Porto 1-0 Braga: Porto win Europa League

The starting line-ups
Falcao’s trademark header just before half time gave Porto the UEFA Cup trophy.
Andre Villas Boas named the side which could reasonably considered his first choice XI for this season, with one exception – Freddy Guarin started on the right of the midfield trio, when Fernando Belluschi has seen plenty of playing time in that position.
Domingos Pacienca also had a decision to make about his right-sided central midfielder – Custodio got the nod. At the back, Silvio (comfortable on either side) played at left-back.
As Villas Boas acknowledged after the match, the game was not a particularly good spectacle. None of the attacking players showed their true quality, and chances tended to come from defensive errors rather than good creative play. Considering that Porto are simply a much better side than Braga – they’ve just finished 38 points ahead of them in a 30 game season – the game was more even that one might have expected.
Opening exchanges
The game started nervously. It was a slow, patient first few minutes, with Porto dominating possession of the ball and Braga reasonably content to sit back and let them play, although Pacienca did instruct his side to hold a a reasonably high defensive line.
Porto were organised in their usual 4-1-2-3 shape, with Fernando sitting very deep in midfield. Villas Boas told his full-backs to push on whenever possible – especially Alvaro Pereira down the left. To aid this, and with Fernando having no specific player to pick up for most of the game, he sometimes dropped into the back to switch Porto to 3-4-3, allowing the full-backs more freedom.
Braga’s shape was 4-2-1-3ish, though Hugo Viana played to the left of the pitch and often came deep, meaning Braga were arguably just a 4-3-3, or 4-1-2-3 themselves, with Vandinho sitting ahead of his defence, like Fernando. Those two were the free midfielders, with the other two doing battle with each other in the centre of the pitch.
Midfield contest
In this zone, each side had what the other lacked. Porto’s movement from the front players was excellent – Villas Boas had clearly worked on some set patterns in the build-up to the match. Their classic movement on the right (which has been noted before in the huge wins against Benfica and Villarreal) created space for Guarin to move forward into, and he provided the cross for Falcao’s header just before half time. There was also good play on the left by Silvestre Varela to play reasonably narrow and open up space for Pereira, whilst Moutinho also played in an advanced role at points, on one occasion trying to break over the top for a through ball when Falcao dropped deep.
Indeed, part of the effect of Braga’s highish line was that the gap between Porto’s midfielders and attacks was small, and it was easy for the two ‘bands’ to combine off the ball. Porto lacked good quality passing from the centre of the pitch to exploit the runners, however.
For Braga, it was the opposite story – Vandinho played well and hit some nice passes into wide positions, but Braga frequently miscontrolled and wasted opportunities to get crosses in. Silvio was one of the biggest offenders here – a surprise, since he is a very good footballer – but he found it difficult to cross from the left, and the whole Braga side looked nervous throughout the game. Combine Vandinho’s passing with Porto’s movement, and you would have had a complete team.
That’s maybe slightly harsh on Fernando, as he did hit a lovely crossfield pass out to Hulk, who beat two players and hit a shot just wide. But even then – that was all about Hulk. He still had to dribble past two players – the initial pass was hardly penetrative.
Brief Hulk threat

Porto often looked like this in the attacking phase of play, with Hulk stretching the play, Varela allowing Pereira forward, Guarin breaking from midfield and Fernando sitting deep
Hulk v Silvio looked like being the key clash in the first half, but Hulk’s contribution after the half hour mark was minimal. Silvio was outpaced comfortably by the Brazilian- the downside of the Braga defence pushing up – and also committed a poor, needless tackle on him that summed up his frustration. It was strange that Hulk didn’t test Silvio further, considering he had the benefit of more pace, and the knowledge that Silvio was another foul away from being dismissed.
Second half
Pacienca made two changes at half time. Kaka replaced Alberto Rodriguez, who had been a fitness doubt, and had been caught in possession for the goal. Viana was also sacrificed, with the more energetic Mossoro coming in and helping Braga to press higher up the pitch.
