Man Utd 2-1 Man City: Rooney wondergoal

The starting line-ups
City started well but United grew into the contest, and Wayne Rooney’s astonishing overhead kick settled the game.
Sir Alex Ferguson went with his 4-5-1 system, dropping Dimitar Berbatov to play Rooney upfront alone. Rio Ferdinand and Jonny Evans were out so Chris Smalling started. Michael Carrick was the central midfielder left out.
Roberto Mancini left out Edin Dzeko to play Carlos Tevez alone upfront. James Milner played in Nigel de Jong’s position, and Aleksandar Kolarov started on the left. Joleon Lescott was chosen over Kolo Toure.
City were the better side in the opening 20 minutes, completing 99 passes compared to United’s 80. They also created the best chance in that period, through a brilliant neat passing move, but David Silva poked wide.
United start sluggishly
United’s passing was poor – they misplaced passes even when under little pressure at the back. Here, the absence of Ferdinand was felt – in addition to United having a much better defensive record when he is in the side, he also offers reliable, solid distribution from the back. The fault was not with Smalling, who had a good game, but Vidic feels the need to bring the ball out of defence more, and his passing range is not particularly impressive.
He is a superb defender, however. He and Vincent Kompany have probably been the division’s best two centre-backs this season, and according to OPTA’s stats, neither lost a challenge in this game.
United were better when they let Paul Scholes have the ball, and as in the meeting between these two sides at Eastlands last season, he was the difference early on. City’s distribution from the centre of midfield from Gareth Barry, James Milner and Yaya Toure was short, calm and reliable – nothing wrong with that – but Scholes’ long crossfield balls constantly changed the point of attack and made it more difficult for City to get into the right positions. The distance of his passes on the chalkboard is notable.
City’s midfield acted as a three, with Toure starting highest up but sometimes becoming the deepest player if Milner or Barry moved forward. This worked nicely, because Silva always moved inside and Milner overlapped to provide width – playing more passes from the right flank than Silva, despite their starting positions.
United’s wingers played different roles – Nani generally stayed on the touchline but Ryan Giggs came inside and saw more of the ball. Nani became increasingly frustrated at his lack of service, however, and started to wander. The goal came when both wingers were more narrow than usual, with Giggs playing in Nani to finish well in the 41st minute.
Second half
Mancini’s first change came soon after the break. Shaun Wright-Phillips (who had only played 130 minutes so far this season) replaced Kolarov, with Silva moving to the left – although as Silva comes inside so much, this didn’t affect his positioning much. Mancini could have taken off Pablo Zabaleta, who lost Nani for the first goal, and put Kolarov to left-back, but he seems to trust Zabaleta more than Kolarov defensively.
His second change was forced on him – Milner went off through injury – but Mancini took this as the opportunity to go towards more of a 4-4-2 shape, with Dzeko joining Tevez, and Toure deeper in midfield. The two subs combined for the City equaliser, a fortunate goal that deflected in off Silva’s back. Nevertheless, Wright-Phillips’ pace and directness did give City another dimension, stretching the United defence, so we should put that substitution down as a good move from Mancini.
Ferguson responded with a similar change – going to 4-4-2 with Anderson off and Dimitar Berbatov on. Having gone from six central midfielders at the start to just four by the end, the game opened up significantly and a third goal seemed to be on the cards.
Rooney’s winner, from a deflected Nani cross, was astonishing, and a fitting winner in any game.
Conclusion
Nothing too exciting tactically – both started at 4-5-1 to keep it tight, then switched to 4-4-2 to try and provide more goalscoring threat. In that respect, the game was rather like the Manchester United v Valencia game at the Mestalla earlier this season – where United also got a late winner.
The game was also notable for the identity of the forwards – the smaller, pacier Rooney and Tevez preferred over Berbatov and Dzeko from the start. The false nine is no longer an abstract concept, it has become an established role in modern football- especially in big games like this.
Man Utd 2-1 Man City: Rooney wondergoal




What an incredible goal by Rooney. Honestly, I don’t understand why the in-form Berbatov was dropped over Rooney, he can play the false nine role as well, but obviously Ferguson’s choice was proven right.
