Inter 3-1 Palermo: Sneijder-Eto’o combination twice opens up Palermo

The starting line-ups
Leonardo won his first trophy as a coach, as Inter lifted the Coppa Italia.
Wesley Sneijder was fit to start for Inter, with Yuto Nagatomo at right-back, and Cristian Chivu on the opposite side.
Delio Rossi used his 4-3-2-1 system. Fabio Liverani was left out, and Afriyie Acquah played the holding role.
Palermo had the majority of possession, spent most of the game in the Inter half, and probably had more chances. They lacked a cutting edge, however, and Inter were ruthless with their quick breaks – a little like in the Champions League final last season.
Inter tactics
Palermo’s Christmas tree shape was largely as expected, but Leonardo’s formation was a slight surprise. A 4-3-1-2 was expected, but instead the Brazilian chose a 4-4-1-1 system, with Samuel Eto’o high up on the left, Wesley Sneijder in a free role, and Giampaolo Pazzini alone upfront. This was welcome news, as it made the match-up between formations more interesting.
Inter’s attacking build-up play was poor when they didn’t break quickly. Nagatomo tried to get forward down the right, covered by Javier Zanetti, but on the other side Chivu wasn’t quick enough to overlap to allow Eto’o inside. In the centre, Sneijder often got into space between the lines but passes rarely came his way – Thiago Motta and Dejan Stankovic are both good ball-players, but were more concerned about protecting their back four from Palermo’s double trequartista threat than playing football themselves. Meanwhile, Pazzini was isolated upfront, and hopeful lobbed balls towards him in the air were predictably unsuccessful.Battlegrounds
Partly because of that, Javier Pastore and Josip Ilicic weren’t particularly involved in the early stages of the match, although there was one occasion when Inter’s defence was opened up when both Lucio and Andrea Ranocchia got dragged up the pitch – this should have put Pastore in, but his control was poor.
There were two interesting battlegrounds on the pitch, and both were eventually won by Inter. The first was in Palermo’s left-back zone, where Mattia Cassani wanted to attack and provide width for Palermo, but was troubled by the presence of Eto’o.
The second was Acquah against Sneijder. The young Ghanaian allowed Sneijder to go free between the lines and got sucked into the midfield battle ahead of him – it’s difficult to see why, because Palermo had numbers in that zone (more so that if Inter had played 4-3-1-2, certainly) and Acquah had no need to get involved. He could have stayed goalside of Sneijder, but moved up the pitch, missed a tackle, and then Sneijder sent the ball through to Eto’o, who came inside and finished with typical confidence.
Second half

The line-ups midway through the second half, after some substitutions
Rossi really pushed his side forward in the second period. It was immediately obvious that the two full-backs were even more attack-minded (and even wider) than before the break, and on 54 minutes Palermo brought on another forward, Fabrizio Miccoli – with Acquah sacrificed.
This was obviously a very attack-minded move, and some reorganisation was necessary. Antonio Nocerino and Giulio Migliaccio played a little deeper to compensate for the absence of a true holding player, and Ilicic also dropped back a little to the right. Miccoli played left-of-centre, Pastore came to an inside-right position, and Abel Hernandez continued to play upfront.
This meant that Palermo now had a front four playing very narrow – but this was OK, because the width was coming from the full-backs, keeping the active playing zone large enough to stretch Inter. And Palermo played some fantastic football – Ilicic saw more of the ball because he wasn’t really being picked up by anyone, and Pastore kept beating players cleverly. All that was needed was a finish, but Hernandez’s shots were poor, and Inter got some last-ditch blocks in.
Closing stages
Leonardo saw Cassani as a threat down the right, and Eto’o was reluctant to drop back and defend too much, so Goran Pandev replaced Pazzini, with Eto’o going upfront. This had two benefits – first, Pandev was more defensively aware on the left flank, and second, with Palermo pushing forward and playing high up the pitch, Eto’o’s pace was an obvious danger in a central role. He took up good positions outside the two centre-backs, and Sneijder kept trying to play him in down the centre-right channel – a few balls were cut out by substitute Moris Carrozzieri, but the Dutchman (now enjoying even more space after Acquah’s departure) eventually played another ball to Eto’o, and that same combination doubled the lead.
That should have been game over, but there was a flurry of activity very late on. Ezequiel Munoz scored a hilariously free header from a corner, then was sent-off and left a hole at the back, and substitute Diego Milito pounced to make it 3-1 in stoppage time.
