Euro 2012 final: Spain v Italy preview

Potential starting line-ups
Of the 30 games at Euro 2012 so far, the 1-1 draw between these two countries in the first game of Group C was probably the most fascinating in a tactical sense. A back three battled against a false nine – not a formation match-up you see very regularly.
Unfortunately, we’re unlikely to see such a contest this time around, now Italy have moved away from a 3-5-2 to a midfield diamond. But then again, the diamond is also unique in this tournament – and besides, it gives us an entirely different tactical battle.
It’s odd that these two managers should produce interesting strategic battles. Both are fine coaches, but neither are particularly keen tacticians.
Vicente del Bosque is primarily an organiser, a communicator and a father figure. His talents shouldn’t be underestimated – he’s won the World Cup, and did so because of some excellent strategic moves – but he is more concerned with creating a harmonious dressing room, and making the most of Spain’s cohesive footballing identity. According to him, Spain’s success has “foundations in many things – in the structure of our football, in the academies, and in better coaches.” He downaplays his own role: “When the players are good, the manager is good.” It’s his usual modesty, and it’s partly to deceive the opposition. But it’s also partly true.
Prandelli is not dissimilar. He focuses upon getting his side to play a positive, attractive brand of football and avoids game-to-game switches based around the opponent. Granted, he’s changed formation completely from a 3-5-2 to a diamond in this competition, but in natural tactical terms, moving away from a three-man defence for the Ireland game was an unconventional move. The 3-5-2 thrives against a 4-4-2 – whereas Italy’s diamond had problems against it, particularly down the flanks. Listen to why Prandelli changed formation – “We maintained a certain balance over the last few games…the team that opened the tournament had a different approach, but over time we found fitness and the balance we had been looking for, so rediscovered the certainty we had lost before the competition” – and it’s all about his own players being comfortable, rather than because of the challenge of specific opponents.
But this is a challenge for Prandelli – Spain are both the favourites and the more predictable side. The tactical battle is all about how Prandelli can stop Spain, and exploit their weakness – he’s spoken at length about this in pre-match press conferences.
Spain formation & selection
To a certain extent, it’s the same as always. The first nine names on the teamsheet are unquestionable (despite some reports Xavi could be dropped) but the balance and feel of the side changes according to the names of the centre-forward and the right-sided attacking midfielder.
The centre-forward – if you can call him that – seems likely to be Cesc Fabregas. You can take it as a process of elimination – Fernando Llorente hasn’t featured yet, Fernando Torres hasn’t convinced, Alvaro Negredo was invisible against Portugal – but it’s probably more accurate to look at the midfield battle. In basic terms Italy have a 4 v 3 in that zone, and having struggled to cope with Andrea Pirlo when it was a 3 v 3, del Bosque will want the extra midfielder to compete there, and possibly to put direct pressure upon Pirlo.
The right-midfielder will, in all probability, be David Silva. He’s started all five games, but so frequently the introduction of a proper winger, Jesus Navas, has made Spain more dangerous. The previous meeting against Italy was a fine example – OK, it was against a three-man defence, but with Italy’s full-backs likely to lack protection from ahead here, a natural wide player would stretch the play and create gaps for others. Silva will probably start the game but not finish it.
Italy formation and selection
Will Prandelli consider moving back to the 3-5-2? “In all honesty, no, I haven’t considered it,” he says. “We maintained a certain balance over the last few games, although we understood that during the match we can switch to a 3-5-2 if we want to.” That settles that.
Giorgio Chiellini should continue at left-back alongside his Juventus centre-back colleagues, and the real question is on the other side. Ignazio Abate is the natural option, but might not be fit. Christian Maggio is naturally right-sided, but is more of a wing-back than a full-back, so Federico Balzaretti is more likely to continue – he played well there against Germany, though is probably the weakest of the three players going forward from that flank, as he’s played at left-back for the past few years.
Elsewhere the only slight question is at the top of the diamond. Thiago Motta did well against Spain in the first game, but lost his place to Riccardo Montolivo because of injury. There’s no reason he should get it back – Montolivo’s forward-playing destroyer role worked brilliantly against Germany, although this drains his energy, which means Motta has a good chance of replacing him midway through the game.