It was certainly a spectacular goal, but it was a fluke. It came off his shin, closer to his knee than his foot. If it had connected with his foot it would have flown some distance away from goal, and not achieved any of the dip that his shinner achieved. His goal for Everton v Arsenal was a better goal.
Couldn’t understand why Berbatov didn’t start. Actually tweeted the following: “Berbatov benched. Okay he was gash last time out but it’d still be questionable under anyone other than The Wizard. #mufc”
There’s just no point doubting Ferguson, even mildly.
“There’s just no point doubting Ferguson, even mildly.”
good gracious, what piffle.
You did not mention about Chris Smailing’s fantastic performance? Carlos Tevez did not have a single shot today!
He has improved leaps and bounds since coming over from Fulham. He looks like a future starting CB for Manchester United and England.
Just 1 game doesn’t make Smalling that good..Remember Evans? last season superb but this season very poor..sad case for him
1) I said he was good.
2) Little interest tactically…
I think it makes sense to play Rooney in that role, despite Bervatov’s recent play. Rooney has the pace to open the game a bit up front and plays better balls to open up Nani. Good move going to a 4-4-2 though. Why not play Berb?
Had City shown more balls at Eastlands against United and got a better result there, they could’ve settled for a draw after going 1-1. As it is, they have zero chance of winning the league. Mancini’s philosophy at the time was that it was those 0-0s against United and Arsenal that were going to help City win the league. In fact, the exact opposite has proven to be true. Faint heart never won fair lady.
Is he trying to win the league though? My impression was that he wants to get in to the top 4 and anything else is a bonus.
That’s exactly the point.
Everybody criticses Mancini for being too conservative, especially in the big games, saying that they’ll never win the league with that attitude. But Mancini’s goal is clearly not to win the league, it’s to get that Champions League place.
So far they are on course to achieve that goal, and I think Mancini is doing a pretty good job there.
If only every club had £160M to spend on transfers they could all improve their league position by a single place.
Yeah, I do think its strange whats going on with the Man City Hierachy at the moment – it’s well accepted that they’ve told Mancini that he only needs to finish in the top 4 this season, but with all the money they’ve spent and the quality of players they’ve bought its VERY odd of them not to expect Mancini to challenge for te title. – The thing is, if Mancini was only a little bit more attacking then Man City would be neck and neck with Man Utd and Arsenal for the title RIGHT NOW. To be fair, they still are technically (and not unrealistically either) in the title race, and if they’d won today then they’d be bang on for it, so I suppose Mancini is doing a goodish job…..
…..although, people should still be questioning why they got rid of Mark Hughes in the first place – there was every possibility that he would have got them into the top 4 LAST SEASON (something which Mancini managed to balls up with his defensive Italian tactics…..and Patrick Vieira), so for the owners to only require him to finish top 4 now is a bit ridiculous…..like I said, very strange…..
‘defensive italian tactics’
haha oh wow
Actually if Chelsea and Tottenham win their games in hand, City are fifth. They do have an easier schedule compared to Chelsea who still have to play United twice, but they’re not in a great position like they were some 4 weeks ago.
he tried to win the league hence by telling all his squad in private to get ready to be champions by the end of the season….then after a few sticky results the objective changed
and this hurts the brains of many fans because they’ve been socialized by the (mostly woeful) english-speaking football media with the idea that anything other than “winning silverware” is a disaster. Or, to render this truthandinsight style, THEY HAVE TO WIN SOMETHING RIGHT NOW! 2ND PLACE & A CHAMPIONS’ LEAGUE SPOT = CRISIS! ARTUR BORUC IS MY IDOL! AAAAHHHHHH!!!
Maybe it’s related to having followed the NBA for most of my life, where only one team from 32 wins every year so if you have a good record and do well in the playoffs (people respect the performance instead of whining and moaning and demanding a new coach, but I find the common approach towards football/soccer fandom very odd. OF course City has spent a billion dollars on their team, but I find the relative patience quite refreshing, as if these are the only executives in the game who have heard that Rome wasn’t built in a day.
