Modric and Song arrivals indicate Barcelona and Real are thinking about each other’s style
Last night’s Supercopa match – a 2-1 win to Real, meaning they won the tie on away goals – highlighted the huge difference in playing style between the two sides.
Real dominated the game in the opening period when the match was frantic and direct. Constant long balls in behind the Barcelona defence produced numerous chances and a red card for Adriano, and Real could have been 4-0 up before Barcelona had even started playing.
But Barcelona dominated the second half, even with ten men, as Real dropped off and let Barcelona dictate the tempo. Barcelona’s passing is quick, in terms of going from player to player, but the speed of their attacks from back to front is very slow and patient.
Real aren’t in great shape physically, and therefore wouldn’t have been able to sustain their first half aggression all game, but it was probably a mistake to allow Barcelona to assert such dominance in the second period, especially as Real had a man advantage. The key tactical feature of the game was not about positioning, but about tempo.
New arrivals
Both sides were playing without their most expensive signing of the summer – Luka Modric for Real, Alex Song for Barcelona. The precise role of each player is uncertain, but both are more naturally suited to the other side – Modric is a short passer that Barca would probably buy if they didn’t already have so many players in that mould, Song is a physical defensive midfielder that more suits a combative Real midfield.
The two clubs haven’t chosen to indulge more in their own identity, but instead respond to the other’s strength.
Modric
For the second summer running, Jose Mourinho’s Real Madrid have signed a top-class midfielder that doesn’t appear to slot into the side easily.
Luka Modric’s predecessor in this respect is Nuri Sahin, who found himself unwanted at Real after only a year at the club. Liverpool have got themselves an excellent midfielder, but Jose Mourinho’s admission that he “didn’t care” where Sahin went this season summed up quite how out of favour he was. Two substitute appearances and two starts (withdrawn at half-time in both) was a surprisingly small contribution for such a talented player, although the suspicion is that there was a ‘hidden’ reason Mourinho didn’t take to him.
Still, it’s a warning for Modric. Sahin arrived and there was no obvious role at the club for him – used instead of Xabi Alonso and Real would have been too fluid, used instead of Sami Khedira and Real wouldn’t have had enough battling quality in midfield.
Modric is a very different player from Sahin. He’s less vertical, he’s more composed and patient on the ball, and he’s probably more versatile with his role. Modric’s positional journey has been slightly odd – having broken through as a number ten, he was forced into a wider role in his early days at Tottenham, before eventually becoming one of the league’s best central midfielders. Modric suited Tottenham perfectly – under Harry Redknapp, Tottenham played with two out-and-out wingers in a 4-4-2 (and later 4-4-1-1), and a large part of Modric’s job was spreading the ball patiently from side to side, acting as a central pivot and a controlling playmaker rather than the one playing incisive balls.
But the main feature of his game is his composure. The midfielder at Real most similar to him, Alonso, is a less tidy player, and one who becomes particularly flustered in Clasicos because he lacks mobility. Alonso’s passing range is better, but in a quick game he lacks guile, he doesn’t have the ability to skip away from an opponent.
It is a game like last night’s that Modric would have thrived in. Whereas Real were clearly the better side in the first half when the game was frantic and Real played direct, they were unable to compete in midfield when the game became about Barcelona’s short, slick passing game, which is where Modric comes in.
Modric could replace any of Real’s three starting central midfielders from last year. Instead of Alonso he makes sense for aforementioned reasons, and this might change the positioning of Khedira. Because Alonso lacks mobility, Khedira becomes a more forward-playing combative midfielder, whereas alongside Modric the German would probably play a more reserved role – Modric plays higher up the pitch, and Khedira would cover the space in behind.

When Modric and Alonso have met directly, the difference in their style has been obvious
Equally, Modric could replace Khedira, with Alonso becoming the holder. This would only be appropriate for home games at the Bernabeu when Real are facing a parked bus. Alonso would provide long-range passes to the flanks, Modric’s balls would be quicker and more incisive – he would become something of a permanently central creative attacking midfielder, as Mesut Ozil scampers to the channels.
But maybe the key role for Modric will be, sometimes, in place of Ozil. Real’s most significant defeat last season came in the Champions League away at Bayern Munich, and the key difference in that first leg was the type of number ten on either side. Real’s was Ozil – creative, forward-thinking and excellent on the break, trying to look for clever balls into the channels to work on. Bayern’s was Toni Kroos, who played much deeper – he dropped into midfield, provided an extra man and gave Bayern control of the game.

Kroos was giving Bayern control, so Mourinho moved Ozil out wide midway through the first half, with Di Maria coming into the middle to provide more energy
It’s that control that Real can lack, especially against Barcelona. Ozil could be pushed to the flank, as was the case in Clasicos during Mourinho’s first season and in the Bayern game, or he could also be benched. Either way, Modric will provide a deeper option.
On paper, Modric doesn’t fit naturally into any of Real’s three central midfield roles from last season. But that is entirely the point – he provides something different to the existing options, and can reasonably replace any of Alonso, Khedira and Ozil in different circumstances.
Song
Song’s transfer was a slightly surprising move from Barcelona. Essentially, he is filling two roles – first, in Barcelona’s continued determination not to sign a traditional centre-back, they required a centre-half who could either play at the back, or as a holding midfielder. Javier Mascherano fitted that brief two years ago, and although he looked uncomfortable in defence for a while, last season he was more reliable than Gerard Pique.
The second role was a replacement for Seydou Keita. The Malian international was clearly a fine footballer – his pass completion rate last season was 92% – and in another side, a less technical side, he would probably be the most gifted midfielder. However, in a Barcelona team with the best midfielders in the world, his main job was at Barcelona’s most physical player. “He is a great player, very strong and physical,” says Sergio Busquets. Guardiola was an absolutely huge fan of Keita, going as far as describing him as his “ethical and moral barometer” throughout his four years in charge.
Whether Song can provide that is questionable, but he broadly fits both tactical roles. He’s not as skilled at the first as Barcelona’s first choice target Javi Martinez, nor as committed as Keita for the second vacancy. But as a compromise, he makes sense.
