Five points on Liverpool 2-1 Everton

The starting line-ups
Liverpool fought back from 1-0 down to book their place in the final.
Kenny Dalglish went with Andy Carroll upfront and Luis Suarez behind. Jordan Henderson started on the right of a four-man midfield, and at the back Jamie Carragher was selected at centre-back, which meant Daniel Agger moving to left-back.
David Moyes selected Magaye Gueye on the left of midfield, Darron Gibson in the centre of midfield, and Phil Neville at right-back.
This was a rather poor game lacking in technical quality – the goals came from two huge defensive mistakes and then a set-piece. There were a few individual areas of interest, however…
1. Liverpool’s centre-back partnership disturbed
Jose Enrique hasn’t been performing well in the second half of the season, yet it was still a surprise to see Agger out on the left. In isolation that move worked reasonably well – he defended very tight to the centre-backs, which was appropriate for playing against Leon Osman, who was looking to dart through that space and in behind the defence.
But the knock-on effect was that Liverpool were playing a combination of Carragher and Martin Skrtel at the back. Carragher brings great experience to the side (particularly helpful with the troubles in goal), and is still more than capable of doing a job, but the reality is that Agger and Skrtel are Liverpool’s best partnership. To break up their relationship was an odd move from Dalglish. Admittedly, Agger has been injured recently and Carragher has played alongside Skrtel relatively regularly, but this has (perhaps unfortunately) coincided with a poor run that has included defeats to QPR, Wigan, Newcastle, Arsenal and a home draw with Aston Villa.
The error that led to Everton’s goal rather summed up the lack of understanding, even if it was a rather exaggerated example, and might make Dalglish less willing to break up the Skrtel – Agger partnership.
2. Suarez into the channel
The most interesting battle of the first half was taking place in Everton’s left-back zone. There, Henderson was used rather than Dirk Kuyt, and played the role differently to the Dutchman. Rather than playing high up and making direct runs towards goal, he dropped deeper and looked to pick up the ball in deep midfield positions.
Baines quite likes to get tight to opponents, and generally has to cover quite a lot of ground down his side. He often moved high up the pitch towards Henderson, which left Sylvain Distin covering a large amount of space up against Suarez, who played to the right of the pitch. This was particularly obvious when Liverpool built up play on their right, because Carroll generally stayed at the far post and was therefore keeping Johnny Heitinga busy.
Like the first point, the goal was an exaggerated example of the problems – 99% of the time, Distin wouldn’t have disastrously underhit his backpass. But long before that, at the start of the first half, getting Suarez into that channel was the obvious approach for Liverpool – in fact, it was the only area of open play where either side really looked good. Suarez had been caught narrowly offside in this situation early on, Distin had received a booking for checking him, and had also conceded a free-kick on the edge of the box for fouling him. Every time, Suarez had been moving into the channel rather than down the centre.
But the importance of Henderson dragging Baines away shouldn’t be underestimated. When Downing went to that side, Baines played deeper and more narrow (to show Downing onto his weaker right foot) and this approach was less promising. Downing did play a couple of good crosses, though.
3. Patient passers play well
Darron Gibson and Jay Spearing were hardly the most celebrated players on show, but in a scrappy game, both did well by knocking the ball from side to side, keeping possession and bringing the full-backs into play.
4. Cahill – Fellaini switch
After Liverpool’s equaliser, Moyes swapped Fellaini and Cahill – the former played close to Nikica Jelavic, the latter played close to Gibson. This didn’t seem to help Everton in either respect, though – Fellaini didn’t improve things going forward. Aside from one good flick-on to Jelavic, he made Everton too direct and route one. Perhaps more importantly, Cahill lacks Fellaini’s composure, and Everton became overrun in the middle.
5. Everton left-back problems
Baines went down clutching his hamstring late on, and (possibly coincidentally) Craig Bellamy immediately came on for Downing. Bellamy’s pace was crucial in driving Liverpool forward late on.
