Euro 2012 preview: Croatia

Croatia's probable starting line-up. Rakitic could replace Perisic. Pranjic or Strinic could play at left-back, with Corluka moving into the centre.
Of the 16 teams in this competition, Croatia are one of the hardest to define. They seem trapped between a few different ways of playing, and don’t have a specific footballing identity
They are clearly not as good as the excellent side of 2008, despite retaining a few of the key players, and a hint of the same formation and style. The loss of Niko Kovac, the excellent holding midfielder, has never really been compensated for, and while their current defensive midfielder Tomislav Dujmovic is hard-working, he lacks the positional intelligence of Kovac.
When that is combined with a centre-back duo that badly lacks pace, Croatia are forced into a much more conservative style than four years ago. Slaven Bilic’s reputation has fallen sharply in that time, but he still has a chance to go out on a high before joining Lokomotiv.
Formation
At their best, Croatia played an attack-minded 4-1-3-2. There’s still the vague hangover from that formation, but it’s more of a boxy 4-4-2 for longer periods. Luka Modric, Croatia’s star man, was effectively a number ten in 2008 but after a few years playing as a deep-lying playmaker for Tottenham, now operates broadly in his club position as part of a midfield duo, and spends a lot of time drifting around trying to pick up the ball close to the centre circle.
Modric is exhausted after a long season at Spurs (where compatriot Vedran Corluka suggested a lack of squad rotation was the reason for Spurs’ sharp decline in the final months). He’s been put on a special training programme in order for him to regain full fitness, but is unlikely to be 100% fit.
Midfield variety
That’s a big blow, because much of the creative burden falls upon him. Elsewhere in midfield, the left-sided midfield position now seems likely to go to Dortmund’s Ivan Perisic, an attack-minded winger, although it’s also possible that Ivan Rakitic could play there. The problem when Rakitic and Modric play together, however, is that they tend to operate in roughly the same zone and make Croatia too narrow on the left.
On the opposite side is Darijo Srna, formerly a rampaging right-back but now pushed forward into midfield. He plays an interesting role – rather than bombing forward down the flank, he is less explosive with his movement, and comes deep to collect the ball. His defensive awareness helps Dujmovic in front of the back four as he moves narrow without the ball, and this balance allows Croatia to be more attack-minded on the left.
Slow, narrow defence
What of the defence these players are protecting? Dejan Lovren might not have been selected for the first XI, but his injury was a blow. The first-choice duo is likely to be Josip Simunic, who at 34 is very slow on the turn, and Gordon Schildenfeld, who isn’t much quicker. They’re protected by both the midfield and by the full-backs, who play very narrow.
Domagoj Vida is basically a centre-back shoved out wide and offers little on the ball, and on the other flank Vedran Corluka offers roughly the same thing, though both Ivan Strinic and Danijel Pranjic could play there and offer much more going forward, with Corluka moving into the centre and offering slightly more mobility. Stipe Pletikosa is a good goalkeeper and a firm first-choice.
Decent forwards
At the other end of the pitch, Croatia are weakened by the absence of Ivica Olic through injury. Although he had a poor season, he is an extremely energetic player who helped close down high up the pitch, and constantly made runs into the channels. It means Bilic will now play Everton’s Nikica Jelavic as the primary striker – he tends to hang back on the opposite side of the pitch to where the ball is, and then storm towards the near post for a one-touch finish. He’ll be supported by Mario Mandzukic, who is more mobile and energetic, and can drop into midfield without the ball if needed, to mark the opposition holding player.
From the bench, Nikola Kalinic is Jelavic’s understudy, while Eduardo may also feature – his record of 22 goals in 45 international appearances is superb and he remains a good poacher.
Gameplan
Expect Croatia to sit deep and then break quickly – sometimes their counter-attacks can be extremely swift and effective, like in their superb 3-0 play-off win at Turkey. They take advantage of their two strikers staying high up the pitch, and the lack of an opposition spare man at the back (assuming they’re playing against a four-man defence) does have its advantages. The disadvantage is that they don’t compete well in midfield, and despite the guile of Modric, they’re often very slow in possession and keep the ball for long periods without looking to penetrate the opposition defence.
There are also concerns about the attacking-to-defensive transition – Croatia can be slow to get back into shape. Set-pieces are also another area of weakness, judging by the crucial 2-0 loss at Greece in qualification, and that could be a significant factor against Ireland.
Conclusion
Croatia aren’t a bad side, but it’s difficult to see how they’ll pull off a shock at this competition. They don’t appear to excel at anything in particular, and their star man Modric seems exhausted and won’t be able to carry the side by himself. Quick forwards should enjoy playing against Croatia, although their counter-attack remains a threat.