Song had three different roles at Arsenal in three years. In 2009/10 he played at the base of a midfield triangle, generally behind Denilson, a distributor, and Cesc Fabregas, who became increasingly attack-minded. In 2010/11 things changed, with Jack Wilshere coming into the team alongside Song, and Fabregas ahead. Song and Wilshere worked as a double pivot, each taking it in turns to go forward, with the other dropping back accordingly. In 2011/12 there was another switch, with Song forming a more fluid midfield three along with Mikel Arteta and either Tomas Rosicky or Aaron Ramsey. Then, Song often ended up as the highest midfielder, and recorded 11 assists, the fourth-highest in the Premier League behind David Silva, Juan Mata and Antonio Valencia.

From the start of 2010/11 to the end of 2011/12, Song became a completely different player
That final season was probably crucial in convincing Barcelona to sign Song. Whereas Real have a much broader squad encompassing a wide range of styles, Barcelona remain largely committed to the Cryuff ideal – and rightly so, considering Guardiola’s great success. The player to replace Keita had to be a footballer as well as a physical, mobile, energetic battler. Song was the best fit for the functional role, from a list of players who could also play tiki-taka.
But it’s nevertheless significant that Vilanova felt the need to replace Keita. Guardiola almost always used him as a substitute, and despite never being a regular, Keita featured a lot. In 2010/11 he was Barcelona’s most-used player – he played in 35 of 38 La Liga games, 9 of 9 Copa del Rey games, 9 of 13 Champions League games. He provided a burst of energy and kept the intensity high.
Maybe it’s no coincidence that Song’s medical at Barcelona received more attention than usual. Do we usually find out specific conclusions from a medical? “He has a very low body fat percentage and very good muscle quality. All the tests have come out satisfactorily and he is available to the coach,” Barcelona’s doctor revealed.
For all the bitterness between the clubs, Guardiola admired Real’s physicality and battling qualities. Their title win was summed up not by the win at the Nou Camp, but the win at the Mestalla when Real bloody-mindedly won six consecutive individual contests on the way to a crucial counter-attacking goal. For all Barcelona’s technical brilliance, they need some aggression at points too.
Last night
In last night’s game, Modric’s major contribution and Song’s major contribution were in the same passage of play. In the 91st minute, Modric nipped in ahead of Xavi Hernandez to nick the ball, laid it off quickly, then motored into the penalty box, got the return pass, and shot at goal. Song was there to block it.
It sums up the qualities each will bring to their new club this season – Modric is a central midfielder with quick feet and good spatial awareness, while Song is there to do the dirty work. Depending on how much the two players feature, this season may see convergence of the two teams in terms of style.



” He’s not as skilled at the first as Barcelona’s first choice Javi Martinez, ”
Err…
First choice transfer target. Surprised that wasn’t obvious, but I’ll edit it.
I think he meant the part about Javi Martinez being more skilled than Song.
that’s not it
So after having discussed the possible intentions of Real and Barca with Modric and Song, respectively – how would you judge the purchase of Martinez by Bayern? Simply motivated by Martinez being pretty good and Bayern pretty rich, or do you see some deeper plan there?
Here in Germany this transfer is seen quite controversially, since Martinez really was hell expensive at those 40M Euro…
I think Bayern definitely overpaid for Javi Martinez. I think it would make more sense financially to either sign Etienne Capoue or Jeremey Toulalan after the news broke about Malaga’s financial situation(and I think Toulalan is a better player than Martinez). But, while they overpaid Martinez is better than Gustavo so it improves the squad.
And I actually disagree with that opinion. I really don’t think Martinez is more skilled than Song. Song can take people on and can be very creative. Song can be a true box to box midfielder. Martinez is just a pure destroyer to me. Sort of like Mascherano.
I would agree about placing Mascherano into your comment, if not for quite a few great long passes that created 1v1 with the goalkeeper for barcelona forwards this and previous season.
He may not have the creativity on the ball but Martinez is better technically.
I would think Barca would have been better suited buying a CD with pace if their intention is to use Song as a CD/DM. Pique in the past year hasn’t filled me with confidence, Guardiola even dropped him. In 1 vs 1 situations or the ability to track into wide channels which Barca often face due to the advanced supporting positions of the full backs. Just one example look how Ronaldo scored at the Nou Camp last year.
Song isn’t exceptionally mobile, good in tight areas, defending pacy dribblers or good at receiving possession in tight areas. Even in his short spell yesterday I felt the angles and areas of the pitch he adopted to receive from the CD was poorer than Busquets would offer.
In my opinion Laurent Koscielny would have been the better player to target at Arsenal for reasons discussed above. Maybe even Vermaelen although he is at times positionally suspect and over-aggressive with his decision making. Mascherano would have become adequate back up at DM.
“In my opinion Laurent Koscielny would have been the better player to target at Arsenal for reasons discussed above. Maybe even Vermaelen although he is at times positionally suspect and over-aggressive with his decision making.”
In my opinion if Barca try to buy one more player from Arsenal, the Gunners should sent out the artillery and level the Camp Nou, the Masia, and the waterfront area just for good measure.
You took that Sahin quote totally out of context. He said “I don’t care where he goes, AS LONG AS HE GETS TO PLAY” meaning Mourinho really DOES care and wants Sahin back if he can improve his game (probably the tempo of his play, which is why he was loaned out to an EPL club). It could also mean “don’t go to Arsenal, you won’t get to play every game”.
I agree with you completely.
i wonder which RM like aspect of Song’s game Barcelona values more, his physicality or his long balls. the first thing that came to my mind after watching Barca play in this season is that it seems they are willing to more forward and use long passes and air balls, specially to the overlapping flanks. it could be what vilanova is trying to do, add more width and direct play. in that case song might help from a deeper position with his long balls.
Now that you’ve pointed out that a player in Barca will have to be comfortable with tiki-taka as well, no matter in which position he plays, i understand that was indeed another very important factor in going for Song. Being an Arsenal player he should be more comfortable with short passes. In fact its indeed difficult to think of another DM/deep CM who has proven to have both of these two qualities, being able to play long balls while being comfortable with short passes as well.
however i do wonder in his eagerness to ensure the passing prowess, whether Vilanove hasn’t slightly overlooked the main aspect of the game of a DM. Defensively, i really don’t think Song is that good, and at the moment that’s what Barca needs the most.
Didn’t he specifically not want Sahin at Arsenal also because Arsenal wanted a buyout clause in the loan deal? Makes it seem like there are future plans for Sahin at Real.