Then, at 2-1 Moyes replaced Baines with striker Victor Anichebe, and they didn’t bother to re-shape and play someone at left-back. Phil Neville, for example, could have gone across there with Seamus Coleman dropping to right-back, but instead they literally just played the final few minutes without a left-back and with Distin now covering even more ground. It shouldn’t really have mattered for four minutes, and Everton had to gamble, but then Liverpool just kept the ball towards the right-hand corner flag – and then Suarez teed up Maxi Rodriguez for an open goal from that position.





“The most interesting battle of the first half was taking place in Liverpool’s left-back zone. There, Henderson was used rather than Dirk Kuyt, and played the role differently to the Dutchman.”
I think you mean Everton’s left back zone here
“David Moyes selected Magaye Gueye at left-back, Darron Gibson in the centre of midfield, and Phil Neville at right-back.” I reckon you meant Baines.
Also I think you made a wee mistake at the start:
David Moyes selected Magaye Gueye at left-back
Good column though.
Did you think about covering Blackburn-Liverpool for the formation changes after the red card and then to three at the back?
I think his mind would have melted trying to decipher what happened in that game.
Wouldn’t Moyes have been better off playing Heitinga in Gibson’s position as a CDM and start Jagielka with Distin? Heitinga would provide defensive cover from the MF so when Distin was pulled wide, Everton would still have defensive cover.
Also, I understand that CBs have a set side they prefer to play on but shouldn’t Everton have flipped their CBs? Distin is a taller, slower CB, perfect for marking Carroll. Heitinga (or in my question above Jagielka) are faster, smaller CBs who’d be able to run with Suarez into the channels. I really don’t understand why CBs don’t just mark the player they match up better with rather than choosing a side. It’s clearly possible. Against a single striker it probably doesn’t matter but against two strikers, when both are so different, I don’t understand why the marking matchup takes a back seat to playing on a certain side.
Distin is a leftie, so he generally plays next to the leftback
Spot on I think, when you look at great sides they always try to match up to the opposition striker.
Yeah, it is odd, but it’s also pretty noticeable that most CBs are worse when they’re forced to change sides. Skrtel playing on the left is actually a very good example. I imagine it’s an issue with how CBs are coached at youth level? If they never have to change sides, they get used to it. On one level, it does make sense. Plenty of fullbacks look like they have no idea how to position themselves when forced to switch sides, when it’s theoretically the same position defensively.
Hello
In our days i thinks the fullbacks need to be more intelligent and have a good flair than ever! They have to switch flanks every game, to go forward, to have speed and good positioning. It’s about some landmarks in my opinion(switching sides).
I think Distin is a bit pacey actually for a CB and is quite good at covering for his defence. Heitinga tends to get dragged up the pitch a bit, so it was better to have Distin covering against Suarez’s runs in behind.
I belive that Heitinga is suited to mark very close Suarez.
Why users still use to read news papers when in this technological world the whole thing is presented on net?
because people see newspapers like u see an ex-girlfriend. with nostalgia!
I thought this match was a truly awful advertisement for the English top flight. Poor passing: inaccurate, underweighted, overweighted… heavy touches, lack of close ball control, hopelessly wayward shots.
Carroll the hero? I thought he was a donkey today, as always. The ball that hit him in the back of the head for the goal could have gone anywhere. All his other shots prompted belly laughs.
And the other two goals – from mistakes that that no top-flight professional footballer should ever make – Carragher’s mistake was particularly brainless.
Down under, a performance by two teams like this would have looked substandard even for the A-League. Arguably the only two classy players on display today were Suarez and Fellaini.
Or maybe I’ve just been spoilt watching a good dose of Spanish football lately. But I can truly say, teams like Atletico, Athletic Bilbao, Levante, even Sporting Gijon (nevermind Barcelona, Real Madrid and Valencia) are way, way superior in quality to these two Merseyside outfits.
I saw only the “highlights” and I agree! It looked to be rubbish. My faves this season have been Athletic Bilbao. The EPL has had something of a collapse in standards.
Agree completely. Both of these sides looked poor with a lot of unforced mistakes. This isn’t just their problem either, it’s something that has been going in with most the EPL teams the last couple of years.
