United States 1-0 Panama: Donovan and Adu come off the bench to help break the deadlock

The starting line-ups
Clint Dempsey scored 15 minutes from time to put the US into the Gold Cup final.
Bob Bradley kept faith with the XI that overcame Jamaica – Jozy Altidore went off injured in that game, and his replacement Juan Agudelo started here. This meant that Landon Donovan was again on the bench.
Julio Dely Valdes replaced the suspended Blas Perez with Alberto Quintero, and set his players out in a 4-2-3-1 shape that became 4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1 without the ball.
The US dominated possession but were frustrated by the disciplined, resilient defending from Panama, and took a long time to start creating genuine goalscoring opportunities.
Tactical match-up
The formations on show were not dissimilar – both sides defended with two banks of four, and the two forwards on either side casually pressured the defence and tried to cut off passes into the midfield. The US had far more of the ball, and therefore Panama had to work hard throughout the first half, although they did a good job of slowing the US’ passing out from the back, making Bradley’s side’s build-up play slow and predictable.
Both sides were more fluid in attack, with the wide players moving forward quickly to link up with the forwards. Clint Dempsey played narrow on the left but couldn’t find space between the lines, whilst Sacha Kljestan was similarly disappointing and was withdrawn at half-time.
On the other side, Panama hit long balls towards their central striker, Luis Tejada, and looked for him to flick the ball into the three other attackers. Their best moves came when they broke from deep, however. Panama put together good, quick combinations at transitions and tried to break with pace – a little like Shakhtar Donetsk, albeit without the obvious technical quality the Ukrainian side possesses. Cooper down the left had good pace, and looked the biggest threat.
Overlaps
As was notable in the win over Jamaica, the US tried to dominate the centre of the pitch. They struggled to create from this zone, however, and credit should go to Panama for keeping it tight between the lines and disrupting balls into the feet of Kljestan. Another important factor was the use of a Panamanian central attacking midfielder, often Nelson Barahona, although he, Cooper and Quintero often switched positions. This meant that Michael Bradley and Jermaine Jones had less time on the ball than against Jamaica, and Jones wasn’t able to get forward and become as much of an attacking force as in the quarter-final.
The US dominance of the centre, and the solid, two banks of four (almost Hodgsonesque) shape of Panama without the ball meant that their wide players often became sucked into the centre, and this created space for the two US full-backs, Eric Lichaj and Steve Cherundolo, to motor forward, as the US midfield worked the ball from flank to flank reasonably well.
Lichaj started much higher up the pitch, partly because Dempsey was so keen to come inside, but it was down the opposite flank where they had a lot of joy – Cooper was a good attacking threat but also weak defensively, and both he and Luis Henrique picked up bookings down the left. The best chance of the first half came when Alejandro Bedoya and Cherundolo created a 2 v 1 down the right flank, and the latter crossed for Agudelo to head against the bar.
Second half
Bradley turned to his bench at half time, bringing on Donovan for the ineffectual Kljestan, and playing in the same role.

The US line-up after the two substitutions
Both sides were better with the ball after the break, moving it quicker and looking more instinctively to the wings for creativity. Panama played some good football and Cooper created a great chance for Quintero with a left-wing cross, but the winger was unable to connect. That was a good example of their football, however – the wingers getting into good positions and combining to create a chance.
Bradley’s second substitution saw a bigger tactical shift – Freddy Adu came on for Agudelo, which meant Dempsey going upfront, Adu playing in the hole, and Donovan moving to the left – still broadly within the framework that started the game. Agudelo’s powerful presence had done little to trouble the Panamanian centre-back partnership though, with captain Felipe Baloy particularly impressive. Dempsey’s link-up play in that position was more suited to good combination play.
It wasn’t necessarily the ‘tactical’ element of the substitutions that created the goal, more the individual contribution of the replacements in a rare situation – a US counter-attack. Panama’s defence was caught upfield from a corner, and the US broke quickly with a wonderful ball from one substitute, Adu, out to the other, Donovan, who crossed for Dempsey to tap in at the far post.
Panama tried to rally late on. Their best hope was the incredible long throw of right-back Adolfo Machado, which had been a threat throughout the game – but having been used to playing on the break, they were a little clueless when the US didn’t leave spaces at the back.