I guess Mourinho sees Sahin as a long-term replacement of Xabi Alonso, considering Xabi’s age. So loaning him out to EPL makes a lot sense since Sahin might there develop the physicality he is still missing.
I read Mourinho is good friends with the coach at Liverpool, so maybe that’s the reason he wanted him there?
he also said “Real Madrid will never sell Sahin” and that he needed to learn some aspects of the game and the EPL was the perfect palce for that. Sahin also mentioned he wanted to improve some aspects of his game.
He doesn’t want Sahin back, though.
How do you know that? Or is that your personal guess?
Arsenal fan here and not really that sorry to see Song go. Even though stat wise he led in terms of assists, he frequently gave the ball away in the middle of the park and in general lacked defensive discipline.
There are also rumours of his disruptive presence in the dressing room.
Unlike RVP he still had 3 years to go on his contract with Arsene deciding that enough was enough.
Still good luck to him – hope he doesn’t become a Flamini.
You’re too generous. I hope he becomes a Hleb – useless to Barca, filled with regret over deciding to leave, and unable to resurrect his career.
Too bad Song’s already said he wants to learn some Catalan. Hleb’s refusal to integrate was part of the problem, in addition to being indignant about his bench role.
Modric and Alonso mostly cant play the together as the pivot in midfield. This would leave alonso in front of the back four with luca pressing ahead, and as seen often Alonso when put under pressure by the opposition is unable to do his primary job of distribution properly.
According to me next season will be very interesting, if Jose brings back Sahin then Sahin and Modric will form a dangerous combination,. Sahin not afraid to tackle in and also has good vision, Modric in front of him will provide perfect pathway for Ozil and Ronaldo.
I do agree as Alonso isnt a pure destroyer but I do think his interceptions are underated.
I think Zonal Marking is trying to say that when smaller teams come to the bernabeu they will play 10 behind the ball/camp in their own half. so Alonso wont really have to alot of defending so he still would be able to Distribute effectively.
Really enjoy this type of article.
From what I’ve seen of him at Centre Back I think Song will do well at Barca, he is a better defender when tracking back and making blocks rather than pressing high where he gives away a lot of fouls.
Really interested to see how much both of them play.
“But Barcelona dominated the second half, even with ten men, as Real dropped off and let Barcelona dictate the tempo.”
ZM, how can we call it “dominating” if it’s the opponent that intentionally allowed that? High possession is not necessarily domination.
Firstly, Madrid pressed unsustainably heavily early, so if you don’t allow that Barca dominated the 2nd half, you wouldn’t be able to say Madrid dominated the 1dt half so much.
Much more importantly, Barca created the better chances in the 2nd half.
Frankly, I can’t understand what you have written, perhaps you could rephrase it? My point is: Real dominated first half and then let Barcelona have the ball. I don’t believe they just weren’t able to keep the ball in the second half having 11 players against 10. With a positive score they preferred to defend (which, on a sidenote, always means welcoming troubles, if you ask me, but it’s Mourinho who decides). Cheers!
the point bobby made is that it was not merely by choice that RM had to fall back in second half. they pressed too much in the first half and would’ve been incapable of doing it in the same way in second half because of their stamina being drained. so RM could not press as much as they did in first half even if they wanted to, and without that kind of ruthless pressing, RM was not able to break Barcalona’s possession. It was not their choice not to disturb barca’s possession in second half, it was the only way for them, which eventually created some dangerous situations for RM in second half.
Alright, but how do we know that Real pressed particularly heavily in the first half that they lacked stamina for the second? First half to me looked like Real were creating chances because of clumsy FCB defenders and generally Barcelona’s high line, rather than an effort bigger than in the previous GD.
I think that is the way to play football – Champion teams need to know how to defend against any team. Just because you are 11 against 10 does not mean you have to attack. I am completely on board with Mou – RM had to defend their lead and try to score in the chances they get and not chase any chances with heavy pressing in second half and hence lose their positions. If they lost the tie in the second half – I would still say this – because then it would have been bcos they could not defend against 10 man Barca – not bcos they did not attack!!
Interesting point of view, but notice how many times a team scores a goal and then decides to defend and they lose the goal, and it’s all from the start again. I’m not sure if losing control of the match is the best possible way to maintain the lead in the match.
Because it was obviously not in the plan of RM to allow barcellona get into one and one position with Casillas so many times as it actually happened in the second half. even with 10 men barca was able to create chances quite a few times which was something RM specifically would’ve wanted to avoid(that was their first priority in second half judging from the change in their tempo and playing style) and yet failed.
When Barcelona had the ball in the feet of their defenders, Real fell back to its own half and waited. If they wanted to avoid Barcelona create chances, they would press them and take the ball for themselves. They prefered to defend, no? I can’t see how your interpretation (they wanted but couldn’t get the ball, and so they couldn’t avoid danger in theit penalty area) is more backed up by evidence than mine (they preferred to withdraw the team into their own half and wait, defend).
i think its pretty clear what he means. ideally madrid would press for 90 minutes because it causes barca problems. but barca are so good at moving the ball quickly that to try and chase them for 90 minutes is ineffective. so what do you? keep trying and get more and more worn out and picked off late in the game or park the bus? its not what they would ideally want to do but the alternative of being run ragged was even more unsatisfactory. atleast sitting deep spared the madrid forwards a lot of running meaning they have some energy left with which to counter. if you press, to do it effectively, it has to be done by everyone. that’s hard against anyone but against barca its near impossible and if you did win the ball you’re players would be too exhausted to do anything with it.
barca press high and hard, but they can do it because they conserve energy whilst in possession for long periods, they defend with the ball. they gamble on winning the ball back early and it often works (then they slow the game down and play keep ball to give themselves time to recover) but when it doesn’t they are vulnerable to direct attacks, especially down the wings. they take a calculated risk. if they faced a mirror image of themselves they would have to back off for long spells like everyone who plays them does. playing an open game and going toe to toe with barca usually means one thing-barca win. mourinho is smart enough to know better than to try. remember inter in 2010 champions league, they parked the bus and so did chelsea last season. man utd and arsenal have both tried to take them on twice in the past 3 seasons and got well beaten
Thanks mate, you explained it better than i did
Great post. My only “but” is even considering current physical weakness of Madrid players, they were still 11v10 which means it was easier for them to press than normally, and they should easily maintain the possession when they had got the ball back.
