Dortmund 2-1 Real Madrid: Dortmund press as a unit and expose Essien at left-back

The starting line-ups - Modric replaced Khedira because of injury after 20 minutes
Dortmund bounced back from their weekend disaster against Schalke to record an important victory.
After Saturday’s disaster against Schalke, Jurgen Klopp returned to something approaching his first-choice formation and XI, although Jakub Blaszczykowski remains unavailable.
Jose Mourinho selected his expected starting XI. With Fabio Coentrao, Marcelo and Alvaro Arbeloa all out, Sergio Ramos and Michael Essien were at full-back. Sami Khedira only lasted twenty minutes before being replaced by Luka Modric.
This match took a while to get going, with the first half ruined by a combination of a slippery pitch and the players’ apparent poor selection of footwear. Once they changed their boots at half-time, it was an excellent game.
There were basically two key features of the match: the pressing, and Real’s weakness at left-back.
Pressing
This was more of a “German” game, based around pressing and quick transitions, than a “Spanish” game, which tends to be focused upon ball retention. Both sides are more suited to such a contest – there is no better counter-attacking side in Europe than Real Madrid, but they fell down tonight because they didn’t press as a unit, and because they didn’t have the initial burst to get past Dortmund’s closing down.
The game was 4-2-3-1 versus 4-2-3-1. Dortmund’s strategy was to stand off the Real centre-backs and pressure the ball when it was played into the midfield or full-backs, so Xabi Alonso dropped very deep, as he often has this season, moving between the centre-backs to receive under no pressure. He often found it difficult to play forward passes, though, partly because the Real full-backs remained very defensive; Essien plainly isn’t suited to playing at right-back, while Ramos surprisingly uncomfortable out on the right, despite having regularly played that position over the years.
Therefore, Alonso’s distribution was generally simple and his teammates didn’t cope well with pressure. Pepe may not have been closed down directly, but gave the ball away cheaply when playing the ball forward to midfielders who were pressed – the opening goal being a fine example.
The departure of Khedira was a huge blow for Real – after a fairly static start to the game, it was the German’s injury that handed Dortmund the initiative, as Modric played in broadly the same position but didn’t have the same energy and mobility. When Alonso dropped deep into a position where he was closed down by Mario Gotze, Modric often found himself alone in the midfield zone against Sebastian Kehl and Sven Bender. He wasn’t able to get past both to launch quick attacks, and Angel Di Maria was a better option on the right. The Argentine played some audacious, nearly-brilliant balls in behind the defence with the outside of his left boot, and his deep, narrow positioning helped Real pass the ball out of defence quicker. Still, Dortmund were pressing as a unit and won the ball close to goal.
With Kehl and Bender around Modric, the free man was, in theory, Mesut Ozil. Dortmund dealt with this by keeping compact and using a high defensive line, with Mats Hummels often darting out of the defence to deal with him. The problem came when Ozil dropped deeper into midfield, where it seemed the Dortmund players weren’t prepared for his movement into that zone. Real’s equaliser came when Ozil received the ball in a deep position, then knocked a great pass over the top for Cristiano Ronaldo. Roman Weidenfeller darted off his line early to make the finish relatively simple, and a through-ball behind Dortmund’s high defence seemed the natural route to goal for Mourinho’s side.
Dortmund right v Real left
Ronaldo was part of the game’s second key battle, which was happening down Real’s left. At the weekend, Essien performed well against Celta Vigo at left-back, but here he was overrun by various Dortmund players. Robert Lewandowski drifted right, but the main threat came from Marco Reus and Mario Gotze doubling up against him. They alternated positions, but both enjoyed the huge amount of space between Ronaldo and Essien, with Alonso not the best coverer, picking up a yellow card in the second half for a clumsy tackle.
The situation was mildly concerning for Real in the first half, but became an all-out problem area in the second. Ronaldo’s gameplan, as always, is to stay high up the pitch and look for quick attacks – indeed, his goal came precisely because of his aggressive positioning, and for as long as he continues to record outstanding goalscoring figures, his defensive performance won’t be questioned.