Levante looked excellent against Barcelona, gave them a very good game. Rayo Vallecano were also very impressive against At.Madrid.
And by this I mean the skill level – as you would expect – but also the tactical awareness and organisation. These things have by enlarge gone missing in the EPL.
The more one sees of the Spanish sides outside of the ‘big two’, the claim that it is an uncompetitive and easy league becomes more and more stupid. It’s clearly from people who don’t watch much La Liga.
It can be statistically proven that La Liga is more competitive than the EPL and has been year on year. All you need to do is look at the spread of points across the 20 teams in each league. Whether you do this crudely or apply a variance analysis, it will show that the EPL is the least competitive of Europe’s big leagues (i.e. there is usually a wider spread of points among the teams).
So despite the superiority of the “big two” as Patrick refers to them, there is still less disparity among the teams in La Liga overall than among the EPL teams.
Add to that the success in the Champions League and Europa Cup of La Liga teams compared with EPL teams – as well as what your eyeballs tell you – it’s plain La Liga is currently the strongest domestic league in the world. Personally, I’m bored with La Liga v EPL arguments, except to say that there is currently daylight between them. I believe the lower level EPL teams have never stacked up against the lower Primera teams but, in the last 2-3 years, the quality of the top EPL teams has dropped away quite noticeably.
You are comparing good Spanish sides to midtable clubs? Because they are nothing more than midtable. Dalglish bought a lot of English players out of necessity. LFC didn’t have enough homegrown players, so they had to make up the numbers. Downing was bought specifically to provide crosses for that donkey Carroll. Both have been rubbish. Henderson is a young player, nor really ready for a starting role in a club like Liverpool. Neither is Spearing. Then there is the brilliance of Charlie Adam, the one season man, who just two years ago was playing second division football. He was not deemed good enough to play for the Rangers. Really now. Lets not compare poor sides to some of the best in the La Liga.
La Liga is more technical, and have better quality players, but while you were watching Bilbao take United apart, you should have watched Bilbao on the weekends as well, when they were poor, couldn’t pass or receive the ball. They have tonnes of potential, but its not a complete side. I do hope they will win the EL, and that team stays together, but its also a very overrated side based on a couple of games that people saw.
Neither Liverpool nor Everton are known for their great slick passing and technical football. Take away the aging and injury prone Gerrard and Suarez, and whom would you take for a top PL side? Take away no one from Everton, and who comes in for one of the top 6 in England? Gibson quickly established himself as a starter for Moyes, when Fergie couldn’t get rid of him fast enough because he was utter rubbish. Baines is a decent player, the rest are rubbish. They play like Stoke, and earn results. A cup run is not indicative of the quality of the team. League is. Hell, Wigan are more technical than both of the Liverpool clubs. And finally getting results to match.
People need to spot this silly comparison. La Liga and the PL are different leagues. In style, more so than quality. Over the course of the season, teams from both would adapt their game and fit into both. Overall the PL has actually become more technical and more even in quality. The depth of talent is better than it was just a few years ago, the style changed too, for the better. Yet a few bad results in Europe, and people are making judgments already. Teams like Fulham, Wigan even, are going after the top sides at their own stadiums. Whereas before they would go in and defend for 90 minutes. I would argue that right now the PL is a better league than it was just a few years back when the English teams dominated the CL. United and Chelsea are in transition sure, so are Arsenal (for the past 8 years), but their competition have actually improved. Add city, Spurs, Newcastle, and you have 6 very good sides that on their day can give anyone a run for their money. United are not as bad as they showed in Europe this season. People need to remember that. This team made 3 finals in the past 4 seasons before this. United are no worse than last season. Yet no one was moaning about the PL then.
Lets wait a few years and see, and not make rash judgments. The PL is simply too rich to become a poor league. Unlike La Liga which is only a step from having 18 of its clubs going under. Real and Barca need to share that television money, or it will hurt them in the end.
I’m well aware that Bilbao have been struggling domestically. I’m not the type to criticise people for making judgments on La Liga without watching it regularly myself.