You are confusing between my point and the point that bobby made. Bobby made the point(which micheal also made in the article) that RM was able to defend better when they were pressing high, something they could not do for the whole length of 90 mins.
My point here is about RM’s solution to this problem of not being able to press on continuously in second half. It was,as you said “they preferred to withdraw the team in their own half and wait,defend”.
Unfortunately, in this approach they could not stop Barcelona from creating clear chances of goal, which were coming much less easily in the first half(when they were pressing high). So the very reason RM was falling back to defend was becoming mute, they were not being able to defend well/better in second half,rather they were better in defense when they were pressing. Which is just the other side of the coin that Barcelona’s attacks became better in second half(due to RM defense getting worse), meaning that Barcelona was dominating in second half.
In answer to your question about why my interpretation makes more sense: you need to understand that just cause one team is sitting back doesn’t necessarily mean that they are defending better. RM was actually doing better in defense when they were pressing high. Since the logical priority of RM would be to put their best possible defensive performance in the second half, to not allow Barcelona any chance of goal, simple logic indicates that they would want to opt for the approach which helps them most defensively. So they should have gone for high-pressing and not sitting back, cause they were not defending better when sitting back, but rather when pressing high.
So there is the questing you need to ask to yourself “Why then wasn’t RM pushing high, instead of sitting back, if they were better in defense when pressing high?” Logical ans: “Cause they could not do it”. then next question would be,”Why they could not do something that this very team did in the first half?” Simple ans:”Cause its not humanly possible to keep up the same level of work rate in second half”.
Hope i’ve made it clear
Fantastic, thanks! My only small “but” is they didn’t have to keep exactly the same workrate as in the first half, because of two reasons: (1) Barcelona also tired to some extent in the first half, (2) Madrid had to press 10 men, not 11.
I think keeping the ball 11v10 is easier than against 11 men. It’s possible even for Madrid players which are less technically gifted than Barcelona, so I think small amount of pressing to get the ball back + retaining possession for long periods of time, would be in my opinion wiser to do.
Regards!
Just to clarify this further: your question was “how can we call it “dominating” if it’s the opponent that intentionally allowed that?”
on two points Barca did something that RM had no “intention” of letting them do.
1. In second half Real had to opt for their second best defensive approach,which was sitting back. Their best defensive approach against Barcelona is pressing high. They could not keep this up due to Barca’s passing play, which drains a lot of stamina out of opponents. RM would’ve ‘intended’ to take their best defensive approach in second half, which they could not…that is the first thing that went against their primary intention.(the point made by Bobby)
2. Secondly, if RM was able to actually defend solidly while sitting back, it still would not have counted as Barca ‘dominating’…then it’d have merely an adjustment in strategy by RM. Since barca was creating a lot many chances in second half, that means they have foiled the reason behind RM’s sitting back as well, which was ‘not to allow barca any chance’. There RM failed,even against ten men. Which means Barca dominated.(that is my original point)
Great idea for an article Michael, but I think you’re reading too much into it. How are they now thinking about each other’s style when they already had the same type of players last season? Barcelona had Keita “physical and combative” and Real had Kaka “mobile and skillful”. Keita left, and Kaka flopped. Nobody is learning from anybody, they simply bought replacements to what they had last season. In Barcelona’s case, they wanted a strong midfielder to replace Keita who can also play in CB, so two birds with one stone. And Madrid simply wanted an attacking midfielder to play the rule Kaka couldn’t play.
Agreed. I don’t think they were thinking about each other’s styles.
Barca simply needed some defensive reinforcement. Madrid needed some more incisiveness and more calm in the final third which is why they got Modric – someone who can as zonal said “Modric nipped in ahead of Xavi Hernandez to nick the ball, laid it off quickly”
Madrid basically needed some Barca and they got it now with Modric. lol.
However I don’t think Barca have gotten stronger with Song – imo they should have signed a world class defender. They need someone who can replace Puyol.
Kaka is a different player from Modrich. They are not really comparable. kaka is a much more veritcal player, a sprinter towards forward and most suited for the number 10 position(playmaker) not the CM, which is what modrich. modrich’s strong points are in distributing the ball and holding on to it, that’s something what barcelona is more renowned for.
In case of Song, unlike Michael, i think the RM like quality which Barcelona is mostly looking for from him is his long passes. Under Vilanova, it seems to me that long passes to overlapping flanks has become a more common site, and perhaps song can help with that.
Great article!
Has anyone else noticed that Vilanova clearly prefers 4-3-3 and more importantly is not willing to move away from it or alter it in any way?
I personally believe that it is Barca’s best formation as well, however Guardiola tried to accomodate Fabregas and altered the formation.
Well imo this means less playing time for Mr. Fabregas. It also seems like Thiago will not get enough playing time this year. Dressing room will have 2 unhappy players. However, Tello will be very happy. And I wonder where Cuenca is.
often it seems more like 4-2-3-1 to me, with Xavi dropping down beside busquets and sanchaz getting up as a forward. but may be you right, perhaps this is the reason why busquets seemed to have played much further ahead of defense line in this match.
i think for something for barca to try for away games against strong opponents would be a 4231
with
alves, pique/masch/puyol adriano/alba
_______busquets_______song___________
pedro/sanchez_____cesc_______iniesta
______________Messi_______________
that would give extra cover in the back with busquets and song in the double pivot especially when alves and alba are both playing as they play high up. they could provide cover if one gets exposed. yes xavi is out but cesc and messi could always switch their positions up as they like to do the false 9. pedro/sanchez or villa even would provide width with alves always overlapping on the wing.
I think you have made some very interesting points. I bet Tito does something like this the next time Barca plays at the Bernabeu. Mourinho’s tactic at home (if forced upon him) is to press very high and very hard during the first half, expending lots of gas. But if Barca can weather the storm it’s all over red rover in the second half. Be a smart move to start with a double pivot and maybe even Thiago (who is a bit of a terrier) and then kill RM off in the second half (in the traditional fashion). No reason at all why Xavi couldn’t come on in the second half.
