Milan 2-2 Lazio: danger down the flanks

The starting line-ups
The opening Serie A game of the season was excellent, with all four goals coming in a frantic first 35 minutes.
Max Allegri continued with his 4-3-1-2 shape, with Antonio Cassano playing just off Zlatan Ibrahimovic upfront.
Edy Reja gave debuts to two strikers, Miroslav Klose and Djibril Cisse, though the Frenchman played in a wide-left role. It was a similar, lopsided 4-2-3-1 to the system Lazio used last season.
The main tactical interest here was how obviously vulnerable both teams were in certain positions – and, as it happened, they were both vulnerable in exactly the same ways, despite the difference in formations.
Defences defend deep
First, the game was extremely stretched from the outset, with both defences defending deep, and a huge amount of space in the midfield as a result. There was barely ever any pressure on the ball and the midfielders all had time and space to pick a pass – the one exception being Hernanes, who was squeezed inside Milan’s diamond and didn’t influence the game a great deal.
With seven players packed into the central midfield zone, it always seemed likely that chances would come from the flanks. Neither side had traditional winger in their ranks – Milan were narrow, and Lazio used Stefano Mauri relatively central and Cisse as a support striker, so any threat down the wings would come from full-back.
This was interesting, for two reasons. First, because the game was so stretched from the start, the full-backs had plenty of space to motor into. The downside of this, however, is that they have to run a long way to make up ground down the flanks, and if they get forward and their side loses possession, they have to travel an extremely long distance to get back into defence.
Second, it was interesting because none of the full-backs received great support from ahead, with the arguable exception of Ignazio Abate, who was covered by Rino Gattuso and then Max Ambrosini when Gattuso departed (with Mark van Bommel coming into the holding role). Therefore, when they attacked, they were creating overlaps against their stranded opposition numbers – but no-one was on hand to cover.
Full-backs

The key battle zones. Abate and Boateng created 2 v 1s against Zauri (orange highlight), Konko and Mauri did the same to Abate (purple highlight) and both Cassano and Cisse tried to exploit the space in behind the advancing full-backs
The 4-2-3-1 theoretically offers good protection for full-backs – the Rafael Benitez-style 4-2-3-1, for example, essentially looks like a 4-4-1-1 or a 4-4-2 without the ball, with the wide players forming a second bank of four. Reja was happy to let his wide players amble back towards their own goal, however, which meant that Lazio frequently defended with just six players.
Abdoulay Konko was the most important player early on. He was given license to get forward and overlap Mauri, which gave a constant out-ball when Alberto Aquilani got too central, and meant that he and Mauri could overlap 2 v 1 against Luca Antonini. These 2 v 1 situations produced a dangerous cross in the opening moments, and later on resulted in Mauri getting space to cross for Cisse’s header.
On the other side, something similar happened. Cisse showed no interest in defending, and so Abate could leave him to Alessandro Nesta and move forward himself, getting most of that flank to himself with Luciano ZauriĀ remainingĀ deep. Unlike Lazio, however, Milan didn’t have a true wide player on that side, and it was only when Kevin-Prince Boateng came out to the flank to help out that 2 v 1 situations were created, meaning Milan’s overlaps weren’t as useful as Lazio’s.
The knock-on effect to Konko and Abate moving forward, though, was that Cassano and Cisse got space in behind the opposition right-backs. Cassano played Konko very well throughout, dragging him wide early on to create space for an Aquilani chance, but for the rest of the game he focused on getting the ball himself in left-sided positions, as he used to do so well for Sampdoria. The most obvious example was on 47 minutes, when a through-ball from Ibrahimovic resulted in Cassano running with the ball, coming inside and then shooting narrowly wide of the far post.
Cisse increasingly looked more like an additional forward as the game went on, to the point where Reja eventually seemed to move Hernanes out to the left to allow Cisse to constantly stretch the Milan backline, from left-of-centre positions.
Amongst this specific tactical battle, four goals in an action-packed first half resulted, almost inevitably, in a more tense second period after both managers were more cautious. There were less forward runs from full-back and therefore less space at both ends, though Milan should have scored a third.
Conclusion
A very interesting tactical battle that seemed to occur almost separately from the formation match-up, although the fact that Lazio had slightly more natural width meant their formation created overlaps more easily.
Both sides looked very prone to easy exploitation, however – Milan still look vulnerable to width, the major problem for Italian clubs in the Champions League, whilst Cisse and Mauri can’t be given such little defensive responsibility. A side with a good natural right-winger would have won this game.
Milan 2-2 Lazio: danger down the flanks





Very interesting and open game, especially for a season curtain raiser. Lazio will be very dangerous this season, if Cisse and Klose can continue scoring goals and remain healthy throughout the season. The only issue is their back four which looked shaky throughout the game. Also, despite his experience, Zauri is past his best at 33 and is a defensive liability. I honestly feel if Lazio had a much better defense, they would be a major threat this season, because that will be their Achilles heel in big matches. But apart from that, Klose, Cisse, Hernanes and Mauri are good enough to get Reja goals.