My post came across as EPL bashing which was unintended, it’s just that recently I’ve seen a fair amount of unsubstantiated comments about La Liga from people who don’t watch it. Some have got a sort of mental block where they are unable to give credit to anything that isn’t the EPL.
I agree that the EPL has got better, but from an entertainment point of view rather than quality. I’m not making a snap judgment, I believe there has been a decline in EPL in the last couple years but it is still the one of the top 2 leagues. La Liga edges it for me due to it appealing more to my personal taste. It always has so that could make me biased.
There are things about La Liga that I don’t like, such as the TV money problem that you point out. It is unfair and gives Real and Barca a stranglehold on the trophies while there are other good football sides who could surely challenge if this wasn’t the case.
Also, as you say, La Liga is only a step away from having a number of clubs go under. Practically the whole league owes a huge amount in unpaid tax – much like Rangers. Financial problems aren’t just in La Liga though, it is Europe-wide and it is in the EPL too. It is going to be the big story over the next few years in my opinion.
Yes, football will be going through a huge crisis. But most of the financial problems in England are self made, the PL clubs make way more money than la Liga clubs, they rip off their fans with the most expensive tickets, they carry stupid salaries, but they get fair money from television.
The Spanish clubs simply can’t do anything. If they try to become financially solvent then the quality of the league, bar the 3 rich clubs, will be that of Holland with 3 giants (Malaga can afford loses for now). They have no choice, the economy wont let them raise ticket prices, the two greedy giants wont share tv money, so I sympathize with them. Not so with English clubs. They all deserve the owners they get, not the supporters, but the league and the FA who allowed this to happen. Fit and proper my ass.
The greed and recklessness displayed is beyond shocking. Clubs making twice the money that most la liga clubs get and still have 70 or 80% of their income spent on players. Who does that? Rangers deserve their troubles, I have no sympathy for them, nor Pompey, or any other club which does this. The fans should not stand for it, but no, instead they moan that every transfer window their club only spend about half their total income on players. This is not Football Manager. Pompey’s FA Cup triumph will now send them to 3rd Division, was it worth it? Hope they enjoy playing Yeovil.
As for quality. I disagree again. As I said, Chelsea and United are in transition, they still have strong enough squads to do well in the league, but their first 11’s are weaker, therefore they can’t compete in Europe for now. Though Chelsea is managing, even poor United did well last season. City still haven’t learned how to win, lets hope that continues for a long time. The rest have improved however. The likes of Wigan, Fulham, Newcastle, Spurs, Sunderland, have more quality than they used to a few years back. The newcomers like Swansea and Norwich play great football that can compete in any league. Are you telling me that the Sunderland of a few years back is better than this one? Or that Derby was better than Swansea? Or that the Wigan that came up was a better quality side than this season’s team? Hell, even the Bolton of today has better players than the midtable Bolton of Fat Sam. Or Rovers for that matter. Most of the teams have improved, even Stoke have some (some I said, few not a lot, but still an improvement) decent technical players on their team these days as opposed to goons who only know long ball and kicking other players. Arsenal stagnated, and lost quite a lot of players over the past few years, mainly their best. But most went to their league rivals. Liverpool are poorer, Everton same, Villa finally found financial sanity, but that wasn’t a great side that O’Neill took to Europe. The players they lost stayed in country mainly. So I do strongly dispute all these claims that the PL is poor when compared to just a few seasons back. Yes some top sides lost a bit, but really now. Were Liverpool of 2005-08 better than city are now? No, or today’s Spurs for that matter? ‘Arry’s squad maybe thin, but the first 11 is quality. The league as a whole is better, more technical, and more balanced IMO. but just because United lose to Wigan does not mean Wigan have stayed crap and United became poor. Wigan are better, and United did lose quality in their starting 11. But United’s squad is quite strong and very balanced. Plus god is there, managing. That is why they are leading the league. However United are at most two starters away from getting back to European elite status.
