Leverkusen 1-3 Dortmund: Dortmund pounce on defensive errors

The starting line-ups
All the goals came in the second half as Dortmund took another step towards the Bundesliga title.
Jupp Heynckes made multiple changes to his side in the first game back after the winter break. Eren Derdiyok, Tranquilo Barnetta and Arturo Vidal were all left out, whilst Sidney Sam and Gonzalo Castro both switched from the right flank to the left. Patrick Helmes played just off Stefan Kiessling.
Jurgen Klopp was without two key players – Lucas Barrios, only fit enough for the bench, and Shinji Kagawa, who is away at the Asian Cup. Mario Gotze played the attacking midfield role, whilst Robert Lewandowski made a rare start upfront.
The first half was slightly cagey, with both sides struggling to create chances, though interesting battles played out across the pitch.
Different approaches
The sides were playing with clearly different formations, and as a result, also played with different styles. Dortmund were keeping possession in the centre of the pitch much more effectively, with Gotze dropping deep to provide a 3 v 2 advantage for Dortmund in that zone.
The away side were trying to play intricate passes through the middle, so Leverkusen’s back four defended very narrow to try and combat that thread.
Leverkusen were playing a more direct style of football – almost an old-fashioned approach of trying to get the ball wide before crossing it towards Kiessling – or alternatively missing out the wingers and asking Kiessling to hold the ball up or try and flick it on to Helmes.
Leverkusen poor
Leverkusen struggled to get their wide players into the action early on, however, partly because they were being pushed so far back into their own half by the attack-minded Dortmund full-back pairing. They scampered forward at every opportunity, with the two holding players generally staying in position and covering the wide areas if Leverkusen looked to break quickly, also making sure they were in space to receive the ball, and keeping attacks moving.

When attacking, Dortmund's full-backs pushed high up the pitch, whilst the holding midfielders stayed in place and covered the wide zones if necessary
Leverkusen also had problems when they played the ball left, because both Sam and Castro constantly wanted to come inside onto their right foot rather than going on the outside. This somewhat contradicted Leverkusen’s overall strategy. Still, they defended well in the first half – as well as playing narrow at the back, Simon Rolfes tracked Gotze across the pitch and shut down that creative threat.
Second half
Dortmund scored three goals in the first ten minutes of the second half, to put the game beyond Leverkusen. Ironically, having spent the first period trying to play neat passes through the opposition, the goals came from very direct attacks.
First a huge throw-in from Lukasz Piszczek evaded the entire Leverkusen defence and was poked in at the far post by Kevin Grosskreutz. Moments later, Grosskreutz got on the end of a Lewandowski flick-on after a long ball from Roman Weidenfeller. Both goals were the result of clear defensive mistakes – first by Daniel Schwaab, then by Manuel Friedrich.
The defending wasn’t much better for the third goal either – a mini-counter-attack resulted in Gotze having the freedom of the opposition half (with Schwaab choosing not to close him down) to run at goal, before finishing coolly. After a tight, nervous first half, Dortmund somehow found themselves with an unassailable lead with half an hour to go.
Heynckes was clearly not impressed and made a treble substitution, bringing on Barnetta, Vidal and Derdiyok – and Leverkusen looked much brighter, creating a few half-chances and eventually getting a goal through Kiessling, who had a good game. Still, Dortmund were relatively comfortable late on, and won the game with that excellent ten-minute spell after half-time.
Conclusion
This was a big test for Dortmund – away at the third-placed side and without two key players. In truth, in the first half there was a danger both sides were going to settle for a point, and it took poor defending rather than an improvement in attacking intent to break the deadlock.
Dortmund looked impressive in the second half, however – they moved from their counter-attacking style to a system more focused upon ball retention to see the game out, and despite conceding one goal, never looked too nervous.
Leverkusen 1-3 Dortmund: Dortmund pounce on defensive errors





“Dortmund struggled to get their wide players into the action early on”
Leverkusen was meant.
just a minor correction, you spelled Kießling’s name wrong in the picture.
Ooh I saw that I saw so 100% sure some saddo was going to come out and nag about it.