Mentalities
Spain will do their usual – relentless ball retention, moving it quickly between players, but rarely moving it forward with any speed. They’ll attempt to tire Italy in the first half, before attempting the breakthrough with greater penetration after half-time. It always feels like del Bosque would be happy with a 0-0 at the break (even against much weaker sides), safe in the knowledge Spain will have conserved energy, and have more options from the bench.
Italy’s approach is more uncertain. Prandelli says Italy are “not so arrogant as to say we’ll control the game from start to finish,” and accepts that “Spain will go into the game as favourites.” Italy are likely to take a hybrid approach, not seeking to dominate possession wholly, but trying to minimise Spain’s dominance to frustrate them. When Spain do have long periods on the ball, Italy are likely to break forward quickly through the forwards. “Our tactical approach will be positive and attacking, where the first objective is to close space to get the ball back. Obviously where we try to win back possession will depend on our attitude and Spain’s performance,” Prandelli states.
Key battlezone 1 – the midfield zone
Spain’s usual area of strength is in midfield, but del Bosque will be concerned about being outnumbered in that zone. As a result, expect to see others playing drifting there – all three attackers are likely to drop even deeper than usual to make up the numbers. This means Spain will lack width high up the pitch, and who will provide runs in behind Penetration will be an afterthought.
Prandelli is looking to “create superiority in midfield” and knows that “the other midfielders work in such a way as to allow Pirlo to control the midfield.” This probably means that Prandelli wants Daniele de Rossi, Claudio Marchisio and Riccardo Montolivo to push back Xavi Hernandez, Sergio Busquets and Xabi Alonso, creating space for Pirlo to dictate the game from. Getting him free is the key, and if de Rossi has to drop in and allow Pirlo forward, Italy will use that approach too.
Key battlezone 2 – the advance of the Spanish full-backs, and the space in behind
Del Bosque will need to make the most of the full-backs’ freedom. This is a tricky battle, because the more the full-backs advance, the more Mario Balotelli and Antonio Cassano will drift wide (Pirlo’s diagonals will find them) and drag the centre-backs out of position. Therefore, moving only one full-back at a time would make sense. Jordi Alba could push forward more permanently and attack down the left, leaving Alvaro Arbeloa to effectively form a back three, keeping a spare man.
Against Spain in the first match, and then again against Germany after they went 1-0 up, the Italians forwards took up very wide positions. They’ll probably look to block off a simple pass to the full-backs, but not actually track them – simply making them nervous about moving forward. Then, when Italy win possession, Balotelli and Cassano should be in a position to break quickly into the channels.
A related tactic against Spain was how Italy looked to attack the space to the side of, and in behind, Gerard Pique when Arbeloa was high up the pitch. Both strikers moved more to the left of the pitch than to the right; one would drop deep and try to bring Pique out, then the other would sprint in behind. Their first goal against Germany was vaguely similar – it depended upon the German right-back being dragged up the pitch (Silva must watch Chiellini), then one centre-back being dragged towards Cassano on the left, and Balotelli headed in. Despite the fact the ball won’t spend much time there, that zone in and around Pique could be the most important on the pitch.
Key areas – StatsZone – Background – Betting
Betfair preview recommended bets:
Spain in Corners Match Bet at 1.45





First!!!
I agree that Spain need to be very wary of the long ball when Italy isolate Ramos and Pique. Cassano has tended to drop slightly deeper than Balotelli during games and shift across to the left into the channel between centre back and full back.
Although this was the same zone that Ronaldo was going to exploit by going up against the perceived weakest of the Spanish backline, Arbeloa, and drawing Pique out of position. Arbeloa and Pique made 11 tackles against Portugal in the right back area and only 1 was unsuccessful.
I think both full backs will still push on but the midfield dynamic will shift with Busquets and Alonso alternating to hold a deeper position. Their loss in the centre can be compensated for by Cesc dropping deeper. In many ways, Alonso going further back, although less mobile, would allow Xavi to adopt a more central position to dictate the game. He has been playing too far forward, squeezed between Alonso and Busquets and Fabregas to his, and the team’s, detriment.
The other key issue for Spain is to press the Italian midfield to prevent the long balls or force enough pressure on them to make an accurate long ball harder to play.
