a small example of Chiellini pushing up into midfield,note that when he thinks Shakhtar might win possession he motions as if he is going to pressure Teixeira but once Juve win it he changes direction slightly and helps Juve keep possession in midfield.
Very good match for Juventus in terms ot tactics even better against Chelsea.
Well well! How lucky are us Juve supporters for the amount of analysis ZM has been giving us recently.
For those who don’t know Juve actually switched to a back four on the weekend when they defeated Torino. But it was good to see us triumphing against an attacking 4-4-2 with our 3-5-2.
Great article by ZM and just a few quick points I wanted to dwell over.
Firstly you are completely right in asserting that it was an honest game and that the second half’s first 15 minutes was the most open of the contest.
I have to say that tactically I was very happy with the first half because although Shakhtar had more possession, they didnt have a shot on goal and we were getting 2 on 2 situations at our end. The battle out wide was reminiscent of that great game Italy played against Spain to open Euro 2012. http://www.zonalmarking.net/2012/06/10/spain-1-1-italy-spain-start-with-no-striker-italy-use-a-3-5-2/ Asamoah and Lichsteiner sat deep and invited Rat and Srna forward who were happy to oblige (Its Shakhtar’s system of play anyway) but they couldnt penetrate. And all of a sudden our strikers were getting 2 on 2’s and could stretch the central defenders rather than just moving them up and back like Vucinic and Giovinco always have to do against packed defences.
As Shakhtar’s full backs go forward, Willian and Teixiera normally move inside. Everytime Willian came inside he had Vidal picking him up, if Stepanenko moved forward than Pirlo had him (although Mkhitarayan picked Pirlo up when Juve had the ball, he tried to push into the box onto the centre backs when Shakhtar had the ball), Pogba basically had Fernandinho the whole game. What was interesting was Teixiera didnt play as narrow. He sat higher and wider than Willian on the other side, even if he bypassed Asamoah, he still had Chiellini to contend with. So even though we were getting 2 on 2 in attack, Shahktar didn’t really have equal numbers in attack because their horizontal movement of the ball was slow and/or they werent concentrating the midfield 4 v 3. Our midfield three were allowed to shift from side to side relatively easily because of the lack of quick crossfield balls. Teams that do crossfield movements well like Bayern, Madrid, Manchester Utd, Dortmund and Shalke will cause Juve trouble. In fact its a perrenial problem for Italian teams (because many play with narrow midfields). Although Teixeira was not as affective in attack as Willian, he defended a lot better than Willian who didnt pick up Vidal or Lichsteiner.
Juve’s first 15 in second half was crazy. We had the game in control why did we push forward. If Mkhitarayan scored we would be talking about Conte’s naivety, however we deserved to win and controlled the rest of the game. Lichsteiner got forward a lot more than Asamoah beacuse of Willian’s poor tracking, but both got forward well and the most impressive part of the night was Barzagli, Chiellini and even Bonucci’s defending when they were isolated 1 v 1 in that 15 min period. Forza Juve. Our defenders showed they can seriously defend in that 15 min period, and our attackers showed that they can counter and utilise space. This game forced us to play slightly differently and we showed we were up to it.
I disagree that Juve have a problem against teams who can move the ball well laterally – Conte has the two higher midfielders, usually Marchisio and Vidal pressing the opposition full backs/wide players, giving three layers of cover in wide areas – ie Srna vs Pogba, Asamoah, Chiellini if needed.
My concern is a team that can bring the ball inside quickly from wide areas and then go straight at the central defenders – though Pirlo has been remarkably effective in the attacking, defensive and transition phases, he can be bypassed. So yes, the teams you mention are probably right, but for a different reason.
Yep that’s what I was trying to say. It requires quick ball movement though. That’s my main point. I did mention breaking the chain of three where an opposing midfielder can get in between one of our outlying Mids and Pirlo. I can see Robben/Ribery hitting up Sweinsteiger or Kroos like that. Or Ronaldo/Di Maria hitting up Khedira.
Great analysis. Juventus deserved the win. Only if they had critical finishers up front, they would have killed the game for sure. And I really liked the number game from Juve. Tactically solid and cleaver play as italians usually do. Cheers from a Milan fan
Excellent example that a 3-5-2 can still be very effective against 4-2-3-1 style of play.But Juve I think they have the right players to play it..Lichsteiner is the definition of wing back,Pirlo is the definition of a deep lying playmaker,Pogba-Marchisio-Vidal are the definitions of a box-to-box midfielders and Vucinic-Giovinco are the definitions of 2 strikers supporting each other.And Buffon of course is the definition of a world class goalkeeper.I think Juve looking very strong at the moment maybe with an ”easy” opponent in next round (and not like Real Madrid) they can get really far.
If one’s following the principle of keeping 1 spare man at the back, it may look like 352 is ill-suited to match up against 4231, but if the 352 team is scrupulous to make sure their wingbacks remain on a par with the opposing team’s band of 3 it results in 5 players in defense taking on 4 players in attack – spot on, in other words.
Of course, this can be tricky when overlapping fullbacks come into play, but with a set of centerbacks like Juve have, plus the energy of Vidal and the other shuttler in midfield, it can work as we saw here.
As for possible knockout matchups, I’d *love* to see Juve-Madrid – I think the old lady can match up with the merengues pretty comfortably.
Two Bonuccis? Now that would be nice.
