Germany v Italy preview

Potential starting line-ups
Euro 2012 has been a fine tournament, but we’re still waiting for a truly classic match. Could this be it?
There is a good chance. In each of the quarter-finals there was one side looking only to defend, and last night’s semi-final was contested between two cautious sides. But both Germany and Italy want to play good football.
“We cannot sit deep, Germany will press us high up the pitch, and we are ready for this,” says Cesare Prandelli. “We will not change what has brought us here, it would be a shame to waste the work of two years.”
“We have to think of a way to play better than Italy in midfield and dictate the tempo of the match,” Jogi Low stated. “We will not let Italy show us how to play football. It’s a confidence thing. We have to be cheeky, we have to be strong and brave.”
If the coaches are true to their word – and there’s no reason to suggest otherwise – this should be tremendously entertaining match.
Selection
Having made three surprise attacking changes to his side for the 4-2 win over Greece, Low has three huge decisions to make in his front four. Mesut Ozil will start as the playmaker, but the other three places are tough to call. On the basis of the Greece game, Andre Schurrle didn’t do enough to keep his place (he gave the ball away cheaply, and conceded possession for the Greek equaliser) but Marco Reus did, with better all-round play and a thumping goal.
While Low will be aware of the differences in style between the two players he’s choosing between on either flank, those differences probably aren’t big enough to pick upon tactical suitability rather than form. Therefore, a combination of Lukas Podolski and Reus seems appropriate for the flanks, based primarily on performances in the tournament so far.
Prandelli’s formation is not certain. Having moved away from the 3-5-2 to a 4-4-2 diamond, there’s every chance he could return to that system, especially with the return of Giorgio Chiellini. However, reports from the Italian media – which have been accurate until now (too accurate for Prandelli’s liking) suggest it’ll be the diamond.
Assuming Daniele de Rossi and Ignazio Abate are fit to start, Prandelli will probably make only one change – Chiellini will replace Federico Balzaretti at left-back. That means Riccardo Montolivo will keep his place rather than Thiago Motta, and Antonio Cassano will start over Alessandro Diamanti.
Germany approach
Germany are clearly a possession-based side. They average the second-highest possession in the tournament (joint with Russia, just behind Spain) and also boast the highest pass completion rate. They’re an excellent passing side, and Low is clear that he doesn’t want Italy to dominate the game.
However, it might be wise for Germany to sit slightly deeper than usual. If they press relentlessly in midfield, they risk becoming overrun in the centre of the pitch, because Italy have extra players in there, and have the passing skills to work the ball past Germany’s players. For all Low’s talk of not letting Italy dictate the tempo of the match, the simple midfield numbers game might make this unavoidable at points.
Germany might look to contain Italy before breaking quickly. Andrea Pirlo is brilliant in possession, but is not a particularly fine player defensively. Much of the tackling and mobility you’d expect from a holding midfielder is effectively outsourced to the players ahead of him in the diamond, but Germany might be able to win the ball in their own half, then break quickly down the flanks.
An interesting feature of Germany’s play against Greece was how they stood off when the opposition centre-backs had the ball, then sprung into life and pressed when the full-backs got possession. That modified press makes sense here, pushing back the Italian full-backs, making Italy narrow.
Germany may be good in possession – but they’re also the competition’s best side at transitions, and that ability might be more useful against an Italian side that hasn’t been sufficiently been tested in that respect, aside from brief moments against Ireland, when they looked vulnerable to quick wingers.
Italy approach
Prandelli will encourage his full-backs to get forward, but this will be significantly more difficult against a German side that is tremendously energetic down the flanks, compared to the extremely reactive Irish and English sides the midfield diamond has previously encountered. Italy could struggle for width.
They’ll try to compensate for that by bringing both Mario Balotelli and Antonio Cassano into the channels, which will make Germany reluctant to bring both full-backs forward at once. Pirlo will look for long diagonal balls into the path of the two strikers, and if Germany push up and play a high defensive line, Pirlo will hit straight passes over the top of the defence for Balotelli, a repeated tactic against England.
But the real question is how Prandelli will take advantage of the numerical advantage in midfield. Again, this is a completely different test to against Ireland and England, who both sat back and didn’t look to put pressure on. If Germany don’t bring Ozil into the midfield zone (and generally, they don’t), Italy could dominate the centre of the pitch. Ball retention will be the priority, rather than working the ball forward quickly through the German lines. After all, Italy have been impressive with their ball-playing skills, but have only scored one goal from open play in 390 minutes.
