Five areas of interest in Everton 1-0 Tottenham

The starting line-ups
This was another interesting clash between David Moyes and Harry Redknapp. Their tactical battle at White Hart Lane last season was fascinating, and this game followed a similar pattern of Moyes responding to Redknapp’s decisions.
I’ve written about the difference between the two over at the Guardian, using the battle between Gareth Bale and Seamus Coleman to sum up the two managers’ styles.
1. Bale v Coleman
That battle was the first area of interest. Coleman teamed up with Phil Neville to double-mark Bale out of the game at White Hart Lane last year, and had expected to do the same here.
But Bale, as part of a continued experiment to put him in different positions to vary his game, started on the right. That meant that Coleman moved across to the other flank too, with Royston Drenthe moving from the left to the the right accordingly. Bale had a disappointing game, and Coleman found it easier to close down the space. Bale was always looking to come inside, so Coleman could stay relatively central and show him down the line, where the Welshman found it difficult to cross with his right foot, or with the outside of his left.
Bale needed more support from Kyle Walker – on one of the few occasions he did overlap, Coleman got dragged to the flank and Bale could come in and shoot, albeit poorly.
Eventually Bale moved to the left in the second half, and Coleman was happy to follow back to his natural side.
2. Tottenham use 4-4-2 again
It didn’t work against Manchester United, nor against Arsenal, but Redknapp again went with two strikers. It looked particularly bad here – neither Jermain Defoe nor Emmanuel Adebayor dropped off onto Everton’s holding player to prevent Spurs getting overrun in the middle, and there was also a big gap between the lines of midfield and attack.
That was due to the unusual nature of the midfield – Luka Modric on the left, coming inside into the centre. Bale was stranded out on the right with two men on him, and the strikers got little support.
Tottenham have generally made their 4-4-2 work when playing quickly and directly down the flanks, but here that wasn’t much of an option.
3. Parker – Sandro
The use of this duo is probably intended to give Spurs more protection, but it seems to do the opposite. When Redknapp introduced Sandro as an extra holding player against Arsenal, it backfired spectacularly and turned a 2-2 into a 5-2. Here, Spurs were remarkably open in the space between the lines that they were presumably trying to protect.
It’s not clear which of Parker and Sandro is meant to be sitting deeper, and which playing higher up. They’re entitled to take it in turns, of course, but that relies on a good understanding which is plainly not there – not yet, at least.
4. Leon Osman
To describe Osman as underrated would be unfair – few regular Premier League watchers don’t rate him. His use of the ball and appreciation of space is excellent, and he popped up in a good position to create the goal for Nikica Jelavic.
His running from deep was extremely impressive, because it was he, rather than the more naturally placed Tim Cahill, who exploited the gap between the Tottenham lines. Cahill generally motored forward high up against the Tottenham defence, meaning neither could come out to any further midfield runners, and Osman sneaked into space behind Parker to great effect.
5. Everton move to a back five
Late on, Tottenham were piling on the pressure, and Moyes introduced an extra defender – Phil Jagielka for Coleman. Initially it seemed that Neville would sit ahead of Jagielka on the right, but by the end of the game Jagielka was simply an extra centre-back, with Neville continuing at right-back in a 5-4-1.





Was wondering ZM, do you think Spurs’ fall from grace will continue or will they recover? And why are they doing so bad at the moment?
Just one thing is missing on Spurs side: a great manager. Just this. Nothing more.
Just imagine either Mourinho, Guardiola, Ferguson or Wenger as Tottenham’s managers. What amazing things they would do with Modric, Bale, Parker, Adebayor, Lennon, Van der Vaart…
Sell all of them?
Just this. Nothing more.
You speak in jest, but hit at the truth: Wenger already sold Adebayor, Parker was sold on from Chelsea under Mourinho, and I think Madrid sold VdV while the special one was in charge too.
