Man City 1-0 Wigan: City start strongly, but half-time change in mentality nearly costs them

The starting line-ups (Silva and Balotelli switched throughout)
David Silva scored the only goal of the game in a slow contest.
Roberto Mancini left Edin Dzeko on the bench. Nigel de Jong was also a substitute, so Patrick Vieira played in midfield, whilst Pablo Zabaleta started rather than Aleksandar Kolarov at left-back.
Roberto Martinez left out Charles N’Zogbia, playing Tom Cleverley on the left, and Victor Moses on the right. Adrian Lopez replaced Steve Gohouri at right-back.
The first half was strange – City dominated and should have been more than one goal up by half-time – and yet they relied on a terrible error from Ali Al-Habsi for their goal. Wigan were content to sit back and play on the break, which they did reasonably well, but were often let down by one of their front four making the wrong decision with the ball.
City tactics
City were an attack-minded 4-2-3-1, with Yaya Toure the closest support to Carlos Tevez for most of the game. In theory, the two wide players dropped back into midfield to form two banks of four when Wigan attacked, but because the away side only did so on the counter, it was rare that City actually had to take up that defensive shape.
Instead, the two City wide players were free to take up attacking positions for most of the game – although neither stayed on the flanks. They both drifted inside and frequently swapped positions – both seemed to prefer playing on the left, up against Lopez, who also made a mistake for the goal. Mario Balotelli caused early problems with a shot very similar to his recent goal against Fulham, whilst David Silva started from a narrow position and looked to work one-twos with the other City players, frequently finding himself in goalscoring positions, but only occasionally shooting.
Lack of fluency
On twelve minutes (12:44, to be precise) – five seconds of football summed up why City aren’t cohesive in their system yet. Tevez dropped deeper than the attacking band of three to pick up the ball, but then when he looked for one of them to make a forward run, all three moved towards the ball in unison. That epitomises why City often dominate games but score fewer goals than that dominance would indicate – they need more drive from midfield runners, especially if they have a false nine able to create space in the opposition defence.
Mancini may have regretted playing Zabaleta at left-back in the first half, because City needed their full-backs stretching the play and expanding the active playing zone when they had long spells of possession. Zabaleta is a good player but his speciality is not getting down the touchline, especially when used on the left. Still, despite that problem, City managed to create chances.
Wigan also created chances on the break in the first half. With Silva and Balotelli slow to get behind the ball, often City defended with only six players, which left them vulnerable to cut backs from wide positions, and players arriving late in the box. City also committed a high number of fouls when Wigan looked to get the ball forward quickly, which resulted in bookings for Micah Richards and Gareth Barry. Other than that, the midfield battle was fairly tame.
Second half
The game changed completely at the start of the second half. Mancini instructed Yaya Toure to move from an attacking midfield position to a holding role alongside Patrick Vieira – similar to the change in position Toure made at half-time in the 0-0 draw away at Arsenal. City were much more cautious in the second half, and as a result had to endure long spells of Wigan pressure – unthinkable in the first period.
Wigan were more attacking. There was more emphasis upon ball retention rather than playing merely on the counter-attack, although obviously this was also a reaction to City’s strategy. As a result, they got more men forward – particularly the full-backs, and had a couple of good efforts on goal.
Changes
Mancini again changed his system when City looked rocky, reverting to the system with Toure just off Tevez in a 4-2-3-1. City couldn’t completely snap out of the more defensive mindset, however. In general this season, they’ve been able to switch to a deeper approach midway through the game, but have struggled when asked to move up the pitch in order to be more offensive.
N’Zogbia was introduced down the right for Wigan and was an immediate threat, so Mancini brought on Kolarov for Balotelli, to sit ahead of Zabaleta.
The final twenty minutes of the game lacked any urgency or creativity, with so many substitutions (and changes in strategy) killing momentum. City seemed to have brought the game to a close when they brought on de Jong for Silva and packed the midfield – but Wigan did have late chances, and will feel they should have picked up a point.
Conclusion
In basic terms, job done for Manchester City – but they laboured to victory having started positively. Mancini was too cautious after half time and invited pressure unnecessarily. They won a very high percentage of their duels throughout the match, though:
If this game was at the beginning of the season, Martinez would have been pleased with the performance – but the time has come where Wigan need to be picking up points. They may have been outplayed for much of the game, but they should have scored at least once, and they goal they conceded was a horrendous goalscoring mistake.