Key battlezone
With different formations, there will be interesting situations all over the pitch. But the battle between Andrea Pirlo and Mesut Ozil will be particularly fascinating. Pirlo wasn’t dealt with sufficiently by England and was allowed to dictate the flow of the game, but doesn’t expect the same here. “I expect Ozil to be a great threat in and around the areas where I am playing, whereas Rooney stayed further up,” he says.
Low says that Pirlo is “the one who directs the game, so we have to stop him and get in his radius.” Ozil is the natural man to stop him, but Ozil isn’t at his best when used defensively, while the flexibility of the Italian diamond means that if Ozil picks up Pirlo, Italy can rotate and drop De Rossi or Claudio Marchisio deeper, allowing Pirlo freedom higher up.
Besides, Ozil is better at playing ahead of the midfield, preventing an easy pass from the centre-backs into the opposition holder. He’ll probably track Pirlo casually, but spend more time drifting laterally into space to initiate counter-attacks. In a strict tactical sense, Pirlo and Ozil should be tracking each other. If they fail to, and concentrate on creating, two of the competition’s most talented players will get freedom, and we could be in for a brilliantly open game.
Betfair preview recommended bets:
Pirlo to be shown a card at 5.4
Germany in Corners Match Bet at 7.0





If you don’t want to use the umlaut (ö) you can spell his name Loew.
lughhvvvvvvvvvv
same with Özil
brilliant preview
As always! Thank you
Pretty sure you mean Pirlo is brilliant in possession.
Yep..noted that as well. Was shocked, coz he is a boss. Forza Azzuri!! Good preview
Wall Street Journal says you’re a fraud!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304782404577490652688623764.html
Who better to listen to than football genius Alexi Lalas?
And we (americans) wonder why the other footballing nations don’t take us seriously…..
Americans… [`]
not smart to dismiss this article just because it is an American paper.
I will dismiss it though, because it does not present proper counter arguments which would then be rebutted.
appalling article. because a team’s movement cannot be represented by the notation 4-2-3-1 for example, it seems to conclude that ’soccer’ is just chaos. which is plain stupidity. players move within a system, and how they do so has a huge bearing on the outcome of matches
Not smart not to understand nobody here dismissed it that way. The other way around. Article is ridiculous and when you see where it was written, everything seems to match – Americans [`].
This is truly an awful article. Presents an idea with pretty much no evidence to back it up because there isn’t any
A huge LOL.
Just examples from Jose Mourinho’s Real Madrid, one of the prime examples of 4-2-3-1 this season, will be enough to defeat this bogus-article.
Look at the beauty of these tactical lineups, obtained from the centroid of the heatmaps.. Perfect 4-2-3-1s
http://www.uefa.com/newsfiles/ucl/2012/2007592_tl.pdf
http://www.uefa.com/newsfiles/ucl/2012/2007672_tl.pdf
http://www.uefa.com/newsfiles/ucl/2012/2007678_tl.pdf
Even better, 4-2-3-1 vs 4-2-3-1:
http://www.uefa.com/newsfiles/ucl/2012/2007691_tl.pdf
Actually this site talk about the moves and movement the player made in a game. The site is not about the line-ups and more about where and how they played.
Ridiculous article, the authors seems to have completely misunderstood the role of tactics in a football game. Tactics is the overall organization of a game, there will never be a time when tactics are unimportant. The fear is that we might one day find an ultimate tactic and so render football tactics uninteresting, but we’re not even close to that yet.
The most ridiculous part is the third to last stanza, where the authors manage to ignore that the current world/european champions Spain are small, tidy players looking to pass their way through defenses rather than relying on brute force. It’s pretty obvious that the people who wrote this article hasn’t watched football or put any great effort into learning the game properly.
“…Mario Gomez, who combine[s] lightning speed with punishing size”
Mario Gomez? Lightning speed?
Well, I hope Alexi Lalas never goes into coaching…for the sake of any team that might be stupid enough to hire him.
Once more, someone brings up this article. I have already given my two cents so only one thing to add:
Go back to your cave, troll!
I think it should say “Andrea Pirlo is brilliant in possession”.
Please correct.
I think Shurrle would be a better option as he did what he was instructed, ‘be direct’ though he lost the ball, a lot. Its understandable considering he has a handfull of starts in the NT and I think Low picks him
I’m so looking forward to this game. I see Müller ahead of Podolski to start this game, but it may be tactically more clever to put Reus on Chiellini to get him in 1 on 1 situations, and I dont know how Müller would play out on the left side. Maybe Löw just goes back to his midfield formation, that started the competition to get more discipline defensively. Klose will be a certain starter, since he likes to drift around the pitch and drop deep, which could prevent Germany from being outnumbered in the midfield zone.
