Liverpool 2-2 Everton: Kuyt penalty earns draw

The starting line-ups
Kenny Dalglish’s first game back at Anfield ended in an entertaining 2-2 draw.
He continued with the 4-2-3-1 / 4-3-3 system he used last weekend against Manchester United. Without Steven Gerrard, Jay Spearing made a rare start in midfield, whilst Glen Johnson started at left-back, as he did against Blackpool.
David Moyes went with a broad 4-4-2 shape with Victor Anichebe and Jermaine Beckford upfront. Steven Pienaar was absent with his imminent move away from the club.
It was, as they say, a game of two halves. Liverpool dominated the first period and had multiple chances, whilst Everton started the second half superbly and looked relatively comfortable when they were 2-1 up, before they also gave up the lead.
Formations
Liverpool’s shape was a cross between a 4-3-3 and a 4-2-3-1. Lucas often appeared to be the sole holding player, shielding the defence with no specific player to mark, but sometimes Spearing would drop deeper alongside him, or even become the holding player himself, allowing Lucas to join attacks.
This meant that Raul Meireles was the furthest forward central midfielder, and he had one of his best games in a Liverpool shirt – no coincidence, seeing as he’s been used to playing in a three-man midfield (albeit in a slightly different role) for Porto for the past few seasons. His goal was a reward for a good all-round game.
Everton’s shape was also slightly uncertain – although on paper it was a pure 4-4-2, in reality Victor Anichebe drifted out to the left when his side lost the ball (as he did against Manchester City), where he dealt with Martin Kelly, Liverpool’s right back. This meant that Anichebe and Beckford rarely compared as a proper forward duo as Anichebe was rather stranded on the left.
Midfield battle
Liverpool usually had an advantage in the centre of midfield and all three players in that zone had decent games, primarily because they kept it simple rather than trying ambitious passes – often, they simply used their advantage to work the ball around Marouane Fellaini and Mikel Arteta, who took it in turns to move right and left, but stayed relatively close together throughout.
Liverpool’s best attacking moves in the first half came when they then played the ball wide to Dirk Kuyt or Maxi Rodriguez, or played in Fernando Torres in the channels. There was little real creativity from the centre of the pitch, as Meireles barely played any passes from a true ‘playmaking’ position (that’s not really his natural game) but plenty of chances were created from wide positions.
Second half
It’s difficult to know what Everton changed in the second half to suddenly become the better side – it seemed to be simply because of momentum, having scored from a set-piece a minute into the second period. On that note, Liverpool have surely conceded more goals from corners with man-marking this season than they did with zonal marking last season.
Everton were more positive and played higher up the pitch (although again, there’s a chicken-and-egg question of whether they did this because they scored and therefore felt confident, or whether they scored because they were more positive) and Leon Osman was a bigger influence on the game when he moved into more central positions. His run through the defence created the second goal, for Beckford.
Liverpool equaliser
Maxi Rodriguez won the penalty for Kuyt to convert, and the Argentina winger got himself into dangerous positions throughout the game, having four efforts on goal in addition to being brought down by Tim Howard. He also completed 25 of 28 passes and drifted into the centre of the pitch, opening up space for Johnson, who had a good game at left-back and (despite being forced to come back inside onto his stronger foot) put the cross in that eventually resulted in Meireles’ goal.
At 2-2, it seemed neither manager wanted to lose the game – neither really made an effort to push their side forward for a third goal. That’s understandable – Moyes was away from home, Dalglish wouldn’t have wanted a P3 L3 record. Moyes introduced three new players but this seemed more about keeping Everton’s energy up rather than changing the game, whilst Dalglish brought on Jonjo Shelvey for Meireles, but didn’t gamble on Ryan Babel late on despite having one substitution remaining. There was only one shot in the final 15 minutes – a Torres chip over the bar.
Conclusion
A game that had various patterns – Liverpool dominated at points, Everton dominated at points, but neither did so for long enough to feel aggrieved at the result.