Having song and busi in would also get more muscle in the middle an on set pieces and corners which is as every one knows is another one of barcas weak spots. Then if things go sour Xavi could come in for either busi or song. Whoever is being poor on the day and the usual 4-3-3 would be back. And also villa could come in in place of cesc or Pedro/Sanchez.
Actually, Vilanova DID alter it none further than in the recent match in Pampeluna. He started with
4-3-3 (Fabs-Busi-Iniesta, Sanchez-Messi-Tello), but with a negative score he had to make changes. He took down Fabs sending Pedro in, making it 4-2-1-3 (Busi-Iniesta, Messi, Pedro-Sanchez-Tello), and later on simply switching Iniesta for more suitable for the job Xavi, and Villa for Tello. Messi played with 3 players ahead of him, the Iniesta role basicly, which the former player couldn’t perform well in that match.
Cuenca unfortunately suffered an injury that rules him out for several months. Tello sure seems to be taking the window of opportunity though! Also now that Afellay has gone on loan.
O and I think Modric’s addition has made Madrid a whole lot stronger. With players like Ronaldo, Higuain, Benzema upfront and Alonso by his side, Modric will thrive.
Madrid can easily play 4-3-3.
if thats the case then what would be the front 6 guys?
ronaldo higuain/benzema di maria
modric ozil
alonso/khediera
i also think the song buy will make barca alot stronger as well… as they could do a 4231 formation when playing away from home
with back
alves pique/mascherano/puyol alba/adriano
song busquets
pedro/sanchez cesc iniesta
messi
messi and cesc could do there changing of roles throughout the game
In future years, I can see Modric and Khedira forming a strong midfield partnership, with the former perhaps also partnering with Sahin, against weaker teams at home. At this present time, Real probably have the stongest midfield in the world, behind Barca.
Easily. No other teams compare to Madrid and Barca. The only team which may have some chance is City but they too have a lot of work to do.
I guess you have never heard of Bayern Munich,they are easily better than City and shown last season that they are just as good as Madrid.They actually outplayed Madrid over the 2 legs and should have won in normal time.Bayerns midfield dominated Real Madrids midfield twice last season so saying Real have the strongest midfield in the world after Barca has no basis in reality.
Also with the addition of Javi Martinez,Manzukic,Pizarro,Dante and Shaquri they just got a lot stronger.They now have strength in depth which they didn’t have and it cost them last year,Manzukic is a brilliant buy,I said last season Bayern need better back up for Gomez,a more dynamic player and now they have that in Manzukic,Piqarro is good as well.Javi Martinez is a beast at both CB and DM,he will give them more of a physical presence at the back.Shaquri is a top talent as well.
they need to be better than Dortmund first
Bayern was not only better than Real because of their midfield, but also because of their defence. Ramos and Pepe are good tacklers, but quite limited in terms of opening up the play from the back. Badstuber and Boateng were a lot better at that and that gave Bayern an additional bit of ‘control’.
Now Bayern bought Dante and Martinez for defence/midfield. I daresay Bayern will be better equipped than Real at defence, midfield, and attack. It’s difficult to compare them to Barca, though, since they play so different, and since they have Messi…
i think to say bayern are better than madrid is a bit optimistic. dante and martinez may well have improved them but it was certainly needed. bayerns defence, lahm apart, was poor last season. the midfield was clearly lacking a true holder aswell. schweinsteiger wasn’t the answer and tymoshchuk didnt play much for whatever reason. cover for gomez was needed too, so they do look better equipped this season.
ramos and pepe arent so limited as you presume,. pepe has often played in midfield and ramos as a wingback. i think it has more to do with mourinho not wanting to take risks than any limitations they have as players. centre backs should defend first and its hard to think of a better partnership at the current time than ramos and pepe. they have both improved greatly over the last 2 years. the mourinho effect perhaps?
yes bayern did get the better of madrid in the champions league but it was hardly a thrashing. dortmund beat bayern 3 times yet where did they get in the champions league, bottom of their group. which is the true measure of a team. the league or cup?
Modric will certainly improve Madrids options this year, and this is also needed.
Considering Bayern’s defence, I strongly disagree with you. Bayern conceded the fewest goals last Bundesliga. CL I dont remember. They had a few problems in terms of injuries (vBuyten, Rafinha) which made them reshuffle a couple of times. Finally, Alaba turned out to be a better LB than Marcelo and Coentrao together.
In midfield Bayern sure did not have a ‘true holder’, but they did not need one since they played double-pivot. Btw. Schweinsteiger was excellent there until his injury last winter. Now they might turn to 4-3-3 with Martinez as ‘true holder’? Who knows…
Future will tell
I actually think Juventus has the second best midfield. They added Kwadwo Asamoah and Mauricio Isla to a midfield they already contained Andrea Pirlo, Arturo Vidal and Claudio Marchisio.
Juve is a good shout as well.Graham,Bayern had Gustavo playing as the holding player last season,he is very good but can be a bit rash and give away too many freekicks.Against Madrid he committed at least 10 fouls in the Bernabeu even though he knew he would get suspended for the final if he got booked….which he eventually did.Even though Gustavo is very good if Martinez plays DM instead he will be an improvement on Gustavo.
Diverinho I don’t agree with your assement of Pepe and Ramos,I think they are one of the most technically gifted CB partnerships in Europe.Ramos used to be a world class RB,so he is technically excellent for a CB.Pepe is good on the ball for a CB too.I think it had more to do with Bayern playing more of a possession oriented game than Madrids counter attacking game which made Bayerns CB’s seem better on the ball.
Pepe and Ramos “one of the most technically gifted CB partnerships in Europe” – now really? I don’t say they are horrible, and they might be better than the EPL average, but please watch them more closely. They are fast, strong, and good in the air, but neither have great technique nor vision. (No comparison to Pique, fE). Especially Pepe is hoofing forward a lot. Maybe I am too critical on them, but please watch them closely in laliga and CL this season…
I still think Ramos has world class technique and passing for a CB.Anyway I think if they both played for Bayern or Barca they would look a lot better on the ball and play a more possession oriented game.Also don’t forget Madrid have Arbeloa at RB instead of Alves or Lahm.Arbeloa is nowhere near as technically accomplished as them two.Little things like these can make a big difference in how CB’s play.