Anyway, here is my take on the game:-
http://chalkontheboots.wordpress.com/2012/06/30/on-the-brink/
I agree that the pair on the right side of Spain’s defense is very sound. I feel Arbeloa is underrated because he is a more traditional fullback in a system (inherently based on the Barca Model) that rewards fullbacks with a different skill set than he has. With sound technique, positioning, and one-on-one defense Arbeloa is a functional player, but he lacks the dribbling or delivery that would silence most of his detractors.
Considering Cassano’s movement, I think the balance of Arbeloa’s deeper position on one side of the pitch, and Alba’s more advanced position on the opposite side is actually ideal. If Alonso and Arbeloa both make 5 off-the-ball runs to go around the outside of DeRossi and try thread a ball behind Chiellini and Bonnuci in the time before Silva is inevitably yanked, I think Spain can get away with their possession-obsessed formation. The Spanish right doesn’t necessarily need to get around Chiellini to be effective in that first 60 minute period where Spain try to dictate the rhythm of the game.
To comment on this feature of Spain’s Euro ‘12 performance, I am convinced that fatigue is a primary concern for Vicente Del Bosque’s decision to focus upon controlled possession at the relative expense of chance creation. Xavi’s central position to Spain’s dominance has been endangered by niggling injuries while Spain’s midfield has no player of superior athletic ability (Toure Yaya, Viera, etc.). When planning to go unbeaten for a month, Del Bosque rightly chose a side that would exert the maximum control over matches.
I think Cesc will probably start, but on the other hand, I bet del Bosque will take him off if Spain need a goal (or even if they don’t) and who will play then? My feeling is it will be Torres.
maybe Im an idiot but I think a front six of:
pedro – llorente – jesus navas
iniesta – busquets – xavi
could do some serious damage against this italy side. It’ll never happen though, but doesn’t it seem like that would work well??
too direct
That is a wonderful thought – maybe a good tactical move with 15-20 minutes to go?
1. I completely agree with Xavi-Iniesta-Busquets midfield. After all, Barca has always played well with exactly that trio and they don’t need a second holder to prosper. So Xabi Alonso will have to go as in those moments of brilliance in 2010WC when VDB would drop Xabi Alonso for an attacker.
2. Pedro is ideal for this system. He can run channels and – most importantly – he is very good in pressing and ball winning. Much better than Silva, Fabregas or Torres.
3. And yes, Llorente must play upfront. He always played well for Spain, and unlike Torres he even showed signs of decent understanding of tiki-taka. He’s got patience that both Torres and Negredo lack.
1. Indeed
2. Indeed
3. Indeed
Pedro LLorente Silva would probably make the perfect hybrid between tiki taka and actually making Spain dangerous up front…
I don’t think this 3 mf can compete with 4 mf of Italy Diamond. Unless llorente drop on to Pirlo.
Spain don’t give their opposition the ball, so it will be Italy’s job to cope, not the other way round.
I think the technical brilliance of the Spanish will be the deciding factor, not any tactical battle.
The Italians are good, but are decidedly scruffy on the ball compared to the clinical Spanish.
If you play direct, you need Xabi Alonso. He’s the best long range passer in the Spanish squad.
That formation isn’t about directness. Just because you have a big man up front doesn’t mean you have to play long balls to him. Not when you the most technically gifted players. It’s about stretching the play and clever passing.
Nice article. Like the idea of pushing up the left-back and playing with a kinda/sorta/make-shift back three.
Spain will start with three forwards against Italy, says Del Bosque
http://www.goal.com/en/news/2898/euro-2012/2012/06/30/3211562/spain-will-start-with-three-forwards-against-italy-says-del
This’s some kind of trick? Or he’s telling the truth. lol
I would say that means he’ll have 3 players in attacking roles. It’ll be Iniesta on the left, Silva on the right with Torres/Fabregas central.
He means Iniesta, Cesc/Torres, and Silva/Pedro.
first off, i think Spain will start with Iniesta-Llorente-JESUS. Iniesta cutting in should leave Alba a LOT of space on the left, which Spain will have to deal with, but is worth the risk. Llorente is better to head the ball off crosses from JESUS and Alba, and just as good as Torres at linking play, but is better with headers. Torres wouldnt likely find much space in behind, although if its nil nil in the second half, bringing in Torres to make the side even quicker could be a killer blow, especially if Fabregas comes in.
if italy play this way i think it would be a good idea to start jesus navas on the right to take advantage of chiellini being fake left back/real 3rd centerback don’t you agree?