The average position diagram shows that Ronaldo stayed much higher up the pitch than Di Maria, while Gotze and Reus both occupied a right-of-centre average position (Copyright UEFA.com)
However, this was much like Portugal’s second half problems against Denmark in Euro 2012, when Ronaldo constantly let Lars Jacbobsen past him, the right-back had all the time he liked to cross the ball, and Denmark got back from 2-0 down to 2-2 following two right-wing crosses (although they eventually lost 3-2). Considering that Real’s left-back, Essien, isn’t even a natural left-back, it was surprising that Mourinho allowed this situation to develop.
Even before the winning goal, Lukas Piszczek had already created two fine chances at the start of the second half. First he pulled back to Gotze, who hit a tame shot at Iker Casillas, then cut back an identical to the edge of the area for Bender, who fired over. There was, quite obviously, serious danger in that area of the pitch for Real.
You can pick the bones out of the goal in various ways – should Casillas claimed the ball? Should Rafael Varane made it his? Positionally, however, it’s notable that both Alonso and Modric have been dragged all the way over towards the left of the pitch to help protect Essien – in the end, Gotze dribbles through to the byline and crosses the ball into the dangerzone – with Modric and Alonso out of position, no-one is covering the edge of the box.
Mourinho was surprisingly passive with his use of the bench. Modric had come on early, while Gonzalo Higuain replaced Karim Benzema in a straight swap – but Kaka and Jose Callejon remained on the bench as Real only used two substitutes, and Dortmund remained reasonably comfortable.
Conclusion
This was an excellent performance from a Dortmund side that could have collapsed after the derby defeat. Back with their favoured formation and reliable combinations across the pitch, they played their familiar high-intensity game, but also adjusted their strategy to find Real’s weak spot – the left-back zone.
As Dortmund concentrated on exploiting Real’s weakness, Mourinho didn’t attempt to patch it up with extra protection. In the majority of games Real can get away with Ronaldo staying that high up, but not with Essien there, and not against a side of Dortmund’s quality.





Brilliant work as always Michael Cox!
Lewand’ski, Schmelzer?? I love You and what are doing with football analysis but please change that ( I wanted to write that You Centre and Eastern Europe arent respected enough, but it would hypocrytical to write it adressed to You
Marcel Schmelzer?
Ouch. I insist on writing Schmeltzer, even if Marcel doesn’t know that
Eh, that is the risk when You try to outsmart yourself
His wikipedia name is Marcel Schmelzer. You are indeed trying to outsmart your arses.
Oh man, Your intellectual skills and sense of humour – level very high.
why didn’t Mourinho just switch Di Maria & Ronaldo?
That’s the question I had. Either that or flip Ozil out as a RW and replace DI Maria for a MF giving Real a 3rd MF to help defensively and possession wise
how’s di maria will help madrid possesion wise? the guy had the worst passing percentage (63%). it really should be khedira + xabi/modric, otherwise ozil & di maria will had to get back a lot and that hurt madrid offense
It’s not about possession, it’s about cover for Essien. Di maria is willing to run way more than Cristiano.
I agree, Di Maria is the most defensive of the four forward players (Ronaldo, Ozil, Di Maria and Benz)
The Bundesliga and German domestic football in general, has seriously improved this season.
Don’t get to watch Bundesliga often but I love watching Bayern and Dortmand in the CL,they both have very different styles but both great to watch.The same can’t be said for any English team in Europe. Not to mention Shalke, the few times I have seen Shalke play(against Athletic Bilbao last season)they look very good as well.
I would love Dortmand to actually win the CL again,we need more clubs/teams like them,a refreshing change from rich but morally bankrupt clubs like Chelsea and City.
Also is it just me or is Mourinho stifling this teams potential? Look at the amazing attacking talent Madrid possess and apart from random pieces of instinctive skill/through balls by Ozil,Benzema or Di Maria their play is pretty boring and unimaginative.Very rarely am I on the edge of my seat watching Madrid,they are an very effective counter attacking clinical machine,but they could be so much more.