The game was played at a good tempo, helped by Liverpool’s inclination to press high up the pitch since the change of manager, and yet there weren’t the crunching challenges we usually see in this fixture (probably thanks to the absence of Jamie Carragher, Steven Gerrard and Tim Cahill) – it was a relatively free-flowing game.
There was no real ‘key factor’ here – simply two sides playing different shapes, but both not quite clicking with the ball – despite the four goals.
Liverpool 2-2 Everton: Kuyt penalty earns draw




Think liverpool needed to make much more of some decent chances in the first half and it could have almost killed the game before half time, was interesting to see that the game was pretty much dominated by whoever had the most confidence at the time rather than tactical changes. Also skrtel needs more recognition for poor defending in both goals and a generally unimpressive season.
Great article again ZM
Thanks kind sir
Glen Johnson playing left back, what’s all that about, he can’t even play right back properly, what’s going to be gained by playing him on the left?
I think he’s being played there because Kelly was very good against United and is considered very promising
Not sure why he’s playing there ahead of Aurelio though.
What’s your opinion of Johnson ZM? This is the way I look at it, look at England’s defence:
A.Cole – arguably the best LB in world football.
Terry – one of the best CB in world football.
Rio – one of the best CB in world football, and very suited to the International game.
Glen Johnson – Might be half decent going forward, BUT CAN’T DEFEND.
Not sure that we can continue to say Terry is one of the best centre backs in world football after the world cup.
I’m sure we can’t say that – he suits the English game and will still thrive at Chelsea for a little while yet but he is definitely not top class, in fact it is debatable if he ever was as good as the press made him out to be.
Strong, dominant in the air, positionally good, leader and intense will to win. I would definitely put JT in the top five centre backs in the world. Could anyone name five better than him?
Pique, Puyol, Lucio, Vidic, Rio. I think Terry’s both underrated and overrated by people. Think he’s in that 6-10 range, not quite world class anymore, but still a top class player. He’s always been better for club than country, but if he’s benefited from quality defensive midfielders at Chelsea, he’s been disadvantaged with Garreth Barry playing in front of him for England.
Agree with Jonathan here. Terry benefited a lot from having Carvalho next to him at Chelsea. Very under-rated player .. Carvalho not Terry.
Poss overrating Terry there, but largely agree.
I agree with king999 central defenders work best in partnerships. Terry benefits from more mobile players like Carvalho and Ferdinand sweeping up behind, this allows Terry to step out and concentrate on winning the ball which is his biggest talent. When the partnerships is broken up as with England at the world cup chaos tends to follow. (see Germany game for example)
The funny thing is, when Carvalho and Terry were playing together, Carvalho is actually more aggressive, while Terry is the one staying behind and sweeping up. Not sure why people tend to think the other way.
As you have said ZM, the definite game of two halves. Before the game it was a struggle to see where Everton could score without the likes of Saha or Cahill and so it proved in the first half where Beckford and Anichebe were largely ineffective. This is a micro-cosm of their whole season – plenty of quality in build up play but no cutting edge.
The 2nd half turnaround was quick and without warning and showed the frailty of the Liverpool back line once again. Reina showed that he can struggle with crosses into the box on Distin’s equaliser and Johnson should have done better in his attempt to clear the ball off the line.
A draw probably is a fair result to save “King Kenny” from a disastrous played 3 lost 3 record!
Looking forward to your other posts on the weekend games ZM – quality as ever
Reina not liking man-marking? Zonal meant it was less crowded, and he isn’t the biggest keeper around…
Interesting point. Apart from last season where Liverpool’s defensive record at set pieces was in keeping with the average, Liverpool had generally excelled at defending set pieces whilst using a zonal system.
This season Liverpool have looked more vulnerable then most from set pieces. I wondered if maybe the players weren’t good at 1 on 1 defensive duties and preferred marking zonal, but your comments about Reina is a good one.
I noticed Lucas on Fellanni at one corner which I thought was a mismatch, but as the play unfolded it appeared Lucas only job was to block the run and get in Fellanni’s way.