If Maggio is playing that will be a good idea.
as always i’ve posted before reading so here i didn’t see ZM mentionned it, sorry for that
Starting Llorente will be a kill against Italy. Their stable diamond is based upon that despite they are narrow and can allow the full backs cross the ball, all of their defenders are good in the air and it does not really affects them giving that space. So no Spain does not need widht, nor they need direct players to widden their play. All del Bosque needs to do is to move Alonso forward to pressure Pirlo.
If the positions are correct, i think spain’s strong attacking side is the left with iniesta and alba combining well, so spain will probably attack/’fake’ attack this way, and arbeloa staying in defense to allow the 3v2.
the first thing i notice is, because of the iniesta-alba relation, abata won’t be able to close efficiently on iniesta as this would mean alba using efficiently the wide space, so either barzagli or marchisio will have to pay much attention to iniesta. I’d take barzagli to do the most of the job because of the (liked) possibility of chiellini tucking inside.
And if silva starts over navas, it means spain won’t use well the wide open space let by chiellini’s tucking inside.
So if think coping properly with iniesta is the first key for italy to win.
The second would be the pirlo-cassano relation, can pirlo find cassano quickly enough for a proper counter attack? it will probably happen quite often because it’s an empty space in spain’s formation: either arbeloa stays low to cover the balotelli-cassano duo, or he tries to use the space wide let by chiellini and attacks when alba is already up.
In the first case pirlo can easily find cassano due to the big space and cassano has all the time in the world to start and attack the spanish back 3 using balotelli, in the second case the pass for pirlo may be more difficult but can lead to a deadly 2v2 duel, very dangerous for spain.
Also we could see italy using the space in the back of alba attacking with balotelli going wide and cassano going between ramos and piqué to make arbeloa useless.
This tactic should actually be a must for any team playing with only one wide player per side and/or 2 central strikers.
The key for spain to win will be as usual, keep possession for 60 minutes to decrease the effect of the crazy long season for spanish players, and then make the good substitutions, navas out wide on the right, or pedro, mata finally playing, llorente for and unsuspected impact.
I foresee Vincente Del Bosque seen as a god or a right place at the right time man depending on the influence of his substitutions on the late game.
If it makes spain win the trophy after a quick goal by italy he’ll be a god able to do what joachim low couldn’t for a start, if italy win it late he’ll be considered lucky to be there even if his substitutions were the correct tactical things to do.
(in the second senario only ZM will be here to defend him:p)
Article is comprehensive but fails to account for the impact of one Sergio Busquets on supporting the Spanish defense when other defenders move forward. He cannot be trusted as a permanent central defender but his ability to land clutch tackles, quickly distribute and be in the right place are one of the reasons Spain has been so successful defensively.
I feel that spain fielding both busquets and alonso is usually overkill but against italy’s diamond midfield it will become effective.
I think its vital that Pedro starts instead of Silva or at least comes on at half time. Xavi has become less influential because the wide players (Iniesta & Silva) have been cutting in too much and a runner like Pedro (also proven on the big stage and finals) will give him that outlet. I could see torres playing some part but its questionable if he could be effective against the Juve CB’s.
Spain will not be stupid like Germany/England were and they will make sure that Pirlo is made as uncomfortable as possible. Could see this being Alonso’s job while Busquets sits back to keep it simple.
Cannot call this one, either way the game wins.
Looking forward to a great game. Two sides with excellent credentials who play the game the right way!
Spain a more controlled posession, Italy a more inclined to take risks with the ball.
Suspect the posession stat will be Spain 55-60%, Italy 40-45%; but, the score…no idea.
Do not care who wins because neither deserves to loose!
Just a hope for Spain don’t turn into a parody of yourselves and refuse to take a risk because they do not want to take risks. I think this Italy side is the best team you have met for 4 years and they will punish you. For the first time in years, Spain will have to take risks if they want to win.
PS. Midfeild of the tournament has to be Pirlo, Xavi and Hernandez … doesn’t it!