It almost worked instantly. Fernando had spent the first half with plenty of time on the ball – but 40 seconds into the second, Mossoro closed him down quickly, won the ball, and was through on goal. Unfortunately, this was his first action of the match and he didn’t look sharp – he couldn’t get the ball out from under his feet with his first two touches, and his third was a fairly weak shot at Helton.
Porto were more defensive having taken the lead. Moutinho no longer tried to break forward and instead sat alongside Fernando, whilst Guarin was replaced by Belluschi.
Braga’s third change also worked reasonably well – Lima was replaced with Albert Meyong, who played a hold-up / false nine role and allowed midfield runners to play off him. And yet, despite the improvement in positioning and movement from the front players, Braga still created nothing of note in the second period, as Porto were disciplined and resilient without ever looking completely comfortable, and without needing to vary their tactics much aside from like-for-like changes.
Conclusion
The two key moments both game from defensive mistakes – Falcao’s goal, and Mossoro’s chance at the start of the second half. The game lacked a true creator, someone who who was going to play the killer pass and provide for the attacking trios – Falcao created the goal and Mossoro ‘created’ his own chance with the tackle, which sums up the type of game it was – these are physical and energetic players rather than silky ones.
Pacienca used the bench well to vary his tactics and his attacking approach (after the game he said that he was happy with the way his substitutions reshaped the game) but Braga let themselves down with poor control in the final third of the pitch. Their failings here were not tactical.
Villas Boas made a big deal of Porto’s mental strength in this game, praising his players for “making the transfer into the environment of the final, which is very difficult” and commenting that they were “able to concentrate in the game and perform their tasks” – this was the major difference between the sides – sadly, Braga looked tentative throughout and were poor in the attacking third as a result.
Porto 1-0 Braga: Porto win Europa League




I would be delighted to see the unlikely occur, in Villas Boas coming to Chelsea, on the off chance he might bring the likes of Hulk, Moutinho or Falcao with him, like Mourinho with Carvahlo and Ferreira.
For Villas, Hulk, Falcao and Moutinho you have to pay 200 Milion Euros…not cheap!
And Villas is a Porto supporter so forget it
Not a great game but it was entertaining. Silvio was the worst player on the pitch, both defensively and with his crap crossing…
he’s right footed, and when playing as a rightback, he is quite good. i think he was supposed to stop Hulk, who drifts inside a lot, creating space for Guarin to move to the right. it was a counter strategy to stop Hulk, but it gufted Guarin space & troubled Silvio defensively
“Their (Braga) failings here were not tactical.” very debatable. They offered no inventiveness in the final third, mostly due to a lack of possession; a lack of possession due to the game plan of sitting back which can be dangerous. Also Pacienca chose to play Lima up top, where in fact he could have benefited playing a quick forward to run inbehind porto’s high line and offer more of a threat.
who is that “quick forward”? Meyong? Paciencia played with what he’s got, & he’s come this far. he lost his best player in December (Mattheus) & is working with a team that is very likely to change atleast 40-60% every summer. why Braga had little possesion with little creativity & infiltration in the final third? yes, Paciencia’s fault. Hugo Viana usually plays deeper, dictating play quite well. for the final, he played further upfield to accomodate 2 defensive minded midfielders. remember, this is Hugo Viana who was originally a 10 but nothing came of it. now, with Paciencia playing him deeper, he actually excelled, felt comfortable & has been Braga’s best player in a lot of games. Paciencia chose to counter Porto’s strength rather than focus on his. its a final, you win an ugly 1-0 or lose 0-7 playing tiki-taka…the outcome is what matters
I dont know Braga’s squad very well past the first 11, but surely they have atleast 1 quick forward in the whole squad. If they don’t they should, so that would be a fault already of Pacienca. Your reply suggests braga played the only way they could. Which is not true. People have the illusion that if you press and attack a team you are left open, which is true if u push stupid numbers forward and play a rediculously high line, however if u attack with good but sensible numbers u can nullify any counter attack and if u position a defensive line which compresses space inbetween the lines but is not suicidally high, then you can remain very hard to break down as well have a far more share of possession with much more of an attacking threat.
Was far from the best games of the competition, until the worst was that these teams did.
