Napoli 3-1 Milan: Counter-attack and Cavani hat-trick

The starting line-ups
Hat-trick specialist Edinson Cavani bagged another as Napoli confirmed their title potential.
Walter Mazzarri played what his strongest XI – Andrea Dossena came in for Juan Zuniga from the side that drew with Manchester City.
Max Allegri has something of an injury crisis, summed up by an extremely inexperienced bench. Daniele Bonera played at left-back, and Antonio Cassano partnered Pato upfront.
Milan took the lead through a superb Alberto Aquilani header, but the pattern of the game was this: Milan get possession, run out of ideas in the final third, Napoli win the ball, break quickly, and score.
Formation match-up
Napoli’s 3-4-3ish shape generally produces interesting games against different formations, and it was fascinating to see it come up against a midfield diamond. At either end of the pitch, there were few major issues – Napoli had 3 v 2 at the back, Milan had 4 v 3. All was well there. The midfield battle, however, was much more interesting, where there was a contest between Milan’s carrileros, who started narrow and moved forward to provide extra runners from midfield, and the Napoli wing-backs.
In a way, the Napoli wing-backs were forced to do a similar job as they did in midweek at City – to come narrow, out of their natural positions on the flank. Still, they did have problems when the carrileros made forward runs into very central positions – Clarence Seedorf found space a couple of times on the edge of the box.
Napoli breaks
It was equally interesting when Napoli won the ball, because the Milan carrileros were never quite sure what to do. In a 4-3-1-2, the midfield diamond usually stays narrow and slides across the pitch. Yet because Napoli attacked so directly, there was rarely any lateral movement from the diamond – Seedorf and Antonio Nocerino simply had to sprint back, often into very deep, wide positions that meant Napoli lost their shape.
In addition, Mark van Bommel didn’t really know what to do with himself. He had no direct opponent to pick up, and without the ball he failed to stop Napoli’s breaks – most obviously when he was skinned by Walter Gargano for Cavani’s second. His distribution on the ball was also quite poor, with the full-backs not free.
Milan in possession
Those full-backs could have done more in the attacking phase, though – Bonera is too right-footed to play left-back and was inevitably replaced by Luca Antonini in the second half. They were obviously scared of the counter, but Milan should have been able to half-trust, half-risk their two centre-backs plus a holding midfield when they were chasing the game.
Napoli rarely looked to press Milan (with the exception of one brief instance at the start of the second half) – they were happy to soak up pressure, win the ball in their own third, and then break. They were very much a counter-attacking side last season, but seem an exaggerated version of themselves so far in 2011/12.
Milan were extremely poor in the final third. It was a surprise to see Cassano to the right and Pato to the left – the former likes to drift in from the left, the latter has sometimes been fielded as a right-sided forward – but that wasn’t their main problem. Their passing was too slow, their play was too narrow and too easy to break down. Aquilani’s header was superb but otherwise he was disappointing, and he probably isn’t at his best as a trequartista. He is much better technically than Kevin-Prince Boateng, but at least Boateng gives drive to their attacks.
There were plenty of late substitutions, but they didn’t change the pattern of the match as Napoli successfully killed the game. Urby Emanuelson came on for van Bommel with Seedorf going to the holding role, and Blerim Dzemaili came on for Hamsik, playing a little deeper and making Napoli a 3-5-2 without the ball. Formations didn’t matter so much by this stage – Napoli were putting men behind the ball and defending deep, and Milan never looked like having the creativity to break them down.
Conclusion
Mazzarri won the battle here – Napoli were excellent at breaking quickly, with the wing-backs and Gargano rapidly turning defence into attack, whilst the addition of Gokhan Inler has made them fiercer in the centre of the pitch, even if they may lack Michele Pazienza’s discipline later on in the season.
Milan’s defeat was extremely reminiscent of their loss to Cesena just over a year ago. Then, it seemed they wouldn’t be able to win the title with such a narrow formation and no drive from full-back, but they pulled it off – so no need to get carried away with this defeat.