Another good insight ZM thanks.
I thought Torres’ contribution interesting – he was effervescent in the first half yet appeared to return to the apathy he has shown over the first half of the season after Everton took the lead. If King Kenneth can bring anything then surely it is motivation – where was Torres’ will to win?
Was this part of the cause of Liverpool’s poorer showing in the second period or was it a symptom of having less of the ball?
Yes, that was strange. Also worth pointing out how Liverpool have declined in the second half of all three games under KD (the first one excusable because of Gerard red…)
Maybe the Liverpool side isn’t fit enough?
Under Hodgeson Liverpool were a pretty low energy side. Plenty of bodies getting behind the ball, shuffling around, not really pressing, passing slowly.
In the Manchester United and Everton games Liverpool appeared to play at a much faster pace, then previously this season, although the particular opponents might account for the difference in tempo. Not that they looked particularly tired but the quality of the passing from Kuyt (I know he probably never gets tired) and Mireless as the game went on seemed to look tired and sloppy.
I think this is a good point its a big change of style going from a slow deep sitting model to the higher defensive line more pressing approach that Dalglish seems to want to use. Liverpool players might need to work on their fitness.
On the positve side it should produce attactive attacking football which will win games, Liverpool will be an interesting side to watch over the coming months as they try to adapt.
I thought that Anichebe was playing almost exclusively as left midfielder in 2nd half, with Osman going to the centre. For me it was the reason for better Everton performance in 2nd half, althought quickly scored goal helped big time. Anichebe was much more involved in the game in 2nd half, aften using his physique to beat Kelly in the air for flick ons, or just holding the ball and creating space for teammates.
Liverpool seem much more positive after Dalglish came. He has gotten the crowd behind the team and the players seem much happier. The squad however looks very mediocre and I think Liverpool will do well to finish in the top 8 this season.
The move of Johnson to leftback makes me wonder why they sent Emiliano Insua away. He looked very good last year going forward and seemed to me to have a better sense of the game then Johnson. Seems like Johnson is in the weird position of being deemed a good player but second best at either LB or RB (Kelly @ RB and Aurelio @ left). For all the money spent on him you would expect a little more.
‘It’s difficult to know what Everton changed in the second half to suddenly become the better side’
Everton changed little at half-time but Osman seemed to occupy a more central role (as you’ve pointed out), coupled with the inexperienced pairing of Lucas and Spearing and the attempts of Meireles to support Torres this allowed Osman and Arteta more room in the centre and were both experienced enough to properly exploit situations in the 20 minutes or so after half-time. Subsequently (with Anichebe pushing towards the left) Osman was able to give more support to the full-back to prevent Kuyt having the same sort of influence as he did in the first half.
Once Everton had flooded the midfield Liverpool were alarmingly clueless in terms of coming back into the game. Would a front 2 with “proper” wingers give Liverpool more options because they’ve once again demonstrated an inability to defend properly for an entire game against decent opposition.
can you please explain meireles having a good game?
I’d like to see his passing stats as all I saw him do was give the ball away by trying to play poorly placed one touch passes all the time.
this subsequently lead to him being subbed with shelvey.
of course the goal was a good one. but im struggling to see a player better than the potential of aquilani let alone xabi alonso.
74%. he did have 3 shots on target. more passing stats on :
http://footballstats.telegraph.co.uk/MatchCenter.aspx
indiv %’s stated in formation info. if you click on “team stats” tab, you can see
who passed to who etc.
The set-up at the start of the match from Moyes was wrong. In our last two games, we’ve played a 4-4-1-1 with Saha behind Beckford. Beckford’s pace and pressure has stretched the gap between opposition’s midfield and defence, allowing Saha (a clearly gifted player) space to create and score goals. Instead, against Liverpool – that space was afforded to Anichebe – a clearly limited player!