This match is about fitness level and about who is in better form.In both questions the answer is one-Italy.Despite the fact that in the first match with Spain they were outrunned after the 60th minute now Italy are in better fitness level.Clearly,Italy are playing better and better,altough Spain’s last matches-weren’t that good.
I’d question your idea of Italy being more fit. Spain looked energized in the 2nd half of extra time vs. Portugal; I think they still have plenty in the tank.
Not to mention Spain have an extra day of rest.
I don’t think much of your analysis. First cause you said in game 1 Italy played with 3 mids, they were actually 6, de rossi on D and the FB acting as midfielders and because u said Spain had trouble in midfield. I watched a replay of the match yesterday, and with a cool head, i can tell u Spain controlled that match very well, they won the mid battle. Also is funny that you dont count Iniesta and Silva as mids but you count de rossi, montolivo or whoever is in the forward point of the diamond as a midfielder, as to say they have more numbers, that is misleading an untrue. Also u talk as if Iniesta and co were avarage players, when the truth is that out of the whole italian team the only one who could get a place in spain is Pirlo and maybe buffon. As per using the match 1 as a reference. Anyone wh knows about this knows that Spain is always jitterish on their first matches in big competitions, and to top that they had a defense that have never played together on those positions. We have seen with tourney progression they have become the best D in the competition together with Portugal’s. In other words they is more to the game that just tactics. Skills, shape, creativity and the referee also play a big part. Specially the referee for today, he won’t allow the Italians being so physical as the French guy did(who was terrible by the way). My prediction is half or more of Italy’s D will be on yellows by the end of the first 45
hehhh…..
“Spain’s usual area of strength is in midfield, but del Bosque will be concerned about being outnumbered in that zone.”
I have a minor quibble with that statement. Outnumbered how? Spain don’t play a 4-3-3 as much as a 4-6-0. Especially when Spain don’t have the ball, Silva, and particularly Iniesta and Fabregas certainly play more in midfield than as forwards. When you say ‘drop deeper than usual’ to compete in midfield, they don’t have to drop substantially deeper – it’s not as if their overall positions will have to be enormously different than usual. As I see it, it’s Italy who are at risk of being outnumbered or crowded out in the centre of the park.
Moreover, I would think it’s Italy’s forwards and fullbacks who will be pulled into midfield more often than in the previous few matches to support the 4 midfielders, and help close down Spain. Abate (or whoever plays at RB) will have a massive job, most likely needing to assist Marchisio with Iniesta and Xabi Alonso, as well as watching Alba. I wouldn’t be surprised if a Spanish goal comes from the work of 2-3 of those players.
Also, unlike England and Germany, Pirlo will find it exceptionally difficult to find much room in midfield and, moreover, he will have a lot more asked of him defensively. Factoring in fatigue (he is 33 after all, and has had an incredible tournament and an extraordinary season in Serie A), this will inevitably be his most difficult match of the tournament. For Italy to win, as ZM says, Pirlo’s three cohorts will have to put in a lot of work to ensure the maestro has the room and time to dictate play, and Pirlo himself will have to play exceptionally well.
It should be a fantastic final, and I actually do predict Italy will score first, and really push Spain out of their comfort zone. However, I think Spain will prevail and win 2-1.
if they all drop deep to a real 4-6-0 just to control the midfield though… where will the goals come from? that’s why they are “outnumbered” with their 4-2-3-1/4-3-3 hybrid they play in central midfield. Italy’s players can stay statically central and still have out-balls and constant goal threats. by default they outnumber spain 4-3
as per as the diagram you have shown then it is advantage spain .
now first let me talk about italy’s tactics which is very important . italy played with a 3-5-2 or 5-3-2 against spain in the first match and now have reverted to 4-4–2 if we are to believe that italy are going to play the way you had shown then it is advantage spain because playing in close quarters suits spain better than as they can press easily and most importantly italian midfielders are not that good to play tika-taka style or even in one on one situations except pirlo he created italy’s first goal when he wriggled off a challenge and pass the ball to quadrigela . generally they will try to through the direct route which they had been using all through out the tournament try to find cassano . but cassano was kept silent in the first game and i think he will doubled by the spaniards but still he gets the space and time it will be worth to see as how he can pick balotelli , montolivo or marchisio who are hard worker ( the last two ) but offer little quality in opening the defense and again not great in one one one situations .
