Argentina 4-1 Chile: debut victory for Sabella

The starting line-ups
Alejandro Sabella’s first competitive game ended in a convincing 4-1 win over an ever-entertaining Chilean side.
Sabella chose a flexible 4-4-1-1ish shape for the game – more on that later. One of the more eye-catching selection decisions was his choice of Rodrigo Braña in the holding role, his trusted number five from Estudiantes.
Having played 3-4-1-2 for most of the Copa America, Claudio Borghi tilted the midfield triangle to include both Mati Fernandez and Jorge Valdivia, leaving Carlos Carmona as the sole holder in an unusual 3-1-4-2ish shape. Main man Alexis Sanchez was out injured.
There was no overall pattern to the game – Argentina dominated, yet not as much as the 4-1 scoreline suggests, and they also came under sustained spells of pressure from Chile.
Argentina
The most interesting factor of this game was looking at Argentina in isolation, seeing what Sabella is trying to do with the side after the ultimately disastrous spell of Sergio Batista. The back four was familiar, but the midfield combination was all-new. Braña was the holding midfielder, sitting deep ahead of the back four and always looking to move into a position to receive a pass, generally distributing it out to the full-backs. Ever Banega played just ahead to the right, and it was more of solid midfield duo than a flexible ‘double pivot’, as Banega generally stayed in position.
Jose Sosa played on the right, in advance of the central midfielders yet not quite as a winger, more as a traditional wide midfielder in a four. Angel Di Maria was higher up the pitch and drifted inside to link up with the front two, meaning Argentina often looked like they had a forward trio. The second goal was a little reminiscent of the Kaka-Robinho-Luis Fabiano triangle unlocking Chile at last year’s World Cup. Messi was a support striker, and rekindled his good natural relationship with Higuain.
Chile
Banega had essentially been forced into playing as a second holding midfielder because Borghi was more or less using two number tens, and the player to left, Valdivia, was the higher up the pitch, pushing Banega back. With Braña more focussed upon protecting the centre-backs than picking up an individual, Fernandez had time on the ball in the centre of the pitch, and those two dovetailed well to create passing angles through the midfield.
The use of both those players left Chile vulnerable deeper in midfield, however – and an Argentina counter-attack always looked on. Messi could drift deep to leave his marker Arturo Vidal unsure whether to come out of defence, and this would then occupy Carmona, allowing Di Maria to push on into space. Formations weren’t strictly a factor for the opening goal, since Chile had sent a couple of their defenders forward for a free-kicks, but it did come from a rapid break instigated by Di Maria down the left.
The Real Madrid player contributed to Chile’s main source of attack, however, because he played high up the pitch and offered little protection to Marcos Rojo, who was prone to Mauricio Isla’s bursts down the flank. With Argentina’s centre-backs both occupied, neither felt able to come out to assist Rojo, so Isla got plenty of joy and dribbled inside to good effect. A couple of times Chile brought one of their outside centre-backs forward to overload Argentina down one side of the pitch, which forced the Argentine wide midfielders back.
Few changes
The game was open and enjoyable, spoilt only by the number of free-kicks in the first half, but it never really progressed as a tactical battle. There was only one sub before the scoring ended, Eduardo Vargas replacing Mauricio Pinilla, in a change that reeked of Borghi being unable to make up for the absence of Sanchez. In truth, when Chile start with two forwards, two number tens and wing-backs allowed to get forward, it’s difficult to know how they can change the game with an attacking move.
The game remained in the same state throughout, and Sabella’s changes shut the game down well. Braña was the only starting midfielder to remain on the pitch by the end, with Eduardo Salvio, Jonas Gutierrez and Fabian Rinaudo brought on to combat Chile’s energy in the centre of the pitch.
Conclusion
A decent start for Sabella – structure without the ball, then fluidity and movement when in possession. For periods they seemed stunned into retreat by Chile’s attacking thrust, but then that’s often for sides playing against Chile – the wing-backs and outside centre-backs have such great freedom to get forward, that there’s often no ‘natural’ response to it.
Still, it should be said that Batista’s debut as Argentina coach was equally impressive (if not more) and look how that turned out…
Chile are the same as always – crazily attacking, brilliant to watch, but flimsy at the back and amazingly bad at turning pressure into goals. They have scored eight goals in the nine competitive games since the start of the 2010 World Cup, which barely makes sense for such a gung ho side.
Argentina 4-1 Chile: debut victory for Sabella




I was most impressed by the balance to the side – Argentina has so many forwards, but in modern football you really can’t toss on four strikers and hope to win most of your games. Still, you have to figure that Mascherano and/or Aguero will start to put pressure on the current players….
nice piece Michael, it came to my rescue!
getting such a result with relatively less quality on the field was interesting, the difference between Batista and Sabilla so far is that the latter’s touch is more obvious, will have to wait for his approach to negotiate sides which park the bus, as he cannot simply counter attack them
You missed the part where Messi and Higuain/di Maria started to run the channels in the 2nd half.