Imagine how someone like Klopp,Guardiola etc would get this team playing.
There are far more interesting teams in Germany. Hannover, Schalke and Werder, for example play in a very attractive/offensive way. Personally, I love Freiburg’s style – and strategy, which is based on developing players by an excellent youth academy.
I think Schalke is a bit like Atletico Madrid. They play the same formation with two strikers and two wide midfielders. Powerful with lots of pace at counters and great finishers/poachers upfront.
Schalke have been using a 4-2-3-1. There isn’t really a viable second striker with Raul gone (unless you’re counting Holtby as a forward).
hannover is indeed great to watch especially in European Matches. In fact every team, coached by Slomka looks pretty strong from the a tactical perspective.
ITV4 are showing bundesliga highlights in the UK on a monday evening. You can also access it through their website
and as a whole the league is very entertaining, high quality and future EPL stars can be found there
It has improved a lot over the last few years. I think it’s fair to say that the Bundesliga is no longer inferior to the Premiership (which it certainly used to be). However, ze Germans are doing it with way less money.
Good shout that about Shalke playing like Atheltico,though Shalke are more offensive.Shalke press higher up the pitch than Athletico,Athletico are more reactive.Both very good teams.
Brilliant stuff. I personally want this Dortmund side to remain together as long as possible, it would be great if they could make a bigger impact on Europe, their quality deserves that. I would far prefer them to go through the group than Manchester City. It’s faintly ridiculous that some people have mooted them to win the trophy despite this being only their second ever season in the champions league, the first was hardly roaring success either. Keep up the good work Mr.ZM!
They have the same problem as pretty much all Bundesligateams, no bench. While their A team can trade blows with every big team in Europe as soon as someone is hurt the quality drop-off is immense. Even Bayern had that problem and have finally invested in a good bench this season, the first time in years.
Such a shame that football has become this way, they deserve all the succes they can get. And I have met them, lucky me!!
What do mean has become this way? Football has always been dominated by a handful of teams that rotates over time.
Today it’s teams that buy their depth that win. Decades ago it was just about hoarding as many youth products as possible. I really don’t pine for the “good old days” because they’re more or less similar to today.
Sorry, you’ll have to forgive me for being a creature of nostalgia! The pool of teams that dominated football in the past was wider and more subject to change. The past throws up consistent examples: PSG who are only being talked about as a european force after an obscene cash injection, beat real madrid in the 90’s champions league and reached the semi-finals. Ajax with that wonderful young team wouldn’t have been able to hang on to any of those players these days, they would have all left before they signed pro-contracts. They won multiple european trophies and dominated europe for a time: Not today! History is replete with examples of teams who couldnt hope to achieve similar success today. Malmo who reached the European cup final, Aberdeen who reached the cup winners cup final, and VIDEOTON some far flung outfit who got to the UEFA cup final and beat Madrid at the Bernabeu. Look at a player like Hristo Stoichkov, didn’t move to Barca until he was nearly 25! Can you imagine that happening today? A player moving from an extremely minor league to one of the world’s biggest clubs, going straight into their line-up and being one of the best players. It wouldn’t happen, he would have moved at 17, there is no comparable case today.I agree with the squad depth point, I don’t remember the world’s best players being so centralised around 5 or 6 clubs before.
“It’s faintly ridiculous that some people have mooted them to win the trophy despite this being only their second ever season in the champions league”
I know memories are short in football, but not THAT short — Dortmund have not only played in the CL before, they won it in 1997. The only team in this group that hasn’t got a Champions League trophy are City. Ajax won in in 1995 and Dortmund in 1997. Real’s last title was in 2002 of course.
Yes I know! City were the team I was talking about! I was aware of Dortmund’s prior success
Oops — apologies. Your wording was a bit ambiguous and I had read it as referring to Dortmund.
Good side Dortmund. Thought they ouplayed Madrid in the second half although Casillas’ punch left a lot to be desired didn’t it.