What other CB partnerships would you say are technically better than Pepe and Ramos apart from Bayerns and Barcas?I can only think of Dortmand and Arsenal CB’s who can rival them.Maybe Ruiz and Rami for Valencia as well?
I genuinely think Pepe is the most naturally gifted CB in the world.
If only he had the patience and awareness of a Terry/Ferdinand he’d be by far the best CB in the world.
In 1 v 1s he’s top, top class.
The problem with him is he often goes looking to extinguish non-existent or at best fires that are not imminent!
Of course his distribution could be better…
Since yesterday evening one might add Atletico. I also think Chelsea have a great CB partnership (Luiz, Cahill). Bremen (Prödl, Sokratis), Schalke (Papadopoulos, Höwedes), ManU – there are plenty of teams with imo similar or better CBs. Did not mention any french club since I do not really know them…
Again, Ramos and Pepe are not bad as such, they have certain strong qualities, but they do not lie in playing and distributing well in a high line. They are good at (last ditch) tackling and dishing out fouls the referees don’t see (especially Ramos in that respect). They are not even really good (at defending) in the air, considering how many goals RM conceded from set pieces last season.
For all of Keita’s utility qualities, he was never comfortable as a defensive midfielder or defender positionally. He was best on the left side of midfield as a more static, combative foil to Iniesta’s ghosting skills.
Barcelona will hope Song is comfortable when asked to be the last man and distribute from the back. If he can do this well, like Mascherano, he will be a good transfer. If he only proves capable of resting Busquets, Barcelona would have been better off just bringing Oriol Romeu back from Chelsea.
Vilanova will test Song at CM, DM and CB. When Song’s transfer became offcial, Vilanova stated “Song will surprise Barcelona fans.”
Sergi Roberto’s emergence and Thiago’s return to fitness will mean Song plays much more DM and CB than he does in the steady role Keita used to occupy. If Song is not comfortable being a last man and distributing from the back, then Barcelona will have erred on this transfer in my opinion.
Reall good article gave me plenty to think about which i hadnt already, which is why i read you stuff.
I thought Barca were extremely direct in the first half and kept looking to release the wide players, however that may have been due to Madrid’s back line not sitting back and trying to force Messi and co away from goal. Dont think Barca used the ball very well though.
We all know that seven or so of their players on the pitch at any time in the game are keeping the ball all night, I think Barca needed to do that in the first half, keep things at 0-0 and attack more directly when Madrid tired in the second. There’s no team that can weather heavy pressing better than Barca due to their ball retention, but they kept giving the ball away cheaply and allowing Madrid to powerfully counter attack, which is exactly what Madrid want.
Furthermore, Barca stood off when losing possession rather than the usual high intensity pressing, im sure this is because Madrid’s players are capable of breaking the first phase of pressing but coupled with their first half poor retention meant that Madrid were able to dominate them, when there’s no way in hell that should be possible.
I suppose that if La Liga is a two horse race, it makes sense for each club to buy players with games against the other in mind.
Fuck me,come up with some new material.
Excellent article as always Michael!
‘The key tactical feature of the game was not about positioning, but about tempo.’
I don’t see this as being entirely correct. To me it seems as if Vilanova this season has decided tactically to make Busquets pressure higher up the pitch and not drop back in between the two centre backs when Barca are in the attacking phase. This to me was the reason Real profited from long balls through the middle last night as both Pique and Mascherano looked hesitant when it came to trying to intercepting the ball. Unsurprisingly resulting in Barcelona’s defence being cut open.
I don’t know if it was strategical or a mere bad game on busquet’s part, but yes i agree with you. busquets was not tracking back as readily as he used to do. if it was a strategy, then i can’t think of one reason behind the idea. so either its a bad idea, or its a bad performance on busquet’s part.
Interesting point, cheers for the comment.
3 individual defensive errors basically cost Barca. Valdes’ late blunder in the first leg, Pique & Mascherano in this game. I thought it was strange how Barca played good as soon as they went to 10 men.
And Yeah, Song’s a brilliant replacement for Keita.
agreed…madrid, while a great team, pretty much has to rely on barca making school boy errors. to be fair, they did their part to provoke them. but pique and masch made mistakes that you rarely see them make. adriano too, dont know where his head was at. despite this, madrid were still made to suffer against 10 men. tito next game will work to ensure that barca dont get isolated 1-v-1 against their forwards.
great article though. i wonder if song has the pace and stamina that barca needs against madrid. keita, not slow, but not the fastest, but was a workhorse and had three lungs. plus selfless, a sacrificer. hard to replace that. good luck alex (hleb) dimitri (chygrinsky) song billong
Mascherano is a fantastic player but I don’t trust him as CB in these big games,his positional sense and rashness when defending often gets punished.We need a proper replacement for Puyol,a world class defender.Masch and Puyol can be great back up.
Tactic analysis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iL5SShANcA&list=UU7jlXTJTjhpA5XjB43LWyEQ&index=1&feature=plpp_video
Surprised that nobody mentioned Khedira. On ZM’s facebook page some guy even said he got roasted. Did I see a different game? For me, Khedira was awesome yesterday, one of the best players on Real’s side, together with Pepe and Ronaldo. I think by playing Diarra lately Mou has tried to show Khedira he still has to fight for his places and for me, it worked, guy looked crazily motivated last night.
Ozil was abysmal again in my opinion, his form is absolutely dreadful, he seems to have trouble playing easy passes right now, was one of the worst against Getafe as well. He should be benched, but Modric is no number 10, Kaka looks to be completely out of favour and I don’t think Granero can cut it on this position, although he is very versatile. Tricky situation here.
Also think Marcelo didn’t have the best of times yesterday. If you re-watch some of Barca’s chances in the second half, almost all of them (Montoya, Pedro) were being played on Madrid’s left side, where no Marcelo was to be found. Even though his offensive strength can be a lethal weapon, he could have well cost Real the win yesterday. I’m not too fond of Coentrao either, he was a total disaster in the first leg against Bayern for example. Still think Arbeloa is terribly underrated, again didn’t let much happen on his side of the pitch, rocksolid guy. Real is right not to buy a new RB, even though some think they should.
Edit: Just read Granero looks like he’ll join QPR. If this is indeed true, I really hope Real will somehow manage to offload Kaka and go after Hamsik. I know life’s not football manager, but I’d love to see Hamsik going there, he’s young, versatile and pretty good.
