Euro 2012 preview: Greece

The possible starting line-up. Torosidis' fitness is a concern, Ninis could start instead of Salpigidis, and the goalkeeping position is uncertain
Greece aren’t overwhelmingly different from the team that shocked Europe to win Euro 2004. They’re not as extreme in their negativity, and not as effective, but are still broadly defensive and their main threat will come from set-pieces.
The continuity from eight years ago is obvious when looking at the midfield zone: dead ball specialist Giorgios Karagounis and the defensive Kostas Katsouranis are present and are expected to start. They have a good relationship from years of playing together for Greece, Panathinaikos, and going a few years back, Benfica.
Also at Benfica with those two was Greece’s coach, Fernando Santos, which helped him settle into the job having taken over from the legendary Otto Rehhagel. The two veterans play an important role in the dressing room, making their position in the side secure.
More attacking style
Though Greece are more attacking, more technical and less structured than under Rehhagel, they haven’t evolved significantly since the last World Cup.
There is still the same formation, 4-3-3, which features Fanis Gekas as the primary striker, supported by Giorgos Samaras moving inside from the left flank, and Dimitris Salpigidis likely to play the most energetic role of the three. His position may come under threat from the younger, more exciting and more popular Sotiris Ninis, but Salpigidis was favoured throughout qualification and seems likely to start. Either way, that player needs to offer width and stretch the play, because Samaras’ tendency to become a second striker means Greece are otherwise very narrow high up the pitch.
Broken team?
Greece can become a broken team, with a 7:3 split and no connecting players. The two veterans in midfield need a runner alongside them to bring energy and verticality to the side. In an ideal world, Ninis would be in a position to take up a permanent midfield slot alongside them, making an all-Panathinaikos midfield trio, but the position will almost certainly go to Giannis Maniatis, a versatile player who often plays at right-back. He’s more of a hard worker than a creative player, but his stamina and speed will be vital in the midfield zone.
Physical defence with attacking full-backs
The lack of midfield thrust and attacking width is compensated for, in part, by Greece’s attack-minded full-backs. Vasilis Torosidis is something of a Philipp Lahm character, able to play in either full-back position and possessing a good long-range shot. He’s likely to start on the right, allowing Jose Holebas to motor up and down the left. Centre-backs Avraam Papadopoulos and Sokratis Papastathopoulos are solid and physical, although they are decent on the ball too.
Torosidis is an injury doubt for the first game, however, which would probably mean Papastathopoulos moving to right-back, and Avraam Papadopoulos being joined by (no relation) Kyriakos Papadopoulos, the promising young Schalke player. This is what Santos did in the pre-tournament friendly against Armenia.
In goal there’s something of a question mark, where Santos has a plethora of options yet none are particularly convincing. Kostas Chalkias and Alexandros Tzorvas are both error-prone, and Michalis Sifakis might play instead, despite being less experienced. Whoever Santos chooses, this is Greece’s weak link.
Attacking options
The excitement is likely to come from the bench. Ninis is the obvious choice if he doesn’t start, but the introduction of Giannis Fetfatzidis could be an even better option. He’s 21, 5′5, starts from the right but comes inside onto his left foot and has great balance and upper body strength when dribbling past opponents. He likes a chipped finish too – all which means, inevitably, he’s ‘The Greek Messi’, a tag he’ll never live up to, but he’s a fine player and likely to be a classic supersub.
As in 2004, set-pieces will be key. Their most important win in qualifying, the 2-0 victory over Croatia, was sealed with two goals from set-pieces at the end of a dull match. Karagounis’ delivery is good, while Holebas and Fetfatzidis are other options, with the centre-backs and Samaras obvious aerial options because of their height, but Gekas is also good at making runs unchecked.
Conclusion
An old, static core to the side that needs energy from younger players to be remotely exciting. Ninis will hopefully get playing time, Fetfatzidis should appear from the bench, while Maniatis provides functional mobility in midfield. The full-backs are attack-minded and might surprise opponents with their constant running, but Greece’s lack of quality upfront is a big problem.