Real might need to switch Ronaldo (he does no defending, and Piszczek is a legit world class player) and Di Maria for the return leg…with Alonso defending it was essentially 3 vs. 1 on Real’s Left flank…After all of ZM’s experience I wonder if he will try to explain Mancini’s tactical revolution with the “Fluid” 3-2-5 (finally found a way to play all 4 of his strikers)
CR7 has as you rightly pointed out not covered himself with glory, he hates his defensive duties. Kaka should still have been brought on
I didn’t see the game, but was Essien really that bad, or just overloaded? It seemed like there were a lot of options to deal with both the main problems for Madrid:
Defending the left side: Ask one of the world’s top athletes to defend a bit, have mobile Modric switch sides with Alonso and try to build from right side before switching, have diMaria & Ronaldo switch sides, have one of the CBs step forward and out to where the strikers were knowing that Ramos can and would want to slide over, play three at the back (Essien on the wing, Ronaldo as a second striker)
Getting the ball forward quickly: Have Modric & diMaria just ahead of Alonso in 4-3-3 or 4-3-1(Özil)-2, let Ramos or Varrane step forward into the space next to Alonso and distribute or bring the ball forward, switch to 3-5-2 with Callejon in for Essien, have mobile Modric switch sides with Alonso and try to build from right side before switching
Clearly, several of these changes could have happened, but it sounds like none of them did.
Switching Ronaldo would undermine the fluid attacking rhythm that has brought the recent success. This was Dortmund, then what about Barcelona, Valencia, or any other team in CL with strong right flanks? The fact that Ronaldo does not backtrack is usually solved by simply attacking the space left by the full back, but tonight Kehl and Bender did well to keep Ronaldo at bay (save for one incident, where the idiot Weidenfeller should have swept the ball anyway).
How was Dortmunds right flank of Götze, Piszczek and Reus not comparable to Valencia’s or any others besides Barcelona?
Real lacks something other teams explote better. You don’t need worldclass players in all positions. CR does not defend. Di María does not defend. Ozil does not defend. But in the other hand you have a team that forms a tight block with his players, whether they are good at it or not. And you loose games because of that “pride”. Tell CR GO HELP ESSIEN. NO WAY!.
di maria & ozil defen dude
*Correction* Essien plainly isn’t suited to playing at left-back
Instead of
Essien plainly isn’t suited to playing at right-back
every1 knew that our left-back position was d weakness…n expectin essien to do wonders is really stupid…he did mess-up bad…but i wonder if nacho cud’ve been d same or better??? (for sure he wudnt ve been worse)
on d part i wud like to say most is our finishin in the final 3rd…however shambolic our defense was, they cud get the ball in front of d midfield everytime…thats wen ozil n di maria were really poor…too many wasted passes & wat was wid those airy shots…neways dats whr we lost it…papin said it right dat its gud benz helps in d build-up, but he is a striker n needs to be thr in d box n improve his positioning..
n dortmund…they were okay but were havin fun on our left flank….missed coentrao/marcelo badly…
finally i can jus say it was a blip…we can do much much more…c u at d bernabeu…hala madrid!!
As a Madrid fan, I’d like to see this formation until Marcelo and/or Coentrao are back:
———–Casillas———-
–Ramos—-Varane—Pepe-
—————–Alonso——
——Khedira—————-
————–Modric———
-Di Maria——————–
————Ozil—–Ronaldo-
———–Benzema———–
u need wingbacks in this situation…ronaldo doesnt track back…we’ll get whipped
that’s acres of space in the left side, any team will counter that side
Excellente, as always
Rightly said. The pressing aspect was particularly evident in the way Goetze stuck onto Alonso. Alonso had to move into centre back positions to lose Goetze, so that that he could distribute better.
But contrastingly, Ozil failed to do a similar thing on Kehl. Seb Kehl was allowed way too much space during Dortmund attacks, and he was left free at the edge of the box to take those 2 rasping shots in the first half. Ozil surely got a lot of space in attack because he was not tracked my a midfielder, but this made him ignore his own tracking duties.