This is why I defend Luka’s transfer price after some criticism of being too expensive. I like his versatilely of playing deep & advanced, but more importantly offers Real Madrid to base the team around him in the future.
I think Song was a great choice though, he can pick out a good pass and he’s a above average short passer. He suits Barca’s ideology but adds something unique too.
Javi Martinez? Never heard of him!
Dear ZM,
Interesting analysis overall, but to make your argument more compelling it would have been a good idea to explicitly outline the various midfield roles that Song and Modric can play in. Madrid play a 2-1 in central midfield while Barcelona employ a 1-2. Although three positions there are six unique roles in question here, of which I see you have only touched the surface.
1. Defensive Midfield Destroyer (Busquets, Lass in the Pivot)
2. Deep-lying playmaker (Alonso)
3. Box-to-box midfielder (Khedira)
4. Central Playmaker (Xavi)
5. Winger in the Center (Iniesta when in left-midfield)
6. Argentine Trequartista (Ozil)
What I find most interesting and relevant to this discussion is how Modric and Song allow their teams to take up roles they cannot now. Xavi is often crowded out in away games (and is playing through an injury), but putting Song in his position and playing him in a box-to-box role would bring a totally new dynamic to the Barcelona side.
Modric cannot play in the deep-lying position that Alonso occupies (he cannot the ping 40-yard passes vital for this role), but pairing him with Khedira would see him play as a busy central playmaker who can carry the ball past opponents and play short passes to Ozil and the wings, like Xavi but more physical. Granero failed in this role and that is why he left. He can also play as the trequartista but at Tottenham this was VDV’s role and his skills in the final third are not as clinical. He kind of reminds me when Zidane was playing in left-midfield very late in his career.
I agree that Modric can excel in the regista role that Xavi plays in Barcelona, but cannot play as a deep-regista. I do not see much distinction between Ozil and Iniesta’s role; neither play ‘in the hole’ as traditional number tens, just Iniesta plays to the left and Ozil to the right.
As for Song playing as a box-to-box carillero, we have seen how successfully Keita assumed that role and he was a favorite of Guardiola but could not break into the midfield trio because he is a more defensive player than Xavi/Iniesta. Using Song in a pivot with Busquets and Iniesta as the enganche would present a radical shift for Barcelona’s style of play.
Nice analysis, though Song could be a deep lying play maker as well. But i agree that he’s best positioning is as box-to-box midfielder.
It is a travesty that a club like Barcelona can be so inept at center back. Mascherano has done well for a substitute replacement for the oft-injured Puyol but he should not be a first choice cb. Barcelona spent two summers talking about Thiago Silva and should have paid the fee to get him. He is worth the money considering the questionable purchases over the last two summers. Fabregas? Sat as Song came in. Sanchez? Was he even missed when he was substituted for with a man down? Alba? A defensive liability because of his height. At this rate, Barcelona deserve to pay when they are exploited through the middle with the moon balls Madrid played. It worked for Chelsea last season and I’m sure teams will continue to follow that game plan.
Are you going to do Athetico vs Chelsea? I love this Athletico team,they have actually grown a pair of balls under Simione.
Couldn’t hang on to obtain while i procured. Someone said plenty of assessments in order to making the selection of procuring anymore fearless . We’ve gucci key case with clip state that that assessments didn’t misrepresent facts. My partner and i most certainly mean to order a different twosome Equals)
I am glad that barcelona can face real only in finals because both teams have something to prove to themself. 7 october we are going to se a wryly big game
Pique, Adriano, Mascherano and Alba in the back four,3 midfielders and one inexperienced defender, two of them only substitutes under Pep Guardiola and all not very tall or physical players except Pique, but he also isn’t the fastest player. It should have bean clear to Vilanova this was only going to be a disaster area! I know Pep preferred to play a midfielder like Pique or Busquets when a defender was injured or banned but this is WAAAY to much for such an important game.
Also deja-vu for Falcao in the Super Cup, also, it shows cracking Chelsea’s defense it’s all about how hard you hit, not how many times.
Barca is over, Pique, Mascherano, Adriano and Valdes are rubbish
Hi ZM
Nice review, but don’t u think Vertonghen would have been better choice for Barca, then Song?
ZEQUEFLERSE giants jerseys
FralaSturbvut cowboys jersey
soatnexorserm giants nike jersey
Cogiodipsmams steelers jerseys
ZEQUEFLERSE packer jerseys Nike
FralaSturbvut steeler nike jersey
soatnexorserm patriots jerseys
Cogiodipsmams cowboys jerseys Nike
ZEQUEFLERSE packers nike jersey
FralaSturbvut steeler jersey nike
soatnexorserm giants jerseys Nike
Cogiodipsmams giants nike jersey
ZEQUEFLERSE patriot jersey nike
FralaSturbvut patriot jerseys Nike
soatnexorserm steelers Nike jerseys
Cogiodipsmams patriot jersey
ZEQUEFLERSE patriot nike jersey
FralaSturbvut cowboy jerseys Nike
soatnexorserm packers jersey
Cogiodipsmams giants jerseys
ZEQUEFLERSE steelers Nike jerseys
FralaSturbvut patriot Nike jerseys
soatnexorserm patriots jerseys Nike
Cogiodipsmams patriots jerseys Nike
ZEQUEFLERSE cowboys jerseys
FralaSturbvut cowboy jerseys
soatnexorserm giants nike jersey
Cogiodipsmams packer jerseys
ZEQUEFLERSE giants jersey
FralaSturbvut giants jerseys Nike
soatnexorserm packer jersey nike
Cogiodipsmams packers Nike jerseys
According to a CNN post and Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, the organization sees a large 12 months ahead.It includes screened representative models involving SAP along with Microsoft office 2010 Design involving Metro-based software which may passage distance involving desktop/ capsule and that is shown by simply ipad device currently. But it really will demand some sort of computer hardware up grade with the people conclusion. Bing, Microsoft and yahoo search venture will turn into the default search engine on all HP computer systems in 42 nations. Though windows 7 ultimate product codehas a way to go to surpass Google as the premier search engine they are definitely shifting in the direction of giving it the excellent ole try.People who had been laid off in 2009 could take their ability set to other organizations and some may possibly make a decision to launch their very own enterprise and take a likelihood on themselves.You can even buy a CD from the market where you can find other softwares and programs. Then you have Norton Antivirus which is considered to the best antivirus for the simple reason that it is able to detect even the smallest virus which is there in your computer. Though many new antiviruses have come but not all have the ability to put a check on all kinds of worms but this can be done with the help of this antivirus. The new ones are able to deal with new virus only which is a drawback for them. Hence you can effectively download it and run it in your system so that you can keep your desktop or laptop error free. For downloading free version of Norton Antivirus you have to search a lot and even if you will find it, it will get expired after 60 days only so you have to purchase it later. If you like its working you can buy it from internet or you can again download it from any software website. But the best thing that you can do is to purchase but it consumes lots of space so you have to check it in case it is decreasing the performance of your system. Hope you are able to explore both softwares and its benefits.The particular Microsof Work area 2010 Diagnostics Means would most likely make some sort of routine from tests not to mention check ups that will look into all of the difficulty that will properly come up inside your application, along with think about car repairs individuals. Moreover it gives the action simply by measure ebook towards difficult this type of problems, that happens to be especially insightful to the individual because they make use of the item to remedy the concerns every time they come to pass. This approach Diagnostics System may help prospects run into blemishes not to mention conditions and even courses these individuals the best way his or hers technique all-around it again.
