Real Madrid 0-0 Valencia: lots of chances, no goals

The starting line-ups
Real Madrid dropped points at home despite dominating.
Jose Mourinho gave a rare start to Raul Albiol against his former club, and played Karim Benzema on the right wing, with Angel Di Maria on the bench.
Unai Emery was without Roberto Soldado, and made five changes to the side that drew with Levante last week. The centre-back duo of Victor Ruiz and Adil Rami, who have been excellent this season, was the only part of the side that remained in place.
This match really should have had goals, with both sides missing big chances.
Real shape
Both sides played a 4-2-3-1 formation, and the battles across the pitch were obvious. Real played a very fluid shape in the final third, with Mesut Ozil typically drifting to the flanks and allowing the wide players inside, exploiting the space left when Mehmet Topal followed Ozil. Cristiano Ronaldo played more centrally than usual, coming inside into ‘number ten’ positions, and he had two early efforts from range that went close. On the other flank, Benzema didn’t look happy when getting the ball in wide positions – he doesn’t have the technical skill to beat Jordi Alba. His best contribution was when he came inside into a centre-forward position, Ozil found him, and Benzema backheeled to Ronaldo for a good chance.
The battle between Ricardo Costa and Ronaldo was interesting. Costa was happy to follow Ronaldo into central positions, which meant Feghouli had to become a wing-back and track Marcelo. Going the other way. Ronaldo didn’t track back much into his own third, which meant Costa got a couple of opportunities to prompt attacks – when he was brave enough to get in advance of Ronaldo.
Valencia breaks
Valencia had plenty of chances here, particularly on the break. Real’s front four generally pressed high up when they lost the ball, but their pressing wasn’t always integrated and Valencia were able to break through one ‘line’ at a time when working the ball towards goal. There were two different situations here. Sometimes, the front four would press, but then Alonso and Khedira would stay deeper, and one of the Valencia central midfielders would get time on the ball to play a good pass. Alternatively, if Alonso and Khedira did move forward, they would often leave Tino Costa free between the lines, and neither Pepe nor Albiol wanted to step forward and deal with him.
This was combined with intelligent breaking down the flanks. Costa got forward a little, but down the left was where Valencia really did well. Both Alba and Pablo Piatti broke past their men quickly as soon as Valencia won the ball. With these players in space, plus a bit of time to consider their passes in the centre, Emery’s side manufactured a good number of chances.
Another issue here was the tempo. Valencia were content to slow the game down at set-pieces (though with the ball they broke quickly), and Real struggled to move up through the gears. There was rarely continual spells of heavy pressure from the home side.
Second half
Mourinho made the obvious decision to bring on Angel di Maria on down the right. Higuain departed, and Benzema went upfront. Within thirty seconds the Argentine had made more successful dribbles than Benzema had in the first half, and he teed up Ronaldo for another good chance. Granted, this was after coming inside rather than staying wide, but it was the kind of classic wing play Benzema can’t provide.
Ozil was probably the key player for Real in terms of creating chances and prompting movement, but Valencia continued to hold out, tracking runners in midfield and defending wito two banks of four. Emery took off his wide players on 62 minutes to give more energy to the side, with Pablo Hernandez and Jeremy Mathieu on. They played the same roles as the men they replaced, with Mathieu staying wide (he seems to cause the big two problems, and he had a good chance here by getting in behind Alvaro Arbeloa) and Pablo trying to drift inside into space between the lines.
Further back, Topal started to play deeper, and sometimes seemed to drop in as right-sided centre-back when the ball was wide. He also helped Ricardo Costa with Ronaldo.
Changes
Jose Mourinho went for Kaka on 70 minutes. The Brazilian came on for Khedira, with Alonso now the sole holder and an attacking band of four supporting Benzema upfront. Ozil played a little deeper and was now helping Alonso play the initial pass into the final third. Real continued to play with great fluidity, but still ended up with too many players in a central zone, and they looked better when di Maria stayed wider, where he played a couple of crosses with the outside of his left foot.
Emery didn’t really respond to the added threat from Kaka. Daniel Parejo probably sat deeper, especially with Topal dropping in, but Tino Costa’s main job was still on Alonso, rather than dropping in as a third holder. Valencia continued to be a threat on the break, mainly with straight passes, and especially by getting in behind Arbeloa, who seemed slow on the turn and got little help from ahead against Alba and Mathieu, who switched position at will.