Still think Rooney shinned it.
yeah, he did actually. If he’d have kicked it with his foot then it probably would have gone out for a throw in, or something…..but, as they all say, you’ve got to buy a ticket to win the raffle, and we all know Rooney loves a Tombola…..(I have no idea what that line means – I just wanted to work the word Tombola into my raffle comment)…..
Unfortunate thing to say, but I’m glad Evans was injured today. Smalling had the perfect game. He has looked better this season than Evans so I don’t know why Evans isn’t give more time off to sort out his problems.
It was funny to hear Steve McMamahon creating a doomsday scenario for United because of Smalling’s presence.
Oh and Rooney, what a goal! Time stood still for a few moments, it took a while to register that the ball was in the top corner. Well done.
Oh and lookie, United were not favoured by the ref, he awarded 4 minutes, 4 minutess (!!!) of stoppage time to city!! Referees normally do not have stoppage time at old trafford when United are leading right? no wait…
I know you are being sarcastic but from a neutrals perspective the referee actually has an excellent game. Quite a refreshing change from recent times.
Jeez, that is what my sarcasm implies. I should put a disclaimer in my post from now on.
Or maybe just not talk about the referee on a site about football tactics…
You again. Why don’t you set an example and not post at all.
Concur with RA.
Yeah, good point about the false nine. Both sides started with one, imagine that a few years ago! In effect, that means both sides started with a strikerless formation…
Only saw first half, and just going to make a quick comment on Micah Richards.
What a beast. Strong, quick, good in the air, good timing in the tackle, can defend and go forward. How the hell does Johnson get in the England team ahead of him? Am I the only one who thinks this? Johnson is defensively absolutely awful, he’s decent going forward, but overated, whereas Richards, defensively sound, and very good going forward also.
I totally agree with you Mark. I thought Richards was brilliant for England under Mclaren, and Capello just hasn’t seen whats good about him. Having said that, after what happened at the World Cup, is it any surprise that we’re questioning Capello’s judgment…..(Upson?!? Why Upson!?!)…..?
Yeah, suppose we can put it down to Capello, the sooner that clueless idiot f*cks off the better.
Martin Kelly is better than both of them.
On the strength of his 25 total games for Liverpool? your objectivity is so refreshing…
To be fair, Richards positional sense is atrocious!
it was. It’s improving leaps and bounds though
Are you one of those fans who has ‘realised’ since the world cup that he is useless and has never won anything of note?
He’s never won anything of note?
Still, I do think he’s terrible at international management; he should go back to club football.
I’m not sure he is terrible at international management, he was really good in the qualifiers but it all fell apart at the WC. I was being ironic when I said ‘he had never won anything of note’ by the way.
Yes, R.A, good in the qualifiers against the likes of Kazakhstan/Andorra etc, even Scotland would look good against them. Play a top quality side with Capello’s awful tactics and player selection, and we get taken apart.
As for the person who said Richard’s positional sense is awful, I’d actually disagree, and I think that’s a typical view of a defender who is seen as better going forward than he is at defending, people will just automatically say they are bad at defending, just because there more renowned for there attacking, Richards is easily comfortable at CB also. Richards was up against a very intelligent player yesterday, Giggs wasn’t going to beat Richards for pace or strength, but he could outwit Richards, draw him in for things and play it past him, which would catch him out of position, but Richards stood off when he needed to, he went in for the tackle when he needed to, and wasn’t caught out all afternoon.
As for Kelly, very bright future, looks like a decent player from what I have seen, at the moment though, I’d still rather have Richards. Anyone but Johnson though!
I wish I was a clueless idiot too, so I could win the Champions League, 7 Serie A titles, 2 La Liga titles and a couple cup titles. Yeah, clueless indeed. During my playing career, I wish I was a clueless idiot too because then I’d win 4 Serie A titles as well.
Get out of here, calling Capello clueless. Which coaches have been equal to or better than him during the two last decades? Lippi? Ferguson? Del Bosqué? Mourinho?
Can’t it be that England don’t have the right players to play the modern game correctly? They don’t have good enough passers, good enough holding midfielders, they have inconsistent wingers. Until now they had no goalkeeper that was really good. Heck, they’ve only got one world-class striker and the rest of the world-class players are either in defense or not suited to international football (Gerrard and Lampard are great in club campaigns because the amount of goals they score, but frankly they don’t score them every game and if they don’t they do not really do much for ball retention or defensively).