Sit Parker as he´s an H&H’er…Hoofin it and Hustle just ain’t enough to get it these days. Outside of that all he does is pass backwards and avoids really initiating a build-up. Kranjcar is extremely underused, and his appreciation for possession is underutilized. Put Modric in the hole instead of VDV, get VDV a yoga instructor, 5 game runout for reserves and maybe he’ll have the stamina to play more than 60 minutes with his miniature heatmap signature.
Time and time again I’ve commented this – once again ‘arry is proved to be tactically inept. Why change a winning formula (Bale-Parker-Modric-Lennon)?
….maybe because Lennon is injured?
why push modric wide?
Lol it’s one of the oddest choices IMO
Can’t VDV play on the wing?
Van der Vaart is terrible on the wing. Modric at least can add intelligent movement to get in behind Everton’s midfielders as well as good possession. And seriously, every manager gets things wrong sometimes. Tottenham, a bit like Liverpool, need to just get back into their groove again.
That is strange. If ‘arry thinks VDV has fitness issues, why not play Kranjcar (spelling?) on the wing. That would be far better than pushing Modric out wide.
A few years ago Modric used to play on the left and continually come inside.
Then it was said to be strange when Redknapp moved him deeper to centre midfield. ( nb; it may have just been me that said it).
Spurs looks moronic
Good call on your fourth point – the genius of Leon Osman is something which needs to be highlighted. How is it that he’s never played for England?
That would mean playing a possession/passing based game to get the best out of him. England and passing just don’t mix ha
Yes, but this is the kind of game England need to start playing, where the old ‘kick and rush’, as everybody now knows, doesn’t work.
Osman for england is something i hadnt really thought of before, but he is the kind of clever, technically competent footballer that is important at major championships.
Everton don’t play a possession/passing game and he does ok for them
They did when Arteta was there, and thats where Osman looked his best. Everton have lost that this season and been far more defensive, and we have seen the likes of Osman not really get into the game.
What is it with Leon Osman’s forward arrow?
What ISN’T it?
“… and Osman sneaked into space behind Parker to great effect.”
Sneaky arrow for sneaky player.
Nice analysis of the tactics employed by these sides. Was, as always, a good read. But what about arry`s personal tsunami occuring under his facial skin??
hahahahahahahaha
A really enjoyable game. Some points I would like to add:
1/ Heitinga and Distin are really starting to look like a good CB pairing. With Jagielka out they have gotten some playing time together and its gonna be hard for Jagielka to get back into the team.
2/ One good point about Bale starting on the right was that he stopped Baines getting forward, who is one of Evertons biggest threats.
3/ The Everton midfield worked well defensively. Fellaini picked up Modric as he moved inside, Coleman doubled up on Bale and Drenthe tracked BAE runs forward. Offensively neither winger really got forward (with Drenthe pushed back admirably by BAE).
4/Jevalic had a great game and showed Everton what they have been missing. He help up the ball well and looked great in the air. He targeted King in the air (with Kaboul much better in the air) and Cahill constantly looked for the second ball – though he didnt end up doing much when he got it. But this gave Everton an outball when under pressure.
5/ Osman provided the link between defense and attack fantastically as well, dribbling past Parker with ease at times. This allowed Everton two ways of attacking, either getting the ball to him or hitting it long to Jevalic. Even when the ball was hit long, Osman was great as ghosting forward into great positions and the goal showed this.
6/ King and Parker have looked off form for the last few games now, maybe Harry needs to refresh the team by rotating a bit more?
7/ Walker really should have got forward more throughout the game with no direct opponent, while Sandro also didnt really have an opponent, though he was pressed by Cahill dropping back when he got the ball and couldnt pass the ball forward effectively.
8/ I was surprised by two up front for spurs again. Defoe just got in the way really trying to play central, and I would have liked to have seen him drift to the left flank and try and try and run at the defense, Spurs didnt really have any width and this could have solved the problem somewhat.
http://economicinterest.wordpress.com/2012/03/10/is-arsenal-the-economic-role-model-for-english-football/ My blog about Arsenal as a role model for the rest of the premiership. Give it a read if you have time.
