Everton 1-1 Chelsea: Kalou strike forces replay

The starting line-ups
Everton and Chelsea drew 1-1 for the second game running.
David Moyes used Jack Rodwell behind Louis Saha, in a 4-4-1-1 system. Diniyar Bilyaletdinov replaced Leon Osman on the left of midfield.
Carlo Ancelotti welcomed Frank Lampard back into the side, dropping Jon Obi Mikel and using Michael Essien as the holder. The rest of the side was as expected.
The game took a while to spark into life, which seems increasingly common with these early Saturday kick-off times. Chelsea started strongly but Everton settled down into a good rhythm midway through the first half, meaning possession was 50:50 at half-time.
Everton good without ball
Everton started slowly but grew into the game, and were particularly good at shutting Chelsea down in midfield. Rodwell played ahead of the two other central midfielders, and Everton pressed Chelsea when they played the ball forward into the middle of the pitch, generally letting Chelsea’s centre-backs have time on the ball. Michael Essien was given space at some points as Rodwell dropped deeper, but his passing was not particularly imaginative and he often played the ball into Lampard and Ramires, who were closed down quickly.
Using Rodwell as the closest support to Saha meant Everton didn’t possess a great deal of creativity or goalscoring threat from their central midfielders. Rodwell is clearly a very talented player, but perhaps not suited to playing so high up the pitch – he did threaten once with a burst forward into the box when his run wasn’t tracked, but in general it was left to Saha to fend for himself upfront.
Full-backs
With neither side looking great in the centre, the most interesting battles were happening in the full-back positions, and Phil Neville up against Florent Malouda looked likely to result in a few chances. Neville’s gameplan against tricky wingers is to stick very tight to them, not letting them turn – he coped well with Gareth Bale, for example. Here, this meant Neville committed a few fouls and was fortunate not to be booked, and also resulted in him being drawn high up the pitch and into central positions, as Malouda came infield looking for the ball.
A knock-on effect was that Ashley Cole had space to run into, but he was tracked well by Seamus Coleman, who is more than comfortable moving into the right-back position. Chelsea could have worked this aspect of the game more – by playing Malouda in a more central position and pushing Cole on, they could have forced Everton into something like a back five, which happened sporadically, but less and less as Everton saw more of the ball.
Second half
David Moyes’ main instruction at half-time seemed to be to tell his full-backs to be braver. Leighton Baines had been reasonably conservative in the first half, pinned back by Nicolas Anelka, but in the second half he and Neville (to a lesser extent) pushed on untracked, and Everton started to dominate possession – and, more importantly, got the ball into the final third of the pitch, especially as the wingers came inside.
Their breakthrough came from a simple corner, however, as Baines’ corner was headed in from the edge of the six yard box by Saha. There’s more to the goal than that, though – it was notable that it was a right-wing, inswinging corner that gave Everton the lead, when many of Baines’ left-wing, outswinging corners had been unsuccessful. Baines is a superb deliverer of a dead ball, but his technique – which gets a lot of height and curve on the corners – means his corners from the left were often played in a fashion that made it difficult for Everton’s players to direct the ball towards goal. When a more direct corner was played in, Chelsea defended it very poorly.
Chelsea’s goal also came from an Everton corner – a quick counter-attack was finished well by substitute Saloman Kalou. The lack of creativity from midfield (Lampard didn’t look fully fit) and Everton’s tendency to defend deep, nullifying the threat of any pace over the top, meant a counter-attack was Chelsea’s best way back into the game.
At 1-1 little happened other than a long-range Ramires strike that hit the post, and the sides will contest a replay at Stamford Bridge.
Conclusion
A relatively unexciting game in tactical terms. The main action happened in full-back positions – Chelsea looked to be gaining down the left in the first half by pushing Coleman back, but a braver approach from Everton in the second resulted in them being the better side.
Everton 1-1 Chelsea: Kalou strike forces replay




With reports of Chelsea having made a new offer for Torres, and Anelka and Malouda’s dip of form in the past couple months, where do you think he’d fit into the side?
Would Chelsea possibly switch to back to last season’s diamond formation or use a 4-3-3 like formation with Drogba and Torres both playing relatively central?
Also good to see Ramires doing well, with the criticism he has been receiving this season, it looks like he’s finally starting to get used to the premier league.
Most if not all Chelsea players have had a tough time in the last couple of months so is a bit harsh to just single Malouda out, and what has Ramires done to better his performance from the start of the season other than score in the last game?
Yeah I guess it’s a little harsh to just single two players out when everyone has been playing poorly. Maybe it’s just my personal opinion but I think that Ramires has been much more composed on the ball now than in the beginning of the season, where it seemed as if he was struggling to get used to the pace of premier league games.