Fair play to Moyes though, as at the start of the second half he switched Victor out left and shuffled Osman infield a little more – and both goals came as a result of the switch. The first goal came from a corner that was won by hitting a long ball to Anichebe and competing for the second ball (though clearly it should have been a goal kick). The second was yet another long ball to Anichebe that Osman picked up on from his more infield position and managed to squeeze through to Beckford to finish well.
The frustrating thing is that if we’d been more positive in our pressure play, then this game was there for the taking. The main difference in the first half was Liverpool putting Everton under pressure when their defenders/deep midfielders were in possession. When Liverpool had the ball in deep positions, Everton sat off and thus created pressure on their defence.
This approach changed at the start of the second half, and we were the better for it. But then, we began to sit off again instead of taking the game to them. Difficult to know if this was psychological or a result of negative instructions from Moyes. History suggests it may be the latter, as the Scotsman appears ill at ease setting his team up to take the game to opponents.
A final point – Neville really must close his man down quicker. The first goal came from him backing off and letting Johnson walk into the box with the ball. He repeated this a number of times during the match, and it’s not a rarity to see either.
I’m amazed to continuously read of Meireles being used as a winger and as an attacking midfielder for Liverpool. In the 6 years I’ve seen him play for my club Porto I don’t remember him being played a single time in either position. His natural position, of course, is the central man in a 3-man midfield, ie the not-quite-attacking not-quite-defensive midfielder. Though he’s done brilliantly on occasion as the most defensive of the 3, particularly lately for the national team.
But as an attacking man? The only thing he’s got going for it is his good finishing/long shot ability. He can’t dribble and has no creativity, no eye for the final pass. What he’s really, really good at is providing a reliable passing option in the initial phase of build-up, and working his ass off winning balls and properly covering space all match long.
I think the british are so unused to watching proper playmakers (no offence intended) that the tendency is to stick there any player with a smidgen of technique. I’m afraid the same could happen to Moutinho if he ever moves to England, he’s been absolutely immense as a direct replacement for Meireles in that neutral role, yet seems to have a reputation for being an attacking genius just because he’s done 1 or 2 neat assists in international games.
Reina makes 2 saves, Howard 9. yet again a poor saves ratio from Reina. yet again negative pt’s in fantasy football. ben foster has made 102 saves, and let 26 in. reina has made 54 saves and let 31 in. almost half the saves. yet more let in. #teflon reputation.
Doesn’t tell the whole story though, does it. Reina has made some really solid saves for us this season and has been mostly reliable (although has been prone to the odd mistake). I haven’t watched Ben Foster much this season but those stats could just be easier saves, just a possibility as Reina has been very good for us this season.
pure teflon. of course, most people will beleive this, because the media pushes this all the time. henry winter’s twitter y/day even mentioned him as player of the yr….rofl !! . i noticed a tweet from ZM y/day in response giving that short shrift. maybe 10 or 20 saves diff could be explained away as unlucky, but 50 saves less despite facing signif fewer shots !! . get real. more evidence. cech 61 saves 19 let in. almost 10 more saves for 10 less let in. joe hart 68 saves 19 let in. again 10 + more saves, 10 less let in. Jussi 76/25. 20 more saves, 5 less let in. Kingson of blackpool 48 saves/ 13 let in . approx 5 saves less but almost 20 fewer let in. i presume people think blackpool defence is better than liverpools !?!?
Three words
Skrtel, Konchesky, Johnson
Two words
Clownshoes defending
Great article once again.
I might be asking a couple of obvious question here but was Anichebe played on the left so that he could win the long aerial balls against Kelly and so that he could knock them on for Osman as opposed to playing through the centre and trying to win balls against Skertle and Agger?
Also, do you think it would be fair to say that in the second half Leyton Baines seemed to be higher up the pitch, which led to Kuyt being less effective?
Thank You in advance
Great article as usual. I always enjoy ZM. Please though, if you could, explain the chalkboard with Jermaine Beckford’s passing pattern. When I hold my mouse above a node it says “Jermaine Beckford pass successful to Agger….or Johnson or Lucas Leiva.” Is this another player’s pattern or are the teammate end-point nodes mislabeled?
Thanks!