Conclusion
An entertaining game – Palermo were better in midfield and their build-up play was very good, but Inter had the most deadly player on the pitch, and Samuel Eto’o scored two stereotypical goals to settle the game.
It’s fair to say that both managers performed well here. Rossi’s side were frequently creating chances by playing neatly in midfield, but were lacking in the penalty box, whilst Leonardo’s surprise starting line-up made the Sneijder-Eto’o combination possible for the first goal, and his substitutions also worked nicely in the second half.
A good tactical battle.
Inter 3-1 Palermo: Sneijder-Eto’o combination twice opens up Palermo




Love the Christmas tree shape, and I can’t really understand why teams don’t use it more often. Pastore is a wonderful player, but Inter’s victory isn’t exactly surprising, as much as I didn’t want it to happen.
Well, i would think it has something to do with the lack of width, both offensively and defensively. It doesn’t stretch the opponent wide and the oppositions full backs are free to go forward and have time on the ball.
Actually, I think the biggest problem with the christmas tree is the lack of presence in the box. This game is a good example, it dominates the midfield and create loads of chances, but no one was there to finish. In this formation, and its more popular varient, the diamond, the width is generally provided by the full-backs. But they can’t always do that, if not because of an extremely dangerous opponent on the wing that they have to take care of, like Ronaldo, or in this case Eto’o, or a hardworking winger that tracks back, like Park Ji Sung. In the diamond, at least with 2 up front, one of the strikers can go wide to provide support, and the other can concentrate on finding space to score. Maybe the solution is for one of the trequartistas to pull wide to provide support for width, but that’ll be taking away the advantage of playing the christmas tree at the first place.
That’s very interesting, i never thought about it but it seems more likely that you’d get more bodies in the box in a 4-3-3 than in a christmas tree.
I’m guessing it comes down to who you have as your trequartistas. When we (Chelsea) lost Drogba to the African Cup of Nations during the 09/10 season we played a 4-3-3/Christmas tree hybrid with Malouda and Joe Cole as our trequartistas/wingers and managed to bang in 7 goals with 6 different goal scorers against Sunderland at home. We also scored 7 against the joint best defense at the time Aston Villa and another 7 against Stoke playing that formation. Having Anelka probably helped a lot too considering his false 9 role would’ve been ideal to play in others.
You could say tho that not all teams have Ashley Cole in the form of his life raiding the left hand side and he never came across and dangerous or hard working wingers when we played that formation (Valencia at OT is an exception but we had more balance with Ferreria on the right)
I hope I made sense
pastore may be a wonderful player, but at the end wonderfulness doesnt matter when you stupidly try to dribble in your own half in a dangerous position. i thought palermo were getting into gear and were soon going to make it 1-1. then this pastore decided to be wonderful and gift inter the second goal.
I agree on the lack of width. It has its benefits but it relies on straight balls all the time, which I think can be a big problem.
your love of the italian football doesnt seems to end and many a times i wonder you give too much importance to the combination rather than the players strength .
secondly if you expect people to use nice language then the responsibility is also on your part to be nice when you comment and just because you doesnt feel it correct it is not . calling anybody bonkers and all that is pathetic .
Rahul, you are an idiot.
seems like you just saw yourself in the mirror when you made that comment.
Cleverly retorted.
I stood up and applauded when I read rahul’s response. Should be a lawyer.
Agree
you don’t have to come here, or read the comments.
furthermore, just because all you comments on the 15 managers article were shouted down for being absurd doesn’t mean you have to hold a grudge…
1) It’s the Italian Cup final. It’s hardly unreasonable for me to cover it. What other games would you suggest I covered on that Sunday?
2) I said that calling Max Allegri a “failure” when he won the league was a bonkers comment, and I think it is. That’s not using bad language.
I agree with you..
just ignore him, he just jealous with you
There is Nothing Wrong in this article, i think the wrong one was Rahul BRAIN
Can’t say anything more about the tactics that ZM hasn’t already covered, but: Eto’o – what a player. He’s not only a deadly finisher he’s a highly adaptive and versatile component in any team he’s played for. Solid work ethic, full-back scaring pace, and decent linkup play. I hope history will recognise him as one of the true complete attackers in this era of the game.
Yes, I agree. He doesn’t get the credit he should, does he? Perhaps because he’s not overly creative or imaginative, based upon technical and physical qualities. Great player though.
Did anyone catch what Munoz did to earn the red? Based on what I saw, that was barely a yellow. I know ZM focuses on tactics, but that card took Palermo out of the game.