Jose Callejon replaced Ozil in the final ten minutes, and Real had more structure to the side, with Callejon out wide on the right and Di Maria on the left. They stretched the play, and now Valencia came under real pressure, though the crosses from wide were often poor, and Valencia’s last-ditch defending was admirable.
Conclusion
This is an odd Valencia performance to analyse – although the scoreline finished 0-0, and Valencia were decent value for their point, the scoreline doesn’t reflect what Valencia did well, because the game could have finished 3-3 or 4-4.
They didn’t defend particularly well, and were probably relieved that Real were so narrow for so long. Their real skill was being able to break through Real, by playing in the spaces between the lines, and later getting in behind Arbeloa.
Real’s play, unusually for a Mourinho side, lacked structure. They also found it difficult to keep the tempo high, or put Valencia under sustained spells of pressure. The first change worked well, with Di Maria on to provide dribbles, but the second made things too congested with Ozil and Kaka in the same space, and it required the third change to bring some structure to the side – you can’t have five attackers wandering wherever they please.





is mourihno going to drive the title on a plate to the nou camp personally?
I’m starting to suspect that what we often call as “tactical genius” of Mourinho is mainly – if not all – belong to Andre Villas – Boas. After the departure of AVB, Mourinho didn’t invent anything interesting about tactics, his team sometimes looks confused and lacks of both idea and structure. Is this only coincidence ? I don’t think so.
Mourinho might be much better at man management, motivation and mental skills but AVB might be the real tactical genius behind all of Mourinho’s success during the Porto – Chelsea – Inter Milan period. These two guys is a great combination, but regrettably they broke up.
To be honest, the finishing is the main problem here. Consistently, in the big games (this was played by Valencia with big game intensity) Madrid fail to capitilise DESPITE getting the majority of the chances. It’s more mental/luck than tactical in my opinion.
I don’t know, tactically AVB’s teams play quite differently from Mourinho’s teams. Sure I think maybe AVB deserves some credit but to say he is the real genius behind all of Mourinho’s success is a bit of an overstatement.
You do know that Mourinho won the treble WITHOUT AVB? And that AVB´s tactics failed miserably during the last season, while Real Madrid top the Spanish league, are in the semi-finals of the Champions League and are the only real competitors to the greatest team in the world at the moment, Barcelona? Mourinho IS a tactical genius. Anyone who denies that is an utter moron.
Even though i agree that mourinho is tactical genius.
Winning everything does not grant you that title(Alex ferguson)
İt just means he is good at everything and his squad is strong.
Villas Boas’ tactics failed last season? Interesting opinion, after all, he won the league undefeated and demolished everybody en route to the Europa League title.
You’ right, Mourinho won the treble in 5/2010. At that time AVB has left.
But the most crucial decision that lead to treble success is switching to 4-2-3-1 formation, with Eto’o played at the left wing and Milito was the centre forward. This decision has been made when AVB was still at Inter. He only left at October 2009, so I have a point here to suspect about AVB’s role in Mourinho “tactical genius”.
“Real Madrid top the Spanish league” ? This is because BARCELONA IS PLAYING WORSE, not because Real is playing better. In 2009/10 season, Pellegrini’s Real earned 77 points after 30 rounds, and in this 2011/12 season Mourinho’s Real has 78 points. Not a big difference.
You may have a point here.
What Mourinho currently does at Madrid is nooothing compared to what AVB achieved at Chelsea
Isn’t it the opposite? AVB had worked under the hands of Mourinho and learned from him. He left after their first year at Inter. At Académica and Porto, AVB did a great job but he failed at Chelsea miserably. On the other hand Mourinho won a treble with Inter without AVB (I don’t believe that he could do that well for a whole season if he weren’t a great tactician). Now he’s in his second year with Real and they still have a fair chance to win the CL and Spanish league titles. Mourinho’s misfortune is that Barca has a similar golden era that Ajax or Bayern had in the 70s.
This was one of the more wildly entertaining 0-0 games that you’ll see. End to end, lots of scoring chances, some last ditch defensive saves, Guaiti pulling various rabbits out of his hat, increasingly tense the longer it stayed 0-0. The “3-3 or 4-4″ comment was spot on, and I suspect we’ve all seen 3-3 games that weren’t remotely as entertaining as this one.