Its not as bad as some try to claim. As for the silly debates of England v Spain. I found that its a matter of taste and not quality that decides about what people think. Quality is similar. Has been for the past decade or so. Just ignore those stupid claims, its like arguing about which religion is better. Enjoy yours and leave others alone. Or watch other leagues as well. This season I found myself watching more La Liga than I have done in the past few years. And more Bundesliga, which is a brilliant and underrated league. And more Serie A (well 2 or 3 clubs in Italy really), but that came at the expense of Holland which I enjoyed for years and South American football, as well as the MLS (I live in Yankland). And all this with the PL being my main point of interest.
The reasons for the PL clubs poor showing in Europe are many, however quality is not usually the answer. No one will tell me that Sporting are a better quality side than city. Or that Spurs were truly the 3rd side in their group. Or that Basel, the next time they meet, will again get a win and a draw off United. A season is not a good indication of how a league is really doing, even a couple of seasons. Dortmund, without buying players, will be a much wiser team next season in the CL, and I can already predict they will get out of the group stages. And quality will have nothing to do with it, they will have gained valuable experience. And so it goes.
We could argue this till next week and still disagree. However, I will stick with my points.
Robert, I respect your views and agree with most of what you say. But you’re the only person I’ve come across who doesn’t think the top flight of the EPL has dipped away in quality. The title is going to be won by the poorest Man Utd team I’ve seen over the last couple of decades. Chelsea’s still a shadow of what they were. Arsenal is currently sporadic, and fourth place is currently taken by a very flawed Spurs side. Go down one level from that, and I’m not sure I’d pay to watch them.
@ Jambonz.
As I said, United and Chelsea are in transition, its not a decline, but a temporary thing. Arsenal were not so good and were always sporadic before. Spurs are flawed yes, but so were Liverpool. Yet no one mentioned city, they improved. How about Newcastle? Lets go through them.
United Chelsea, transition, Arsenal, no real decline despite last summer’s panic, Liverpool poorer, but coming back, Spurs better than before, City huge infusion of talent and money, it should be money an talent in that order. Newcastle better, Everton same, Fulham much better, Wigan are more talented and showing it, than years ago. QPR on the level of West Ham couple of years back. Norwich and Swans replaced poorer teams, they improve the league. Blackburn, as talented as they were, just badly managed, same for Bolton, Sunderland a huge improvement in quality, Stoke, a slight one. Etc. How it the league as a whole worst? We can’t say the league is worse based on two teams, even if they are/were top teams.
People think La liga is great because of two teams. How much have others improved really? And before you mention 3 Spanish sides in the EL, I would like to point out that there were 3 Portuguese sides last season, yet no one was running around praising the Portuguese league to high heavens.
Its lazy to claim that the PL is in decline. When the top four were clearly better than others then everyone moaned about lack of competitiveness in the PL. Now that its competitive everyone says its shit. The overall talent pool has actually improved in the PL. Just go over the squads of teams from a few years back and now, and not just the traditional top four, but all of them.
And United’s first 11 might be poor, but the squad is stronger, and its the squad that wins the league. Look at Barca and Real, Madrid improved their squad, and hence will likely win the league. Their first 11 is pretty much the same as last season. Barca’s squad includes a lot of kids, so they will likely lose the league, add the motivation thing and it magnifies. The league is a squad game, cups are for first teams to win, especially the CL.
I thought Liverpool deserved to go through in this game. a Few points:
-Defensively, apart from the goal, the CB partnership did all right against Jelavic. Agger (as ZM touched on) defended well against Osman, as he moved inside and didnt try and really test Agger at fullback. Johnson got forward well as well, with no Everton player tracking him.
-In Central midfield, they weren’t particularly good. Spearing was poor on the ball I thought, and the lack of creativity in this zone cost Liverpool, as they couldn’t control the game effectively. Henderson also contributed to this poor control in midfield. He was totally anonymous on the right and Liverpool needed someone driving from central areas more and helping give the CM a link to the attack.
-Downing was poor. He couldnt get the better of Neville on the wing and needed to change his game up by moving inside and making more direct runs into the penalty area. This is an area of his game that has been poor this season (despite doing this well for Aston Vila) and Bellamy (as showed when he came on) would have a much better option on the left.