Germany in Corners Match Bet at 7.0?!? Don’t know when that could’ve been. Just checked and it’s down at 1.68. ZM hasn’t become so influential that it’s effectively shortening odds!?!
One way Germany could look to stretch the Italian diamond would be to send Lahm forward a bunch and try to create a 2v1 against Abate. This would force Marchisio out to the flank more, making it an even 3v3 in the midfield. In addition, since Boateng is a more natural centerback, have him stay home and create a 3-back defense against Balotelli and Cassano.
This would leave more space on the flanks for Balotelli and Cassano to receive passes from Pirlo and expose the German CB’s, but like you alluded to…. it all comes back to stopping the flow of these balls from Pirlo. Whether Italy go direct or build-up, it’s all through Pirlo.
Remember that Mourinho had Ozil mark Pirlo, when Madrid played Milan in the 2010/11 CL group-stage. Both were rather quiet that time, but Madrid dominated the flanks with fullback and winger combining on either side.
Boateng though is not as attackminded as Ramos was that time. And maybe Prandelli will order DeRossi to pay special attention to Philipp Lahm.
That would reduce the contest to Schweinsteiger and Khedira against Montolivo and Marchisio, where I would give the Germans a definite edge.
Also we have not seen the full passing abilities of Badstuber and Hummels in this tournament; maybe they can show them off here, assuming they are not closed down by Cassano and Balotelli.
As Fred already pointed out, did you mean “Pirlo IS brilliant in possession”, in “Germany approach” paragraph?
Anyway, I can’t really see Ozil and Pirlo cancelling each other, so I hope this will be an open and entertaining match.
Also, I think Chiellini is a good defensive option and he’ll help coping with Reus and Ozil, but don’t you think Balzaretti could have been a bigger threat on the left side, if he got to push forward and face J.Boateng?
Thanks for the analysis btw, here in Italy every journalist seems to be too busy recalling Ger-Ita sweet history to talk about tonight’s game.
This has all the makings of a classic tactical battle. 4-4-2 diamond against 4-2-3-1 has plenty of intricacies to keep us occupied. Attacking-wise for Germany if they can get their transitions right and on getting the ball out to the flanks to create 2v1 situations, before either left or right midfielder in Italy’s diamond can come across to cover, then they may get some success there. That zone in front of Germany’s back four will be pivotal to Italy’s success. Both German centre backs will be occupied by Cassano & Balotelli at different times and if Cassano decides to drop deeper then it’’s be a 2v2 situation with him and Montolivo up against Khedira and Schweinsteiger. Albeit that we leave one of the German centre backs as a spare man.
After what happened with England and Rooney if Ozil doesn’t track Pirlo it will be criminal. To be honest, can’t see the German’s giving Pirlo all that freedom.
Why Klose ahead of Gomez?
Klose is simply the better all-around player.
To be mean to Gomez, I would steal a quote from American Football coach Rex Ryan. “All he does is score goals.”
It is all fine and well if he does score goals, but when he does not, his value for the team borders near zero. He gives some good cover on defense once in a while but other than that; his movement outside the box is average at best, his link up with teammates is oftentimes non-existent, he is poor with his back to goal; all things Klose is much better at and Klose scores goals at a similar rate even though his finishing is not as good as Gomez’ (the one area where Gomez really shines).
Gomez also does generally better against average or below-average opposition (Bayern is without titles since he became their starting centre-forward).
Germany have won 18 straight matches with Mueller in the side, and Podolski has been a joke this tournament (goal aside). Reus and Mueller ought to start together, although Loew may surprise us.
Podolski a joke? Please give me a break. He’s been much more effectual than Muller or Schurrle.
How has he been more effective than Muller exactly?
Well, the match pretty much showed why.
even though italians have 4 players in the midfield i think that the germans will stretch them over the pitch . the will definitely use the flanks to move the ball and i think in the first 15 min we will see pressing and try to asses as to how fast can italy move the ball or do they just pass it back or what do they try do with it . if the italians are able to move the ball fast which i suspect even though montolivo and marchisio are there to help pirlo and de rossi i think they were not so impressive for me . another point is how whether the german centre backs follow cassano when he come deep or wide or will they keep shape and let him have the ball . germasn playing high line will favour the italians but hummels plays there where cassano like to drop and he is good in one on one defense . it remains to be seen as to how cassano and balotelli try to combine because i hadnt seen them combine secondly even though cassano may have the ball i am not so sure the italian midfield will able to help him much or can create from that situation .
i think motta will start in place of montolivo to give that solidity to the midfield and most importantly i think that gomez or klose will track pirlo but de rossi does pose some threat as he is equally good but remains to be seen whether he picks up on ozil .
for me the germans will dictate as they are the superior side who come close to matching the spaniards in terms of quality and strength and i dont think that the italians will dominate the midfield germans movement on the flank will disrupt italians shape and they will definitely be susceptible on the german pressing .