Because essentially the Braga decided not to play, and try with that Porto had not played.
3 defensive midfielders and destructive game, block low, loss of time from the start.
The odds of Braga were not many, but this type of strategy did not give them a better chance of success, lost a chance to shine in a European final.
FC Porto struggled to play with this kind of opponent’s game. He played it safe, always with great confidence, without ever losing control of the game.
Falcao scored another excellent goal, which he broke the record of Klinsmann’s competition, and made the party with supporters.
The party was lovely, in Dublin and Porto.
FC Porto is the team with more European conquests in the century.
This season trophies and records fell like you never saw.
What pride!
What bliss!
Come the Champions League, our natural environment, exciting challenges
A big hug to everyone who participates in this great space!
http://thebluefactoryofdreams.blogspot.com/
Carrega Porto!
Just a quick note: It’s “Paciência”. But he’s always referred to only by his first name “Domingos”, as he was already when he was a top-scoring striker for Porto, Tenerife and for the national team
Prety straightforward match…
The team that would score first would have the upper hand… and after Porto scored, the game was pretty much over.
Braga progressed by playing tight defensive football, and by not putting themselves in a position to have to chase scores.
They aren’t a team designed to take control of a game, and pressure the opposition with a coninued attack style. They are primarily a counter attacking team.
Porto recognizing this, after scoring, were more concerned with keeping a good defensive shape… and didn’t even try to score a 2nd.
too late . now since the season is over i would like you to extend this column in transfer activities and talk about the team requirements and the players that will fit in . hope you will listen .
Please?
I’d also love to read your musing in the off season, ZM. There’s no reason why this has to arbitrarily be a tactics blog when there are no tactical things happening (In-Season is a different story, obviously).
It would also help to keep your readership up. Lots of people would probably forget about sites like this in the off-season (but no doubt this site has the quality to survive no matter what)
Michael Cox writes on more diverse soccer topics for sites like espn and thefootballramble, as well as on the guardian’s football weekly podcast. I personally look forward to extensive Copa America coverage this summer, and maybe some Gold Cup, MLS, and Russian Premier League as well
indeed, I feel like there is a lot to talk about. How general tactics have changed over the year, how things will look like next year, what specific and general weaknesses and strengths certain teams or leagues will have! anaylsing teams over a season is also another option – I would love to see season long anaylises of Real Madrid, Barcelona, Liverpool, Porto, and Man Utd…
If you browse through his general articles and 2010 review you’ll find he already does many of the things you listed. He also (amazingly!) covered every World Cup match last summer with previews and write-ups. I’m sure he has plans for this summer as well. Asking for me just sounds greedy and selfish.
Great article as usual, how much do you think players like Falcao, Hulk and Moutinho are worth?
http://www.inforthehattrick.blogspot.com
Sorry to bother you with the off-topic comment, but will you be covering Copa América, seeing how many of these players will be playing there?
Please keep this a tactics site, not a supporters site for transfer discussions!
Plenty of deep analyses to be made during the summer.
I watched the whole game, and thought it was a pretty terrible spectacle. It seemed to me Porto were playing a ridiculous number of long balls and deep crosses trying to hit Falcao or get him in behind the Braga defence. It worked for the goal, but precious few times aside from that. Braga were playing a very dense pressing game – they crowded their own half with everyone behind the ball and wouldn’t let Porto play it into feet within 30 yards of the Braga goal. There were a lot of niggling fouls and over-reaction to challenges, designed to break up any passing flow. I suppose Porto reacted to being kept at arm’s length by simply hitting the ball over the obstacle. Not much fun to watch, but it did the job.
I was pretty disappointed by Hulk. I now see why people say he’s very selfish and plays with his head down. There were numerous occasions where he either isolated the fullback or tried to get a counter-attack going, but he simply ran into traffic every single time. The guy doesn’t know when to pass, and with Braga being so compact it just wasn’t the occasion to try long solo dribbles. If Hulk had passed on those occasions where he did take an opponent out of the game, Porto would have found a lot more space. I can’t see the guy doing too well in the Champion’s League with such a naive style.