Effin’ hell, get over it. This is not a German site. It’s a minor, irrelevant, honest mistake. It makes NO, not the tiniest difference to the analysis.
And it’s always in the German matches that some pedantic prick feels the need to point out these negligible inaccuracies – and I hate to find the cliché of us Germans being this bunch of stuck-up nitpickers so …confirmed at every opportunity. If I was ZM I’d probably misspell Kiessling as a running gag by now and lie waiting for the fussy Germans to came forward.
I say: ZM, Thanks for the brilliant analysis. And congrats for getting Kubas name (Blasczfskyxzczs…wtf?) correct every time.
first sentence is meant to be “when I saw that i was so …”
my anger kindof messed with my fingers i guess
but well, you can always correct me
WTF?
I’m not talking about the ß/ss thing, but about the ei/ie error.
And of course it’s a minor, irrelevant, honest mistake. That doesn’t mean it can’t be corrected.
And I’m not saying the analysis is bad, not at all.
I’ve been enjoying it very much.
Yeah, I don’t get either why someone ought to object to a friendly pointing out of such a spelling mistake. It’s the sort of feedback most writers are grateful for.
That leading to such a hostile rant makes defintely a “WTF?” moment.
This game showed how important Kagawa is to Dortmund’s overall game. Dortmund always looked a step off the pace in the final third. Kuba was especially disappointing with his wayward shooting.
I disagree. Dortmund always tend to struggle against Leverkusen, who have arguably been the best side in the league next to Dortmund. Considering this was on the road, without two of their players and an 18 year old filling in it was quite impressive. Goetze is a special special player and the closest thing Germany has to another Oezil. I think he controlled the lines brilliantly yesterday.
I, too, was wondering how Klopp was going to replace him – and to try if Götze mightn’t make a good ten if you take him off the flank would have been my solution as well, so I was happy to see Kloppo do just that. I think Götze did fantastic in that role of which I am not sure if he is used to playing it (he might have done in the youth teams) and that if the game proved one thing, it is that Dortmund do NOT rely on Kagawa nearly as much as all the naysayers predicted.
I don’t see him as a new Özil cause Özils key asset for me is his gentleness of touch (if Özil was a drummer he’d be playing with brushes instead of the drumsticks everyone else uses) but surely Götze is a fantastic talent whose play is witty, youthful and unpredictable.
Leverkusen should have changed to a 4-2-3-1 or 4-5-1/4-3-3 system at half time.
You could try a 4-4-2 against a 4-2-3-1, but Helmes is an old school striker, and Kießling is also a striker and not a mobile forward (both not good for pressing). But that wouldn’t have been a problem if it had not been for the bad crosses in the first half. Dortmund’s pressing, Dortmund’s direct style was better in the first half and Heynckes should’ve reacted and bring in a third central midfielder for Helmes after the break.
All three goals showed poor defending (very static), and the three subs after the goals were too late.
Now, after the game, Henckes should know that he should have packed the midfield and played a counter attacking style. And it was his failure that he didn’t change tactics after the first half.
Yep, agree that Heynckes made a few errors there. First off, he should have played Vidal from the start, who is currently the best player in Leverkusen. Looking back at the performance of Helmes it would be easy to say that playing Vidal instead of Helmes with any of the three systems you mentioned would have likely been more successful. Before the game, I would have at least put Vidal in over Bender, but I guess Heynckes wanted to see the twin brothers play against each other…
Personally, I think Leverkusen will be strongest going with 4-5-1 in the future. Their central midfield bench is quite stacked, it would be a shame not putting them to good use.
I think, Heynckes had his reasons (injury, don’t know exactly) to put Vidal on the bench.
Vidal returned from home a week late due to his son having to go to hospital, that’s the most probable reason for him not starting.
thanks.
I thought that Heynckes was just looking at the training performance. After the winter break it’s difficult to know who is in “the zone” and if the opponent will be in form. No competitive matches to base your decisions on.
With that in mind, it’s even more astonishing that Heynckes didn’t adjust his line-up at half time.
great analysis as usual.
Dortmund were missing Kagawa and Barrios. Kagawa ability to deal with difficult situations and his excellent first touch would have made it possible to play more fluid. Lewandowski could not play the holding striker as good as Barrios. Nevertheless Dortmund still had a quiet good game and could have scored through well played attacks (Lewandowski has to improve his finishing) rather than through individual mistakes.