An unforgivable error. We should all go back to reading the reports in the papers that list every team as playing 4-4-2.
Nah, just pointing out a few bits.
Really great to see Gonzalo Higuain back in form. After doing so well for such a long time, he faded a bit last season though it’s starting to look as though he’s back to his best.
If Sabella and Mourinho can keep him firing, then the weight on Messi and Aguero’s shoulders might be relieved.
Brilliant article!
If Argentina can finally get a coach to get this team assembled cohesively, then the world could at last be treated to the inherently brilliant football that this country can truly display if the conditions are right.
I thought that with Messi moving deep and unsettling Carmona, couldn’t Vidal have shifted across to the right and Jara stepped forward a little to deal with Di Maria? It was technically 4v3 there anyway, since Banega/Brana didn’t really provide penetrating runs from deep. The problem with this could be however a Sosa blind run from deep (ala Dani Alves?)
Great article once again ZonalMarking!
Well, his name was José Pekerman…
exactly.
OK game (Ururguay & Peru were more intresting, Paraguay not the same without Martino) overall.
Borghi really shot himself in the foot, in my opinion, by playing both Mati & Valdivia, as well as Suazo & Pinilla. adventurous, yes…balanced? not at all.
Sabella continues to impress me with his calculated approach…his only fault is being one of Bilardo’s disciples
Argentina has the right formation, the wrong players.
Chile on the other hand has the wrong players in the wrong positions. Vidal is an all-action player, why put him at CB?!
No, Chile has the right formation, wrong players.
Argentina has the wrong formation, wrong players. Messi is a flase nine feminista, why put him as a second tip tridecosaurous?!
because Messi is a carnivore.
haha
Misteri del fútbol.
Mai possibile che a destra l’Argentina non disponga di un pedatore di rango (ed efficienza) superiore al Principito Sosa ..?
Maxi Rodriguez sarebbe molto utile al contesto tattico sabelliano.
Grazie ZM, gran bel post, come al solito.
no, Maxi would be crap. Alvarez (with faster movemnt of the ball) or Pastore (with better defensive awareness) would be better, but i think this role is Gaitan’s. its a very difficult position though, Argentina doesn’t have many players who can occupy the tactical requirements of it
Crap? Esagerato
Alvarez muove la palla con velocità, ma è lentissimo e quasi mai ripiega. E con Zabaleta alle spalle, la corsia di destra sarebbe facile preda delle incursioni avversarie (pensa ad Alvaro Perez-Cavani vs Zaba-Alvarez:l’inferno).
Pastore è fondamentalmente un trequartista. Giostra ovunque. Relegarlo a destra (come un Sosa o un Maxi qualsiasi) sarebe uno spreco di talento e neuroni.
Gaitan si adatterebbe a destra? In verità l’ho visto giocare poche volte.
Possiamo fare tutti i nomi del mondo, molto dipenderà dall’impostazione tattica che Sabella cercherà di dare alla squadra.
Con la speranza di non rivedere più Sosa in campo ..
ps
il mio undici ideale:
http://files.splinder.com/768784b8d4446a9ace2d759d3694d357_medium.jpg
good article, only one correction, Batista’s debut (official) was: Argentina 1-1 Bolivia in Copa America and Argentina played awful that day, the previous games were only friendly.
Could Pastore fit into Sosa’s right midfield role? Or would he simply not offer enough protection for his fullback?
Chile were same old chile, adventurous and attacking to crazy levels, but one of my fav teams to watch, how football should be played.
Argentina – The goalkeeper seems new, havnt kept an eye on argentina for the while, is he any good? who does he play for?
Brana had a good game holding midfield, surprise selection, but worked in my books, he kept possession and stayed calm. Banega seemed a strange selection though, i wasnt quite sure what his role was really, he just seemed to be holding too, which seemed a bit cautious for argentina, i would have rather had banega holding (a position i think he could really well) partnered with mascherano.
Sosa played well i thought, and helped press chile, and also link up midfield with attack, this let messi stay further up the pitch where he can do damage. Di maria looked dangerous and a big threat to chile, they struggled to deal with him today. And Higauin was fantastic up front, linking with messi, whilst staying a big presence in the penalty area.
The defense still looks there weakest point, the CB’s lack speed and the fullbacks dont get forward enough (key strategy needed for big teams)
My Argentina team would be:
Andujar? (probably weakest position, they really lack a quality GK)
Jonas Gutierrez – Fabricio Coloccini – Ezequiel Garay – ??? (No quality LB)
Mascherano – Banega – Di Maria
Messi – Higuain – Lavezzi/aguero
The goalkeeper position and LB position are the weakest points of Argentina right now.