Quick guide
Coach – Fernando Santos
Formation – 4-3-3 with little width upfront, but attacking full-backs
Key players – The full-backs: they offer the width and directness that doesn’t come from further forward
Strength – Set-pieces: Karagounis is a fine free-kick taker, and Greece possesess aerial threat from corners
Weakness – A lack of security in goal and a very static side overall
Key tactical question – How much do Greece stretch the play, and how much do they connect midfield and attack?
Key quote – Santos: “Greece don’t have a Messi, so it’s tactics first, then quality second”
Betfair odds - 110.0 (109/1)
Recommended bet - Poland v Greece to be under 1.5 goals at 2.6
Further reading – Ed Malyon’s preview at InBedWithMaradona



Excellent preview.
I didn’t see Greece’s last match against Armenia but based on the lineups, I had assumed that Maniatis was the RB and Papastathopoulos (love the name btw) was pushed up to become the defensive midfielder, promoting Katsouranis slightly higher. Apparently that wasn’t the case though. I never would have figured that Papastathopoulos would be suitable as a fullback…
Papastathopoulos played some games at RB at Werder especially at the start of the season. He has also played as a RB for Greece in the past so he has some experience there.
I watched most of our games in the qualifiers and i’d say we did not have to do too much. The only constant is we are tough to beat. Other than that we are a big question mark.
Greece are very direct and not very entertaining, but I think they might qualify over Russia in this group, though I can’t see them going any further. They look strong defensively (apart from GK, which could ruin their chances) and have clear routes of attack. They can hit it long to Samaras on the break, they can get their fullbacks forward and hit crosses into both Gekas and Samaras and they have a lot of dangers from set pieces.
Their weaknesses will be; playing a dodgy GK, having no threat or creativity from midfield (a danger if they go behind) and relying on Gekas up front who is not much more than a poacher.
I have to say I didn’t know about their threat from the bench that ZM pointed out, could help them win games late on? My prediction is they will beat Russia to go through.
http://economicinterest.wordpress.com/ Have a read if you have time.
I have ten pounds on Kyriakos Papadopoulos being Greece’s top goalscorer at 25/1. I saw quite a lot of Schalke games this year and although he didn’t score that many, he has excellent ability in the air and is a constant threat. Add to that Greece aren’t going to attack ‘that’ much, I feel it’s a pretty good bet.
I think Samaras has a decent chance of playing as the lone striker. Despite being an infuriatingly inconsistent player, he is good at running the channels – fast, strong, skillful and can hold the ball-up well. As “isolated” forwards go, on his game he’s as capable as they come.
“On his day” being the operative phrase. He’s far from prolific. At club level, for Celtic, he’s only scared a handful of goals in the past two seasons – with the caveat that he has been playing deeper and wider under Lennon, rather than as an out-and-out striker and racked up a lot of assists this season as well as impressing in the Europa League.
Samaras is exactly the sort of player who could thrive in this group against this level of opposition. Depending on what mood he’s in.
One of the most interesting tactical debates in this year’s tournament is whether Greece will be able to be proactive when it is needed. Greece is one the unfortunate sides which are neither big favourites nor doomed outsiders and they don’t know if they have to be proactive or too defensive. That was pretty telling in the qualifiers. They performed well when they where more defensive against Croatia but never seemed to get the better of (theoritically) weaker opponents like Georgia when they naturally looked to be more offensive. Not sure if Santos will try being more flexible but unlike 8 years ago they aren’t considered much as underdogs with every opposition and solely defensive tactics will make things difficult against Poland or Czech Rep. where Greece has a decent chance by playing proactively.
