Wolves 2-1 Man United: poor defending from set-pieces costs United their unbeaten record

The starting line-ups
Manchester United lost in the league for the first time this season.
Mick McCarthy made two changes. David Jones and David Edwards made way for Jamie O’Hara and Nenad Milijas.
Sir Alex Ferguson’s right side of his defence changed – Rafael in for John O’Shea, whilst Jonny Evans was a late replacement for Rio Ferdinand.
All the goals here came in an action-packed first half. It was not a particularly ‘tactical’ contest – United were 4-4-2, Wolves were 4-4-1-1 with Jamie O’Hara just off Kevin Doyle. Both sides played their natural game, and didn’t particularly look to change things throughout.
Wolves start well but United lead
Nani got United off to a fantastic start with his excellent goal after three minutes, but that was the highlight of United’s attacking play. That was a moment of individual magic rather than a good team move, and United seemed too reliant on one of their attackers doing something exciting – Wayne Rooney was fairly quiet, Nani was often wasteful after his goal.
Still, even considering how early the goal came, it was against the run of play, as Wolves put United under plenty of pressure early on. Their game was fairly simple – long balls towards Doyle complemented with intelligent wing play – particularly through Matt Jarvis on the left, who played higher up the pitch than Adam Hammill on the left. Karl Henry moved the ball from flank to flank, Milijas drove forward more.
Their long balls were not hoofs, however, they were accurate, direct passes towards Doyle, who moved in sync with O’Hara across the pitch, meaning the latter was always in a position to pick up the knock-downs from the Irishman. Both Wolves goals came from set-pieces, though – both needlessly conceded by United, and made worse with poor marking.
United toothless
The issue for United was not a case of a specific tactical match-up undoing them, but their confused strategy finally resulting in what even United fans must admit is a long overdue defeat away from home. Their overall performance here was not entirely dissimilar from the performance at Blackpool, West Brom, Aston Villa or Stoke, all games where they managed to collect points having been very poor at times. Here, they simply lacked the magic in and around the penalty box that Nani, Dimitar Berbatov or Javier Hernandez have provided in previous games.
It’s difficult to know what United’s gameplan is away from home. In previous seasons, with first Cristiano Ronaldo and then Wayne Rooney the focal point of their attack, they were devastating on the break. Now, with Berbatov the main man and Rooney playing off him (a reversal of the roles from last season) it’s not entirely clear what United are trying to do on their travels. At home they dominate the ball and put pressure on the opposition defence throughout the match, and the 4-4-2 with Rooney and Berbatov upfront has worked very nicely – 12 wins from 13 games. Away, however, they neither have the counter-attacking threat of previous years, not the ball retention ability they possess at home, and they have 3 wins from 12 games. Their unbeaten record until this game was testament to their character rather than their tactics.
Second half
Sir Alex Ferguson chose to replace Michael Carrick with Paul Scholes at half time, a good move as Scholes’ passing was both surer and more incisive.
The formations remained the same for much of the second half, and there was little change from the overall pattern of the first. The one exception was O’Hara being replaced with Kevin Foley and Wolves going to 4-5-1, with an extra man scrapping in midfield. They offered no goal threat in the second period.
Ferguson brought on perennial supersub Hernandez for Berbatov, and in response Wolves’ defence played a lot deeper to nullify the Mexican’s pace. Balls through the defence were no longer an option, and so United instead started crossing the ball more – and so then they lacked height and a physical presence in the box. Hernandez’s finishing ability this season has been impressive – but here finishing wasn’t really the problem, United simply weren’t creating chances to finish. Hennessey wasn’t tested after the 20th minute.
Conclusion
Nothing fancy from Wolves – long balls to the forwards, tricky wing play, and goals from set-pieces. However, at 2-1 up their defensive shape was excellent, their two banks of four rarely became dragged out of shape, and they won plenty of challenges in their own box. Doyle played the lone striker role very well, as always.
United lacked spark, creativity in their side. None of their attacking players had good games, and it’s difficult to remember anything of note United did in the final third after Nani’s opener. Scholes, Darren Fletcher and Ryan Giggs all became frustrated late on, and United are now in the position of having to bounce back from a defeat – something they’ve yet to experience so far this campaign.
Wolves 2-1 Man United: poor defending from set-pieces costs United their unbeaten record




i didnt watch the game an so thank you for analysis Sir ZM….a bubble burst!!? in that Man U are not that Good… imo they have been riding on their luck for awhile now.
If a team goes 29 games without being unbeaten, regardless of the subjective assessment of luck, then they probably are that good.
Just what we needed before the derby. Ferguson has to buy in the summer. Sanchez from Udinese is my ideal.
A couple typos:
*Adam Hammil on the RIGHT
*NOR the ball retention ability…
Typo in the typo correction:
*it’s actually “Adam Hammill”
Besides surely it’s a little disrespectful and condescending when people correct typos – the comments section is to surely promote discussion!!