for me italians will be better suited with the 3-5-2 combination with maggio in the team as it will stretch the spaniards and pace of with maggio on the right flank can cause problems . italians needs to stretch the spaniards they cannot play in the diamond formation and if that happens montolivo or marchision may get caught up high on the pitch which may expose de rossi and pirlo both of whom are good defenders and good readers of the game but can be played around and most importantly the spaniards will move the ball from one flank to the other which will stretch the italians and can cause problems . if they are to play 4-4-2 then they need to borrow idea’s from croatia game who took them to the stretch . i may replace motta instead of marchisio as he brings solidity to the midfield and he does not loose the ball as marchisio offers very little going forward .
the italians will have to work had and try to capitalize on the spaniars mistake which they do in the game ( they are prone to it ) .
rain is caming power may go out i will write the spaniards tactics later .
thanks for obliging and posting the review early .
spanish are many things but prone to mistakes ain’t one of them
Another key battle will be which side can dupe the ref into awarding free kicks by thrashing around like angry moray eels.
And on form is Italy, who suckered the ref v Germany constantly. Every time the Germans bumped into an Italian, he went flying like he’d been hit by the US Marines’ artillery divisions.
Don’t want to get that hair out of place, eh ladies?
So nice of you to resurrect the same old tired clichés about Italians when extremely few other people have seen anything like the behavior in Prandelli’s team that you’re attributing to them.
In fact, it was the absurd flop of an English player that resulted in Maggio being wrongly disqualified for the Germany game.
But, hey, enjoy tonight’s game as much as you can while wearing your anti-Latin glasses.
anti latin glasses, lol
You’re consistently one of the worst contributors to the comments, imo.
Are Italy in fact playing a classical Argentinian 4-1-2-1-2 with Pirlo playing the #5 and Montilivo playing the #10?
Well technically yes but them being Pirlo and Montolivo it’s hardly “classical”. Almost the opposite is true; Montolivo as the destroyer and Pirlo the creator.
Balotelli will be the key. He was not sharp enough in the games against Spain and Croatia. Against Spain he dwelled when he was clean through. He kept getting into scoring positions against England and in spite of not scoring he never stopped. He was the difference against Germany. I can see Spain struggling to contain him today.
I think Spain will start with the 4-6-0 (with Cesc) but will end with up throwing on a winger and a no9.
having a good game is no guarantee on good performance on the next match, specially when balo is involved. look at ronaldo he had 2 good games and couldn’t muster a single shot on target against spain. also the spanish D is not the german D
Barca only play with one holder because they have to win in 90 minutes. As Sid Lowe points out, draws are the new defeats in La Liga. But Spain, if they don’t concede — which is helped by their two holding midfielders — have 120 minutes to beat their opponents. That’s a big difference, because it gives them so much more time to wear their opponents out. Playing the Barca system would lead to Spain conceding more goals in the 90 minutes and probably winning the tie less often.
That’s very insightful. Many seem very keen to drop one of the two DMs (i.e. Alonso) and use the Barca 3, without much thought.
With the 2 DMs, Spain is shutting down the opposition, and challenging them to try and stop Spain from scoring for 120 minutes. Few teams succeed in doing that. And those that do would still have to beat Iker in a shootout.
Good point! And I believe Barca relinquishing their 2-0 lead against Chelsea has probably been a decisive experience for the Spanish and VDB. That’s something Spain in their current state won’t let happen.
Is it just me, or does Pedro-Llorente-Navas up front seem an obvious combination for 2-3 goals a game almost automatically. Stretching the field with a target in the box. Really, is it just me? How have we never seen this at all?
in this tournament spain hadnt been pressing that aggressively because of the kind of players that are being used by them out of the front three cesc and silva and even arbeloa are not that mobile and are not naturally aggressive to close down . since these three dontclose down the players naturally other cannot do that aggressively since it will create cracks and will cause problems so they are just at time intent to let opposition have the ball and close them when they come in midfield zone . your analysis for the spain on the offensive part is correct and i cannot add anything new since they are boring the viewers and oppositions . they are just testing oppositions patience and concentration . i hope that like in the german game italy scores first then we will have a good game and hope that cassano and balotelli link up well just as they did in the german game .