it looks THE weakest team of the comp. the greece-haters from 2004 will be happy. can’t agree with the early line about negativity in 2004. if aiming to win the tournament & shake up the world is negative ,so be it. sometimes teams win these comps thru great individuals, or great teams. but 2004 was all about a top manager. sadly the likes of Hansen will never appreciate this. luck also helped in 04 as i felt fatigue played a big role for some top teams
While Santos has done a very good job so far, his selection of goal-keepers is mind boggling. Sifakis was in the bench all year because Aris was using (the younger) Vellidis, Tzorvas was mostly on the bench after a bad start and Chalkias only plays in PAOK because of his relationships. At the same time, goalkeepers like Kapino and Karnezis (both from Panathinaikos) and Chiotis (APOEL) who all had an amazing year were left out.
Out of the 3 chosen, I think Tzorvas is the most likely to start.
Karagounis, in all likelihood, will not start or at least not play full games; however, he is a vital player for Greece and he will undoubtedly feature. His old age (or, more accurately, his declining fitness) makes it difficult for him to play 270 minutes within such a short time frame. The best example of his decline came away against a staunch Latvia. Outmatched in the task of containing Verpakovskis, Karagounis opted to conserve his energy and instruct his teammates to fulfill his defensive duties as he let the Latvian danger man stroll through Greece’s final third unmarked in the run-up to Latvia’s solitary goal. Also, his penchant for collecting yellow cards means Santos will have to pick and choose which games he can afford to drop Karagounis altogether so as to preserve him from a possible suspension and allow Karagounis to feature in more vital matches.
Ninis will likely play some role in the starting eleven and Greece will certainly look to him as the creative hub. Ninis is a technically superb and markedly intelligent player who has a knack for being a step ahead of the opposition and for both the unpredictable and the sublime, but questions rightly remain about what sort of impact he will have for Greece. Unfortunately, a stuck-in-his-ways Otto Rehhagel and a stream of injuries have prevented his career from taking real flight and have left most Greece supporters wondering if he will ever truly deliver on the promise he showcased at the u-19 Euros, where he was named MVP and where he had outclassed a very young Mesut Ozil despite being nearly two years Ozil’s junior. To Sotiris’ credit, he has performed well overall in qualifying, but just as he found his stride (right after scoring a fantastic solo effort against an inexperienced Israeli defense) he was clumsily and cynically brought down. The resulting injury from that foul meant Ninis would miss out on decisive trips to Latvia and later Georgia before the tense decider at home against Croatia. Had Ninis featured he would likely have made a difference and he would have been brimming with confidence after his display against Israel. Nevertheless, with Otto no longer at the helm, Ninis must ditch his injury-prone tag and start living up to his potential.
Fetfatzidis is Greece’s most eye catching player. His unbelievable dribbling ability, peerless in at least Greece, makes him near impossible to defend against at times. Mature and intelligent for his age, it is difficult to accept why he has been overlooked at the club level and by consequence the international level. His club, Olympiakos, have thus far failed to nurture him properly; a point that comes to bare given the temporary inclusion of Kazim-Kazim and Giannis’ resulting demotion to Olympiakos’ Europa League B team and Greek Super League bench. Olympiakos have a poor record of youth management, Kyriakos Papadopoulos, who has since dazzled at Schalke, being the most obvious example. The problem is that Olympiakos’ mentality for instant success prevents young players room to grow and gain proper experience. Regardless of Olympiakos’ flawed management of young players, Fetfatzidis is sure to succeed in the future. Whether any of that excitement will appear at the upcoming finals remains much at the discretion of Santos. Santos, however, seems set on a conservative approach and might only play Fetfatzidis if Greece need to throw a little caution to the wind.
Nice article but I do disagree with one or two things. Salpingidis always gives width, he is simply not a naturally talented winger. He is a willing runner and is clever but his dribbling skills are very limited as is his delivery. Torosidis though is a world class right back that has never been given a chance to shine in stronger leagues, but for Olympiakos he has been superb at all levels. If he’s fit he’ll be superb for Greece.