Conclusion
A decent tactical battle despite the lack of interest in in the starting shapes. The game was largely about who could work combinations down the flanks – the nature of the goal was almost out of place, since the US had very few opportunities to break quickly.
The contribution of Adu was important in the goal, as was the good work of Donovan – and, of course, the fact that Dempsey was playing as a centre-forward for the finish. Bradley has selection decisions to make ahead of the final – like in last summer’s World Cup, he seems to be better at making substitutions than he is at picking a starting XI.
United States 1-0 Panama: Donovan and Adu come off the bench to help break the deadlock





You have Lichaj listed at LB for both sides.
Other than that, great analysis as usual. I was very impressed by Adu.
As was I. I’m so happy Bradley has finally decided to play 4-2-3-1. Adu has said for years that his best position was behind the striker but Bradley insisted on using him in a wide role because of his size. The Line-up that finished this game should start against Mexico. Holden for Bedoya and we are probably at our best XI.
I’m sympathetic to this, but I wonder if we have a striker whose complete enough to play the 1 in a 4-2-3-1. A single forward system puts a lot of demands on the guy you put up front, and I’m just not sure we have the personnel for it.
Dempsey.
Oops sorry will fix!
Adu was productive both when holding and moving the ball. He’s deserving of more time, and I’ll be interested to what happens with future chances.
A player I’m becoming increasingly disenchanted with is Michael Bradley. I’m starting to see why he didn’t see any time for Villa. Yes he does make some timely tackles, but I’ve not been impressed with his work with the ball. Repeatedly saw him needlessly hold up the play flow, play lazy back or square passes, and hopelessly bomb the ball forward or crossed. I’d like to see Jones paired with Edu. Not sure how likely we’ll see that option with coach’s son though.
Looking forward to the next game. And thanks for ZM for the excellent analysis!
Thank you. Edu has been overrated and overlooked for too long. Coach’s son is a good players but we all know he’s allowed to have bad games when others are not.
Edu and Jones would be a formidable tandem in the center.
hey ZM, i know it is off topic but what do you think of villas-boas going to chelsea? Do you think chelsea will start playing a more possesion based game?
Wrote about it here! http://es.pn/kpOn9n
and a great article it is. I am sad that he left Porto. I hope he brings Mikel back into the fold at Chelsea. but I’ll still never understand why they fired Vialli (who was the previous record holder for youngest manager to win a UEFA competition before Villas Boas usurped that position) in the first place.
Why is Donovan not starting? I mean Bedoya is playing for Örebro SK, in the Swedish league which is really bad at the moment (we keep selling every player that has potential, next up is Mohamed and Ibrahim Bangura, keep your eyes out for them they might just make a splash in the footballing world). He’s good in Allsvenskan (the Swedish league) but he’s nowhere near Donovan’s level.
Bradley does like Bedoya, but as ZM implied, I’m sure he was just rewarding the starters from the Jamaica game. LD came off the bench for that one due to his plane landing at 7am that morning. Against Jamaica we had the most success from a 4-2-3-1 I’ve seen, so part of Bradley probably also wanted to see the personnel from that game (which was very much a new mix) give it another go.
anonymous makes good points. also, this is not the highest-prestige tournament around, so maybe it’s an opportunity to let new blood play in meaningful but not crucial games.
(Note: The “Preview” button did not work for me on Firefox v. 3.6.18)
Thanks for covering the US games in this tournament. I like the observation about Bradley making improvements at halftime. It’s way better than no improvements at all, which is what I feel accustomed to from watching Arsenal the last few seasons, although it is a curiosity that Bradley can’t bring his good ideas to the initial kickoff. Watching the friendly against Spain crushed my confidence in this team, but I’m feeling a little better. (Seriously, they were shocking in that friendly against Spain.)
Adu was just terrific, the difference maker in this game, and I for one hope that he starts against Mexico.
Check out my blog @ http://www.inforthehattrick.blogspot.com
Nice coverage, current formation better than 4-4-2, but still I think we lack the advanced central midfielder to be the supply line for the attacking forward/wingers.
stuart holden**
Holden’s very good (probably had the best club season of any US player), but he’s not exactly a classic #10 now is he? Certainly better than the other options, though. Replace Bedoya with Donovan and Kljestan with Holden, and the team starts to look pretty good. Too bad so many of the most important players will be seriously aging by 2014.