So with the Manchester derby coming up as well as two games vs Chelsea, this four point gap at the top is surely likely to dwindle in the coming months if Man U continue to play as poorly as this…
Having seen Wolves play with 2 up front (eg. vs Liverpool) and with 1 up front (eg. vs Man Utd), what do you think is the most suitable solution? The 4-5-1 makes Wolves more defensively solid, helps them to win possession back and gives the wingers room to manouvre, but there’s very little goal threat – Jarvis lacks composure in front of goal and Doyle’s shooting is very weak. Any thoughts?
Cheers, saw that you’d tweeted last night about doing a write-up about this one and I was looking forward to it. Thanks for the analysis.
1. It was crazy how Wolves and Doyle were targeting Johnny Evans with the long ball punt upfield. How did Evans suddenly lose his aerial ability? I miss the Evans of old who had the balls to kick Drogba mid-air.
2. How do Wolves who are sitting bottom of the league put up such a show against the league leaders? Or conversely, if they are capable of such a display, how are they rock bottom? They may have beaten United now, but they will probably proceed to get whacked 5-0 five times or more before the end of the season.
3. I wish United had actually taken a few more shots off when they got into the box. Too often they got into the penalty area and passed it sideways. We do not want to become the joke that Arsenal are.
4. As is customary, did any Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea supporters notice how many fouls Wolves got away with in the penalty box? Of course not, because the referee was favouring United right? ^^
Please lets not talk about refereeing decisions on this website. We will all just get stuck in the same boring arguments. Good article ZM btw
Did I touch a nerve here?
Karma???
JediRage,
You’re the one who seems to have a nerve touched here.
I didn’t realise I sounded upset by your comment. I’m not a united fan but I just get bored of the ‘fergie time/paying the refs’ arguments.
Yes you touched the fear-of-tedium nerve, the bloody-hell-are-all-football-supporters-stupid-and-paranoid nerve.
Dear me, this is quite comical, I meant to provoke Arsenal, Chelsea fans etc., didn’t know it would be this successful. Carry on please.
Stop being pretentious.
1) Perhaps they looked at how he defends and have learned to exploit it and Evans hasn’t been able to respond. A ZM look at him would be nice.
It’s not like he’s a particularly strong guy, so for me his shackling of players before was the curious case, not him being bullied.
2) They didn’t play well, beyond keeping a good defensive shape. Their passing was useless, they couldn’t keep the ball, and they created nothing. United just defended set pieces appallingly and posed little threat.
3) Arsenal score as many goals as United. Barcelona play the same style and score far more than United. It is a stylistic difference, it does not make them a joke. The idea is that keeping possession is a better option than hopeful shots at the keeper that will only go in if the keeper makes a bad error.
3 & 4) Please leave tedious fanboy garbage off here, there are enough sites infested with that crap.
In my review of the game, I wrote that United are five points worse off away from home than after 12 games last season when they won 7 and lost 4. Maybe they are missing the speed and directness of Valencia?
It is clear just how important Rio Ferdinand is to the defence with his composure and organisational skills. The last away game he missed was Blackpool with similar poor defending of set pieces.
It is also noticeable how Berbatov is not the same player away from home with just four of 19 being scored as opposed to when he plays at home.
As has been the fact for a while the centre midfield is lacking in real quality – Carrick and Fletcher while decent are neither enforcer types or massively creative. Being dragged out of the mire by Scholes and Giggs was never going to be something they can keep up each week. A third of all Giggs’ passes went astray which happens when he is off form.
This results sets up the derby perfectly when United are sure to revert to 4-3-3 but which striker drops out? Cannot see Rooney playing left. Hope you will be giving us a review of this game – will look forward to your thoughts as ever ZM
I think it is scandalous for premiership teams to play in veggie patches and this obviously negated United’s rythm in passing.
1. Coming to the point of the front man… Just after those 2 rooney goals in the last match, everyone is thinking he is back and Berba who scored 20 goals till now been pushed to his last season’s role
2. How many matches did United draw when Evans was playing? When he is around.. Vidic thinks he has to take care of everything. Why didn’t united started with Smallings?
3. Do all united fans really wants goals from Nani? I better choose good crossing from him because i have 2 strikers up front.
>> even 1999 team lost their first game after 29 games…
>> Loosing this match is good because, all the media fuss about unbeaten run will be over
>> Finally team sheet without Gibson
1. i think it would have made a difference if UTD could have put on Hernadez and Valencia together, the poace of both players would surely have asked more questions of the Wolves defence..
2. Smalling will start alongside VIdic, just has a alittle more composure in the air at the moment than Evans does..
3. i agree that this has burst the bubble of the unbeaten season; maybe focus will be sharpened somewhat after this. You know how they say one step back to take two forward..
I got the impression on the highlights show that Evra might have put on a bit of weight. A trick of the light?
Be that as it may, ManU should really have tried to offload Rooney to Chelsea.
THATS A INTERESTING COMMENT; IT COULD BE ARGUED THAT BOTH HE AND TORRES HAVE HAD SIMILAR SEASONS AND JUDGING BY THAT HE IS AT LEAST WORTH THE SAME AS TORRES….
WOULD ROONEY BE EASIER FOR CHELSEA TO ACCOMODATE THAN TORRES..???