Lazio 2-1 Roma: Full-backs give Roma the early advantage but Lazio nick it late on

The first half line-ups
A game that turned on a red card and penalty decision – Luis Enrique won the early battle, but Eddy Reja’s side came through for him in stoppage time.
Reja chose his usual shape, a cross between a 4-3-1-2 and a 4-2-3-1. Hernanes was the playmaker, Djibril Cisse a left-sided forward, and Alvaro Gonzalez deeper on the right.
Enrique was without Francesco Totti and David Pizarro started on the bench, so Miralem Pjanic played as the number ten in, broadly, a 4-3-1-2.
A victory for Lazio, then – they had the better of the game overall, but great credit should go to Enrique for his bravery throughout the fixture.
Roma lead
Roma went ahead early on, and were more imaginative with their formation, positioning and movement. The 4-3-1-2 is often an extremely static, boxey formation (especially in Italy over the past couple of years) but Enrique’s version of it was attack-minded and fluid, and pushed Roma forward early on.
The main feature was the positive running from both full-backs. Jose Angel moved very high up the pitch down the left, whilst Aleandro Rosi did similar down the right. But it was the cohesion and movement across the team that made this so confusing for Lazio. First, Daniele De Rossi dropped deep, almost into the defence (as he has throughout this season) to make something of a three-man defence, allowing the full-backs to motor forward at will.
Equally crucial was the positioning of the forwards. When Roma didn’t have the ball, Bojan Krkic and Pablo Osvaldo moved wide near to the Lazio full-backs. Then, when the possession was turned over and they moved into centre-forward positions, the full-backs started to track them, narrowing and leaving space for Angel and Rosi to overlap.
This meant Gonzalez and (to less of an extent) Christian Brocchi were forced wide, and Roma could often work the ball across the pitch in the middle – Angel, Fernando Gago, Simone Perrotta and Rosi could outnumber Gonzalez, Cristian Ledesma and Christian Brocchi.
Lazio breaks
The downside to this attack-minded display was that Roma were vulnerable on the break. De Rossi, whilst playing deep, was watching Hernanes rather than creating an extra man at the back, so when Lazio’s transitions were quick, Djibril Cisse could get 1 v 1 against Simon Kjaer. Lazio would win both centre-forward v centre-back battles in a pure sprint – Cisse is quick, Heinze is slow.
Lazio also got back into the game by being more positive – no longer able to stand off and wait for Roma to attack, they pressed high up the pitch, forced mistakes and won possession in the Roma half. De Rossi still isn’t quite a natural primary holding player and gave Hernanes too much space for long shots, whilst at the back Abdoulay Konko pushed higher up the pitch on the right, often leaving a 3 v 2 situation with Stefan Radu playing more defensively. This meant there were only three defenders being occupied by Osvaldo and Bojan’s drifts, rather than four, and obviously an extra attacking player as Lazio played well in the final stages of the first half.
Lazio turn it around
It’s worth remembering that whilst a lot of interest came from the full-backs getting free, the lack of true width high up the pitch meant that all three goals came through the centre. The first and the last goal were reasonably similar – a chip through from an attacking midfielder to a striker – and the second goal also originated from a straight ball, for Brocchi storming forward. Kjaer brought him down and was off, Hernanes scored the penalty.
11 v 10 then, and Roma had to readjust with Kjaer off. Enrique was once again brave – most would have taken off one of the front three, but he removed Perrotta (who was poor) and moved Pjanic deeper into vaguely a 4-3-2ish system.
Lack of Lazio width
Lazio had already gone more attacking at half-time with Senad Lulic on for Radu, but it’s fair to question why Reja didn’t stretch the game more laterally when he had a man advantage. If anything, Lazio seemed to get narrower and narrower as the game went on, with Hernanes the man expected to drift to the left to provide width. He had a very good game, but why leave it to him? Roma were being extremely aggressive with the use of three attacking players when they had only ten men – it would have made sense to make their midfield work harder with the use of width, forcing them from side to side.
There was the occasional cross and Lazio had some good attempts, but they never quite seemed certain of getting back into the game. Klose’s late goal means Reja will get the praise, but even with a man extra for much of the game, he struggled to overcome Roma.
Conclusion
Can you give more credit to the defeated manager? Enrique got the better of the early stages and readjusted admirably when reduced to ten men. Lazio may have eventually done enough to merit the victory, but with the momentum and an extra player from 50 minutes, it was surprising it took until the 94th to get the second goal.