Also if Hummels was trying to cover Ozil, why didnt Madrid make run into these channels then?? I guess this is again due to Goetze role on Alonso who was not able to feed Benzema. Also Modric seemed more inclined to go to di maria than direct play.
Btw, Subotic and Hummels are definetly the best centre back pairing in Europe right now.
Interesting that you rate Hummels and Subotic so high right now. Dortmund has conceded a lot of goals in the Bundesliga and the pair has been widely criticized.
You’re right. Except for Hummels and Piszczek, I don’t think any of the Dortmund defenders are that good.
Ronaldo as false 9 in the return leg? Would love to see it. Play ozil wide right and Di Maria on the left. With Alonso , Khedira and Modric in midfield.
Want to see Morata given a chance , Benz and Higuain have only played well in fits and starts , they need to be given a kick up the behind.
At risk of being controversial, I dont think Ronaldo has the requisite football intelligence to play as a false 9, his game is based on exploiting space rather than creating it.
Exactly. In fact, I was just wondering, what does Ronaldo bring in to his team, other than being at the right place at the right time, with his great knack for goals. We just see him run into the spaces from the wings towards the box.
Ronaldo is the perfect player to play LW in a 433 with a false 9, but he is not the man to play the false 9. And what more do you want from him other than “being in the right place at the right time and scoring goals” when he does it more than any person other than Messi?
This made me laugh,Cronaldo as a false 9 hahahaha I would love to see him try.
As a central striker in a 4-3-3, he certainly wasn’t a very conventional number 9 in this match:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-v9gx7PzOQ
eh-hem, he did it aplenty for United in CL (and PL to a lesser extent, with the interchanging attack), the false nine role . The Arsenal game in the link below is a good example but so too is the away game against Roma, in my view. His intepretation of the false nine was different to say Totti’s, Cesc’s or RVP’s, as Ronaldo’s way was more direct, speed and going to either flank in a counter attacking team (he was a provider to a certain extent, as well as a scorer), instead of the subtle style in a possession-reliant side of say Totti or Cesc. Different ways to execute the false nine role. As illustrated by United’s success during that period, it was a brilliant counter attacking set up with Ronaldo as the false nine. So I wouldn’t laugh if I were you, as Ronaldo has tried the false nine role and done it well. Rather tedious how some people get carried away at having a laugh at Ronaldo’s so-called limited game.
Considering Real’s counter attacking prowess, not a bad suggestion for Ronaldo to being a false nine for them, considering at United that role was in a team that had plenty of focus on the counter attack in CL.
I think modric should play with alonso and khedira in the middle and drop ozil. I know ozil is a better player than 3 of them combined but he just doesn’t fit into a team built around Ronaldo. I would love to see one of ozil or Ronaldo leave the team. It’s better for Madrid as a whole.
Ozil is a fantastic player but is subjugated by Mourinho and his whole gameplan which revolves mainly around counter attacking and feeding Ronaldo to score goals.I would love to see Ronaldo leave this team so Di Maria and Ozil can reach their potential.
Both of them, Ozil and Ronaldo, are luxury players, in relation to how they can hamper their own side’s tactical strength. Got to be one or the other, for me. Not because of my United connection but I’d choose Ozil to be left out. He is a class act but for the big games, never have been a fan of Ozil and Ronaldo in the same side.
Ozil may be a bit of a liability in terms of defending, but with him gone who will provide the ideas and the passes from which Ronaldo scores? He is Madrid’s main source of creativity.
I agree with Thomas T that Ozil is the primary source of creativity. Though my main concern with Ronaldo & Ozil is the big games, for the so-called lesser games they can get away with it with ease most of the time, the tactical headache. It is a dilemma though as they are both important in the attacking phase yet they cause defensive issues for their own side as a duo. Far from a polished side, despite their success and quality.
Funny thing re defensive duties: Klopp said before the game about his side “I’m really locking forward to that game. And whoever doesn’t help out at the back is an asshole.”
this may be very interesting. thanks for that. we have to have more sites like that. i recommend you against your great content and articles and great topic solutions.