Napoli 3-1 Milan: Counter-attack and Cavani hat-trick


Valdes? Napoli’s goalkeeper is Morgan De Sanctis
Relax, man. ZM simply copied the board from Barcelona – Milan game and then adjusted few names and positions, forgetting about the keeper. Happens.
Also, ZM, there should be “that meant MILAN lost their shape”, not Napoli.
Nice article, and thanks for updating “Upcoming” section
. Keep up!
Well spotted actually=P
LOL..
ZM must be really on fire.
He analyzed 7 match this week. So it’s normal he’s make a little mistake.
I didn’t think Napoli would be as impressive as they’ve been so far this season. They actually look stronger than last season and Inler is one of the key additions. He really links up defense and midfield and looks a perfect fit for the shape. Great pick up.
Your are awesome ZM
i have a question about Napoli main formation is it (3-5-2) or (3-4-3/3-4-2-1)?
3-5-2 (3-4-1-2) when Hamsik drops into midfield to add numbers. usually its 3-6-1/3-4-3 (3-4-2-1) depending on Hamsik & Lavezzis involvement in zone 4-5 (between half-way line & opposition’s penalty box)
3-4-2-1 is the main shape.
But Mazzarri’s system has showed very fluent since he is a very practical manager.
He shifts to a 4-man defence when facing 3 forwards, drifting Campagnaro as RB and Aronica or Dossena as LB, and has employed 3-5-2, 3-5-1-1 and 3-1-4-2 depending upon the opposition.
thanks Marco!! very detailed response
you’re welcome!
I just dont understand why Allegri insists on playing so narrow. Ok so they have a 4 v 2 situation in midfield, but what is the point in that if there is nobody wide to spread the ball to?
If I learned anything this week it is that I must not miss any Napoli matches this autumn. Such a joy to watch.
I don’t think a counter attacking side can win a major league title. Napoli won’t be contenders if they expect to play counter attacking football against bad teams.
Not identical, but Brazil topped the last World Cup Qualifiers with a mainly counter-attacking approach.
Good point. Will be interesting to see how proactive they are against the “Stoke Cities” of Serie A (reply to BigCHrome)
“Aquilani’s header was superb but otherwise he was disappointing, and he probably isn’t at his best as a trequartista.”
As a Juve fan, strongly agree with this. He’s at his best as regista really, his defensive skills improved greatly under Delneri. The balance of his technique and Boateng’s drive will suit Milan nicely this season methinks.
A similarity I saw about this game and the ManC vs. Napoli game, was how crucial it was that Napoli occupied opposition fullbacks. In their system, Milan’s sole source of width comes from the full backs (and kinda Cassano/Robinho/the seconda punta drifting wide) and with City, Silva and Nasri (as ZM said) drifted inside too much so width had to come from FullBack. Without Hamsik and Lavezzi occupying the fullbacks in these two games, I think the results would have been very VERY different (not in Napoli’s favor)
“Good point. Will be interesting to see how proactive they are against the “Stoke Cities” of Serie A”
La Juve, ad esempio.
LoL @ La Juve, ad esempio.
However, it seems that Napoli already played against the “Stoke City” of Serie A: Cesena. The goals scored weren’t made during a counter-attack action.
la inter merda,ad esempio
Wow 3 reports one day someone is putting in overtime. Another great report ZM
Milan has been playing with a narrow midfield for the better part of the last ten years, there is nothing wrong with that. The problem is that their current fullbacks aren’t high quality, despite the fact that Milan has plenty of them. Milan 5-7 years ago were the kings of keeping possession, they were a shadow of their former selves against Barca the other day. If Milan were to go out and buy two world class fullbacks it would do wonders for their possession and the overall attractiveness of their football. Like ZM said they can still win the league with this formation and current squad, but I think that probably has more to do with the current lack of quality in the Serie A.