Atletico is 9-4-2 at home. How nuts does the race get if Real Madrid comes away from Vicente Calderon with 1 or 0 points on Wed?
I think Mourinho needs to drill into the players that we must get 3 points at the Calderon. I am fearful we will only take 1 point at best from the Clasico on the 21st, so to win all the other Liga games is imperative.
If you think Madrid won’t lose at the Camp Nou, then they can definitely afford a slip-up or two outside the Clasico. A tie vs. Barcelona would be very beneficial to Madrid, since it means they can lose/tie in Bilbao and still win the league.
I would like to see some:
……….Ronaldo
DiMaria….Ozil….Callejon
…..Khedira..Alonso
Marcelo………….Arbeloa
……Ramos…Pepe
……..Casillas
Kaka > Ozil in the 65th minute
Higuain or Benzema > Di Maria or Callejon if we fail to score after 70 minutes.
Coentrao,Albiol,Adan,Diarra on the bench for tactical/injury replacements if needed.
In my opinion this gives us the best shape and options. Callejon and Di Maria are both capable of staying wide or cutting inside. Ozil can drift to the flanks in support. Ronaldo is a monster in the air to play up front.
I would have like to see Pedro Leon replaced so we had a natural right winger, sometimes natural width is crucial to open space.
i personally doubt ronaldo capable to play lone forward role, he would probably frustrated there with limited time with ball, the guy just don’t have the patient to play as a lone striker playing high to keep the center half up…
with so many attacking talent in Madrid i probably suggest Mou to at least try play 3 defender with 2 DM.
Ronaldo… higuain….DiMaria
Ozil………….Callejon
Khedira..Alonso
Marcelo…Pepe…Ramos
Casillas
“i personally doubt ronaldo capable to play lone forward role”
right, because he sucked so as a lone forward when playing in that role at Man U…
(see http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/20/teams-of-the-decade-3-manchester-united-2006-09/)
Your link isn’t working but I found this article and I think you misread what Michael Cox said. Ronaldo didn’t play necessary as a lone frontman as it’s well said: “United featured no permanent frontman.” . Surely he was and can be a important presence in the central frontline but no the same way that Higuain or Benzema are. He’s more mobile and works better coming inside. Trust me, he has already played many games for Portugal in the usual lone forward role, never worked. He needs space.
I think RM can play quite and with wide with their usual team with Di Maria and Ronaldo moving inside. Ozil drift wider to the right and Marcelo going forward.
playing marcelo at lcb is like telling ronaldo hes not allowed to dribble
Mourinho’s abilities as a man-manager and motivator have been far more integral to his success as a trainer than his tactical ability, in my view. I’d go as far as saying he’s overrated, in that department.
At least there’s somebody who agrees with me…
definitely he is good man manager and motivator and he is good tactician but that in defensive sense . he knows how to stop teams from playing but is unable to create a system where on he can tell his players as to how to thread opposition defense he expects his players to do that for him letting them freedom at times on positional play . real madrid are never fluent they just depend on the individual brilliance of their players rather than of their coach which why they struggle against barca and teams who defend properly like levante at the start of the season . he got success at chelsea because utd were building and arsenal had lost some of the best players . at inter he won because there was no great challenger to his team and he had some very good players whom he need to manage properly . his teams had never been pleasing to the eye and they struggle against teams who are very discplined . wont be amazed if he goes on to loose the title .
ever remember a fellow portuguese who too was a real coach ( utd assistant )and his team too was in front in points only to loose the title in last few weeks .
Sorry, do you watch Real Madrid games?
Then could you tell us couple of tactical geniuses?
Michels, Sacchi, Ancelotti… for example. They really had strong influence in football’s modern tactics.
Bielsa. Very bold tactics.
Also, Mourinho’s tactics are built around strong teams that usually play against lesser opponents, and then have enough quality to play counter-attacking football against SLIGHTLY better opposition. Think back to every team he’s managed, and you’ll see it was quality team. The day Mourinho manages a mid-table side, is the day I will judge whether he’s a good coach or not.
No credit for Di Costa?! That guy was the most influential field player for Valencia.
Ozil was running things for Real Madrid. Was pleased to see him not subbed out as early as usual.