Munoz didn’t deserve the second yellow. The replay clearly showed that he got the ball first.
ZM is a stupid pathetic retard.
Journalistic neanderthal Alexander Netherton, is that you?
yeah. he’s the retard here. not you, the idiot who chose to add mind numbing stupidity into what is a fantastic blog.
Shame, the previous comments under your proper name were quite intelligent!
I think it was his second yellow. When I saw the replay, I thought he clearly got the ball first and that it wasn’t even a foul, but I only watched the replay during the game so I can’t be 100% sure.
I was sorry that Palermo didn’t win the game. They put up a great fight and it would have been refreshing to see someone new lifting a trophy.
Check out my blog @ http://www.inforthehattrick.blogspot.com
Inter looked so much more dangerous with Pazzini off, I thought I could mention that. He’s a great goalscorer, he puts them in when it counts, but sometimes I find myself thinking Inter are better with Eto’o in the middle than on the left.
I think a more specific way of putting it is, Pazzini is not much use if the opposition play a high line, as Palermo did when they had possession. He’s not confident in his ability to race past defenders. Eto’o unsupported can make chances for himself against 2 or 3 defenders, with Sneijder’s support he becomes a terror. Closer to goal, Pazzini is better at ghosting past defenders, while Eto’o is more likely to be double marked.
Agree with all of that.
Pazzini is penalty area finisher. He has great response, accuracy, and also aerial skill. But his lacks of speed and dribbling tricks make him a very service-dependent type.
Maybe learn one two tricks from Berba will do him good.
One may say that any experienced coach could have seen Cassani as the width-providing threat and responded appropriately but it is hard to predict with Leonardo. I dare say it, but this cup victory could give Leonardo much-needed confidence with his substitutions, Pandev especially, and tactics to propel himself as a better tactician.
I would say he absolutely nailed his substitutions. As an Inter fan I was hoping the Milito/Sneijder substitution would happen as soon as Pandev came on, which shuts down Palermo’s full-back threat (Eto’o on one side, Pandev on the other). But that was with a 1-0 lead, leaving Eto’o upfront for a while guaranteed a second goal with how committed Palermo were to the attack.
I’m just happy to see Leonardo succeed after not being appreciated at Milan (yes, I’m a fan). May the rivalry continue in good spirit!
I’m not a big fan of Leonardo. I don’t feel like he’s tactically adept enough to win the big games (i.e. Champions League). Eventually Leonardo will have a bad string of performances next season and he will be sacked for another young Italian coach or maybe ANCELOTTI. Who knows!
I kinda agree. I like Leonardo but I don’t rate him much. He’s gone out of the Champions League 7-2 and 7-3 on aggregate two years in a row!
I think the Inter that has played for the past 1.5 months would not have lost to Shalke. He is improving, 2 months ago his formation looked more like 4-0-4-2 than 4-3-1-2. Now he has his midfielders sitting deep, pressuring opposing midfielders as soon as they lose the ball, and other basic requirements to defend properly. I think his main weakness now is fullbacks, but that might be more about not having anyone he trusts with marking fullbacks.
Point is, I see him doing well.
Say ZM why can’t I see the pictures/jpegs unless I open them in a new tab ?!
I’m having the same problem ZM. Since your Champions League Final review, I can’t view any of the diagrams for some reason.
sorry, am fixing this!
ZM, why do you think the 4-3-2-1/4-3-1-2 formations are widely used in Italy but practically non existent in other European leagues? Would Italian teams have more success in Europe if they were to switch to 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 styles?
mainly due to lack of good wingers.
Yes, I think it’s a cause/effect thing. But the lack of width in Europe keeps costing them.
I chatted about this on Football Weekly Extra with Jon Wilson recently – here at 25:30 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/audio/2011/apr/14/football-weekly-extra-podcast if you’re interested
That little bit about Eriberto was hilarious!
Haha
ZM should devise more original titles – they express such common place facts, that I’m little tempted to delve into the article.
Good, attention-seeking headlines are one of the worst things about journalism
I think it’s time for Inter to retool if they want to become a major European power again. There never going to have another coach such as “The Great One” who was able to do more with less because of his tactics. There back line was so suspect that if they had Walter Samuel healthy half those goals would’ve not gone through. If i was Moratti, i’d start bring in young players such as Hazard, Sanchez and Gervinho to replace the older fading players (i.e. Milito, Stankovic, Zanetti, Lucio)