What ever Capello has done in the past, so what? As England manager he has been a CLUELESS IDIOT.
Can’t it be that England don’t have the right players to play the modern game correctly? – We do have the right players, Capello just chose and continues to choose the wrong players.
G.Johnson over Richards and Wes Brown.
Barry over Carrick.
Heskey full stop!
Milner over A.Johnson, Downing and Young.
They don’t have good enough passers, good enough holding midfielders – 2 birds with one stone here. Carrick is a better holding player than the completely pointless, and completely useless Barry. Carrick is also very comfortable on the ball, and can dictate games from deep whilst still offering a shield to the defence. However, for some reason Capello prefers Barry who can’t even hold his position.
(Gerrard and Lampard are great in club campaigns because the amount of goals they score, but frankly they don’t score them every game and if they don’t they do not really do much for ball retention or defensively). – Part of the problem. Why does that idiot continue to pick them? Gerrard, and to a greater extent Lampard have never performed like they do for there clubs in the white of England, so why does Capello continue to pick them? Because he’s a lying bloody hypocrite, when he came in he told us what we wanted to here. Let me analyse that in more detail.
‘I’ll pick players on form’ – Guess that’s why you took the completely useless, completely out of form Heskey to the World Cup?
‘I won’t pick players on reputation’ – Why do you continue to pick players who never perform for England then?
And then of course there’s his insistence on playing the 4-4-2, which clearly isn’t very effective in International football. Did Capello not realise how effective the Germans were in midfield back in SA 2010? Clearly not as he let them outnumber us and run all over us. So, after the faliure of the 4-4-2 in SA he continues to play it, and we can’t even beat Montenergro, with the tactics/setup by Capello a complete shambles if you remember the roles Gerrard and Mr Clueless Barry himself were playing under Capello’s instructions.
In conclusion, I don’t give a sh*t what Capello has done prior to managing England, because as manager of England, he’s been a complete disaster, how can this even possibly be argued…
When Richards first played for City under Stuart Pearce, he looked like he had the whole lot – ultra fast, could head it further than most players could kick it, bonecrunching tackler, had a bit of discipline (I remember him keeping Thierry Henry in his pocket one afternoon at Eastlands, playing centre half – a huge factor in the victory that day). However, that initial impressive form soon waned once he started to believe the hype (a £20m bid from Chelsea mooted). For the last two years he has stepped onto the pitch with the air of a Maldini but played like Richard Edgehill on a bad day. Once the whistle blew, he played like a rabbit in the headlights, positionally atrocious, never showing for the ball, seldom getting forward, with or without the ball and ending up being dropped by Hughes and then Mancini, only getting a look in when others were injured.
Capello hasn’t picked him because Capello speaks to Mancini. Mancini tells him he is arrogant, poor defensively and poor offensively. Capello already has Glen Johnson to tick all those boxes, why have two of them?
However, Richards looks like he may have been listening to a bit of Mancini’s advice. There was a definite change in his all round play v Notts County in the cup a couple of weeks ago. His concentration appeared sound, his positional sense was good, but his attacking intent looked particularly menacing. One attack down the right saw him show good pace to advance towards the byline, LOOK UP, then play the ball in for Dzeko. It was well defended, but later in the game he got forward in similar fashion, and played a pearler right across goal for Dzeko to prod home with his shin (like Rooney on Saturday). He was impressive against Birmingham before knocking himself out in the 36th minute attempting a Terryesque clearance with his head, thus missing the West Brom game, but his showing v Utd at the weekend demonstrates to me at least that Mancini may finally be getting through to a young man who could easily be the fleet footed Adonis that City and England expected him to be when he first emerged.
Great post
I haven’t heard the name “Richard Edgehill” for years…
Bang on about Richards under Mancini. He looks much more solid in recent weeks.