In reality he should be playing a 3-5-2. They would be so much more effective. Chiotis or Sifakis in goal, a back 3 of Papastathopoulos, Kyriakos Papadopoulos and Avraam. Midfield: Torosidis and Holebas as wing backs, a midfield 3 of Torosidis, Maniatis and Ninis. Up front Gekas or Mitroglou with Fetfatzidis in behind as the link man. That would be a well balanced and very dangerous team with Karagounis, Samaras and one of Gekas/Mitroglou off the bench as effective subs. The truth is, that whilst Greece do have plenty of individual talent, the lethargic and aging midfield of Katsouranis and Karagounis prevents them from playing a high line. There is rarely enough pressure on the ball in midfield and they risk being overrun if they play open. 2 seasons ago PAO played Barca and lost 5-1 at the Camp Nou. Rather disgracefull Katsouranis covered merely 2 k/m more than Tzorvas (the goalkeeper!)! He has become a lazy player that is resting on his laurels and this makes Greece look worse than they actually are.
by the way that was a typo, Torosidis at right wing back and a midfield 3 of Fotakis, Maniatis, Ninis
sorry that was a typo: Fotakis, Maniatis and Ninis in midfield. Torosidis right wing back
I’m not a great fan of Fernando Santos. I think he is outdated. He underestimates the team, which is not as bad as it looks in the field. I believe in this team but the coach is the real weak link. We may not have the talent of the Germans new gen, or the tactical knowledge of Dutch but we have descent team with some virtues.
First of all, Santos is obsessed with 4-3-3 formation. 10 years in Greece we see that formation over and over again in all teams he managed regardless the players he had. My opinion is that a 4-2-3-1 suits better with this players. Furthermore, the selections he made to travel to Poland are outrageous!! The Goalkeepers are unready (Sifakis), without games (Tzorvas) and veterans (Chalkias). He also left a usefull tool like Vyntra who can play in all 3 position on the defense and the most developed player of the year: Athanasiadis. A strikes that can add movement and pace on the attack.
I also believe he is making a huge mistake with the 4-3-3 formation. I believe a 4-2-3-1 would work better. Holebas-Avraam-Papastathopoulos and Torosidis (giving width to the attack with his runs) are a solid bank of four in the defense. In front of the defense the perfect guy is Kyriakos Papadopoulos with all his energy and the right positioning he can help in set-pieces and to retain ball possession. Maniatis could be usefull with Russia as a second holding midfielder and Katsouranis will help as a deep-laying playmaker with Poland and the Czechs. With Torosidis giving width to the attack, Ninis could play to the right wing and penetrate or converge to the middle as a 2nd playmaker. In this situation Karagounis is the number 10 to earn all the battles in the middle and Samaras on the left to play as a second striker. Although i believe the best 9 solution was Athanasiadis, he must not start Gekas. Mitroglou (or Samaras?) should be the head of the attack..
He may be outdated but he completely outcoached Smuda today.
As Michael tweeted yesterday, Poland was murdering Greece on the right wing. Santos, as his co-patriot Jesualdo Fereira, lost again the first half with ridiculous choices. Samaras never helped covering Holebas by marking Piszczek, Gekas was playing “hide and seek” between Polands centerbacks and Chalkias choise was as bad as hell. He totally outcoached (on the second half) a coach without a trustworthy bench..
He made wrong starting choices but he was able to recover and his side went close to winning a game which seemed lost at half time. As for Poland’s bench, it’s not the deepest squad at the Euros but there were few interesting options there and not using substitutions was a bad thing to do by Smuda.
вот копии часов улисс нардин часы мужские копии часы скелетоны купить продаю реплику элитных часов фрэнк мюллер http://vipreplicastore.net/tovar/3/2516/breitling-windrider-chronomat-evolution.html – купить часы graham какие часы у ивана урганта maurice lacroix скидка
sWmfpxTktc http://toryburchshoesonsale.weebly.com/ mGcsayEzks tory burch tote sale