Didn’t see the game, interesting use of Rodwell, who I personally don’t see what the hype is about. He’s pretty much a typical English player, big, strong, good in the air, but technically not brilliant, and if he’s the kind of player we’re considering to be the future of our game, then personally, I’m disappointed to be honest.
As for Chelsea, there is the saying, ‘you don’t become a bad team overnight’, and Chelsea are not a bad team, but something just isn’t the same. They don’t have that ruthless, destructive streak to them anymore, and players like Cole, Malouda, Anelka, Drogba, even Terry and Lampard can be considered in this to an extent, there coming to the end of there careers, and there declines are starting in my opinion, which can be used as a reason for the decline in form. Also, replacing those players, is going to be one hell of a job.
Don’t know what to make of the Torres move to be honest, providing he does go to Chelsea of course, but for me, it’s a panic buy, and it’s an Abramovich buy as a desperate attempt to win the CL. Torres for me has been poor this season. Similar to Rooney in a way, not quite as bad, but the touch is gone, the control has gone, so many basic passes going astray, and not quite as deadly in front of goal. If he does go to Chelsea, what does that mean for Drogba? Drogba and Torres you’d think would be lethal, but that would most likely mean 4-4-2, which I can’t see Ancelotti playing.
ZM,what do you think if somehow,without Lampard,Ancelloti deployes Mikel as a deep lying regista (Pirlo,Xabi Alonso) and Essien and Ramires as his ball winning midfielders,like they are there just to run,tackle and give him the ball so that he can pass long balls to Drogba,or balls over the top to onrushing Malouda and Anelka?
That would be very interesting setup..
cant believe you just put mikel in the same bracket as xabi alonso/pirlo….completely different types of player
no they arent
mikel has a passing range sligthly worse than theirs and he is strong and comfortable in air,thats why people say they are different types of players,pirlo and xabi alonso can only play as deep lying registas,but mikel can play that role COMBINED that he protects rhe back four
I didn’t really think that the game was much of a spectacle. As to Chelsea declining I think they had a poor run and the quality is still there. As for the Torres bid I think although it will cost us a lot of money it will be worth it. Torres is a world class striker and I believe last season converted the highest percentage of chances offered. That, coupled with the fact that Chelsea generally create many many chances during the course of a game, sometimes over 15 per game, and you have goals waiting to happen.
http://www.feeling-football.blogspot.com
What’s happened to Essien? He used to look like one of the best midfielders in Europe and I can’t remember the last time he even looked like one of the best in the Prem for more then the odd game.
The Torres move is bizarre, there’s no doubting his quality, but I’m not convinced as to where he’ll fit into a Chelsea team. He and Drogba might work as a front two, with Torres dropping off, but then I’m not sure how the midfiels would shape up, back to the diamond, perhaps, with Cole and Bosingwa pushing on, can’t see them settling into a flat midfield line. Don’t think they’d stay with 4-3-3 either, it’d be a waste of Torres to play him wide, and even if he was given license to play narrow there are still defensive duties involved that could pull him out of the game.
All speculation, of course, but it’ll be fascinating to see how it’s managed. Think Chelsea need a midfielder far more than a forward, or at the very least somone who’s more comfortable playing wide.
Might be a bit of speculation, but if Chelsea sign Torres, we might return to a diamond formation in midfield with Mikel (or Essien) holding, Malouda on the left, Essien or Ramires on the right, and Lampard at the point. It worked for a good portion of the previous season, and I think it only fell out of fashion because Malouda started playing so well. (And given Lampard’s less-than-stellar form this season, we might see Malouda at the point of the diamond and let him interplay with Torres and Drogba.
that would be incredible, but would ask a lot of the full backs which maybe ashley cole wouldn’t be upto (at the moment anyway) due to his condition being in a poor state…although not to say Van Anhoult couldn’t step up
zhirkov?
I heard in Chelsea’s last game Anelka played in the hole does that mean they will be playing that 442 diamond formation again to accommodate Drogba and Torres up front?
Anelka was splendid in the slightly-withdrawn role. He was creative and pacy: Kalou was sprung by Anelka’s long pass and his goal was classic nonchalant Anelka business. If Lampard still struggles to find the net, Anelka could be the point of the diamond. He certainly has no problem running back to the half line to receive the ball.
Also, to the commenter above, I agree that once Zhirkov is fit, he (and Anelka’s good form) might shift the squad entirely. Should he spell Malouda on the left, Lampard, Mikel or Malouda may be left out of the squad. Something like:
Bosingwa–Ivanovic–Terry–Cole
Essien
Ramires–Zhirkov
Anelka
Drogba–Torres