Gutierrez played well at the world cup at RB i thought, and could provide a attacking outlet there, while he is strong defensively. Coloccini has yet to get a chance, when he has been outstanding for Newcastle (4th in premiership right now) he should definitely get a chance. While garay has looked really good since joining Benifica. The midfield would look solid, with banega holding and controlling the tempo of the game, mascherano breaking up play, and di maria linking the midfield with attack and pressing high up the pitch.
The front three would involve higuain at the central striker, making space for messi and lavezzi/aguero to make runs inside.
or possibly move di maria to left back, and play pastore in midfield maybe??
Thoughts??
u gotta b kidding jonas gutierrez as a right back? and di maria playing cm?? this is real football not fifa
Okay maybe that would be too attacking for a argentina side that still has defensive problems, I would probably go for zabaleta at RB against the hard teams. Then gutierrez against the weaker teams. I would imploy the same tactic with di maria, moving him to LB against the weaker teams or when argentina are chasing a game.
Di maria has good defensive awareness, and has played there for argentina before. Plus he would be used more as an attacking midfielder, drifting forward from a midfield three and linking up with the front three. He is also very good at pressing, so he could be used to press higher up the pitch. I play him or pastore there, who could a similar job, and is more suited to CM.
My dream is to see a fluid front 4 of Messi, Aguero, Pastore and Di Maria – unfortunately Higuain would have to sit on the bench. That would be quite something if the reach there peak at the next World Cup. However that would be too unbalanced a side and they’d probably be vulnerable at the back…
What really hurt Chile and has been missed to a large extent by most commentators was the absences of both Gary Medel (suspension) and Pablo Contreras (injury). These two absences forced Vidal out of his usual position for the national team of central midfield where he is usually paired with Medel or Carmona. This had a two-fold effect of leaving Carmona as the sole holding midfielder against a rampaging Argentina side, which was never going to work, especially with a makeshift centreback. Borghi got it all wrong playing both Fernandez and Valdivia especially away from home and Beauseajour looked sadly off the pace.
Great article as usual, ZM. Was wondering if you’d be doing an analysis of UEFA’s technical report for the 2010/11 season?
The Front six of Argentina should be:
Mascherano Banega
Messi Pastore Aguero
Higuain
I thought similar in an earlier post, pastore could link the midfield and attack, so messi doesnt have to come too deep (big problem for argentina).
And maybe play di maria LB to help aguero play a narrow leftish role.
Messi being comfortable coming deep is a huge asset for Argentina as it often pulls other teams defensive lines out of position.
I agree, but i meant coming too deep to get the ball and end up in deep midfield, which was happening at the copa america. Keeping messi near the goal, whilst still having him central to build up is the trickiest part for this new manager.
too narrow, especially without truly credible attacking fullbacks. Di Maria needs to be involved somehow, so maybe pull Higuain and put Aguero up front? I don’t buy Di Maria at left back against a top side (i doubt he could contain Alexis Sanchez, David Silva, Tomas Muller, etc)
aguero wouldnt fit as a central striker i dont think, it has to be higuain or maybe milito (messi could do it too, tho wouldnt work as well). Higuain and messi have a really good relationship, so i wouldnt break that up. Aguero seemed to work at the copa america on the left hand side, so i would play him there. That front three could be very cohesive and flexible.
Then have a midfield three of banega, maschrano and pastore, with pastore the link player. That looks like a solid midfield.
Di maria could work well at leftback, he’s at his best making runs down the left wing, and he provide the width for aguero, and i do think he is good defensively actually. It would be an attacking selection, but against most teams, argentina will dominate, then change LB for big games if you want to be more solid.
How about Aguero as a super sub, with Higuain starting (and Messi, Pastore, Di Maria in a fluid trio behind him)? If you’re a tired defender, Aguero is probably the last player you want to see warming up. If Argentina need to chase a game, then they can put Di Maria at left back, Aguero at left wing and really go for it. I just think it’s too aggressive to start matches with.
fair point, that could be a better way of using this tactic.
Infernal spirits yea, i necessity compose matter likely this goal didnt hold delivery, may i repost this Argentina 4-1 Chile: first appearance conquest instead of Sabella | Zonal
I haven’t seen an arsenal article/post match analysis on this website in a while.
Under Bielsa we scored 35 goals in 22 competitive games, we scored 4 IN Colombia, 3 IN Venezuela, 2 IN Bolivia, 2 IN Paraguay ( this is much harder than it sounds), 2 IN Brazil, 2 IN Uruguay.
The problem Bielsa had is that he never managed to had an apropiate substitution for Suazo.
ZM – What say you now after Chile v Peru (4 – 2)? What a fantastic game, with both sides giving it everything. Maybe Eduardo Vargas is the missing piece for Chile up forward. When Alexis comes back they are going to be quite a handful going forward, although the Peruvian forwards did boss around their defence. Anyway, can’t wait for their next game.