The goal was clearly after an offside and shouldn’t off been validated. Another game added to the many of ill won games by italian sides, though I think Shakhtar are happier with second place since there are many strong teams who didn’t won their groups.
Not mentioned in this article bt I actually thought Chiellini played a similar role to what Busquets played for Barcelona on a few occasions last season, throughout the game he fluidly shuttled from CB to DM.Chiellini tended to press high up the pitch when Shakhtar first gained possession so Shakhtar found it difficult for Shakhtar to launch counter attacks and generally slow their transitions from defense to attack,this helped Juve get back in their defensive shape in time to defend.Chiellini often pressured Teixeira so Shaktar didn’t have a 4 vs 3 advantage against Juve in midfield and so Asamoah could concentrate more on Srna and not get overloaded by Srna and Teixeira in 2 vs 1 situations.I feel this tactical switch by Conte helped Juve dominate the game by only having one spare man at the back while at the same time having 3 CB’s in the box when defending deep.
Two incredible teams with lots of quality. Shaktar has a tremendous balance the brazilian flair and creativity in the ofensive aspect and a lot of rigorous and disciplinary style on the defensive momentum, altough Srna and Rat are ofensive players. Douglas Costa, Willian, Alex Teixeira, this are all great players. Juventus is an incredible team aswell. Fantastic center backs, fantastic midfield, they only lack a great striker (Lewandowski would fit perfectly).
Great teams taht nobody is counting but they will create problems to must of the remaining teams
I know bonucci was good, but I didn’t think there were two of him like your picture implies.
Something that I don’t hear often enough from people I know is the importance to Juve’s game of having such a strong back 3. I can’t think of better personal for that defensive set-up. This is exemplified in Chiellini, who can not only play as a CB, but also on the left. This was most evident in this match when he broke up every attack that came down the shaktar right close to the box
I didn’t know Bonucci had a twin brother:P
Not mentioned in this article bt I actually thought Chiellini played a similar role to what Busquets played for Barcelona on a few occasions last season, throughout the game he fluidly shuttled from CB to DM.Chiellini tended to press high up the pitch when Shakhtar first gained possession so Shakhtar found it difficult for Shakhtar to launch counter attacks and generally slow their transitions from defense to attack,this helped Juve get back in their defensive shape in time to defend.Chiellini often pressured Teixeira so Shaktar didn’t have a 4 vs 3 advantage against Juve in midfield and so Asamoah could concentrate more on Srna and not get overloaded by Srna and Teixeira in 2 vs 1 situations.I feel this tactical switch by Conte helped Juve dominate the game by only having one spare man at the back while at the same time having 3 CB’s in the box when defending deep.
I would like to see Juventus’ 3-5-2 against Barca’s 4-3-3
How Juventus would deal with Messi’s False Nine Role?
Can they handle Barca’s Inverted Wingers (Villa, Pedro, Sanchez, Inieta, etc)?
ZM: “an own goal following a deflected Lichsteiner cross”.
Lichsteiner was in a pretty big offside position. That is a clear fact too.
Uhhh, did you watch the same game the rest of us did? Because well… https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A9YUzghCUAASOh_.png:large
Great game for the back three, Vidal showed his true warrior spirit, and Asamoah put in quite the defensive display. We need Pogba to have a little better positional sense and a little more grinta. No doubt he’ll be world class soon enough.
Carl, your picture shows it was offside just as I said, other comments here are saying the same thing too. We’ve all seen the same game I hope (maybe except you).
I think Juventus played well & they deserved to win.Though it was a away match Juventus fall in some difficulties because the condition was not match.But in the 2nd half Juventus played really well,created some couple of chances & won the match by 1-0.
Juve simply won by an offside goal, Typical Calciopoli’s behavior
Excellent analysis it seems (I didn’t see the game). I would have to say that while leaving yourselves open to counter-attacks when you need a point isn’t wise, taking the game by the scruff of the neck is a great idea in the first sixty or seventy minutes: it’s so common to see a team go out in such a situation if they’ve set up to do little other than defend.
Aren’t we a bit quick to forget the crystal clear penalty Juve weren’t awarded early in the first half, for that blatantly obvious hand ball in the box after the free kick and Chiellini’s shot?… Please tell me that’s not a penalty!
It should have been 0-1 much earlier and, given how the two teams played after Juventus went ahead, it probably would have ended much worse for Shakhtar than the way it did with the late offside goal.
What? I take it you are a loathsome Chelski supporter who is used to watching his team park the bus and play boring football when playing against the best European teams.
Juves bravery and assurance in their own ability should be commended,teams like Juve are why I watch football,not Chelsea.Players like Pirlo are why I watch football,not Mikel or Ashley “I want to be a Centre Back ” Cole.
You make out that it was such a big risk but were Juve not the far better team? How many chances did Shaktar have all game despite Juve “leaving themselves open”(they didn’t)? About 2.It may come as a surprise to you but teams don’t have to play with 10 men on the edge of their own box to defend well,certainly Juve don’t who not only have the best defense in Europe but also the team who defends best as a unite.
Congratulations Juve,Conte and their reserve manager whos name escapes me for destroying the worst European “Champions” in history then been only the second team to win at the Don Bass Arena.Hope Juve,Dortmund or Barca win it this year.
Hope the small club that is Chelsea enjoy the Europa Leauge,see you on Channel 5.