Quick guide:
Coach – Slaven Bilic
Formation – 4-4-2
Key player – Luka Modric
Strength – as always, a deep squad for a country of its size
Weakness – a lack of pace at the back
Key tactical question – will Bilic be more proactive against Ireland? That seems like a game Croatia must win
Key coach quote – “Modric is our main player”
Betfair odds – 65.0 (64/1)
Recommended bet – Croatia to finish bottom of Group C at 3.45
Further reading: Jonathan Wilson’s Behind The Curtain, the Croatian Football Blog.



You’re slightly wrong about this one. Although almost everything is correctly stated, it’s highly unlikely Ireland could beat Croatia in the opening game. Furthermore, Croatia never lost to Italy, even when outplayed.
I do agree with the first two sentences.. and I put it all down to Bilic and his terrible tactics since 2008. There is no flow in the game, no idea what to do with the ball and so on..
I hope Ireland doesn’t prove me wrong but I do expect them to be trashed in the first game.
Why couldn’t Ireland beat Croatia. If Georgia and Greece can do it, why not Ireland. Or are you forgetting that Bilic has overseen 1 quality performance in the last 4 years….
They could but it’s highly unlikely in my opinion. As I said, I hope they won’t prove me wrong. Btw.. I would rather lose to Ireland than Italy or even Spain, I do appreciate them as a team.
This makes it sound like Ireland v Croatia will be the dullest game since Ireland v Egypt in Italia 90.
England-Algeria 2010? Paraguay-Japan 2010?
I’ve got stop reading ZM so much. I keep using the word ‘broadly’ in my university essays
Love it haha
Croatia are a poor side, but I think they actually have a decent chance of making it out of the group. Bilic has obviously recognized that his side isn’t at the same level as 2008, and has gone for a defensive 442, similar to Ireland, where they will be hard to break down and will break at pace through the wings. But in this approach they actually look strong: With a solid defense (when sitting deep), an excellent winger in Srna (one of the best crossers of the ball in Europe), a CM in Modric who can offer quick and precise passes in transitions and a in form striker in Jelavic who is lethal in the penalty area.
Dujmovic is also underrated in that he offers good protection to the back line and so is Mandzukic who can offer good movement and work rate from up front.
I can’t see them going further than the quarter finals with such a basic approach and they could easily get thrashed by Spain’s quick movement. But their quick breaks could expose Italy down the wings (where they lack protection) and that means it could be down to whoever wins out of them and Ireland. Both teams play identical formations and tactics almost, but Croatia have the better players arguably, which suggests they could get the better of Ireland.
If Modric is indeed unfit, it could ruin Croatia’s chances of progressing.
Yes, it’s the weakest side since euro 2004- the main issues being the frightening backline and Bilic’ coaching. Still, I think the boys have 1 good game in them, most likely vs the Italians(as is usually the case).
I think they have a decent shot of getting out of the group, with Italy still a bit dodgy and Ireland arguably a similar side but weaker. There are from the worst side at this tournament.
You could definitely be right about the Italy game.
I don’t think the lineup listed here is their best. Eduardo, Pranjic, and Rakitic should all start. Move Corluka to CB, pull Srna back to RB, and play Pranjic at LB. Then the back line has more speed, while Srna can still advance to cross the ball. I’d play Rakitic and Dujmovic as a double pivot, Perisic on the left, Eduardo high up on the right, Jelavic as the striker and Modric in the hole.
Corluka won’t play on the left, he will be centre back due to Lovren’s injury(he was first pick CB). On left back Strinic(probably) or Pranjic. It’s question who will play the other centre back position, Schildenfeld(probably) or Simunic.
Modric is exhausted like Xavi, Iniesta or any other player who played over 50 games this season.
Where is this info about Modric’s exhaustion coming from?
Mind you, it would not surprise me at all…
It’s just become received knowledge that Modric is exhausted. Truth is, he’s played the same number of games as any top player has who’s been healthy throughout the season.
More worrying is Bilic’ instructions to Modric- he sits too deep which breaks the link between midfield and attack.
I think it’s Spurs just looking for an excuse for their awful end of season form.
So, no mention of Niko Kranjčar, whatsoever?
OK. He’s overweight and has barely played in over a year
so.. how much does he weights and how much he should?
oh and btw author of that article doesnt know much what he’s talkin about
Čorluka will start in the middle, Strinić on the left, and Šimunić will go to the bench.