The way Madrid looks to pressure is interesting. Rather than trying to maximize how compact their block stays to compress space, Mourinho looks to augment how he presses by depending more on one of Madrid’s great strength-pace.
Rather than “hunting in packs,” as Michels described, in Madrid’s system it’s often a smaller number of players in a zone closing down the ball through velocity and individual effort. Rather than maximizing compactness to make the pitch small Madrid can consume space through speed.
The advantage of this approach is that it allows Mourinho to play his backline deeper than would be otherwise necessary (something he may not be particularly comfortable doing). It also allows him flexibility in positioning his holding players.
The trade off however is that by not trying to maximize compactness, space can develop internally within the Madrid block, especially once the ball gets past the first line of defense.
And that’s what we saw in part in this match vs. Valencia as ZM points out. Valenica were able to find space between the lines at various points in time because Madrid weren’t trying to squeeze their block tight when they pressed up field. Their upfield defenders look to defend high but the defensive line played more conservatively, deeper (as did Alonso in this match).
The other issue that arises from this approach is that if the individual work rate of the players falls off or fatigue sets in the quality of the pressing can fall off quickly. This was another factor in this match, one which helped Valencia to move past the Madrid defense “one line at a time.”
Spot on! I wish u had some diagrams or a more in detailed post…very original analysis
Thanks. I’ve actually written about the Madrid defensive system and its evolution extensively on our site. It’s a Barcelona related blog but I do promise that I try very hard to be objective, especially in the tactical analysis. Nearly all of the posts include detailed still shots analyzing formation as evidence for what I’m saying.
If you’re interested in the subject below is a link for the tactical review I wrote for the last Clasico. It’s a long post so if you’re especially interested in the Madrid defensive system skip to the section titled: “The Madrid Defensive System: Foundations”
I summarize Madrid’s defense and some of its evolution in that match review because that context was why Guardiola chose to play the unorthodox formation he did in that match. Regardless, that section can stand on its own as an analysis. It has detail and still shot images focused on the Madrid defense that may prove of interest.
http://www.barcelonafootballblog.com/12254/match-review-part-2-el-clsico-madrid-1-3-barcelona-system/
Actually Mourinho’s team always had problems with player’s fitness and stamina at the final part of the season because he rarely make rotation and usually let key players play almost the whole season if they were not suspended or injured.
Inter Milan was really struggling with their physical condition in the last two months of 2010/11 season, but this team included a lot of experienced players and their mental skills were admirable. However, the current Real Madrid team is generally young and some players still could not adopt with the congested fixtures, especially Ozil and Di Maria. I must say that Real is also very lucky this season with few injuries in comparison with Barcelona.
Among the key players, only Higuain and Di Maria have some injury problems, while Barca had to stand with the injuries of Villa, Alexis, Pedro, Iniesta, Pique, Abidal, Fabregas and Xavi (actually he has to play permanently with some minor injuries) to an extent.
i would agree, mourinho likes to field a consistent xi, and i for one think that inter’s collapse last season under benitez was at least partly the product of mourinho’s treble campaign. but italian clubs are also notorious for their training calendars, are they not? where there is an overemphasis on long distance running in the preseason and then a huge push after the winter break, often leading to players exhaustion at key moments in the season? not too sure here… i do recall that mourinho got his start as a fitness coach, and maybe moving away from those roots for so long now to be in the manager position has alienated him from some of the details of fitness. that is, he isn’t so detailed in his plans and/or madrid’s players won’t accept such micro-management from him. also if i recall, his fitness coach has been thrown out of more matches than mourinho himself this term. grasping at straws, but perhaps theres some connection?? (don’t everybody rush to agree with me that this is clearly a martian ufo conspiracy involving a grassy knoll and ancient rosicrucian orders!)
and @Euler – brilliantly put! i enjoyed reading your comment and will look through the site you linked. i saw similar during the match but couldn’t quite understand what i was seeing. and the reasons you describe are a large factor in why i think mourinho tries to choose a consistent xi that he can trust to execute his plans accurately. though it has looked self-defeating at times, but there are certain players that seem to thrive playing 180minutes per week. ozil does not appear to be one of them, and i would say he should be a critical structural element of rma. i honestly cannot wait to see how this type of block works itself out for mourinho’s team (whatever one that may be) in the near future, if it can be developed to counteract a barcelona or bielsa-type press.