Holden is great and may find himself there by process of elimination, but he’s not a creator. USA have 5 very good MFs now (Jones is excellent in the team now) who on paper fit into the 2 bands nicely, but honestly I’ve no idea if we can make a 4-2-3-1 actually work. Donovan and Dempsey love to come inside and find the ball; in a 4-2-3-1, sometimes you need the wings to just fly upfield and trust play will find them. Otherwise, it just stagnates until we lose the ball. I think it’s going to take us awhile to get there.
I disagree. 4-4-2 needs wingers to hug the touch line, but having 2 defensive midfielders allows the fullbacks to go forward much more and provide width so the wingers can come inside and support the striker in goal scoring and creation.
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/04/22/is-the-sweeper-set-for-a-return-to-prominence/
the diagram in this is essentially what the us are doing with bradley and jones taking it in turns to sit between goodson and bocanegra who spread really wide in possession and lichaj and cherundelo provide width. This also means the attacking midfielder can play slightly deeper than a classic number 10 because the wide players push forward and narrower (he must also stay in midfield so the remaining holder doesn’t get isolated.
(my comment above) This is true the FBs can provide width, I don’t mean to discount that. I’m just pointing out what I’ve observed in past USA games. Cherundolo is by far out best back going forward (can I take a potshot at James Milner here?), but he’s 32. We really don’t have any other backs of the marauding type. Lichaj plays fearlessly, but he’s right-footed. Daniel Williams is a possibility if he decides to commit. Again, I’m really curious to see how Bradley shapes his 4-2-3-1 if he sticks to it.
Timmy Chandler
Lichaj is looking like a good replacement on the right for Cherundolo in a few years. Another right back with great attacking potential is Chandler – just have to make sure Germany doesn’t grab him.
Mexico will, most likely, dominate possession against the United States. Should this occur, will the US play a standard 4-4-2 or 4-2-3-1? (or even 4-2-2-2?)
I think we’ll line up in the same 4-2-3-1. However, our fullbacks (especially Cherundelo, who we rely upon for right sided width) will be pinned back by Dos Santos and company. Without attacking width, we’ll probably be reduced to playing the long ball and relying on quick counters. For that, we need a true center forward, who can hold up the ball, and feed our midfield runners (especially Dempsey, who is our best player and main creator/goalscorer). I don’t think Aguadelo is ready, but he’s arguable better than anybody else we have in that role. Regardless, the United States go in as underdogs, even though we’re at home.
Unfortunately the only guy that really fits that description is Wondolowski. And I’m not sure he’s that type of player, either.
Hopefully Bob Bradley has been taking notes on Mexico, and develop a proper tactical plan for managing all of the talent they have on the attack.
That player, eventually, will be Bunbury. He is having a down year, but he will be that center forward a 4-2-3-1 / 4-3-3 craves eventually.
Yeah, the lack of width without the Cherundolo getting forward is a major issue. Perhaps it might make sense to play Donovan on the right and tell him to stay wider than usual (IIRC, he played a pretty traditional winger’s role very well while at Everton). That would probably mean starting Adu or Kljestan, though, which, despite Adu’s excellent cameo, doesn’t fill me with confidence.
Against Jamaica width came primarily from Bedoya on the right. In fact, he often occupied the very space that Cherundolo moves into, and this was probably one of the reasons Cherundolo sat back in that game.
I like the lineup the US finished with. In future tournaments I’d put Altidore up front and have Dempsey replace Bedoya, but for this one I hope Bradley begins the next game the way he ended this one.
I enjoyed watching Panama in this tournament, and I hope Dely Valdés stays on through World Cup qualifying.
Thanks for the analysis, Zonal Marking. Instructive as always.
I feel that the eleven that ended the game would make a good starting XI for the final. Agudelo just isn’t a complete striker in my opinion. I think he’d be better served as a deep lying strike partner for someone who can finish with more frequency and consistency, specifically due to his skill and his ability to hold up play for more players to get forward. He could be a great catalyst for our attack if used right.
I was quite impressed with Adu’s performance, and I think I’d prefer him behind Dempsey rather than Kljestan. The ball Adu played to Donovan was excellent, and I’d like to see more of that in our midfield.
Thanks as always, ZM. Quality stuff.
