Manchester City 1-0 Stoke: Man City clinch first trophy since 1976 after Toure strike

The starting line-ups
Yaya Toure’s powerful shot 15 minutes from time gave Roberto Mancini’s men the victory.
Mancini was able to call upon Carlos Tevez upfront, meaning Edin Dzeko dropped to the bench. Mario Balotelli started on the wing, and Aleksander Kolarov played over Pablo Zabaleta at left-back.
Tony Pulis brought Matthew Etherington back into the side – though he didn’t look fit – and Robert Huth also recovered from injury to play at the back. Thomas Sorensen got the nod over Asmir Begovic in goal.
City were better throughout the game – never quite in complete control, but always the better side. They carried out their gameplan more effectively than Stoke.
Formations / Stoke threat
The battle of formations was pretty much as expected. City were 4-2-3-1, Stoke were more 4-4-1-1 than 4-4-2, as Jon Walters was asked to keep goalside of Nigel de Jong in the midfield zone.
That was part of Stoke’s problem, because Walters was therefore forced to play far too deep and this meant Kenwyne Jones lacked support throughout the contest. For his part, Jones played the centre-forward role very well – he won free-kicks from Vincent Kompany (who looked uncomfortable coming up the pitch) won headers against both centre-backs, had a penalty shout in the first half when he caused Kompany problems, and also had Stoke’s best chance of the game when getting on the end of an Etherington ball over the top in the second.
That was the extent of Stoke’s threat, however. With Walters deep, Etherington lacking his sharpness and Jermaine Pennant’s delivery from the right rather poor, Stoke were underwhelming. Stoke are notoriously a long ball side , but their passing performance in open play was poor even by their standards – Opta recorded, for example, that Stoke’s first half pass completion ratio was their worst of the season, and by the end of the game half of their outfield players finished with below a 50% pass completion ratio. They were outnumbered in the midfield zone and didn’t spread the play wide well enough.
City overlaps
In open play, the main point of note was how City brought their wide players inside and were fluid in and around the penalty box. Sometimes this produced chances in itself – Balotelli cut in and forced a superb save from Sorensen, whilst Silva found himself with a great chance but thumped the ball into the ground and over the bar. On other occasions, it opened up space for the City full-backs to get forward – Kolarov was a real threat down the left but his delivery was erratic. Micah Richards was a little too reserved on the other side and could have asked more questions of the half-fit Etherington, especially with the excellent Nigel de Jong providing protection deep in midfield.
Delap’s throws were dealt with reasonably well, and Pennant’s free-kicks from the right were disappointing. In fact, the most interesting set-pieces were goal-kicks – when Stoke had one, they brought their wide players inside to try and get on the end of Jones’ flick-ons (the only time he had support in the game) and when City had one, Stoke pressed them high up the pitch which forced Joe Hart to go long, often conceding possession. Hart also conceded possession when he tried quick goal-kicks after set-pieces, with Stoke’s centre-backs were up the pitch. He is a fine goalkeeper, but his distribution is not quite at the level it should be.
Aside from the wide players coming inside, City often looked dangerous when players moved forward from deep, central positions. Both Toure and Kompany had efforts from long distance – with Stoke’s two central midfielders moving towards their own centre-backs quickly and Walters staying on De Jong (rather than in a specific zone), City had space in that area of the pitch.
Second half

The line-ups when the goal went in
Pulis elected not to make a chance at half time, despite his two wide players struggling and Stoke being outplayed in midfield.
With the same XIs for the second half, the game continued in the same pattern. City were the better side, and despite Jones’ golden chance, looked more likely in front of goal.
Etherington’s injury eventually meant he had to depart, with Dean Whitehead coming on and Delap going left. This meant that they looked more readily to Pennant on the right, but Kolarov was more defensive in the second half and had few problems.
Mancini sub
Mancini gambled on 72 minutes with an attacking move – Gareth Barry off, Adam Johnson on. Barry may have been carrying a knock, but it was still positive for Mancini to go with an extra attacking player, rather than with Patrick Vieira, for example. Silva came inside and Johnson went to the left, with Toure dropping deeper.
This had a clear impact for the goal – Toure may have been starting off further out, of course, but he still got forward, and it was notable how many players City had in the box for the goal, as Toure arrived late to crash the ball in. That wouldn’t have happened if the more reserved Barry had been the ’second function’ midfielder rather than Toure, so Mancini’s substitution deserves credit.
Stoke caused few problems late on. John Carew replaced Delap with Walters coming to the left, but Stoke looked physically drained and were unable to win the ball back quickly enough. Their natural response without the ball – to drop deep and wait for attacks to come, was no longer good enough and Manchester City were calm in the final ten minutes.
Mancini brought on Zabaleta for Tevez and went 5-4-1ish, with a spare man at the back against the double aerial threat of Carew and Jones, and Vieira replaced Silva very late on for extra protection, but Manchester City were comfortable and deserved the win.
