Ivory Coast 3-0 Equatorial Guinea: Ivory Coast reliant on set-pieces and mistakes

The starting line-ups
The individual quality of Didier Drogba and Yaya Toure proved too much for Equatorial Guinea, but the Ivory Coast are yet to convince.
Ivory Coast coach Francois Zahoui has made plenty of changes to his side in this competition – always in a 4-3-3 shape. He seems keen to utilise his strong squad, and almost every position aside from the goalkeeper and centre-backs has seen rotation.
Gilson Paulo’s selection has been more consistent, though he did change things for the final group game. Here he recalled a couple of players dropped for that defeat to Zambia, and brought in Narcisse Ekanga Amia for his first start.
The Ivory Coast were strong favourites but didn’t play particularly well. They continue to lack creativity from midfield, and their wingers can be wasteful in the final third.
Formations
The Ivory Coast were 4-3-3, largely as expected. Yaya Toure started off playing very deep and was often tracked by an opponent, but ventured further forward as the game went on.
The Equatorial Guinea formation was interesting, and difficult to describe in purely numerical terms. Their defence could be defined as either a back three or a back four – when they had the ball, the right-back Kily made very adventurous runs down the right to stretch the play, whereas the left-back Fousseny Kamissoko stayed in position and got himself tight to the three centre-backs. Without the ball, however, Kily dropped in at right-back.
This situation influenced the way Equatorial Guinea played higher up the pitch. Randy, on the left, was like a wing-back but Kily was the only man playing wide on the right. The intelligent ball player Juvenal sat in front of the defence while Konate played as more of a destroyer.
It was difficult to tell what the two attacking midfielders, Ekeda and Ekanga, were supposed to be doing. They basically looked to shut down the Ivory Coast central midfielders without the ball, but their role with the ball was unclear. A couple of times Javier Balboa made runs out to the left and created space for those two to exploit, but on the ball they lacked quality.
The unusual Equatorial Guinea shape impacted on how the Ivory Coast played. For example, Kily’s runs meant that Max Gradel played much deeper than Gervinho (although he naturally plays further away from goal anyway), while the runs towards a similar part of the pitch from Randy, Ekanga and Balboa meant that Kafoumba Coulibaly played out to the right more than he would have liked, and frequently found himself next to Gosso.
Lack of creativity
There wasn’t much promise from the centre of midfield – no-one took the game by the scruff of the neck. Yaya Toure had to retreat too deep, Coulibaly was concerned with his defensive responsibilities and Didier Zokora is hardly a creative player. On the other side, Juvenal wasn’t quite as impressive as in the group stage, and often didn’t have enough attacking options.
Both sides were probably most dangerous down the same side – Equatorial Guinea built up play down the left then switched it to Kily on the right, who was a threat with his crossing. However, his positioning meant that Gradel could break dangerously, while Ekeda moving into the middle meant that Boka was often free to get down the left, and he created a couple of chances when he moved into the final third.
But this was a game simply decided by the better players – the gulf in quality was huge, and Drogba and Toure’s brilliance got the second two goals, after Rui’s terrible mistake let in Drogba for the first.
Those two goals came from set-pieces, though, and in open play they were poor. The Ivory Coast continue to lack a true playmaker – Toure’s job surely needs to be concentrated higher up the pitch where he can drive at the opposition – they have enough tackling ability and strength elsewhere to be comfortable deep in midfield.
Conclusion
The Equatorial Guinea did well – their unusual formation dragged their opponents out of shape, which helped to make the Ivory Coast look slow and clueless in possession.
At the moment the Ivory Coast rely too much on the wide players for attacking drive. They are both excellent at dribbling but not particularly adept passers. Gervinho, in particular, has an amazing tendency to go on a good run then fail to do anything with his final ball.
Here, it didn’t turn out to be costly – but later in the competition it might become clear that the Ivory Coast are weaker than the sum of their parts.