now spain defensive tactics cassano like to drop on the left flank which either brings his marking centreback wide or he is given time on the ball which is dangerous . but then england dealt it well by denying space to other players around the box whom he can pick up so even though he had the ball he couldnt harm them because the other ones were checked and he was reduced to shooting the ball from from distance . that is one way to contain him. or else just as spain dealt with ronaldo when arbeloa moved forward and ronaldo got the space to operate he was closed by busquestus and alonso so that is one option . i think spain will go with option no. 2 . in the first match balotelli used to drop on the left in the space left by alba but was dealt successfully by ramos .
spains midfield will definitely dominate they are the best tika taka players and are very good in one on one situations and never loose the ball and if they are ever going to then they go down like a pack of card causing ref to blow the whistle and give them the foul.
just as much had been said about that xavi should be dropped i dont know from where this talk comes from if there is a person that needs to be dropped then it is alonso since he is not suited to style of play that spain play . he more of a player in english mould who like open game . play long balls in behind defense or to find wingers by his pin point crosses
. he is not the one who goes on aggressively closing people and play tika taka style .
Nice preview rahul. r u from mumbai?
no amravati . if you know .
I think mentalities will be the key factor. Spain are the greatest team of our generation for sure, but look flat and tired. When Portugal played with enthusiasm and pressed Spain looked uncomfortable. If Italy throw caution to the wind, and go out and ‘play’ I think they can take this match. If they do, I think we may see 3 or more goals scored in the game too
90 Minutes Up : Tactical Preview
http://90minutesup.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/euro-2012-final-spain-vs-italy-tactical.html
Wanted to see Torres ideally…
Hoping for Italy in 90 minutes to cause a bit of an upset.
ZM, do you see Italy’s success in this tournament bringing the 2-striker formation back to the mainstream?
The narrow midfield diamond combined with the two strikers bringing width all on their own by overloading on one side of the defense, seems as interesting a solution as any to the issue of choosing between having width in attack and giving up the midfield battle.
Why not drop Busquets and leave Alonso as the sole holding mid with Xavi and Fabregas completing the midfield triangle? Put Torres up front, Iniesta on the left and Navas (or Pedro) on the right. Perfect combination of pace in your front three with a constant threat of balls played in behind through all three creative midfielders. How is this not even being considered, I don’t get it?
Dropping Busquets would be a terrible idea as he is so important to the Spanish midfield as well as supporting the defense given how high they press. If anyone should drop from the midfield to accommodate Cesc, it should either be Alonso or Xavi (and then push Alonso up). I also don’t feel that Torres has done enough to warrant starting in this match. In fact, I think it would be a mistake. He’s only looked good against Ireland, arguably the weakest team in the tournament. Pedro has the energy, the speed, and most important, the confidence to play that center role if called on to do so. A front three of Iniesta–Pedro–Navas would be killer.
But doesn’t Alonso possess the same skills, as well as the addition of being a great deep-lying playmaker, as Busquets to back up the defense when the rest of the team pushes high on the pitch in attack?
Also, I don’t understand how so many people are saying Torres hasn’t done enough to be considered. He scored two goals, yes against the worst team in the tournament, but they were stellar goals (especially the first) that showed what he can do at his best.
At this point in Euro 2008, he had only scored one goal against Sweden, who didn’t make it out of their group, and he had even started every game besides one group game, leaving him at a much poorer goals:game ratio that he is at right now. Yet he started the final and scored the only goal of the game.
Busquets is the more defensive of the two, as he has supported the Spanish defense more than any other midfielder. His ability to read the game and put himself in an ideal position to make an impact, hold the ball up, and distribute it quickly to a player moving forward should not be underestimated. Certainly Busquets has the least glamorous role on Spain, but it’s also a crucial one, and not something I see Alonso as capable of at the same level. Alonso is at his best when he goes forward, something that Busquets allows him to do, and that he would not be able to do in Busquets role especially as the sole holding midfield player. Given Xavi’s age and how he has played in the tournament, to me it makes more sense to drop Xavi and move Alonso farther up to play alongside either Cesc or Iniesta, if Iniesta is still playing forward.