-Carroll and Suarez showed a good partnership. Suarez made great runs in behind and always looked a threat, having one of his best games this season I thought. While Carroll lead the line excellently and despite that horrible miss, he kept going and got the winning goal. But his all round game was really good too, bullying Heitinga in the air and holding up the ball well.
Such a poor game. Has premier league reaaly gone so backward? Some laliga matches could have been much more entertaining( but ofcourse wembley and the liverpool history made the match watchable).
Dont know why everyone( not here) is praising carroll. that guy isnt good enough for liverpool
Few points on Everton:
- Heitinga was poor against Carroll and I think Everton missed Jagielka in this game. He could have dealt with Carroll in the air better and brings a bit more leadership at the back.
- Baines had a great first half, and was key to Everton starting well, offering penetration down the left and some quality crosses. But in the second half he was pushed back and couldn’t get into the game.
- Gibson was the deepest CM for Everton at times and he did okay in the first half showing a some good long range passes (though a lack of Liverpool pressure). But the second half showed his poor positioning and I still think he needs to develop his game if wants to become a deep lying midfielder.
- Gueye had a poor game, far too deep and ineffective for Everton. He and Henderson marked eachover out of the game.
- Osman, Cahill and Jelavic combined well for Everton in the first half and they lost momentum when they started making changes (switching Cahill and Fellani).
Read my blog if you get the chance http://economicinterest.wordpress.com/
Cheers! Didn’t get to catch this game yet and appreciate your (and many fellow commenters) insight.
I was a bit disappointed with Everton in the second half. 1-0 up, I thought that they got tight and nervous and started dropping too deep way too early. Liverpool pressed forward, but Everton didn’t do anything at all in the second half.
Everton had a good chance to reach the Final, and after being 1-0 up they only have themselves to blame really for not being adventurous enough in the second half. Shame.
Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide
credit and sources back to your website? My blog site is in
the exact same niche as yours and my visitors would genuinely benefit from a lot of the information you present here.
Please let me know if this alright with you. Regards!
I’m glad you highlighted the Fellaini/Cahill swap in the last third of the match. It drives me absolutely crazy when Moyes does that. Fellaini is immense (on many levels) when playing as a holding midfielder, and was almost singlehandedly responsible for Everton dominating the center of the pitch in the first half (I wasn’t nearly as impressed by Gibson’s performance as you were; I thought he disappeared from the match for long stretches of time). Cahill simply isn’t capable of doing that job.
This isn’t the first time pushing Fellaini away from the center of the pitch has cost Everton this season, either — in the Arsenal match won by that spectacular van Persie volley, the pass that led to the volley came from Alex Song dribbling into the area normally patrolled by Fellaini while he was pushed up to the center circle.
Didn’t Fellaini pick up a slight knock? which would justify the switch. Although I agree that Cahill isn’t anywhere near as effective as Fellaini in the centre mid role.
Anyone see the ITV ‘pundits’ talking about Liverpool’s “back three”? This is from guys who are paid very good money to comment on the game.
Shows why sites like this are always gaining in popularity.
The reason Agger was picked at left-back instead of Enrique was to help combat the threat of Fellini.
In previous games again Liverpool, Fellani from corners and free kicks liked to pull to the back post and win headers there. And he won pretty much all the headers he went for causing Liverpool problems.
In a previous game Liverpool were being hurt so much by this Dalglish put Sotirios Kyrgiakos on at half time to try and nullify the threat.
Agger is pretty solid in the air – and left footed – so it made more sense to put him there than let Enrique (who’s not great in the air) deal with the threat of Felaini all afternoon.
Some saw it as Liverpool being negative in not playing the full back who likes to get down the wings, but Agger also gets forward a lot, poses a good threat from set pieces, and can arguably cause more problems in an opponents penalty area than the Spaniard. The winner in the previous game against Blackburn showed this.
Fantastic website. A lot of helpful information here.
I am sending it to a few pals ans additionally sharing in delicious.
And certainly, thanks in your sweat!
I loved your article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.
I really enjoy the blog article.