Man City 1-0 Wigan: City start strongly, but half-time change in mentality nearly costs them




Really not sure what to think about Wigan. Half the time they seem capable of great things, the other half they’re not so much flirting with the championship as making love to it. I like to think they will avoid relegation… but with a renewed West Ham and Birmingham with games in hand, I just can’t see Wigan escaping without them seriously turning it on for the last ten games.
Birmingham’s games in hand are Everton away and Chelsea away. I see us getting nothing.
But I would agree that Wigan would have to do very well to avoid relegation now.
ZM in your opinion what is the best formation/tactic to beat/counter a 4231 formation?
it’s not as easy to find then the 3/5 at the back against a 442, and as 4231’s are getting so common i’d like too know if you know a way to have a tactical edge on this formation…
4-1-4-1 can be effective if you want to stop the opposition playing effectively in a 4-2-3-1 as it effectively “inverts” their midfield with the 1 “holder” picking up the “no 10″ and the other 2 centre mids picking up the 2 defensive mids. See the Arsenal-Birmingham report – Ferguson roughly picked up Rosicky, wheras Gardner and Bowyer roughly picked up Song and Wilshire.
If your goal is to prevent the 4-2-3-1 team from playing proper football, then 433(4123)/4141 is the best because every player faces direct opposition (i.e. nobody is free)
I think 4-1-4-1 would be good if you wanted to negate it. The only problem is that when you leave no one free you create a situation where the match will be decided by who wins the 1v1 duels and if your up against a team that is your technical superior you will probably lose out.
Every 4-2-3-1 is different so you cant really say that one formation or tactic will catch it out. But i think a 4-4-2 magic square might do the trick. You would win the midfield battle 4v3. Depending you can exploit them down the middle if the opposition use cms instead of DMs. If you have 2 strikers on the defensive line and have the AMs take turns entering the defensive line you might be able to catch the opposition off guard. There are to many variables in a match situation to say that one formation will always dominate another. It would be intresting to see how a 4-4-2 magic square would match up to the 4-2-3-1.
——-X——–
—–X—X—
-X—X—X—X
————–
——-X–X—
–X—–X——
Hey check out my blog its for any one who loves the tactical side of the game and or people who are just intrested in the finer details in the game.
http://footballphilospher.wordpress.com/
I’m not sure we’ve yet found an obvious solution, nothing in the way 3-5-2 and then 4-3-3 got the better of 4-4-2.
4-2-3-1 is essentially good for possession, three men in the centre – how do you beat that? Perhaps by putting one of the wider midfielders more narrow – see Ramires for Brazil, or Iniesta for Spain at the last World Cup, which means an extra player in the midfield zone.
4-3-3 is the logical shape in terms of ‘matching’ 4-2-3-1, but I find it can be risky – the man deep in midfield can find it difficult to play a forward pass. With a 4-2-3-1, you’ve got two holders, and with the two centre-backs they form a nice ’square’ for retaining the ball.
thank you all for your answers
I don’t agree with you when you say that the change at half-time was unnecessary and that Mancini played it too cautious. Wigan had a few very good chances in the first half, including one with a completely unmarked man in the box, at just 10-11 metres from the goal (probably their biggest chance of the game), and another when the Wigan forwards’ lack of communication made them get in each other’s way at a cross, somewhere near the 6-yard box.
Most of these chances happened because City’s men didn’t track back, as you noticed too. So it was obvious that they needed to change something because they were playing very risky. You may disagree with Mancini’s idea, to put more men behind the ball (although that seems logical, especially when you have a one goal advantage), maybe he should have made his players be more carefully defensive. But that was hard too because I have yet to see the day when Balloteli will defend properly.
Wigan did have chances in the first half – but then so did City. The result of Mancini’s change was that Wigan had more chances in the second half, but City had none…
I actually thought Wigan were unlucky to go in one down. Moses was causing some problems, and Wigan were playing very nice football, and I thought City were subdued, and they only went in one up due to a goalkeeping error, didn’t watch the 2nd half so can’t comment.
Winning dailyderby results for California Lottery draw 4793 on sat march 5 2011 are: 1st – 06, 2nd – 05, 3rd – 01 Race Time – 1:41:05
Sweet day. Anfield bathed in sunshine, batter Mancs, Sunday lunch out, coffee & brandy, off to pub to watch MOTD. Does it get much better?
Okay, I know I should be used to it by now, but stuff like this: “Yaya Toure the closest support to Carlos Tevez” still shocks me every time.
Didn’t Yaya use to play as AM for his country too? Just like how other similarly “robust” midfielders do for their African countries too: Mikel, Boateng, and sometimes Essien too.
Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, Lv Handbags
the internet would be a much better place. coach handbags Please keep it up! Cheers.