Concur, well said.
it’s taken me a while to appreciate how great ZM’s analysis really is. didn’t think this site was so special at first, but then i searched around the net and found that no other site is as well balanced in terms of tactical intelligence, accuracy, evidence, relevence, reasoning, thought provoking and speed.
well done ZM, keep it up!
i swear these counter attacks are nightmares for big teams here napoli winning by counter s and in spain levante has beaten real with one deadly counter WOW what a night to see two big teams losing
KPB is utter crap.
“I don’t think a counter attacking team can win a major league title” – BigCHrome.
Man Utd win the EPL most years and they’re a counter attacking team.
They are great at counter attacking, but the difference being they can also make the play.
Napoli – not much to say about napoli really, they tore milan apart on the break, but i still think they dont need 3 at the back (too cautious for a team with title ambitions) and could do with playing another forward and bringing hamsik deeper into midfield and more central. He tends to drift into that position anyway, and then play a right sided forward/winger and have a better chance of keeping possession whilst keeping a great attacking threat. But great performance today by them.
Milan – As many people have been saying, milans biggest problem is there poor fullbacks. They need bring in some talented attacking fullbacks, if they want to move onto the next level and compete with the other top teams in europe. There fullbacks today were far too conservative, and i really think if had fullbacks who would charge upfield today, they could have won the game. Instead they just brought pressure in themselves allowing the wingbacks and napoli forwards into the milan half. If Milan do win the league this season it will be because of nesta and silva, these two are a great CB pairing, and are backbone of milans title hunt. The injury crisis didnt help milan, but they got the rest of team all wrong i thought. Van bommel just wasnt needed at all, milan should have played seedorf/aquilani with nocerino in deep midfield, with seedorf/aquilani controlling play and starting attacks.
Was Boateng injured? because he should have played today as the attacking midfielder, he is the best one milan have, though really they should have looked to buy one in the transfer window (maybe robinho could play there?). And im guessing ibra is injured too, he should get straight into the side, with cassano and pato playing off him, this sort of attack could win milan the league.
Overall, poor tactics from milan, didnt get there fullbacks forward, too conservative in midfield, aquilani didnt suit playing so far forward, and the front two needed a point of reference like ibra, to play off and absorb the pressure so they allowed more space.
Interesting to see the plight of Emanuelson and Taiwo. Surely they must be wasted money if they weren’t seen fit to play today. If Bonera is as bad as he it sounds (he didn’t look too flash during the game) and needing fullbacks with more presence, surely one of these two would have been a better option. I know Emanuelson is seen as too lightweight for fullback in Serie A but that was originally his position at Ajax and could have given more athleticism and creativity from fullback giving the side width. They would give up something defensively but with Abate generally staying at home, and MVB going no where Milan always had four players back to cover the break.
Taiwo, who did have a decent reputation in Europe a few years ago, would have surely been a better option than Bonera. They needed width, and as you said Taiwo is at his best “charching upfield.” Although not technically gifted at least he would have given pace/power and given width to at least try to move around the Napoli defenders.
I just think what a waste of money (especially Taiwo) if those players aren’t playing, to put in an old, less athletic, uninspiring wrong footed defender. Seems pointless.
Might be wrong though. Thoughts?
I agree, either one of those two should have played, i do think Emanuelson is unfit apparently, and not sure about taiwo, but out of them two, i would go for taiwo. He is powerful and provides strong running down the left, which milan really missed, as an outlet. This is important because with such a narrow midfield, the only other option is long balls to the front two or back to defense. But they still need a good attacking RB, who can do similar, then milan could really dominate and break down teams.
If he was being conservative and picking defensive FBs then it made no sense today, as keeping player back didnt stop napoli’s counter attacks, so was a very bad decision with hindsight.
Taiwo came on a free, so unless his wages are stratospheric he’s not a waste of money. And he hurt himself in late August, my understanding was he’s supposed to be out for a month.
Since Emmanuelson and Antonini were subbed on here, I am not sure why Bonera was preferred from the start – I’d like to see Urby get a run of games, personally, as Antonin has always rubbed me the wrong way.
and as for anonymous’ comments, I think Abate is a good attacking RB and if they can use Taiwo to sort out the left they’d be all set.