ZEQUEFLERSE patriots jerseys
FralaSturbvut packers jersey
soatnexorserm packer jersey
Cogiodipsmams patriot Nike jerseys
ZEQUEFLERSE cowboys jerseys Nike
FralaSturbvut cowboy jersey
soatnexorserm giants jersey
Cogiodipsmams giants jerseys
ZEQUEFLERSE steelers jerseys Nike
FralaSturbvut patriots Nike jerseys
soatnexorserm patriots jerseys Nike
Cogiodipsmams steelers jerseys
This video post is really great, the echo quality and the picture quality of this tape post is really remarkable.
ZEQUEFLERSE giants jerseys Nike
FralaSturbvut packers jersey nike
soatnexorserm steelers Nike jerseys
Cogiodipsmams cowboys Nike jerseys
ZEQUEFLERSE steeler jersey nike
FralaSturbvut packers jerseys
soatnexorserm steeler jersey nike
Cogiodipsmams cowboys nike jersey
ZEQUEFLERSE packer jersey
FralaSturbvut packers nike jersey
soatnexorserm giants jersey nike
Cogiodipsmams packer Nike jerseys
ZEQUEFLERSE cowboy Nike jerseys
FralaSturbvut steeler jersey nike
soatnexorserm patriots jerseys Nike
Cogiodipsmams cowboys jersey nike
ZEQUEFLERSE patriots nike jersey
FralaSturbvut patriot jerseys
soatnexorserm cowboy jersey
Cogiodipsmams packer jersey nike
ZEQUEFLERSE packer nike jersey
FralaSturbvut packer nike jersey
soatnexorserm cowboys Nike jerseys
Cogiodipsmams steeler jerseys
ZEQUEFLERSE steeler jersey
FralaSturbvut packers jersey nike
soatnexorserm patriots Nike jerseys
Cogiodipsmams packer jerseys Nike
ZEQUEFLERSE packers jersey nike
FralaSturbvut cowboys jerseys
soatnexorserm packers jerseys
Cogiodipsmams cowboys jersey nike
ZEQUEFLERSE packers jersey nike
FralaSturbvut patriots jersey
soatnexorserm steeler jersey nike
Cogiodipsmams patriot jersey nike
ZEQUEFLERSE packers jersey
FralaSturbvut giants nike jersey
soatnexorserm steeler jerseys Nike
Cogiodipsmams packers jersey nike
http://www.pittsburghsteelersjerseynike-store.com/ DeCastro Steelers Jersey
Emmanuel Sanders Jersey
http://www.steelersjerseynike-store.com/shop-by-player-lamarr-woodley-jersey-c-14_34 LaMarr Woodley Jersey
http://www.giantsjerseysnike-store.com/men-game-c-1_3 Men Game Giants Jersey sale
http://www.pittsburghsteelersjerseysnike-shop.com/shop-by-player-james-harrison-jersey-c-14_32 James Harrison Jersey
Cameron Heyward Jersey
http://www.nikenfl-pittsburghsteelersjersey.com/kids-c-9 Kids Steelers football Jerseys
Women Giants Jerseys
http://www.pittsburghsteelersjerseynike-store.com/shop-by-player-sean-spence-jersey-c-14_46 Sean Spence Jersey
http://www.giantsjerseys-store.com/ Cheap NIKE Men Game Giants jerseys
http://www.officialsteelersjerseysnike.com/ Pittsburgh Steelers Jerseys on sale
Men Steelers Jerseys dress
Nike New Mike Wallace Jerseys Steelers
Troy Polamalu Jersey
Cheap Women Steelers Jerseys Pittsburgh
http://www.giantsjerseynike-store.com/ Jason Pierre Jersey New York Giants
http://www.nikeshop-steelersjerseys.com/shop-by-player-mewelde-moore-jersey-c-14_40 Mewelde Moore Jersey
http://www.nflnikenewyorkgiantsjersey.com/shop-by-player-david-diehl-jersey-c-14_24 Diehl Giants alternate Jersey
http://www.nikeshoppittsburghsteelersjerseys.com/shop-by-player-david-decastro-jersey-c-14_57 David DeCastro Jersey
Nike Brett Keisel Jerseys Steelers
http://www.newyorkgiantsjerseysnikeshop.com/ Jones Giants Jersey sale
Cheap Lawrence Timmons Steelers Nike Jersey
Shaun Suisham Jersey
Lawrence Timmons Jersey
http://www.nikeshoppittsburghsteelersjersey.com/shop-by-player-heath-miller-jersey-c-14_29 Heath Miller Jersey
Leonard Pope Jersey
http://www.giantsjerseysnflnike.com/ Cheap Nike Lawrence Tynes Jersey New York Giants
http://www.nikeofficialpittsburghsteelersjerseys.com/ Pittsburgh Steelers Jerseys Nike
http://www.nflnikesteelersjersey.com/men-elite-c-1_4 Men Elite Pittsburgh Steelers Nike Jersey
Cheap Kids Game Steelers Jerseys