Conclusion
Stoke didn’t play well. They didn’t carry out either aspect of their gameplan well enough – the classic physical/long ball threat was not as dangerous as usual, partly because of a high line from Mancini, and partly because Jones didn’t get enough support. They didn’t play well enough on the floor, either, unlike in the 5-0 semi final win over Bolton – despite a fine pitch, the passing was wayward and they were hampered by Etherington and Pennant’s reduced mobility.
Mancini’s side were not spectacular, but very well organised and, with the exception of Jones single-handedly causing Kompany and Joleon Lescott physical problems, composed with and without the ball. Tactically, Mancini got things spot on here. His side were in control of the game early on, and then he injected another attacking player to add fresh impetus when Stoke were growing into the contest.
Manchester City 1-0 Stoke: Man City clinch first trophy since 1976 after Toure strike




disappointing game I thought, not much to watch from either side. Rory Delap really is shockingly poor on the ball for a premiership footballer!
He only plays because he can throw the ball far.
Its a pity that, isnt it?
He really was bad. I was at the game and seem to remember counting Stoke’s highest number of passes in one move was 5 in total. Atrocious. Stoke didn’t deserve to get anything out of the game.
HEY GUYS, ITS ME AGAIN
Well said, all the major points of covered.
I think that Balotelli primarily led the line after the Johnson substituion, with Tevez in the hole and Silva wide-left, but they were switching positions so often that you could argue with any static positional diagram.
I thought De Jong was excellent defensively but his passing left a fair amount to be desired. He played short passes well and a couple of nice through balls, but for the amount of time he was given on the ball I thought he could have done better. As an ex-Ajax player i’m sure he would be a bit dissapointed with his passing. Still, in his role as a ‘destroyer’ he deserves high praise.
It’s going to be a tetchy Charity Shield!
Very well played by City.
As much as I would have loved to see Stoke beat Man City today, it would have been a travesty if Stoke had actually managed to do it – they were awful and City played very very well…..
Zm, I have to dispute (a little) your belief that Kenwyne Jones had a good game – on many occasions he failed to hold the ball up well enough (along with Walters), giving away possession quite cheaply in my opinion, and when he got into dangerous positions his touch generally let him down. I think that John Carew may have been a better option – although he is definitely lazier than Kenwyne, he has more skill and ability, which at this sort of level (cup-final against team of World-Class players) generally comes to the fore more……
I definitely agree about Etherington – he didn’t look fit enough for the game and should have been replaced early on…….roll on the Champions League final……
I don’t suppose that the Continent is shivering at the prospect of plying that Man City side. But perhaps it won’t be that side it has to face.
If you replace Gareth Barry with a competent player, it looks like a very good first XI. If you replace Gareth Barry with a star (Bastian Schweinsteiger and Luka Modric are the ones that come to mind), it looks like a team that can win the league.
There are still areas to be addressed – Kolarov has yet to fully convince at left-back, Barry as you mentioned is a cut below the rest of the first team, and arguably one of the wing positions is up for grabs due to Balotelli’s inconsistency – but City are looking dangerous. They’ve sorted the defence, and their fluidity and interchange in attack is improving game on game.
City will add another world class midfielder (in the Silva mould) to their ranks. Don’t be surprised to see a cheeky bid for Fabregas. Balotelli and Dzeko will be better for a year of premier league experience under their belt. Dzeko with an actual pre-season will be beneficial. The weakest link is Kolorov, but to be fair to him, he does add an attacking threat and the ability to hit a ferocious drive. I don’t think he is necessarily required to be a great defender in the system Mancini uses. The fact he was used in a wing back role against Fulham shows his possible worth in a more advance role. I think he possibly could be one of those players whose first season in English football is a struggle. Having said that, Mancini will have no qualms filling the LB position with another accomplished player – possibly Cliche (?) – especially as that is one position City have little depth in. Lescott can fill in but not to the level required of a CL team, and Zabaleta is multi-functional, yet is not as comfortable on the left. So a LB will come in to compete with Kolorov. Even if City made no changes, this team is going to perform better next season. Remember this was a brand new team that spent the formative parts of the season figuring out each other. Add to that the injuries to Balotelli and Johnson, plus the suspension of Kolo Toure. This team will be much stronger even before the anticipated summer blockbuster signings. I don’t think mancini will bring too many new players in, maybe 3 or 4 max
Leighton Baines seems like a move that makes sense for both Man City and Everton. Everton needs the cash and Man City need a LB. I think Zabaleta/Bellamy might move with cash to Everton like the Milner deal with Aston Villa. Everton could get Neville’s eventual replacement in Zabaleta and Bellamy could start on Everton’s left wing. But if Man City want to become an elite team they do need a player like Modric or Nasri. Either one would bring the starting 11 together and make have a really solid player at every spot. Actually, Adebayor going to Tottenham would also be interesting because Tottenham need a striker.