To me, Adu had two plays that were world class: the first, the pass to Donovan and the second was about ten minutes later, he had the ball on the right side about ten yards within the Panamanian half. He held the ball and drew (I think) three defenders then played a ball about ten yards into space behind the defenders that he then ran on to down the wing. It was a bit a skill that made something out of nothing.
I have only seen him play a few times, but the dude has legit talent, and if any one heard his post match interview with Fox Soccer, he seems like he is focused on becoming a better player and teammate — I was as impressed by that interview as I was by his performance.
Not to get ahead of myself, but, I would trade a US loss in this tournament for a matured and improving Freddy Adu.
I think you might be using the team “world class” a little lightly. the vision was their but world class playmakers would have played a much better through ball.
Not to get too much into it here, but Adu has _always_ shown these flashes. If he is engaged and given space, he can work magic, especially coming on as a sub and against a lower class opponent. But it is extremely teasing. I agree that his postgame interview was the most revealing and his constant mentions of “team” and “work” seemed genuine.
The final should be interesting and a great match.
Tactically Mexico has been playing, according to their coach, Chepo De la Torre in a: 4-4-1-1.
Bradley has been playing 4-2-3-1 which looks a lot like 4-4-1-1.
Both coaches are in love with 2 defensive destroyers in the middle and reluctant to play 2 forwards at the same time. Sounds very low scoring.
Mexico have worked a lot better when De Nigris comes on for one of the defensive midfielders, the four goals against Guatemala and Honduras, and the second halves against El Salvador and Cuba happened after he came on and De la Torre played a 4-1-2-1-2.
Great point. Den Nigris has been excellent off the bench. Except as the tournament has progressed Chepo De la Torre has pretty much kept Torrado and Castro as the 2 central defensive midfielders. For example against Honduras, he didn’t touch them, they went 120. Same with the Guatemala match.
Some might say against certain competition you want 2 destroyers but against Concacaf clubs that try and defend for long stretches. It might be a good idea to just work with 1 destroyer. But the results are working right.
Good point about two destroyers. Seems that both Mexico and the USA are set up to keep a clean sheet in the first half then adjust in the second to get goals for their best player. First half goals are a bonus.
If it’s 0-0 at the half, it will be interesting to see which happens first: Dempsey going up top, or De Nigris coming in to open up space for Chicharito.
Given that Mexico’s traditional flaws against the USA are lack of good finishing and getting hit on the counter, de la Torre’s formation and strategy is sound: avoid the counter early on, then set up space for Chicharito against tired legs.
good points you make regarding the Concacaf teams. I’ve noticed stretches when Castro is played at right back, Guardado comes into the middle to partner Torrado, Gio goes to the left and makes room for De Nigris. If the USA isn’t really attacking in the 2nd half of the game, Torrado’s tackling and Guardado’s box to box play might be more appropriate in the center of the park.
Agreed. Perhaps above all De Nigris opens up space for Chicharito. I’m not sure how well suited he is to playing alone up top (at least not yet). Guatemala and Honduras were able to track him with two central defenders, until De Nigris came on. Having a second forward helps, having one who’s big and dangerous in the air helps even more. With only one marker, Chicharito can be untrackable, especially late against tired defenders.
I actually find Mexico’s formation to be more of a 4-2-3-1 and USA’s more of a 4-4-1-1. Though, during a match, both formations can be very similar. Surely an interesting match to come.
Nice article Michael and let’s see how the Americans will deal with Mexico
I am really glad to see the return of Adu. He will definitely not reach the hype (He was playing in Turkish Second Division before the summer) but, man, he is still only 22 and may still have a chance to materailize part of his potential.
I did not notice Dely Valdes is the manager of Panama until yesterday. Like him as a player since his cagliari days and hope he can show his ability in bigger stages.
I also suspect Dempsey was offside when Donovan crossed the ball but the replay never emphasize it.
Dely Valdes set up his side very well against the USA in both matches–he pinpointed the weaknesses of the USA individuals, and adjusted to their formation change. His side was well organized, and resourceful–scoring critical late goals in two of their other matches. Very impressive, especially the speed of their transition from defense to attack in the group stage match vs. the USA. Not surprised to hear ZM mention Hodgson or Shaktar–he clearly knows what he’s doing.
he was clearly onside if you watch replays on youtube. Their is a defender on the 6 yard line and Dempsey is outside the 6.