The Silva passing stats jumped straight out at me when I read the above. I didn’t see the game but on the blogs everyone seems to be heaping huge praise on Silva’s passing. However, as shown above he only had a success rate of ~70%. For a quintessential spanish tippy-tappy player this seems low and therefore a very interesting stat to me; especially as everyone seemed to agree that he played well. Is this an adaptation to the english game where quick attacking moves are often preferred over keeping possesion? It would be very interesting to compare these stats (and possibly an average for the season) to those from his Valencia days… Any chance ZM?
He is responsible to play the killer passes and hence his passes sometimes don’t find the target.
He also tried a lot of one-twos that didn’t come off every time. He was definitely City’s best player tho.
Indeed. But my point or question was whether in a similar game (i.e. two top teams playing each other) for either Spain or Valencia would these stats (% of passes successful) be higher because the different style of football?
Don’t have the stats from Valencia, sorry
also bear in mind he picked up the ball in very congested areas high up the pitch surrounded by lots of bodies, as opposed to playing in the centre, dropping deep and having time to pick a pass
a few crucial points,
- i think city’s movement early in the game was far superior, both teams packed the midfield, but it was the movement of tevez and silva dropping deep and coming into the middle that was causing trouble for manchester united.
- Nani and Rooney were the only significant threats for city, and nani in particular looked dangerous when he was not doubled up on
- At some point city began to press agressively, this suprised me as is an uncommon tactic for city to use unless their lossing. I think this was the biggest mistake, while it did cause united to misplace a few passes, it opened up space for nani and rooney to attack in the open and thats how the first goal came.
- Fast-forward till after city ties and i was happily suprised mancini left his aggressive side out. with the introduction of berbatov, the message was clear. Both teams realised that a draw only benefits arsenal and chelsea/tottenham, so they went for it. Some of the most exciting football i’ve seen all year
Much is made of City’s “defensive” tactics but how defensive was their line-up compared to United’s? Their use of a 4-2-1-3 with Silva floating was initially more creative, more receptive creating triangles.
United’s flat midfield three failed to support Rooney so as a result, much was up to the wingers to take on the full-backs and support the striker. As it was, both Nani and Giggs were involved in the first goal and only later, when Berbatov came on could they really push players forward.
Mancini does, however, have a penchant for wanting to not lose the match rather than going to win.
rooney’s goal was great
but i preferred vidic’s header against dzeko (*plus that elbow)
smalling’s intercepts n passes were excellent yesterday
Aye, that was awesome.
Sir Alex savours Wayne Rooney’s fantastic winning goal vs Manchester City: “In terms of execution, you’ll never see any better than that.”
Just saw the Wayne Rooney game winning bicycle kick goal against Manchester City. That might be the best soccer goal I’ve ever seen.
Hi…
did anyone see the arsenal’s match?
the second goal is what this blog talked about be4…
using the new offside rule…
V.persie was in offside position…
a long ball passed to the right to walcott…
walcott used his speed and pass to v.persie who became inside already and scored…..
Actually that is also what first came to my mind when I saw that goal but I don’t think that it was an intentional little tactic by Arsenal because the Wanderers defence was pushing so high that van Persie didn’t bother to drop deep into his own field and he was hanging around the midline for a quick pass & counter-attack. But I still truly believe that that organized and well-executed second goal is a valid reason why Arsenal should have some serious hopes against Barca, specifically at the home fixture. The only way to beat Barca is to break through their pressing game when they lose the ball (as Inter did last year) and in order to do that you have to be very very organized & quick to take the ball directly into Barca’s penalty area – the only team who tried to do so was Villareal imho but they lost eventually at Nou Camp last November; yet, Arsenal is definitely better than Villareal in terms of the overall team composure and individual skills. I believe Arsenal has a shot in the upcoming round.
Indeed, well spotted!
i want to ask to ask a question to all of you do you really think after watching edin dzeko last night is he really worth 30 mil . secondly other than scoring that wonder goal for me rooney had a very poor game he still needs to work on his technique . he cannot turn with the ball and many a times his first touch lets him down and there are question marks about his dribbling ability . even when he scored and he passed ball it wasnt a great one . you may had talked greatly about scholes having a good game but let me tell you when you 5 in the middle then i would rather play carrick or somebody other than scholes who can cover and close than just distribute because scholes cannot defend . even though city may be thinking about future but the future looks brighter for utd than city who have four good players on loan and they all are very talented so even though city may sign a few but even in the future utd will hold a upper hand .