Starting: Hart-Richards-Toure-Kompany-Baines-De Jong-Toure-Johnson-Modric-Silva-Tevez
Bench: Given-Boateng-Kolarov-Milner-Balotelli-Dzeko
I thought the game was actually a real bore, quite surprised at how charitable people are being to City. I suppose we shouldn’t begrudge them their first trophy in however long, but they managed a fairly uninspiring 1-0 win over a limping Stoke (the worst I’ve seen them play for a long time). Besides Leicester and Notts County who forced replays, and Man United who are obviously quite good, it was a pretty boring path to the trophy for City.
In fairness, lots of the players were saying ‘this is just the first brick in the house,’ etc.
Just realised I could’ve attempted a joke about a ‘brick shit house,’ especially considering City have the brutish figures of De Jong, Balotelli, Richards etc in their armoury. I won’t though, think I’ve missed the moment.
this stoke team will get annihilated against any decent side in the europa league. Their central midfielders are awful on the ball ESPECIALLY DELAP!
Unfair. Whelan is good, and seeing as their play isn’t based around technique and ball retention that lack of passing ability isn’t so bad. Thing is with the Europa League, what do you classify as a “decent side”? Usually it’s a long time before you come up against anything that could be considered a truly ‘big’ side.
Not to mention, of course, that Stoke are notoriously hard to beat (especially at home), and the chances of a European “annihilation” are lessened as a result. I’m looking forward to Stoke in the Europa League, such physicality will be alien to Spanish sides for example.
What I would really like is for Barcelona to not make it out of the group stages next year, drop into the Europa League and meet Stoke. Hopefully, on a rainy, thundery night at the Brittania. Then, the age old question of whether Lionel Messi can hack it against Stoke at the Brittania on a cold and wet night would finally be answered.
Will definitely be interesting to see them come up against continental sides but I have much less faith in them than you, referees in European competitions would stop a lot of the physicality that Stoke use.
Whelan is quite good on the ball. They’re a tough team to beat, and on their day exciting going forward too. If they can find a decent right-back and a creative midfielder in the summer I think they might surprise a lot of europa league teams. Watch them destroy Bolton in the semis, for example…
I was quite impressed with Mancini’s tactics especially in the second half. The introduction of Johnson with Silva dropping back into midfield really does seem to be a far more progressive way for city to go about things. Perhaps we’ll se a lot more of that next season from city especially in their home games if they want to push on.
Congrats city.
Any reason you’re not covering Pool v Spurs? It’s not under upcoming and could be interesting tactically considering Liverpool play a 4-2-3-1/4-3-3 and Spurs a 4-4-2/4-4-1-1. And of course winner will get Europa League.
Excellent as ever.
I was disappointed by Richards tonight. Up against a clearly half-fit Etherington, he didn’t offer the level of attacking threat necessary tonight. Wilson at left-back for Stoke was never going to offer any major threat going forward, and so in theory Richards should have had the run of the City right flank. As it was, I only remember one or two occasions where he got forward, and none to any major effect, in contrast to the lively Kolarov.
Interesting about Walters, I picked up on this too. His energy and movement across the field complements Jones well, but today it just didn’t seem to work too well for Stoke. It seemed to me that he was marking De Jong, if anything, TOO well; he stuck to him very well, but with Stoke struggling for creativity (with both wingers injured and Whelan struggling to get into the game) perhaps this wasn’t necessary. Whenever Stoke were out of possession he was sticking to De Jong, and when they had the ball back he was within a few feet of City’s destroyer and best tackler, to Stoke’s detriment. Stoke ended up abandoning all pretence of creativity late on, resorting to their infamous long balls, which was a shame.
one of my mate says john o’shea is a good utility player to have and that not many utility player are good as him…it makes me laugh …lol how do i counter that? lmao
you can’t counter that, its true. He can do a solid, reliable job anywhere in the back four (or arguably as a defensive midfielder in a push), grew up at the club, knows the culture, works hard and doesn’t make many mistakes. Ferguson has always known the value of players like that – the likes of Butt, P Neville, Brown, O’Shean might not be world class but they’ve been vital squad members.
I wish Chelsea would keep hold of either Mancienne or Cork, for that reason. Won’t happen though…
not sure what its got to do with this game though…
macienne and cork are the opposite sorts of players to O’Shea….O’Shea’s proven and lots of experience, hence making up for his average ability. Cork and Mancienne have barely any experience of playing in chelseas first team
yeah, but if Ferguson hadn’t seen the value of holding onto versatile players from the youth ranks, even if they’re not potential world stars, then O’Shea wouldn’t have got that experience. I wasn’t comparing his age to theirs, I was comparing his ability, versatility and the fact that he came through the ranks.
I was surprised at some of the harsh fouls on Pennant, he looked dangerous until being kicked and pushed over repeatedly.
the reason Stoke’s long ball didnt work was because Kompany and Lescott are big centre backs and competed well enough for Kenwyne Jones not to get an easy flick onto Walters. The best he could do was win the ball but not anywhere near Walters. Man City did not play a high line…
VOTE EM manchester PARA GANAR LA LIGA CAMPEONES AQUI:
http://www.desportoevoradistrito.blogspot.com