I think Redknapp is trying to keep certain players happy rather than playing the right team. I don’t understand why he doesn’t play Kranjcar or the Mexican bloke on the right when Lennon is missing, rather than destroying the midfield balance.
And where is VdV? It doesn’t matter how much Defoe and the press whine about it – this was a game where VdV was needed to beef up the numbers in midfield, because Everton are good in this area. And they are extremely underrated too.
Yeah, the freezing out of Gio Dos Santos is inexplicable and astoundingly stupid. For this reason alone that silly-talking fraud shouldn’t be allowed near any national management position.
Sorry for the non tactical point but does anyone else thing Bale is infact an extremely limited footballer? He is a very good flying left winger, but every time he plays elswhere he just doesnt look comfortable on or off the ball.
Maybe so, but how important is that? Gerard Pique is a very good centerback, but every time he plays elsewhere he just doesn’t look comfortable.
The solution is to just play Bale on the left and maximize his abilities.
What you said about pique would make sense if pique wasn’t barcas emergency additional striker- example the 2nd leg of CL against inter in 2010
Does anyone know if this actually happened?
So Gareth Bale isn’t two-footed? No tactics are going to help that. That’s a TECHNICAL failing.
4-4-2 is generally accepted as a safe formation for a team that’s not particularly TECHNICAL, for example, England?
Maybe the technical side of the game is overlooked – though an excellent tactical analysis as always, ZM.
The numerical formation has nothing to do with how technical you are. Man Utd and (especially) Arsenal have had some fantastic seasons playing a nominal 4-4-2. It’s all about the personnel – Modric / Bale / Adebayor / Defoe isn’t exactly Pires / Ljungberg / Henry / Bergkamp.
I disagree entirely – from what I’ve read from serious football text books (German, Italian and others) 4-4-2 is the default start-up for a team learning to play, or the safe option for teams who aren’t particularly good.
Man U look good doing it in England simply because the EPL has low technical quality compared to the Bundesliga, La Liga, Serie A, Eredivisie etc. Notice Man U are bombing in Europe, as are Man City. The most technical team in the UK – Arsenal – does ok. The typical EPL player is fast, tackles at the lower limit of thuggery, kicks ok, and can pass sometimes.
But technical as in really creative, with great vision? No.
Not that any of the top teams in the EPL are even remotely ‘English’, which is the real reason why the English national team sucks.
Yet it is pretty much the same Man u team that got to the final last year, the premier league has some of the best technical players around. don’t get poor english techinique mixed up with the premier league’s technical players.
Arrigo Saachi’s 4-4-2 Milan team would beg to differ with your perspective on 442, and I’m pretty sure Man U got to the Cahmpion’s League final last year on the back of that 4-4-2.
I’m not a partisan for that (or any) formation, but I did watch Villarreal’s take on it with Rossi and Nilmar up front, Cazorla and Cani out wide, and it looked sufficiently technical to me.
And Arsenal, though it pains me, are out of the CL.
So mediocre english players will blossom into world class ones if they play in the big teams? what are you saying here? They’d still be terrible players and the england team will still play the same, except english teams would do worse in the champions league (see man utd).
LOVE your website ZM, but I thought this particular article was unfair on Spurs and perhaps swayed by the result. After all we (yes, I’m a Spurs fan!) had 61% possession, 22 shots compared to 9 (9 on target compared to 5) and 8 corners compared to 0 [http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17243496]. And against Man United, which you cite as another example of 4-4-2 not working, we had 57% possession, 18 shots compared to 6 (9 on target compared to 5) and 7 corners compared to 3 [http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17175777].
Of course stats don’t tell the whole story, but I think that the above are clear-cut enough to show that our overall performances in those two games were actually better than our respective opposition’s.