Furthermore I would like to point out that Sahin often droops deep between or on the left side of the centre backs. Something, as you pointed out several times, Busquets does at Barcelona so well. Sahin does it not that often and uses his position more in order to receive the ball and play a good it to the midfield rather than to stay there. Still I think this move is important because the fullbacks push often very high.
That said I believe that Sahin and Bender are very fine working duo. Klopp mentioned after the match that the chances Leverkuse were able to creat after the 60. minute were rooted in the substitution of Bender (due to injury). He added that Dortmund have a huge problem if he would be out on a long term (because Kehl is as usual injured).
Dortmund is an incredible side especially if you consider that they have a first 11 with an average age of only 23 (which is the youngest side in the Bundesliga by the way)!
keep the good work up
Yeah Bender was very good tackling and fouling when necessary to slow down the Leverkusen attack. It was especially important considering how high up the FBs were playing. Having arguably two of the best defenders in the Bundesliga allows the FBs to get up without worrying too much about defense.
Personally I thought that Lewandowski still did pretty well, despite his missed chances. If anything, I think Kuba had an average game at best.
Either way, the game was decided by lackluster defending.
You are spot on with Sahin and Bender though.
What Heynckes should take away from this match:
1. Start Vidal, ALWAYS. Unless not match fit no excuse to leave him out.
2. Stay with the 4-2-3-1, it worked well when used and utilizes the personnel best.
3. Start shopping for another CB because Hyypia is nearly done, Friedrich is at best above average.
I believe Vidal didnt start as a disciplinary measure (he did not come back on time from his holidays or so) but seeing how neccessary he was Heynckes shot himself in the foot there. They should just have made Vidal pay a fine i guess.
I was disappointed with Lars Bender. In his 1860 days he was by far the better one of the Bender twins. Sven is a tireless workhorse, but Lars had the presence, the positioning and he could play visionary passes and he was a threat in front of goal. Sven is more a Hargreaves, Lars was more a Ballack. He used to RULE our midfield (at 18!). But while Sven is now irreplacable at Dortmund, Lars has (for me) not yet properly arrived in the Bundesliga. I’m still expecting that breakthrough to happen though.
re Vidal: Not a disciplinary measure. Vidal was absent due to a bereavment in his family and did not train enough with the team during the break. Bender is supposed to have been good in training, so perhaps Heynckes thought him less of a risk. Hindsight is always 20/20!
you are a 59+1 fan? my condolences
Well, I don’t think it iss fair to put verdict of Lars performance atm. Sven was practically more “lucky” to get into starting XI due to Kehl injury. Well, he certainly prove that his starting place is well earned of course. While Lars has to compete with captain Rolfes, Vidal, Ballack and Balitsch. Give this boy some time, or maybe Bayer should loan him to another club to gain some experience.
I was especially suprised how well Dortmund coped with the absence of Barrios and Kagawa. Additionally I didn’t see Sahin as dominant as in other games, at least in the offense. To win this commanding besides all the problems, against the strongest competitor is astonishing and I don’t see anyone taking the title off Dortmund this season.
Nice analysis again.I really miss something like ZM in Germany
And because this is the best blog focused on tactical systems, I’d like to read an analysis of the match Hannover 96-Schalke 04 next weekend here. This could be really interesting because both play a classical 4-4-2 system, but nevertheless totally different styles. (And this match will be interesting, because Schalke tries to reach the Euroleague ranks while H96 is sensationally fighting for the Champions League)
Oh, just take a look at:
http://www.taktikguru.net/
http://werder-fussball-blog.net/
http://defensivemidfielder.wordpress.com/
and some others (At Spox.com you can find a user group about tactics)
11tegen11 is a side about Dutch football.
And the pages from Tim Hill, Tom Williams are a good read.
Leverkusen had plenty of chances in the last minutes, but they didn’t manage to score. Seems like there is nothing to stop this young talented Dortmund Team.
By the way: Błaszczykowski is known in Germany as ‘Kuba’ because its easier to write and speak.