is mourinho trying to have his cake and eat it, too? and by doing so, is he sacrificing the feature most of us associate with mourinho (a good shape, purpose, and identity to the side)? the last clasico madrid stuck to their formation and took the game to barcelona, which worked admirably, much better than anything has. arguably, arsenal did the same to manchester city this weekend to good result. is this a question of finding the right balance between stability so that players know their specific roles and tinkering to be able to adjust to on-pitch realities? guardiola has been trying for the balance between innovation and dogma, too, and i have been feeling that’s been erring on the side of too much innovation. now i’m starting to feel like mourinho is erring on the side of too little identity.
cheers
Well put on the issue of identity. I think this has been Mourinho’s great challenge at Madrid.
How does he take a collection of elite, attack minded talent and carve out a coherent approach to defending as a unit that best fits their skill sets while at the same time not diminishing their attacking intent?
That’s a very difficult balance to create and he’s veered between different models (high pressure vs. trivote, etc) at different times, particularly in the Clasicos.
The high pressure models seems to be the best balance, IMO, but because the block doesn’t stay maximally compact it allows interior space. It is very difficult to beat Barcelona with space inside your block. The last Clasico was a good example of this – Messi just had far too much interior space to operate as did Iniesta in the 2nd half when he pulled centrally off the wing.
That’s why in the following Clasico in the Copa Del Rey Mourinho went back to the trivote – to suffocate that space. That failed to produce a result and also wasn’t particularly popular amongst some players and some supporters. In the next Clasico Madrid got back to a high pressure system. But while that produced a 2-2 draw – there was still significant interior space within the Madrid block.
The “solution” in theory seems clear – play the defensive line higher and stay more compact. But that has it’s own trade offs and Mourinho doesn’t seem eager to take on the risks involved. That too is more than reasonable as playing a very high line is indeed risky-again especially when the other team may have the ball for 65% of the match.
Interesting to see how he approaches the next Clasico. Could go in very different directions.
There’s contributions like Euler’s (objective, insightful). And then there’s contributions like yours in this thread (biased, shallow). I suggest you review the way you isolate rational analysis from emotional drive (this was not based in this single post). Please don’t take this personally.
very insightful. However, teams need tremendous composure on the ball for it to work. Recall the 4-2 vs. Villarreal last season. Villarreal sliced through Madrid with ease in the first half, with Cazorla, Borja Valero, and the rest causing big problems with quick interchanges. However, the introduction of Kaka allowed Madrid to up the tempo, and Villarreal were battered in the second half. For whatever reason, Madrid couldn’t quite hit top gear against Valencia, and it cost them two points. The bit about fatigue also explains why Barcelona have been able to fight back in recent Clasicos.
What an open game, I didnt watch it but saw highlights, how on earth was it 0-0, could have been 3-3
Also on real Madrid, is it just me or do real mardrid lack a dynamic rightback. Its normal to have one reserved fullback and one ‘winger’ on the otherside to have balance in the back 4. Sergio Ramos looks like a centreback these days, a bit more powerful. Arbeloa for me is a tad on the slower side, Coentrao is a leftie. Diarra looks energetic enough but maybe just not a natural rightback
“di Maria stayed wider, where he played a couple of crosses with the outside of his left foot”. Eh?
Di Maria loves those types of crosses. Instead of a cross that swings inside towards the net, he likes to cross a ball that starts to curve away from the goal. And since he’s left-footed, he uses the outside of his left foot to make those crosses.
Great article, totally what I was looking for.
Benzema lacks the technical ability to beat Alba? Really? This is the first time I´ve ever read that Benzema lacks the technical ability. If you had said pace, I would´ve agreed to a degree, but technical ability, no, never.
He said “technical skill” rather than “technical ability.” The former referring to skill on the ball (Ronaldo-style flicks and step-overs mixed with quick feet and close control – think Fifa skill moves), the latter meaning ability to strike the ball.
In any case, I’d be surprised if Benzema wasn’t skillful enough to beat the full-back. Maybe his play was a bit predictable. I would have thought that it’d be more accurate to say that he lacked the understanding of how to play that role – not sure where to position himself, when to stay wide, when to cut in with the ball, when to try to use his skill to beat Alba and when to make off-the-ball runs in behind – and that was the reason he couldn’t get the better of Alba.