Well, yes, after watching the game last night, I do think he is really worth 30 million, although that might have something to do with the fact that I had seen him play for four seasons in domestic, European and international competition before that. There are plenty of players, even world class players, who struggled in their first five games for a new club; there are also plenty who struggle in their first half a season, their first season or simply never adapt to a new club, system, league, etc. Would Ibrahimović be worth 10 million to you if you based your price on his first four full games against English competition? I mean, to be fair, Džeko is definitely off the pace at the moment; he’s picked up a goal and two assists, but he looks sluggish, doesn’t fit neatly into City’s system of play and generally hasn’t had a good game since his debut against Wolves. Perhaps the rigors of the English footballing schedule have caught up with him and joining an unbalanced side in the midst of their title hunt was too big of a first bite. Still, I just don’t understand the arrogance of so many Premiership fans, as if this handful of games he’s played in the BPL somehow outweigh everything he’s done before and define him as a player. We’re not talking about a one-season wonder from the Eredivisie, we’re talking about a player that has scored against the likes of Ramos, Lucio, Kompany, Mertesacker, Vermaelen, Subotić – in fact a player who has made a complete fool out of some of these defenders – and I somehow doubt that the ability has simply evaporated since crossing the channel.
don’t forget he’s also just come back from the mid-season break to join up with city. so he’ll have to work on his fitness as well as gelling with new team mates
Slowly but sure, ManU took Manchester City down. Rooney’s goal is really an uppercut for Manchester City. Great job! MU will be the champion this year!
I was at the game and it was good to see the game from high up in the North Stand.
What stood out was Smalling’s contribution. Quick, good in the tackle and excellent distribution, it was an all round display to be proud of considering his age and lack of experience. One game does not make him a world beater but was a good effort and shows that when Rio is out, he can step up.
My vantage point also gave me a chance to watch Anderson closely which I have wanted to do for a while having not been overly impressed so far this season. He had another poor game and he appears lazy when it comes to tracking back and his passing is often hit and miss. I know he is stocky but he looks like he needs to slim down a bit and add some urgency to his work to win over the doubters. Is he cruising a bit after his contract renewal?
Great Rooney goal. Was right behind it and you could see him assess the situation and then get in position to execute the effort – one of the best seen at Old Trafford.
Is it only me? But I really believe Nani is the best PL winger right now but he still doesn’t get any recognition. People keep going on about Berbatov but Nani for me has been Utd’s best player along with Vida maybe because he has the responsibility to create as well. Nani has the highest no. of assists to his name, he can shoot from both feet, electrifying pace and has become a good crosser. At this rate he can easily become one of the best players.
And P.S- IMO Rooney’s goal was great especially considering the opponents and at time he scored but I did see a better goal than that. His strike partner scored a goal against a certain Liverpool.
agree. My player of the season would be Nani/Nasri
He’s been the only United player who’s been better than mediocre away from home, so he gets credit for that. Though he does copy Ronaldo in wasting vast amounts of possession with stupid shots. Would do well to cut that out.
This “best winger” thing doesn’t mean much though. Arsenal’s ‘wingers’ play a very different style, Chelsea & City don’t play with them.
Might be a great analysis, tactically, but to be honest, this game was so lame und boring, that I stopped watching it after 20 minutes.
Thank you ZM for being the first commentator I have heard acknowledging Vincent Kompany as the outstanding defender he has been this season. I agree with you that he and Vidic have been the two best defenders in the Premier League so far. Unfortunately, however, I think Kompany is also probably the most underrated player in the league, and does not get the credit he deserves.
agree, although Kompany could be blamed for both goals conceded today even if it is picky!
Kompany and Toure together = rock solid.
was anyone suprised by Rafaels obmission from the starting line up in place of O’Shea? Is this a pointer to the upcoming games with Chelsea and Liverpool; O’Sheas greater experience in big games to replace the pace and attacking instincts of Rafael, especially away from home..??
There is an article about that very topic at this United fansite, unitedrant.co.uk.