wholly irrelevant, but it’s always odd to see nations, quite often in Africa, with generally weak sides but stand out players from the Western Leagues – Hleb for Belarus, and Berba for Bulgaria, as well as Valencia for Ecuador, are also representative of this
I wouldn’t call Ecuador weak.Also are you trying to say Ivory Coast are a weak side?
Poor may be strong, but certainly not world class. Didier Drogba is a truly world class player, better than any English player, yet man for man, England have better players than Cote D’Ivoire
Yeh your’e probably right, however they’re better than most of the middle ranking European sides including the home nations.
England>Ivory Coast. And i’m Scottish!
CIV have several stand out players…
Kolo Toure
Yaya Toure
Gervinho
Kalou
Seydou Doumbia
Its weird that you feel Drogba is their only stand out player
Also I dont see who you would consider “weak” on the side. I guess Sol Bamba who is in the championship at Leicester and Barry the goalkeeper in Belgium. But the rest could easily all fit in top clubs.
Kily’s energy is astounding,a championship team should pick him up.
Hi Michael,I’m very impressed with the details you provided for this match. Helps us to understand the games like this better.
Great job!
All the best..
ZM why do you think almost every African side seems to have this problem of lacking creativity in midfield?
I remember reading quotes from a Man Utd scout in Africa, who speaks about the “Bouba Diop” template. I think the suggestion was that kids in Africa play on long narrow stretches of ground, which produces players who have the physicality & stamina to cope with these conditions.
Good Q – Jonathan Wilson has often written about this: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/soccer/world-cup-2010/writers/jonathan_wilson/05/29/africa.playmakers/index.html
Because they do
Technical ability on the professional scale comes largely from academies. The players that stay in Africa aren’t getting the same type of training that they would in Europe or South America
I think it’s this too, rather than any natural restriction. IMO the most technically adept african-bourne player is Balotelli, and it’s no surprise that he grew up playing football in Italy.
Technical ability is not the point. Riccardo is talking about creativity. There are many good technicians in Africa but there arent many creative midfielders like Xavi or Sneijder. Thats why an usually defensive player like Seydou Keita has to play that role in Malis side.
Ivory Coast – A Strong side, but I dont think they will win this African cup of nations. They look okay defensively, with a good CB combination in Toure and Bamba and a useful LB in Boka who can get forward well. But at RB Gosso looks a level below the rest of the defense and looks a weak link. The goalkeeper is also a worry very inconsistent and I can easily see him conceding a howler.
In midfield they are far too defensive and lack any sort of creativity. Coulibaly did okay breaking up play today in the right areas, but zakora is not the player Ivory Coast need in deep midfield. He makes the midfield too defensive and doesnt offer any good passing. This is a key weakness of Ivory Coast, they cant break down teams that defend deep, because they have poor passers in deep midfield. Zakora in this game just couldnt pick out the players further forward and it meant slow build up play that allowed the opponents to get back in position. Yaya was also played too deep, and it was surprising because he has playedat attacking midfield for City with good results, so the coach should be scared to play him there. He also doesnt quite have the passing skills to unlock opponents when playing deep, but he offers good dribbling ability, a good shot and tough tackling further forward which can start quick counter attacks. playing him deep is a waste to the Ivory Coast team, he doesnt have the skills from deep to get them playing, and they need to get there two best players connecting, in this game they were too far apart.
In attack they look good, Drogba has had a good tournament so far, finishing chances well, holding up the ball and dominating in the air. But he hasnt been supported centrally enough (Yaya needs to play higher) so they havnt capitalized on his good all round game so far. The wingers have done well too, both have the dribbling skills and pace to get the ball forward and have a good target to cross and play off of in Drogba. But they havnt provided that final ball very well (especially Gervinho as ZM said) and this has meant Ivory Coast have wasted good chances a lot.
Ivory Coast need to sort out there midfield, they they have looked unbalanced and unable to control games like there status would suggest. They were lucky today, as they individual talent won them the game, but against better opposition they will find it hard to score. Moving Yaya higher would help, but they still lack any sort of control in deep midfield. another idea could be to get the two wide men playing narrower sometimes, looking to move into central positions with Drogba creating space for them by dragging the CBs out of position, that could surprise the less cultured defenses in this tournament.