Personally, though (and I’ve been saying this since last year) when people are healthy I’d love to see them play a 4213 with Acquilani and one of Ambrosini/Nocerino/Van Bommel/Gattuso as the holders, and Seedorf or Boateng as the 1. Then they have at least 5 people (Urby, Robinho, Cassano, Ibra, and Pato) to fill the top three spots, they’d have some more attacking width, and we could see some real swashbuckling stuff.
Ahh thank you Josef i was wondering what Taiwo cost Milan. It just seems pointless to me to bring on those two players at the same time, both aren’t naturally or physically suited for the left back position. Maybe Emmanuelson to play left back and then use MvB to put in El Shaarawy earlier to give him more time. Really, the game was gone. And the only chance to get back into the game was through creativity and width to get goals. So really they had nothing to lose by making a substitution like that. Also, giving El Shaarawy more time, in a game that is effectively lost so nothing to lose, could only be better for him to find his legs in Serie A. Brought in for the future he needs time and experience and he could have made more of an impact.
As for Taiwo, i liked him early at OM but have seen a bit of a lack of technical ability and although he has power to burn, think he is a little one dimensional so don’t know if he is the real answer to their fullback problem. He seems like a downgraded more ‘bulked up’ version of Evra. I agree that Abate isn’t bad (is he naturally a defender? Or a converted midfielder?) but i don’t think he can be relied on to be the sole attacking width for Milan. It is hard for Milan who have thrived for years off playing a very narrow midfield and attack but have had world class fullbacks (Maldini/Cafu) but that has been discussed on this site enough i think lol.
It has to be said though, that if you can’t play those players [Taiwo/Emanuelson] in that situation (which seems from the outside to be their ideal) then what is the point really having them at all?
I agree, it seems way to cautious to have three deep midfielders on, especially when your going for the title, they need ibra, with two pacy dribblers either side of him. I do think they will win the title again, they just have too many options, unlike other teams.
ZM, how the 3-4-3 of Napoli differs from the one Gasperini would like to play at Inter? Would you mind to elaborate on this?
Really excellent by Napoli. I thought they were utterly dominant on Sunday, so much more thoughtful and inventive than their opponents. It’s hard to see Napoli winning the league, but it would be absolutely brilliant if they did!
Great article ZM!
I was not at all surprised by the result.
With Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Kevin Prince Boateng and Robinho all injured, Allegri was definitely lacking options for the attacking trident.
Aquilani is not mobile enough to play in the attacking midfielder role, Robinho and Boateng should both be preferred ahead of him when available. Pato was awful, as he often is when Milan is playing against a deep, packed defense.
I still hold Milan as the main contender for the league title; with Robinho and Ibrahimovic back, they will look like a completely different side. And while Napoli look very impressive when they are allowed to sit deep and play on the break, that’s generally not how you win the league.
Another superb display of counter-attacking at pace from Napoli.
The point has already been made re. how they maximise their attacking talents when they’re at home to say the likes of Novara or Siena, when quite clearly the opposition will be defending in numbers against them.
One further point, the new signing of Inler has fitted in superbly into the midfield but furthermore there seems to be a marked improvement in Walter Gargano’s game. No longer just the ‘enforcer’ role in midfield but his technical displays at Man City and against Milan have been good on the eye when he has the ball.
Quite possible that Napoli’s excellent start to the season could also have bourne out of the fact that these 2 are dominating games and dominating possession which allows the tridente to ‘do their stuff’ at the top end of the field.
First off, no will win at the San Paulo this year.
Secondly Milan played with Bonera, so it was like having 10 men, and Cassano was too slow to play against a team like Napoli.
Finally Milan really should have grabbed Monty instead of Aqua, Monty could be a more offensive sub for MVB, or used on the left.
Napoli also jumped to #6 win the world with the win.
As usual a great article. The only point I would add is the importance of Cavani’s quality. None of those three goals were straightforward to finish, and without him in this kind of form Napoli would not be looking so good. Not criticizing the tactics (they need to adopt to players – just look at Inter), but just thought this needs to be clear.