And there is an idea to put Srna to right-back and Kranjčar to right wing, from where he could come to number 10 position, and make a deadly triangle with Luka and Dujmović.
Putting Kranjcar on the right would be absolutely awful- he’s terrible on the right, as he isn’t able to cut inside onto his favored foot(if he can neither cut inside nor beat his man on the outside, what is he supposed to bring?!?). Sadly, for these reasons, I can imagine Bilic playing him there.
What’s even more nonsensical about this idea is that there’s a perfect(natural!) right-sided player who already showed his value in the friendly vs Estonia: Ivo Ilicevic. It would be criminal for Bilic to overlook him for the out of shape, out of form, Kranjcar. The only place Kranjcar should EVER play is as a classic no.10. If he can’t play there, he shouldn’t play. Enough of playing players out of position. It’s no coincidence that most goals Croatia have conceded in the last 4 years have originated from the left side- the same side Kranjcar plays on. He’s a defensive liability and slows the game down too much.
All right, I’m done ranting.
It’s little coincidence that once Bilic decided that Modric should play as a strict regista(instead of a more free role), his performances for the team suffered. Croatia is not Spurs, and trying to use Modric in the same manner hasn’t born fruit in 4 years. He becomes completely isolated from the attack and ends up harmless to the opposition. Modric, as the best player in Croatia, needs to be given a more free, advanced role in the side. The best formation for this would be either 4-3-1-2 or (especially vs Italy’s likely 4-3-1-2) 3-4-1-2. Both formations take advantage of the 2 strengths in the squad: strikers and central midfielders(well, Modric, Rakitic, and even Badelj). 3-4-1-2 has the additional benefit of utilizing 2 players in their best position at wingbacks(Srna and Pranjic), instead of shoehorning a centerback into RB(Vida), or settling for a mediocre LB(Strinic) because Pranjic isnt a very good defender. Still, 4-3-1-2 would be an improvement to the present 4-4-2, as it would give Modric the freedom needed, utilize 2 strikers, and also allow Rakitic to play as a regista(or even as the left-sided shuttling midfielder he’d still help connect the lines).
Even 4-3-3 (or 4-2-1-3)would be an improvement, with Rakitic playing deeper and Modric playing more advanced, with the front three of Jelavic in the middle, and Perisic and Mandzukic (or Ilicevic) cutting in.
And whatever Bilic says that formations are slowly dying out, is a clear b/s. It is so, …hmmm H.Redknapp… Srna and Pranjic would both work way better as wingbacks than full-backs or wingers. Even some of the world’s best players (Sneijder) are useless if used in wrong formations, such as 3-4-3 of Gasperini’s Inter.
Yes, a 4-2-1-3 or 4-2-3-1 might work. Still, I’d love to see Eduardo playing alongside another central striker(Mandzukic or Jelavic) as this is where he excels. Bilic had the brilliant idea to push Eduardo out left in one match(Greece) and he was completely useless(clearly, Bilic hadn’t watched Wenger try to put Eduardo out left after Arsenal switched from 4-4-2 to 4-3-3). While much hype has been given to Jelavic, Eduardo is still the most effective striker by a country mile. He needs to play and he needs to play centrally.
And yes, the whole “formations don’t matter” mantra is kind of funny considering that the 1 impressive match in recent years(v Turkey in Istanbul) was about as formation-centric as possible. It would’ve made Roy Hodgson proud: 2 banks of 4 defending narrowly that were always looking to get the ball quickly to the 2 strikers.
Excellent blog as always. I’m Croatian but agree with you in this analysis. Bilic seems to have regressed as a coach in the last 4 years. I have a feeling that the players lost confidence in him, but also his tactics after 2008 were uninventive. As a consequence in many games players seemed lethargic. Also except Modric and Srna, there is not much quality in this team.
I like your idea of a 3-4-1-2 with wingbacks. It would probably be the best solution for this group of players, for the reasons you already mentioned. It would also stabilize the defense. But with Bilic it’s just wishful thinking. I don’t expect Croatia to progress beyond the group stage. Traditionally there is a good chance that we are going to underestimate Ireland, and be a little more motivated against Italy and Spain. It would be nice if we manage at least one win though.
Why not play Pranjic at LM and have two wingbacks (he and Srna) in front of the back 4. It could make them very hard to break down out wide, while both Pranjic and Srna are good at crossing.
Not sure whether Croatia will surprise or fade out this tournament. Hoping for the former.
wHoaxiHlgj http://chiturboflatiron.webs.com/ wJdznzOtws chi turbo