Ghana as the other major contender aren’t any more balanced though.
They are unique amoung the “big boys” of West and Central Africa in that they have an overabundance of quality players available to control the midfield, but also desperately lack creativity and only have one decent striker in Asamoah Gyan, who is habitually half fit during tournaments.
Ghana are a lot more balanced. They have a well structured defense and a well balanced midfield, with annan capable of keeping possession very well and Asamoah providing good dribbling and passing ability further up the pitch, he connects the midfield with attack very well. They also have a very talented winger in Andre Ayew who break down deep defenses with good pace, dribbling ability and a much better final ball than Ivory Coasts wingers. He is my fav for player of Tournament as I think he will shine in the later stages of this tournament. And Gyan is still one of the best forwards at the Tournament, his finishing is excellent and his hold up play helps Ghana move up the pitch.
My only Problems with Ghana are: A lack of squad depth compared to Ivory Coast, A back four that individually can make errors, A weak left winger which means more emphasis on Ayew and Finally too much emphasis on Gyan.
The last point is the biggest problem, they rely too much on Gyan for goals, they need to be able to score from other areas of the pitch or they will be too predictable.
E. Guinea – I was very impressed by this team, despite the lack of talent, they were set of very well and cause Ivory Coast some problems. Defensively they found it hard to contain Drogba (who deosnt?) but they didnt concede in open play. They also couldnt quite handle the wingers pace and trickery with only their wastefulness not getting Ivory Coast some goals, so I cant reall praise there defense. But in Kily they had a very exciting RB, who got forward throughout with amazing stamina and cause some tricky moments. Randy also played similar (to me it looked more like a back three/five most of the time) and both kept the pitch wide for the more forward players, creating some space to play into. With better players they could have easily cause an upset.
Juvenal and Konate looked a good partnership in midfield (similar to Newcastle Partnership in midfield). Juvenal throughout the tournament has looked very good, the heartbeat of his side, he sets the tempo. He found it harder as the game went on with Yaya pressing him more and more, and will be disappointed with his last performance in this tournament. Does anyone know who he plays for?
The movement of the front three was very clever, and the width of the wingbacks meant more space for them, but they didnt have the quality to get the ball in the back of the net. Balboa was impressive with his hold up play and movement, but has been a poor finisher all tournament. Both Ekeda and Ekanga were wasteful with the ball and couldnt provide that final ball that was needed – either a shot or a killer pass. With two better players, maybe they could have won this game.
Overall a good try by a clear underdog, the scoreline was harsh on them, they played some good stuff, but in the end: there defense let into many chances (Ivory Coast were wasteful), there attackers were wasteful themselves (lacking the quality unlike Ivory Coast) and despite a attractive formation and tactics maybe they would have stood a better chance keeping the midfield tighter with three men rather than two against a much better team?
I saw several games of this tournament, watched the Copa America last summer frequently and saw every game in South Africa. The only conclusion one can draw from those tournaments is:
The rest of the football world is loosing ground against Europe.
Does anyone still want to claim that there is a potential African World Champion visible on the horizon like they predicted in the 90s?
In the current African Cup the amount of indivual mistakes and the lack of tactics and creativity is astounding. And on that level some of the big names couldn’t even qualify for the final round.
The dreams the great Roger Milla planted into the heads of football fans in the early 90s do not seem to come true. African football is stagnating while Europe is building structures more efficient than ever.
“The rest of the football world is losing ground against Europe. ”
I think the last World Cup really showed that as well, seeing how 3 of the final 4, and both of the finalists were European sides. Sure, Ghana made it to the quarters from Africa, but at no time were they a threat to win it. And even the last surviving South American side was Uruguay, not one of the usual powers Brazil or Argentina.
Small correction, Ivory Coast have rotated their GK during the tournament I believe Barry did not play the final group stage game