It was Enrique’s shape that provided more interest individually – at last, a 4-3-1-2 from a big Serie A club with fluidity and movement! With the movement of the forwards an the full-backs, plus De Rossi so deep, it was more like the 4-3-1-2 of, say, Santos than of Milan or Inter in recent years. Enrique needs time, but shouldn’t be criticised following this defeat.
/p>
Lazio 2-1 Roma: Full-backs give Roma the early advantage but Lazio nick it late on




nice analysis. thanks for praising enrique, the man deserves some time.
Agreed, I think he’s building a good project there.
There arguably the most exciting team right now in Italy
Does Napoli fall in this category as well?
Too bad they draw with Parma this weekend :/
They lost 2-1 at home to Parma actually
They are equally exciting, but roma get the nod, because its a new strategy, while napoli are playing the same as last season, and people are starting to figure them out i think.
One question I would like to pose is, how far are you going to let OSvaldo and Krkic track the full backs? It reminds me of the below game, where the strikers can often end up behind the central playmaker if they’re tracking the fullbacks too far.
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2011/03/16/brisbane-roar-2-2-central-coast-tactics/
I side with the idea of backing L. Enrique and of praising his courage; I do, however, find peculiar that if you’re planning a season of one false nine and two wide-strikers, you get rid of both Vucinic and Menez. Reja’s paradox is to combine a diamond-midfield with an “extremely” lopsided formation. To me, it still looks like a 4-2-3-1, but I understand it’s a question of taste (and geopolitical tradition). The geometries of Matuzalem have added something on top of the numeric superiority.
Regarding Menez and Vucinic, it’s my understanding that they were both out of contract, or in the last year of their contract with no desire to extend (a la Nasri). I don’t imagine Roma would have willingly parted ways with them and Mexes, but the influx of funds from the new owners allowed them to build a new team anyway.
Very well written, really felt like this was one of the first games where you could see Enrique’s Vision starting to manifest itself. Wondering how you think Totti will fit in? I know this is the eternal question for Roma.
I’d imagine Bojan will drop out for Totti.
I think pjanic would actually, with totti as the false nine, and bojan and osvaldo the wide forwards.
Maybe gaggo would then be dropped and pjanic played deeper in midfield.
gago de rossi pjanic
Totti
osvaldo bojan (names except for totti and de rossi may vary)
Im not sure if that midfield is too light weight tho, gago would have to put in a shift if pjanic is playing in the midfield too
I get the feeling you find Serie A the most interesting league tactically
because it is ;D
What a frantic finish, really emotional. The truth is that Lazio could have scored way more goals in the second half than they did, anyway I dont think Roma played all that well as you describe it, they lost an insane amount of balls during build-up play, the ball-winning qualities of Brocchi et al today were fantastic. You could also really see the pressure in the players but also in Reja’s eyes, everything but victory would have been unacceptable, espeically after Kjaer’s red card. These games arent always decided by tactics but by heart, passion and grinta(I know that sounds cliche but still).
Roma lost to Lazio, and Totti didn’t start the game? Oh boy, I can already hear the Roma fans screaming at Luis Enrique. He’s a talented manager though, I hope he gets a full season.
totti was injured…
Despite the loss, some encouraging signs from Roma today. For the first time this season they looked genuinely fluid in attack – particularly in the first half. I remember a terrific break around about the twenty minute mark, when a series of passes between Bojan and Pjanic resulted in Angel being put through down the left only for his cross to come to nothing. Simply sublime.
How is Roma’s 4-3-1-2 here different from a 4-4-2 diamond? Is it that the two “wide” midfielders aren’t playing as carilleros?
I would say Gago and Perrotta play more central than they would in a diamond, while the two forwards often move on the wings.
Lazio – getting konko to move higher up the pitch was a good decision by Lazio, he wasnt being tracked that far up the pitch and was relatively free, really became a good outlet. There mifield two of ledesma and brocchi worked well too, ledesma showed a great range of passing today, and marked the space pjanic wanted to work in well (important for a holding player) and brocchi broke up play and kept possession well. Hernanes was great in the hole, cisse was a big threat, and klose held up the ball really well and gave a focus to the attack (such a underrated player). The big problem for me was GONZALEZ, played far too deep and central, wasnt really clear what his purpose was and it meant Lazio lacked someone on the right spreading play and really testing the space angel left behind.
If Lazio had tested angel more in this game maybe they could have won the game more comfortably.