I assume so. I assume your article can offer those people a very good reminding. And they are willing to express thanks to you soon after
secondly i dont agree with your observation that ozil had quite a free space to operate infact he was marked very closely by kehl infact he fouled he 2 or 3 times and most importantly if you had looked as to why the first goal by dortmund was scored then you could clearly see that ozil was closely marked by kehl and when he came deep to get the ball pepe misplaced the pass and it was picked by kehl who fed lewandowski for goal and again for the real goal the same thing happened but this time ozil turned quite well on him and the germans didnt expect kehl to beaten so easily you could see they were ready to press but that one moment of magic by ozil opened dormunds defense and real could unlock dormunds defense . another thing with the pace that dortmund played they looked that they were the ones who were playing on counter attack and real trying to slow down the game .
i wouldnt criticize modric although real missed khadeira in the middle but midric didnt that freedom in the middle which khadeira has he want venturing forward as he would had wanted but was rooted to a position . this is where dortmund won the game and real lost it because dortmunds midfield was able to support their wide players and could even change zones and could create numerical superiority but real wasnt able to achieve that and couldnt open dortmund .
the real difference was the way the midfield functioned dortmunds midfield pressed real midfield quite up while real’s midfield kept on dropping deeper and deeper . dortmund were playing man to man they were pressing hard and more importantly there midfield was coming much forward compared to real’s none of real’s midfielders seemed to go beyond benzema or had a suitable effect . gotze,bender, grouskruze all seem to dart in the box .while nobody from real was ready to go beyond benzema .
at one point if you could see there was a space between subotic and hummels and it could had been exploited if there was a run from the midfield hummels in particular wasnt keeping the shape that well and i thought that he could been exploited .
but all and all credit to dortmund coach you could see that not only are they very aggressive but they are very good technically which is a very good sign for a good team .
hope they make the s/f of the ucl since they have all the ingredients to be successful .
We found so many great DVDs we were excited to watch after again. Over the lifetime of two months, we re-watched god, the father of this Rings trilogy, the Godfather trilogy, and related to twenty several other movies we loved and also hadn’t watched from a while.
I think getting the wing back upfront of the attack with the fact that Ronaldo won’t go down to defend makes a lot of sense to me. This is the exact same matchup used during the Ajax vs Man City game where the wing back (don’t remember his name) made a lot of play. When Dortmund uses wing back to overload Madrid’s wing back (in this case, Essien), he would be forced to stay deep in the defensive line and could not help the offense.
For some reason, I think wing back can play more roles than other position when this kind of matchup can be deployed.
It was all a tactical failure of Mourinho for me, rather than the players.
First of all, you have one of the best (still) defensive midfielders in the world like Essien and instead of using him where he will really fit best you play him as a left back.
That`s ridiculous. Then you got Khedira come off and play the fragile Modric as a pair to Alonso. So what do we have then? 1) Essien playing in a very uncomfortable zone, then Modric being pushed back and assigned primarily defensive work and finally, Modric again is not allowed to play where he`d help the most-as a second/attacking striker.
I think that a young boy from the cantera shoud`ve been played on the left with Essien replacing injured Khedira and Modric next to Ozil or replacing him, thus keeping a much better balance in the side. Now, only because of Mou’s fear to bring out ONE youngster on the left you`ve got two other players suffering and given inappropriate duties.
As for Cristiano-it`s not about him not helping out his partner in defense. It`s more about not even bothering to track back and press within opponent’s half when losing possession.
I am a big Mou fan – But for once I also felt like the same way watching the match – Things did not go well and there were some obvious things that Mou failed to address. He has been in such situations before but as always made changes during the match and has corrected the fallings – but here he seemed lost. Bcos I am his fan & he is such a master class, I am sure he would have analysed the other possibilities as well. He must have been preparing on what he can do for the return game knowing that making tactical changes may not still help the team win…
How do you know that some 18 year old from the academy would have been up the the task and held his own against Reus, Goetze and Pisczek? It would probably have been a disaster. Much better to play Essien out of position (he didn’t do too badly, he just didn’t get support).