Lazio played 4-4-2 with a diamond midfield.
This debate, essentially… http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/03/analysing-brazils-fluid-system-at-close-quarters/
I can see that.
I noticed Brocchi drifting farther towards the touchline than your diagram notes, whereas Ledesma stayed in the middle.
Engaging analysis as always, ZM- It’s great to have you back!
Do you think there’s a chance of Guardiola starting with a similar system to the 3-4-3 he used against Villareal when Barca face Milan? Or do you think the similar midfield diamonds and Barca’s wide forwards coming up against Milan’s attacking full backs would just lead to the two opposing systems cancelling each other out?
If Barca plays their false 9 style 4-3-3, which plays like 4-4-2 diamond with wide forwards, then they will pin back Milan’s fullbacks and rob them of width, and each side will have 2 spare men. However, Barca’s will be their fullbacks, and Milan’s will be their CB’s.
The 3-4-3 would be a better choice because it still pins back their fullbacks, makes 2 CB’s redundant for Milan when Messi drops into midfield, but gives Barca spare players in better places: 1 in the center of defense, and 1 in the center of midfield.
It will be interesting to see if Milan try to have a CB step into midfield, and Silva would be perfect for this job, but I’m not sure the rest of the defense will adapt properly to this. Probably Boateng gets asked to play wide right in more of a 4-1-4-1.
Thanks for a great review.
P.S. There is a small typo though.
It says “… Konko and Mauri did the same to Abate (purple highlight)… “. I guess it should be “to Antonini”, not “to Abate”.
Milan were good, but not good enough. Aquilani was average for most of the game, was hardly a threat. I think he is more suited to playing higher up the park in the ‘hole’ just behind cassano and Ibra. But allegri seems to prefer Boateng’s direct running and energetic style. I would also like to see Milan play a 4-2-3-1 similar to Germany’s system during the 2010 WC. With Ibra up front, Robinho on the left, Pato/Boateng on the right and Aquiani in the ‘hole’ And with VanBommel and Ambrosini/Reno/Flamini in midfield. What do you guys think. Cassan drops to the bench though, but he should be useful from there.
Milan – I dont see why they need to play Ambrosini, far too conservative for such a talented team. They could just play aquilani and gattuso deeper, with aquilani setting the pace of the game (deep playmaker) and gattuso providing the energy. Then have Boateng as the link player between midfield and attack as he already does. Then by dropping Ambro they can can play pato/robinho on the right to provide another goal threat.
Lazio – Mauri just doesnt provide enough threat from the left, he played too deep and didnt look like changing the game. Hernanes was marked out of the game, but i dont see him as a attacking midfielder, i think he is much more comfortable playing deeper and controlling the game. Though i can see why lazio play him there as they already have ledesma and need him further forward. But for the players own career, i think he needs to move to a bigger club as he is very talented, and there isnt many players that can control a game like he can.
I’ve always thought Aquilani to be better higher up the pitch. Playing him deep is a waste of his talents in my opinion. He’s never really excelled as a deep playmaker for some reason.
I agree. Aquaman is better as a centre-midfielder who can drift. I don’t know why there is this constant need to put CMs as deep lying playmakers. It takes a certain skill set to do that.
Im not saying anyone can play there but Aquilani is a great passer and has that certain skill. I think he could player further up the pitch, but hes not really a goalscorer, which i think you need if your playing high up the pitch. And he doesnt have the stamina to play as a CM i dont think, and isnt quite his standard. He was quite in this game in that sort of position
i dont think hes had much of a chance, he was never played there for liverpool (due to injuries) and did play there for roma when starting out and did alright. I think he could do well with a tough tackling partner. I just think hes a great passer (short and long) and is pretty good positionally, he would just to get better at intercepting. Ambro isnt needed, he just slows the game too much and you dont need 3 deep midfielders.
Plus Milan dont have someone like that so could at least try it?
watching Barcelona-La Real at the moment. there’s a hint of Lavolpismo in the way they play. worth an analysis!
Lazio looked very impresive early on, but the Italian mentality took over. with the score at 2-0, they forgot its not even half-time, thus conceding when Milan picked up the pace. the don’t seem to be missing Zarate as much as most expected. i missed the beginning of the game, but at first sight i thought Edy had gone 3-61, the way Konko pushed up & Cisse provided width. lop-sided 3-61 it would have been!
the way milan play, if Antonini, Abate & Taiwo are their fullbacks, they’ll be exposed in Europe again. its a shame, because Allegri has brought the best out of most of the squad.
ZM S break was annoying
i could t stop checking every 2-3 hours in fact am new to the site but can t stop reading
i read all articles about recent World cup and ucl but i did t understand how u schedule ur posts i would like to know is by recent games or tactical interest so one can follow properly
in huge am huge fan and i learned too many thing s from here so all thanks to ZM
indeed, same here too. your break was so annoying. HEAR THAT, MICHAEL COX!