I agree it should be a great match. The key duel will be Ozil vs Pirlo, as I dont think either will mark eachover very strictly, meaning a lot of space for both creative players. I would think Reus would start over Podolski as well, as Muller has played better on the right than Podolski on the left.
I think Germany will win this, they will look to push their fullbacks on like England did at the start of their game. This will overload the Italian fullbacks and give Germany the chance to dominate play. Balotelli could be a threat in behind, but Germany have generally played a high line very well and Balotelli’s finishing had been erratic, so I don’t think Germany have too much to fear there. Montolivio will have a quiet game and De Rossi and Marchisio will have their hands full with Khedira and Schweinsteiger.
Italy should therefore keep those midfield two at bay, and disrupt their passing. But Germany have ball players at the back in their CB’s so should get the ball forward fine. Plus Ozil will be free, Lahm will rampaging forward and Klose will be dragging the CB’s put of space.
I can’t see anything past a Germany win here, Germany will leave Pirlo free but overwhelm the rest of the Italian team meaning he won’t have much of an effect without options.
Have a read of my new article on the British government and their first two years in power: http://economicinterest.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/britain-the-coalitions-first-two-years/
You can’t leave Gomez out. Alongside Falcao he’s the best natural CF. If and it’s a big if, Germany do manage to get an edge over the Italians midfield, he needs to be the one ready to pounce.
I think Gomez (if he starts) will be the difference maker tonight. Much talk about Pirlo but Pirlo does what he did against England in every game he plays in- check Juventus last season as an example.
The vulnerability of italy to quick wingers that ZM points out was also evident against England when on the very few occasions that Walcott got the ball the defenders stood off, seeming to fear his pace. Looking forward to this match!
I don’t think they will, but if Germany are that concerned about giving Pirlo space they could deploy Kroos as a “number 10″ and move Ozil out wide (as Mourninho has done in the past at Madrid). Giving them a bit more defensive cover in the center of the pitch. Don’t think it will happen (Kroos has seen very little of the field for one thing) but it could be another “plan” for Loew to utilize, perhaps to kill the game off.
i see this as a plan against Spain, with Ozil placed on Arbeloa’s side.
Hate to say this but Ozil is not effective against physical defenders like arbeloa.Logical choice would be to play ozil against alba only if low decides play him in the first place
That is exactly what ive been expeting the hole tournament. Toni has done a great job combining with ozil and gotze in Q.
——-KLOSE——-
OZIL———MULLER/REUS
——-KROOS——–
——-KLOSE——–
REUS————OZIL
——-KROOS——–
Was just going to say we could see Kroos in, Ozil out wide. See its breaking on twitter that this may be so.
Kroos can neutralise Pirlo better, leaving Ozil free, but Lahm will need to provide the width. Boateng to be quite conservative.
is so, Podolski instead of Reus (so ozil on the right). I shouldn’t have put the qualifier on my first post, I’d look awfully clever right now…
If domination in midfield is the key,then italy for sure have extra players here.So as pointed out by ZM in this article http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/06/27/germany-4-1-england-tactics/ and rightly so,then why isnt the same advantange decisive here?.Most certainly atleast one of Montolivo,Marchisio and De Rossi would be free and if Cassano can take 1 of the centre backs out of position,then a huge space could open up for Balotelli and/or a runner from midfield into that space created.So isnt it poor tactics from Low?.Shouldnt he change his tactics marginally to combat the opposition’s tactics or am i missing something here.Please let me know.I want to learn
Thank you
Mueller surely deserves to start. He played well in the group stages and Germany looked better when he came on for Schurrle against Greece, with Reus moving to the left. I think we’ll see Reus-Oezil-Mueller, with Klose up front. Podolski has been fairly disappointing so far and doesn’t offer as much movement or defensive awareness as Mueller.
I think the Italian numerical advantage will be countered by Germany making sure Oezil drops slightly deeper, preventing simple passes to the holder (without asking him to man-mark Pirlo) and by having Mueller tuck in a bit more to help out in midfield. Reus can stay wider on the other side. Germany won’t be overwhelmed.
Actually I hope that play with 5 players in the midfield and Balotelli as the lone striker. They could overwhelm German in the middle.