I think it’s fairly obvious that playing both Higuain and Benzema isn’t going to work. As hard as it is for Mourinho, one needs to be dropped (probably Higuain). Real Madrid need width, or at least good movement. Benzema can’t play the “Pedro role”. Put him up front and either bring in Kaka with Ozil on the right (not an ideal solution either) or play Di Maria (and failing that Callejon.)
The only thing that Benzema might be missing there is raw speed, with and without the ball, that CR7 has. This is the second time I read ZM diminishing the technical skills of Benzema, I am quite astonished I have to say, since I think Benzema is probably the most technical player at the current RM.
Either way, I suggest you all go and watch more games of RM – Ronaldo probably has the better running and shooting skills, but Benzema is better at dribbling, keeping the ball at his feet with great control, and knowing what to do with ball in order to fool the defenders.
Perhaps Mourinho wants Benzema to play as Eto’o in 09-10 season.
I though Real madrid really should have won this game, they were so fluid and created a lot of chances. Benzema did okay when Arbeloa got forward but I would agree Real looked better when Di Maria came on, he could offer more when Valencia were defending deep.
The CB pairing didn’t work for me, they were too easily dragged out of position and left gaping holes in defence. The fullbacks got forward consistently well and were key to Real Madrid being fluid. especially Arbeloa who was great in possession.
Alonso was great in deep midfield, recycling possession well and Khedira provided good runs from deep and a surprise element to their play.
I was most dissapointed with the front four not really doing much defensively. They seemed lazy and didnt track back or press the players in defence. It meant Valencia could easily play out from the back.
Overall, Real madrid were fluid and kept possession excellently (with nearly every players superb technically) as well as great late runs from both fullbacks and Khedira. The problem was that their CB’s ended up out of position a lot from Valencia’s good movement and their front four were poor defensively meaning Valencia could comfortably break with the ball and find gaping holes in between the CB’s.
http://economicinterest.wordpress.com/ have a read of my blog if you get the chance
May be Real didnt win because, it was the first match in la liga this season, outside Barca, when a team really played hard – defending with heart and attacking whenever there was a chance to, against Madrid for the whole 90 minutes. In other matches, when the teams tried – often a red card or penalty worked against the other team. for eg. like in the Madrid derby.
while a bit harsh, could be true… of any big team in most leagues, rma and fcb included. but its not that easy of a feat to pull off, for a small team to have the courage and belief in themselves to go up against a barcelona or a milan or a manchester united and know they’ll have to work at 100% for 90mins to have a chance, and that any moment of relaxation could mean a match-ending goal through one player’s moment of brilliance. that said, valencia is far, far from a plucky little side that whisked a point away. they always show up against the big two and play to win. i really rate emery as a manager, but remember that he gets a lot of flack from supporters because they see him as not ambitious enough to take the title from madrid or barça.
with all that said, your analysis does a major disservice to the reality of the events as they unfolded, which zm has described quite well, as usual. there was a ton of goal mouth action, and this match was a clear demonstration that a sport like football is reliant on chance and a few key moments. the ruthlessness of madrid was not in evidence at this match, but thats an impossible metric to quantify, barely describable really. a lot is a factor of confidence and mentality, one of mourinho’s strong suits (in my opinion). either side could have taken all three points here, for different reasons. both managers fielded good teams, mourinho maybe responded to emery’s rather defensive shape by gambling more. emery’s gamble to suck madrid in and create space paid off, but without goals. brilliant match from some top players and managers.
the refereeing quip thrown in at the end is very tired, but duly noted. i think spanish refereeing is generally deplorable, but was spot on here. both madrid and barcelona get a shameful amount of calls in their favour, but it would be wrong to suggest that is the cause of their success.
Not true at all. Malaga pushed them back for a while in the league fixture at the Bernabeu, and Rayo gave madrid many problems in the league fixture away. Fought for the full 90, and was a game that Madrid desperately deserved to draw or lose. Valencia Away was also a game similar to that — Mourinho instead used the trivote to compete in the midfield, and just made it a physical affair across the whole pitch.
True, Madrid attacked better with the arrival of De Maria. But to say, Benzema lacks the technical ability to beat Alba, am afraid, is not really fair. For me, Benzema is the only player from the Real side, who could start for the current Barca team. He has excellent qualities on the field, and also on his temperament. He could shine for Barca.