As for Torres, I’m just going by what I’ve seen from both players in this tournament. Pedro has played better when he’s come on. Pedro also plays with more energy and his speed would pressure the Italian CBs.
This is the Euro final. Having faith in Torres just seems silly to me. The man is not going to ever recover his sparkling ability from 3 years ago.
I don’t think Pedro has the pace of Torres, nor the finishing ability. If it was Torres put through by Cesc against Portugal I think he would have scored. I do like Pedro though, and would rather see him come on than Navas.
Interesting… Thanks for enlightening me! I don’t get to see Spanish football very often so I was dumbstruck as to why Del Bosque wouldn’t even experiment with subbing Busquets for Fabregas.
I’m still totally in favor of starting Torres up top for this game though. I don’t understand why people completely ignore his two great goals against Ireland and his regaining of form towards the end of last season with Chelsea.
If you watched the Confederations Cup in ‘09, it was pretty clear Alonso couldn’t play the holding role alone. Playing both him and Busquets is imperative for Spain because otherwise they’d be overrun in midfield.
Great article, as usual.
Not related, but… will Zonal Marking comment the Libertadores finale?
Thanks!
If Abate is fit, I would have start Balzaretti, Chiellini, Barzagli, Abate on the back for from left to right. Balzaretti has been playing well, especially when he play as left back. Chiellini’s best position is central defender. Bonucci has been playing sollid football but no reason why he cannot be drop from the starting eleven.
Off topic, sorry, but does anyone know a good english website/blog for Argentinian Soccer (i.e. Sambafoot for Brazil)? Thanks!
Where has Mata been this whole tournament?
Italy have looked stronger as they progressed through the tournament. They carry a greater goal threat than Spain. The Spaniards looked a tired team against Croatia and struggled past Portugal. Substitutions as always, will play a major part. Spain need Pedro’s energy during the second half, if they are to have a chance.
Italy just have the edge for me.
O yea..don’t you look like an idiot now.
Be kind, Spain took risks with the ball that they haven’t before which is why the share of the ball was 50/50.
Wish they had done that all tournement!
Great champions are not afraid to loose and last night Spain player like great champions
Just wish they’d play like that all the time because a side like them has no right achiving 70% posession and regulalry squeezing through 1-0
Spain’s share of the ball was fifty-fifty because Balotelli, Montolivo and De Rossi managed to close off some of their usual passing lanes. That twenty minute spell in the first half where Italy controlled the game saw Iniesta and Silva dropping back deeper because they couldn’t get the ball out to them.
Interesting point
But also thought Spain took more risks than ususal with their delivery into the Italian box.
Didn’t pay a lot of attention to Busquet’s movement but wonder if he dropped deap to creat a passing tringle to get out of the press at the back. That might explain why Alba had the freedom to push on for the second goal.
I agree with you Locost that main reason behind 50/50 possession was Spain playing more vertically, more direct, and that resulted in less precision, higher risk of not completing a pass, but also more dangerous, more swift attacks. There was a serious will of scoring. I would argue however if there’s a need for playing that way in other matches
.
Another, less important reason was that for some parts of the first half, Italy managed to retain the ball well, thus forcing Spain, unable to win the ball back, to retreat and wait for an Italian move.
In both semi and final Alba had a lot of freedom going forward, and also sometimes he was taking a risk. His teammates spotted early on that they could make some use of his speed.
Kudos for Spain. Becoming the first nation to defend the Euro Cup. Italy never looked like a competitive side and they were all over the place. Or perhaps Spain were too good for them to handle.
I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.
Corset could be underwear incorporating bendable,
flexible, large, or perhaps cosmetic components for example Lycra,
nylon (nylon tricot), polyester, silk, wide lace, man
made fiber and sheer fabric or just be sensible, 100 % cotton or even synthetic underwear.
Your bra and panty set promote within the transform for 21st century seemed to be operated by introduction associated with present day systems in addition to cloth which help out
with coming up with modern solutions for instance laser-cut seamless bras as well as molded T-shirt bras.
Graphic designers tend to be putting larger focus on rich-looking fabrics, laces,
embroideries along with smarter, far more adventurous shades.