I’ll be Gomez upfront, Kroos on the right side and Podolski out left. Three changes again, hope Löw trusts the right players again.
i am quite sure that kroos will play center and ozil on the right wing.
That formation by Italy inspired ZERO confidence.
Look at the right wing. Podolski and Lahm against ABATE?
That’s just asking for trouble. Chiellini might also struggle against Reus and Boateng but at least Boateng isn’t as big of a threat as Lahm.
This might be a long night for Italy.
abate is not in the starting line-up
He is according to the ZM article, which is what I am addressing, since this is ZM’s article’s thread.
And no matter who starts in that spot, it will be a nightmare playing against Lahm and Podolski with no winger ahead of you to push back Lahm.
hahaha it was Balzaretti and he completely bested Lahm. I guess it goes to show ignorant you sound, when you don’t even know a players quality (and even his name).
PS: And if Marchisio comes wide to help Abate against Lahm, that will leave a huge hole for Schweini to run into, almost all the way into the box, which is equally dangerous.
The German line-up is: Neuer, Hummels, Badstuber, Lahm, Boateng, Khedira, Schweinsteiger, Özil, Kroos, Podolski, Gomez.
ZM,
Thanks for posting this preview early
I’m shocked that zonal marking isn’t your only priority in life
I think after the Euros are over you should do an article about the future of football. It seems that teams are becoming increasingly better defensively in terms of zonal marking and denying space. Can possession-based football be forcing opposition to evolve into essentially forming an iron wall in the penalty area instead of doing what it intended originally, beautiful tiki-taka goals?
Spain, regardless of whether or not they are champions this year, have already proven how successful their strategy has been and continues to be (at least defensively). Portugal demonstrated how to deal with Spain’s attack but also offered very little attack of their own. The resulting stalemate was, on one hand, tactically fascinating, and on the other hand, goalless (and as some say boring). Can we expect more of these stalemates in the future? Will this lead to more and more ‘boring’ football or another step in evolution with players like Messi being harvested and nurtured? Besides him, there are very few players that can single-handedly dribbled through the iron wall and nick a goal. Just curious…
The offside law means that there will always be a reasonably strict formation at the back. The fact that so few players are truly two-footed means that there always be some preferred dispositions further forward. In fact, why bother arguing? It’s decades since I played football and still it’s obvious to me that it’s a silly article.
Oops, misplaced. That’s a reference to the article linked above i.e.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304782404577490652688623764.html
Well, that was a truly shithouse performance by the referee.
Pirlo should have been dismissed for his handball on the line. That was deliberate – and very well done – and denied an obvious scoring opportunity.
Every time an Italian had his hairstyle bumped out of place there was a stoppage in their favour. Italy fouled continuously and the ref did not bring them under control.
Shut up,Italy played better,Germans were poor with Ozil and Kros playing in one position.
I agree. The Germans were poor and deserved to lose.
That was a colossal error by the referee, whether it suits you or not.
And truth hurts – Italian players are the only footballers capable of taking on the Spaniards at Synchronised Diving.
Funny, I hadn’t even though of the referee until seeing this comment. He was a non-factor.
Pretty much this.
The ref? Haha go whine somehwere else. Italy were superior and they deserved to win, actually 2-1 was a misleading result, 3-0 would have been a better indicator of how the match went.
I didn’t even notice the referee like a previous poster but I went back and watched the replay of Pirlo on the goal line. Actually I watched it several times to make sure.
And yeah, that was totally a hand ball! It would’ve completely changed the game.
I urge everyone to go watch that play again.
Don’t be pathetic and a lousy loser.the ref was absolutely ok.there was no decisive ant-german decision at all. Keep in mind how your German ref Stark massacred the Croats by not granting TWO clear penalties. By doing this he kicked out Croatia against Spain and helped Italy to advance to the QF. Now these Italians kicked out Germany. So if you want to blame a ref for Germany’s good bye at the Euro 2012, then blame your fellow German country man Wolfgang Stark
Congratulations! You are the winner of ‘The Stupidest, Most Non-Sensical Drivel Spouted By A Moron Who Knows Nothing About Football’ Award
joe90, shut the fvck up, you Kraut
Sorry Revenge. We got the decision wrong. Hummm wins!
utterly nonsensical fanboy whining: come back and reread this in 48 hrs and (one hopes) you’ll be embarrassed by your own dishonesty and immaturity….
I am sure that ze Germans will beat the Spaghettis
Hey! I merely wish to give an enormous thumbs up for the very good information you’re got here on this post. I will likely be coming back to your weblog for much more soon.