I was very surprise to see how timid both teams were to attack in the second half. With Milan, I feel there is a lack of cohesion in the final third. Too much confusion. To add, I thought Milan wouldn’t want to draw at home, but they seemed content. While Lazio looked pretty cohesive, I feel that the defense looks slow and may be easy to exploit in future games. Good analysis, ZM.
I thought Lazio were rich in right-wingers (rim-shot).
i think it was more of a 4-4-2 diamond midfield with cassano slight out of position in the role that Robinho played for Brazil at the world cup. if only someone could whisper in Arsene Wenger’s ears that this is the role that would bring the best out of Arshavin rather than that of a wide man in a 4-2-3-1!!
You didnt even read the comments above…
That’s an excellent point. I agree Arshavin is better suited to that than the system of current usage. I think the betterment of him would be transferal to a team of other.
Also, did anyone see Messi diving for that penalty? What a shameful display from someone who is held up as a role model for kids. My own son was crying after seeing Barca draw (he is a Barca fan and Messi particularwise). He said he’d have rathered they lost the game but kept their dignity. I thought it was well put as he is only 17.
Role model for kids? Depends… in what. Best player in terms of pure football skills – hell yeah. Fair play? Hell no. The best player in fair play probably plays in 3rd League of Azerbaijan. If anyone thinks fair play has anything to do with the current common definition of the best player in the world, then I’d advise such a person to reconsider that.
Btw, “only” 17?
What are you, 12? ‘Best skillz – hell yeah, playin’ like a pussy – hell no!’. Grow up, buddy. Diving for a penalty is morally shamful. I play football (or soccer as you may know it) every week and last year someone on my team dived for a penalty the way Messi did and we purposefully kicked it wide because we were all just too embarassed. Resorting to cheating is something this Barcelona team do all too frequently. Everything is ok while you’re winning, people make excuses for you. Inevitably they’ll start losing and when they do I suspect popular opinion will turn on them very swiftly as a direct result of how they have behaved when things were going well.
you are playing in 3rd League of Azerbaijan, Feathertouch? That’s fair play you can’t expect when stakes are really high. But one thing is true: Barca has some actors in their team. And primo uomo is Sergio.
Really fascinating match-up from two teams that should be consistently entertaining this year. Obviously, Klose and Cisse up front will do a lot of damage this year, especially if Mauri keeps on swinging quality balls into the box.
Great analysis, keep up the good work!
Once again another fantastic article. Love this website and all the comments from proper football fans. Feel free to read the first post of my new blog at http://studenttactician.wordpress.com/ as i love the discussions on this website!
Cisse hasnt bothered to do anything defensively, playing him as a “winger” in a 4-2-3-1 is suicide.
It will be interesting to see what formation Milan play against Barcelona, I’m pretty sure they’re going to play Robinho, but I’m not sure about Pato. It would be a shame if Pato doesn’t get a chance since his speed can open things up. But if I had to bet would be Robinho, Ibra, with Seedorf just behind them.
It might, it would be dangerous, but it would be interesting to see Milan play
a 4 man diamond middle of Robinho, MVB, Seedorf, Boateng.
Just watched a re-run of the match today. Aside from the tactical issues pointed out in this article, the most astounding aspect of this match was the lack of any pressing and pressure being applied to the man on the ball. Time and time again, be it from playing through balls or crossing from open play, the man on the ball was allowed to stop, put his foot on the ball and pick out a pass or a cross without being closed down.
This is not the first time that I have noticed this watching a Serie A match. In terms of athleticism and physical intensity, Serie A seems to be lagging behind the Premier League and even La Liga and the Bundesliga. I can only put this down to two things – either most teams in Serie A have ageing squads and are not as athletic and mobile as they used to be or Italy has fallen behind other major leagues in Europe when it comes to physical preparation.
100% agreed, Kevin. No pressure on the ball at all, it was amazing!
so standing off the ball is an indication of a lack of quality?
this is an interesting topic as I have heard argued significantly. lack of pressure yes, can mean those things kevin has pointed out, but the fact is on the ball pressure is not always a necessary tactic to win game or even play good football. the tactical aspect of serie a (which has been prevalent for…ever) allows players to not put significant pressure on the ball, but be able to pressure through positional awareness. this match was not a great example as often times both teams had poor shape but I think the main “issue” with the competitiveness of serie a is more due to the medias portrayal of the league since the calciopoli scandal…i personally find the league more competitive and therefore just as “quality” as both the premier league and la liga…in la liga you know it will either be barca or real and in england man utd, possibly city/chelsea whilst the serie a is really up in the air. i would rather watch a league with little point disparity and a fairly compeititive race to the title, then one where the outcome is known before the season gets into full gear. if we are talking pure skill then yes, la liga and the premiership take the cake, but i think tactically and competitively, serie a matches up with both the leagues…lets not forge the bundesliga as well, which is highly “unrated”
Excellently written article, UGG Boots if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a much better place. UGG SalePlease keep it up! Cheers.