Still, I agree that Bale was ineffective on the right.
But spurs havnt created clear cut chances like they usually do. Parker and Sandro are allowed possession in deep areas and the teams have focused more on stopping modric and bale, which they have done pretty effectively. When Spurs play Modric in deep midfield, he can create from deep and solve this problems, Spurs are missing that right now.
Exactly. Most teams dont have a striker to drop down onto Modric when he plays deep, so a midfielder has to close him down/mark, creating space in the middle for the player in the hole and thus creating those overload chances where you have more players in attack than they do in defence.
Modric is their primary creator – he might not get assists himself, but he plays a lot of key passes – so he needs to play in the middle because he’s absolutely vital to Spurs. Even if that means Parker, Sandro or another playing playing on the wing, it would be worth it. Southampton did this when their RM was injured – we played Richard Chaplow, who is identical to Parker in style. He made the RM spot his own because his CM roots meant he could get forward and back and provide passes through the centre, cutting inside or running down the wing. If it can work for us it can work for Spurs.
Harry Redknapp is trying too much. He’s actually working -too- hard. Modric is best when he’s in the centre, and Bale is best when on the left wing. Now, if you lose your RIGHT winger, someone should just come into replace him, rather than shift players over. Spurs were playing attractive, fluid football and giving themselves lots of passing options with 2 central attackers (whether 2 strikers or an extra midfield man), 2 extremely wide players (Lennon and Bale) and two energetic centre midfielders (Modric and anyone).
Now, they’ve come into the trap of wanting, but unable, to play tiki-taka, by trying to force players to play shorter passing by bundling them up at that end of the pitch. Bale is coming inside and clashing with one striker, while Modric comes inside and clashes with the other, and then you have Sandro and Parker as the only players who are free, but they are often marked since they sit so deep – they also cant spray passes forward to the front 4.
Redknapp needs to realise that his side rely on and thrive on lots of space and lots of width. Going back to the vague 4-2-3-1 where Modric sits further back with one of Parker and Sandro, and then Bale and another offering the width. If Kranjcar plays, tell him to hug the touchline and mix up his play to give Modric options. Then playing Adebayor who loves having someone play behind him and with wingers crossing the ball in. This seems to be Tottenhams best option, offering the most fluid play and also the best as a team – creativity in Van der Vaart and Modric, the stabaility of having Sandro/Parker sitting back, the width of Bale and the opposite winger/inside forward and then a lone striker up front offering an outball as with the 5 midfield defending, he doesnt need to track back as much and leaves him free to press the defence and make runs into channels which he did superbly with Saha.
Whatever happens though, Adebayor, Saha and Defoe will never partner each other. All of them are pretty much the same player with some varying qualities, but they all play the same role at the very least. Even playing Modic behind the striker would be a better option.
Why not use parker n modric in centre, bale and whoever out wide and krankcar behind Ade? Dunno, anything for spurs would be fine if they just use two centre mids who take turns to defend, oh and bale on the left.
Defensively Everton is one of the best set up teams. They are probbaly the best set of players to nulify spurs flank attack.
A natural fullback in Neville, 2 wingbacks in coleman and baines, and Drenthe a former wingback who is now just a winger.
Rodwell is also poweful and two footed so he can be chucked on either side of a midfield( I wonder if he would make a good fullback?)
The probelm with Everton is finding goals, maybe they have that with Jelavic
Osman is pretty much Everton in microcosm. He is always really great in the second half of the season and pretty poor in the first half of the season. This has been the case for about 4 years.
I can never work out if him playing well causes Everton as a team to play well, or if Everton playing well as a teacm causes Osman to play well personally.
Osman is Everton’s knight.. One square left, two squares forward
Brilliant
would it be possible to translate your web-site into spanish because i have difficulties of speaking to english, and as there usually are not numerous pictures in your internet site i’d prefer to go through a fantastic of what you may be writting
Ahighbloodpressurediet.com