Roma – I have never rated Heinze, he has lacked pace since his Man United days and all ways looks too rash. In this match he contantly looked a liability and was outpaced by klose (not a fast player himself) and dominated in the air I thought. This spread doubt in the younger kjaer, and he had a poor game (for such a talented player) getting himself sent off in the end after a series of rash challenges.
Angel and rosi were great, getting forward really well and giving roma width high up the pitch, and giving space to there central players.
De Rossi is starting to impress me in the holding role now, i didnt rate him there, but his passing has improved a lot and he is starting to learn about the positions he needs to take up. He has given Roma more direction tho and looks a good leader on the pitch.
Perrotta’s energy helped today I thought, he pressed brocchi and got a forward a few times with late runs.
Gago i wasnt sure about though, his kept possession well, but played really deep for no reason i thought, he could played higher up the pitch and actually created chances, but he seemed too cautious. Roma needed him moving up the pitch and combining with the forwards, but then again this isnt really how gago plays, so maybe a different play should have played.
IT seems enrique is trying to copy barcelona’s front three from last season with messi as the striker but playing very deep, and the wide two making diaginal runs inside. Roma had that today with Bojan and osvaldo doing there jobs well. But they missed totti as the false nine, whose movement and creativity lets roma play like this. IF Pjanic was supposed to play this position, then he was far too deep, with 3 CM’s behind him, he didnt need to be worried about possession as much, and should have played higher up the pitch. He created well, but Roma lacked a focus point high up the pitch, which meant they had to get there through balls for the two widish strikers exactly right (which is what happened for the goal).
I think the ideal solution is to get totti back, play him as the false nine, then replace gago with pjanic and get him moving up the pitch and combining with totti.
You are right with the false nine. Luis Enrique puts in many aspects from Barcas tactics at Roma. Another example is De Rossi dropping into the defense line when Roma has the ball. He forms a three man defense with Heinze and Kjaer in order to have more influence in the build up and to allow the full-backs to go forward. Sergi Busquets or Mascherano have done the same at Barca last season.
Roma are occasionally beginning to resemble a formation I came up with last term – a 5-3-2 with no centre forwards. It’s something I think would counter most, if not all, other (current) formations quite effectively and therefore be a great general formation for a team that consist of the right sorts of players for it – not sure if Roma do though.
Without the ball both forwards would stay wide, tracking the opponent fullbacks to a certain extent. In possession the wing-backs would seriously have to overlap to fill in as wingers in attack as the wide forwards would move to the middle. Depending on the opponent’s formation, this would happen either in turns or at the same time on both flanks, i.e. if the opponent has one or two forwards, both wing-backs would go up the field and against a front three, only one would. Should the latter be the case, only the wide forward on the same flank would go central and the other would stay wider. Also, should there be a De Rossi or Busquets type of player as a centre-back/sweeper, he could make the same happen through the middle, giving an attacking central midfielder a chance to cover as a centre-forward/false nine.
To conclude, the 5-3-2 would be a 4-3-3 in attack and provide enough width on every occasion both offensively and defensively, without having to compromise in the middle of the park – in theory, that is
What do you think? Please have your say.
Interesting, but maybe too much running from the wing backs – doing 70-80 yard shuttles up and down the line the whole game.
I have thought about a 4-2-2-2, with the front two being wide and on the opposing full backs, and the 2 advanced midfielders making runs into the box – tried it on a well know simulator, but had little success with it. Sure it would have more success in real life. The full backs can then move up to support the midfield, the two wide forwards can drift inside/deeper, and switch with the 2 advanced midfielders.
True, the system would require some Dani Alves type wing-backs – maybe four of them to cover a full season – but they would be eased by the fact that when the wing-back on the other side is attacking, they wouldn’t necessarily have to – at least not to the same extent. And, as mentioned, a versatile sweeper would lessen their running as well.
Roma, need time to gel, too many signing to get on the same page for things to go well in the first half of the season. However not really sold on Bojan yet.
Angel could develop into a great attacking FB.
Speaking as a Roma fan, I’m of course VERY upset at losing against those (censored).
However, there is a lot of promise in this team, and I’m pretty sure that withoud the red card, Roma would have won – or at least not lost.
We should be patient. Spaletti didn’t start out exactly brilliantly – and then 11 straight victories, while at the same time paving the way for the future of football.
One thing that does worry me, though, is the absence of a pacey centre-back. You can’t afford to have Gabriel “Speed” Heinze when playing such a high defensive line.
ZM just listened to your Guardian Weekly podcast. Can Please tell that French Tw@t to STFU. #Clueless.