And Modric is not a striker. He was played in a position with which he is familiar.
To anybody who thinks those is better than head phone are worth the amount of money: you were bamboozled. Get your Sony studio room monitor dj earbuds instead.
The truth camaraderie foresees the requirements of alternative versus laud the possess.
Reputation ROBENUK http://www.robenuk.eu/
Do not ever speak of all your happiness one even less blessed rather than your own.
Basket Nike TN Pas Cher http://www.tnpascher2013.com/
Because the person doesn‘testosterone accept you profession long for them to help you,doesn‘testosterone necessarily suggest they’ll have on‘testosterone accept you with all they may have already.
stella mccartney jumpsuit http://www.stellamccartneyhandbags.com/
Because the person doesn‘testosterone accept you profession long for them to help you,doesn‘testosterone necessarily suggest they’ll have on‘testosterone accept you with all they may have already.
basket nike tn pas cher 2012 2013 http://www.frmarque.be/
To the world maybe you are one individual, yet somehow to 1 one maybe you are the.
proenza schouler ps1 wallet http://www.proenzaschoulerps11bags.com/
Acquaintanceship might goldthread whom jewelry the paper hearts of all the modern world.
soyoyoso http://www.soyoyoso.com/
Prefer relates to the proactive concern to make the your life in addition to growth of what my spouse and i love.
Nike TN http://www.fr-marque.com/
To the world maybe you are anyone, yet somehow to 1 particular person maybe you are the globe.
Robenuk Site Sur http://www.robenuk.be/
Wherever there is certainly wedlock with out affection, you will have affection with out wedlock.
Chaussure Nike http://www.fr-marque.fr/
A honest partner is a that overlooks a person’s backsliding together with can handle a person’s success.
http://www.robenuk.net http://www.robenuk.net/
You should never communicate your main joy to 1 a lot lucky enough besides one self.
nike tn nike pas cher http://www.frmarque.eu/
Absolutely no male or female will probably be worth your entire tears, also , the person who is simply acquired‘p get you to shout out.
Nike Free 3.0 V4 Damen http://www.nikefree3runschuhe.com/
Happen to be survive the minute each individual family member is convinced brand-new areas such as a small transcendency about the another.
Robenuk Avis http://www.robenuk.fr/
The main reason for RM to lose was the pitch.. It did not help the creative players. You are not able to make the turns, dribbles, start-stops that you usually can do – that cost them bad.. The team was also limited in resources to make the changes to accomodate the pitch. Essein in the middle with a proper left back cd have helped.
I also like the idea above on playing without a proper striker – RM should play with neither Higuain nor Benzema (they are not effective at all this season) – Ozil can be the false 9 if not CR7. That will allow Modric/ Kaka to play with Alonso & Khedira/ Essein.
So either Dortmund played on another pitch or they don’t have creative players… Is that what you want to tell us? It’s a lame excuse to blame it on the pitch!
No – I think Dortmund were better prepared for this type of pitch as it is their home ground. They do have creative players – but can you compare them with RM’s.
I am waiting for the return leg to show you what I mean. Anyway it is a lame excuse but in close matches like these, these smaller details matter.
The only reason Real lost is because of the selfishness of Ronaldo and Di Maria; instead of passing the ball to their striker Benzema, they preferred to shoot or made poor choices.
I do not even understand how I ended up right here, but I thought
this submit used to be good. I do not recognize who you are but definitely you’re going to a well-known blogger in case you are not already. Cheers!
This was more of a “German” game, based around pressing and quick transitions, than a “Spanish” game, which tends to be focused upon ball retention.
I find this statement confusing, considering that Spain / Barcelona are arguably THE best pressing teams possibly of all time and Jürgen Klopp admitted to use Barcelona DVDs to teach his team a thing or two about pressing.
I think Barca press and then keep possesion and take the ball forward with their tiki-taka.
German game is abt quick transitions.. Pressing is a common theme – yes. But the difference is what you do after you get the get the ball back. Barca/ Spain keep possession. Germany/ Dortmund (at diff levels) get the ball straight up to attack.