I would rather consider it as a bit of an off day for Benzema that he couldnt convert. Ronaldo also missed some sitters.
Whatever, it was a great game of football and a scoreless draw was a fair result, if not a bit perplexing.
I think ZM is trying to say that Benzema is lacking the skill in the specific “classic wing play”. I agree Benzema is fantastic as a striker and really skillful but his moves didn’t work in this particular position against this particular defender. Just a mistake from Mourinho that was corrected later on.
Thank you for doing this match as well! Great analysis.
One more point I’d like to add which maybe wasn’t emphasized enough. It’s that how Xabi Alonso was withdrawn from the game by Tino Costa. He had a really quiet game, espacially in the first half. As a concequence Madrid didn’t dominate that much and did not create chances from deep positions. And his presence maybe made it easier for Valencia to break cause he’s not the tackling type holding midfielder.
Anyway good game for Valencia, wish there were more of these in this season…
well Real had around 60% possession and Alonso had about 60-70 odd passes, so I wouldn’t say he was too contained. I would blame the front four not working hard enough today to press Valencia’s defence
Not hard to break Madrid down. What it requires is the ability to pass the ball and maintain possession. What Madrid does is take advantage of teams’ inability to maintain possession and they just bombard away and run up the score. If three or four passes can be strung together then Madrid is exposed defensively. Valencia, although not full of world class players, was able to match the pace and athleticism of Madrid. Football is a strange game and sometimes the ball does not go in regardless of how expensive your team may be.
This match was very interresting indeed. For us Valencia fans it was a thriller, and and uplifting experience despite not scoring and dropping down to 4th in the league.
I compared the tactics to when they last met. Then RM got the better of VCF, especially in the first half, with playing Benzema, Özil out wide, while Khedira went higher up than usual. They constantly won the ball high, and managed to both break up VCF’s attacking build-up, and to keep up the pressure in offence.
This time Emery surprised everyone, who thought they saw the unusual (for Valencia, since Emery’s never been succesful with with them) 4-3-3, with Parejo playing behind Aduriz. But instead Tino (who normally play deeper in the pivote), both acted as a playup target between the lines, and neutralizing Alonso. This also left Parejo to playmake from a deeper position, as Banega usually does (injured rest of the season). Tino weren’t that contained either, but was allowed to make passes that were risky, as Valencia sat very deep, and there were no room to pass to players running channels. Stationary targets are easier to screen and wrestle the ball from. Hence Valencia got a lot of breakaways.
The lack of good alternatives for Alonso made Pepe often take deep runs from behind, leaving more space for Valencia to counterattack in.
It’s actually a tribute to the “old” Valencia, when they didn’t bother dominating play, but counterattack fast, and massively. Another great change was replacing Barragan, who’s been great in attack, but shaky defending) with Ricardo Costa (which normally play centre back), to take care of CR7. Topal playing as a third stopper sometimes is correct, since he plays well in that position too. His performance was spotless.
Not sure what you mean with Valencia defending bad, but their lack of good organization have cost them a lot of points this season. Then they have usually taken greater risks going forward, with both sidebacks going all the way. Individually I think their defence was good in this match.
Ironically, many VCF-fans think the defence were the performers, while the attackers Piatti and Aduriz weren’t good enough.
Whether Valencia played 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 is splitting hairs, and it would be more correct to say that they played 4-2-3-1, as their 4-3-3 is nothing like how it’s normally played, with Barcelona f.ex.
So going to do an analysis of the Liverpool Blackburn game or just write ‘What did I just watch?’ and leave it at that?
hello there and thanks on your info ? I have certainly picked up something new
from right here. I did then again expertise a few technical
points the usage of this web site, since
I experienced to reload the website lots of instances previous to I could get it to load
properly. I had been wondering in case your web hosting is OK?
Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading
instances times will sometimes impact your placement in google and could harm your high quality ranking if advertising and marketing with Adwords.
Anyway I’m including this RSS to my email and can look out for a lot more of your respective intriguing content. Ensure that you replace this again very soon..
Hiya very nice web site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Amazing
.. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally?
I am glad to search out a lot of helpful information right here in the post,
we’d like work out extra techniques in this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .