Arsenal 1-1 Leeds: Leeds close to another shock

The starting line-ups
A penalty for either side – Arsenal’s coming in the final minute – meant these two sides will have to settle the tie at Elland Road next week.
Arsene Wenger made sweeping changes to his side, keeping only Alex Song and Johan Djourou from the XI that failed to beat Manchester City. Nicklas Bendtner was used on the right, with Marouane Chamakh upfront.
Simon Grayson went with the 4-2-3-1 system he’s played in recent weeks. Arsenal loanee Sanchez Watt started on the right, with Robert Snodgrass in the centre. Ben Parker started at left-back, making just his second appearance of the season.
The match could reasonably held up as a stereotypical FA Cup tie. The outsiders played above themselves and the game was scrappy – not great for technical quality, but hugely entertaining throughout.
Leeds set out well
Grayson’s tactical approach was largely spot on. Snodgrass was used just off Luciano Becchio and drifted from flank to flank in behind the Arsenal holding players, but more importantly for Leeds, it meant two pacey players on the wings, so Max Gradel and Watt tracked Kieran Gibbs and Emmanuel Eboue’s runs forward – Gradel in particular was his typical energetic self, often ending up as an additional left-back when Eboue scampered into the final third.
Snodgrass and Becchio also pressed Arsenal’s centre-backs when Wojciech Szczesny had the ball, which meant Arsenal were unable to play out from the back, and Szczesny was instead forced to launch the ball up the pitch, and therefore Arsenal struggled to get into a passing rhythm.
This was less of an issue for them than usual, since in Bendtner and Chamakh they had two players capable of challenging in the air. It did play into the hands of Leeds’ defenders, however, who were much keener on having an aerial battle than trying to cut out Arsenal’s slick passing game.
Arsenal cumbersome in attack
Overall, however, Arsenal’s combination of attackers didn’t work. Bendtner never looks completely comfortable on the wing – he takes too many touches on the ball and slows attacks down, and had a tendency to retreat with the ball, rather than taking on his man. There was a similar problem with Chamakh, who after starting the season winning penalties and free-kicks with his determination to turn quickly and get past defenders, now seems much keener to cut back when he picks up the ball, again meaning that Arsenal play in front of the opposition rather than getting in behind. Andrei Arshavin was the one player who did make a run past the defence to meet a good Tomas Rosicky ball, but his touch was poor and this seemed to affect his confidence for the rest of the game.
Rosicky was Arsenal’s best player in the first half, finding space between the lines and playing some good passes. Leeds’ central midfielders, whilst performing well, did have the attitude of scrappy Championship players – they were too keen to close down Song and Denilson in possession, which meant space opened up for Rosicky. Still, the Czech was not given many promising runs ahead of him from his teammates, and Wenger omitting Theo Walcott seemed like a poor decision. There was obviously a desire to rest Walcott, but Leeds’ defence was so prone to pace in behind that it surely would have been worth starting him – it’s difficult to see how Leeds would have been able to cope with Rosicky in space playing balls through the defence for Walcott to come onto.
Leeds take the lead
Still, Leeds dealt with the opposition they were presented with well. Their centre-backs won everything in the air and the wingers closed down Arsenal’s full-backs when they got the ball. They also had some degree of attacking threat – not enough to produce many clear-cut chances, but they were forcing Arsenal into misplaced passes in their own half, and also forcing Arshavin and Bendtner to retreat further than they would have liked, easing the pressure on the back four. That back four defended relatively narrow but did not specifically invite crosses.
Leeds went ahead early in the second half – Gradel won a penalty that was converted by Snodgrass, and Leeds found themselves 1-0 up.
Walcott leads fightback
Wenger’s response was to bring on Cesc Fabregas and Theo Walcott, and Arsenal were immediately much brighter. Much of that was down to Walcott, who provided pace, directness and confidence on the ball that was clearly lacking from the front three in the first half. Grayson brought on Leigh Bromby as a fifth defender and went 5-4-1, but perhaps conceded some midfield ground to Arsenal and invited pressure in doing so.
Still, he was minutes away from getting the win. It was no surprise, though, that Walcott was the man who eventually made a difference. His pace created four notable moments – a good cross into the box that Bendtner didn’t convert, a run to meet a ball over the defence that he lofted into Kasper Schmichel’s arms, and he then was brought down for two penalty shouts, the second of which was given. Fabregas converted to make it 1-1, and Leeds had to withstand heavy pressure in stoppage time.
Conclusion
Leeds defended well both tactically and practically – they pressed Arsenal’s centre-backs but also did the scrappy stuff at the back excellently. Only failure to cope with Rosicky looked like undoing them early on, but Arsenal’s lack of directness from their wide players failed to punish them here.
Walcott was the game’s key player – Arsenal clearly missed his pace when he was on the bench, then he provided almost all their bright moments when he finally arrived.
Arsenal 1-1 Leeds: Leeds close to another shock





Arshavin was horrible today.. Expect hes 1st half one on one and a good pass to Bentner in the 2nd he never succeed with anything. Even the Arsenal’s fans patience is running out on him.
He seemed to be moving in the wrong direction every time a pass was played to him. What’s that about?!
His form has been poor for a while now but in this game he was terrible. Almost everything went wrong for him and his confidence must be rock bottom. Also Fabregas seemed to be the only player in our team who could pass well today. Perhaps thats because he came on when Walcott was making good runs but he was also passing the ball well to other teammates, which no one on our team was doing well.
Arshavin’s laziness was only tolerated when he was playing well in an attacking sense. Now that form has abandoned him he simply looks lost. Perhaps further evidence of the death of the lazy player http://footballingbrain.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/death-of-the-lazy-player/.
“Also Fabregas seemed to be the only player in our team who could pass well today.”
vs.
“Rosicky was Arsenal’s best player in the first half, finding space between the lines and playing some good passes.”
Hmmm, who shall we believe? ZM, got the passing stats for this game?
Ha no doubt ZM knows better than me. It just appeared that the only player on our team who could pass the ball well was Fabregas when I was watching the game.
still that doesnt give anyone and especially the arsenal fans to boo arshavin.
im well and truly embarrassed to see the arsenal fans boo one of their own. very embarrassing.
You said it. How does singling out a particular player on your team & booing him help anyone? Shame…
Seemed to work on Eboue.
Spot on Brenton.
Eboue responded to the criticisms and has come out a much stronger player. I was at that infamous Wigan game and to see someone perfrom so poorly meant drastic action was required – and it brought RESULTS.
I am sick of people saying players shouldn´t be booed, fact is fans are pretty patient and booing isn´t a decision reached lightly. Arshavin really needs to pull his socks up and I think he has the quality and mental strength to do so. Our booing is only a catalyst and a hurry’up reminding him of that lack of effort will NOT be tolerated when you pull on that red and white shirt.
[This is really to Jairu but comment replies don't nest that deep]
The “tactic” of booing fans booing their own players is so unbelievably stupid as to totally disqualify proponents opinions on anything else sports-related.
Eboue is a rock of a man with a big heart, and thus he was able to grow out of abuse (even though his problems had not been due to lack of effort). The vast majority of people do not react this way to being booed and will in fact perform worse. How would *you* perform at your job if random drunk felt empowered to show up and loudly insult you? Most people’s performance will lower under such pressure, though there are some (e.g. Michael Jordan) who thrive on roar of the opposition and others (apparently Eboue – one anecdote, not proof of anything) who are spurred by boos to work harder.
Furthermore, not only does booing (1) literally make the situation on the field worse by harming the performance of susceptible players with relatively fragile mental strength (but who could play well if encouraged), but it also [2] forgoes the opportunity to make it better: it’s well-established that a roaring crowd supporting a team can lift their spirits and make them play better.
If we have a team performing at 85% of capacity with no fans, by booing instead of cheering we not only don’t see any increase in performance since the players aren’t being lifted by a 12th man, but we see a decrease in performance since the booing affects their confidence.
So if your goal is for a team to win, booing them is phenomenally unproductive. Whether fans are “patient” or not is beside the point. Booing is selfish, emotional arrogance. If you want your team to win, you cheer them. If you want your team to lose, you boo them. If you are a person with respect and integrity, you cheer. If you are a jerk, you boo. This is something I noticed as a New Yorker and it made me have contempt for the fans in NYC, because they are very fast to boo.
Really good article as usual, very impressed with Leeds in a cup tie again. My question is how is Bendtner still playing for Arsenal? For a while he gave them a different option up front, but now Chamakh can fill that role infinitely better. There is obviously some talent but Bendtner has never shown he is good enough to develop into a world class striker. What are Arsenl fans opinion of him?
He seems to divide opinion, but I can’t imagine many people think he’s any good as a right-winger.
I see shades of Ibrahimovic in Bendtner and think he has alot of talent. I can only guess that Arsene Wenger is playing him in a deeper role to improve his decision-making, like he did with Diaby on the left awhile ago.
Yeah, strange decision by Wenger to play him there, not sure how playing him out of position helps his ‘decision making’. I see what you mean with the shades of Ibra, and Bendtner has a good goalscoring record. But let’s be honest he just doesn’t have half Ibra’s talent.
Isn’t he played on the wing as a way of having multiple options on the same team? Arsenal’s strikers tend to swap positions and it can help unsettle another teams defence if they use different methods of attack (for example hitting it long to Bentner when the defence has just got used to RvP’s dropping deep).
Anyway he’s not bad on the wing, he can get possession from goal kicks quite easily if they aim it at him as he can aerially dominate almost all full backs. His dribbling isn’t that bad either, see the Denilson goal against Everton last season.
ZM re: Chamakh do you think his lack of directness is as a result of Arsenals brainwashing policy of passing it around the box?
The obvious answer is that a player has slightly more time on the ball when they’re receiving it out wide than they do up front.
As RA says it also gives the team different – and unusual – options in attack.
I wonder if this is something like the strategy of Mancini playing Jo on the wing. As you noted in the main article, it gives the keeper another long ball outlet and puts pressure on a full back who wouldn’t normally be so challenged in the air. It seems like a decent enough thing to try out, even if it didn’t work out so well in this case.
As (generally) an Arsenal fan, I think Bendtner is a good talent, but he is inconsistent and maddening at times. He’s really got a great physical presence and can be a handful, but I’ve seen him miss so many times when he was odds-on to score that it seems there’s some mental block. The last year or so it seems like he’s starting to get past this, but the introduction on Chamakh cannot help him since he’s seeing less playing time and he knows he doesn’t have Wenger’s full confidence.
I’d prefer to see Arsenal go away from the target man up front. I understand that sometimes it seems beneficial to have a long ball outlet, but I vastly prefer the multiple small runners model that Barca have at the moment. When you have talented playmakers and can control the ball like the Gunners, there’s a lot less need for the big guy to punt the ball to, and you seem to be better off with someone who is quick and skillful and can try to break the offside trap.
Good article and definitely agree that Walcott should have started and had a big impact when he came on. I thought that Leeds defended very well for the majority of the game but were slightly lucky late on not to have conceeded a 2nd and maybe a 3rd as Arsenal exploited their high-line with balls over the top for Walcott and Bendtner. Surely Grayson would have done better to have dropped the defensive line, especially in light of Walcott’s introduction? Be interested to hear your thoughts on this.
Agree that Walcott made the difference. His pace and trickery on the right caused Leeds untold problems and with Bendtner in the middle he had someone creating difficulty amongst the tired Leeds central defenders for him. It was inevitable that Leeds would retreat but Walcott’s directness and speed meant that their mistakes were in the box rather than outside it.
Been waiting for Leeds to appear on ZM for a long time. Marvellous stuff. Keep it up Michael.
I think it was the shift to 5-4-1 that opened the game up for Arsenal. Leeds became totally over-run in midfield and allowed Arsenal more time and space to play the killer pass – with Walcott using his pace to capitalise on this. Had Grayson not brought on another defender, I think Leeds would have won.
What about Eboue? Haven’t seen him in an Arsenal shirt in a while, and it showed. Being outworked and outplayed by Max Gradel, is never a good look.
I agree, it seemed like he’s deteriorating. Maybe a lack of games is taking its effect on him.
Eboue never does too well defending one-on-one against fast wingers. He’s better positionally and in the air than a lot of people give him credit (actually started his career as a centre back for Beveren), and he’s obviously pretty fast, but I’ve seen a lot of one-trick ponies like Gradel (who is, to be fair, a good dribbler and very fast, if nothing else) beat him in the past. also, he had his best season with Ljungberg (who did a lot of defensive work) ahead of him – Bendtner and Walcott don’t really compare in terms of helping out defensively.
Maybe this isn’t very tactical, but the Arsenal 2nd XI felt like they lacked understanding. Not really communicating, many passes going astray. Maybe it’s more obvious because we’re used to seeing Fabregas and Nasri do those telepathic one-twos, but across the entire pitch it felt like communication was lacking. Bendtner, Arshavin and Chamakh don’t strike me as a very cohesive front three.
If I was going to play that 3 as a front three, it seems like the natural way would be with Arshavin in the hole behind the big fellows, but we all know tactical flexibility is not Arsene’s favorite idea.
I have to agree with you on that one. I dont knw why you would change that many players at a time. It is sure to ruin chemistry unless the group of players you have are extermely tight. Ive even read an article where carlo anchelloti and another guy who works at chelsea said your really suppose to change 3 to 4 players at a time.
I am an avid reader and big fan of ZM so would love to hear your thoughts but to my mind, with due respect to the way Leeds played, dint this game provide the perfect illustration of the misfits in arsenal? Denilson, Bendtner and judging by his performance in the last few games Arshavin.
Denilson – has always been too slow to defend well and apart from his occasional long distance strike has never really fit in. He does not have the physical strength nor speed to cope and while his distribution is reasonably accurate that seems to be only because most of his passes are horizontal balls < 5 yards.
Bendtner – another one who is too slow. Height and strength are supposed to be his only attributes but as shown (again) today he always wastes several chances – any top class striker would have put away the headed chances he had.
Arshavin – while there is no doubting his skill he seems increasingly lazy & disinterested and today was just another example of that – several misplaced passes by him and he could not control several balls played to him.
Wenger's persistence with his mistakes is costing Arsenal dearly.
you’re not gonna have a lot of sympathy criticizing Denilson on this site. he made a few stupid tackles today including the penalty, obviously – but he’s hardly the only one this season. Fabregas’s daft handball in the area a few weeks ago was just as bad, if not worse. I think he’s actually had a decent season so far – the fans just remember some bad moments in the past (like that day the ref outran him against Man Utd) and are completely blind to the improvements he’s made in his game. he’s a lot stronger in the tackle this season, makes better decisions, and as you say, he’s become a goal threat as well. if it weren’t for the quick emergence of Wilshere, I think he’d have gotten a lot of games, and proven a lot of Arsenal fans wrong.
you’d think that we’d learn from guys like Song and Fabianski that as stubborn as Wenger is about playing his young kids, even when they’re playing badly, he’s usually right!
I thought Denilson played extremely well yesterday, with the obvious – and rather significant – exception of the penalty incident.
if you are an avid reader and big fan of this site than you should already know your criticism of Denilson is not going to find agreement here. Check out http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/07/30/central-midfield-role/ and
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/21/denilson-arsenal-arsene-wenger-passing-ratio/
or even better, when Arsenal played Barca, Denilson had the most passes for Arsenal despite coming on as a sub: http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/31/arsenal-2-2-barcelona-passing-statistics/
Most people with functioning eyes realize that rather than “Wenger’s persistence with his mistakes is costing Arsenal dearly” it is the case that Wenger built a competitive team within a budget and without an oligarch, sheik, or half-trillion in debt. People talked trash about Song too, and he’s the best holding midfielder in the L right now. Arshavin’s in a “slump”, sure, but he also has the most assists on the team and the third-most in the league: http://www.premierleague.com/page/Statistics
so perhaps a revision of your opinion is in order.
Today’s game was a good watch and was impressed by Leeds and the courage they showed to attack Arsenal. Agree with many that Bendtner and Arshavin were poor. The Dane thinks he is world class but has never really shown anything that suggests he could be first choice. He needs to find another club where he can play consistently and only then will he possibly prove his worth.
Have not seen a lot of Szczesny but he impressed at Old Trafford a few weeks ago and looks like in time he could fill this problem position for the Gunners. He is a good shot stopper and commands his area well. Distribution needs some work but that is to be expected.
Schmeicel and Bruce brought back memories of when their father’s used to haunt Wenger with solid performances. The save from Denilson late on was world class and reminiscent of the Great Dane himself.
Keep up the good work ZM – enjoying hearing your views on Football Weekly also.
well, Bruce never played in the EPL while Wenger was the Arsenal manager, but yeah. Alex had a great game. makes you wonder why he’s had so much trouble sticking with a team – I mean, Keane made him captain and then sold him a year later.
A big lover of the FA Cup myself, and glad you did this game ZM, good report as always.
Impressive performance from Leeds, Bruce impressed me for Leeds, 2/3 goal saving interceptions, the absolutely perfectly time tackle on Chamakh I think it was I particularly remember, it HAD to be perfect, or he was off, the timing was impeccable.
On the whole, I thought Leeds looked like a very decent side. No nonsence, solid defending, Becchio impressed me up top, good all round game, target man, with a bit of pace and a good work rate, impressive combination. Gradel/Watt on either wing, both had good pace and trickery, but both worked very hard for the team, Gradel tracked back all game long, and lastly Snodgrass, bit of guile in a more industrious, work man like performance. Grayson has a reputation in football of getting his teams to play good football, I know they were playing Arsenal, but I can’t see a centre midfield partnership of Howson/Johnson dominating midfields through there passing quality, and none of the defenders seemed very good at bringing the ball out of defence…
As for Arsenal, it’s got to be seen as a disappointment really, and I don’t really think we can blame Wenger for resting two of Arsenal’s three best players (Nasri/RVP) as the team was still strong and you’d think would be favourites to beat Leeds. And Wenger’s substitutions were spot on to be fair, Walcott was very good when he came on, constant pace and good movement was giving the Leeds defence all kind of problems, and as for Fab, played some lovely balls, the one for Bendtner in injury time, where Bendtner should have scored, but sliced wide, was absolutely magical.
On the subject of Bendtner, and bringing in Arshavin also. Starting with Bendtner, I don’t think he’s as bad as people say, he’s not just a typical lump of a target man who has no skill, Bendtner has good skill, with decent physical attributes also, but he gets ridiculed as being some sort of Emile Heskey in some quaters, but I don’t think he helps himself with some of the comments he makes, underated by some and a good player I would agree with, but the best striker in the world as he calls himself, he needs a severe reality check. As for Arshavin, he had an absolute disaster today… When he first came to England, banging in four goals at Liverpool he was quickly overated by many, one journalist was referring to him with a quote along the lines of, he might as well be wearing a Brazilian shirt as he never gives the ball away, which is pathetic in my opinion, firstly because Brazil are more known for there moments of magical brilliance as opposed to Spainish like keep ball, but the actual statement is wrong, Arshavin regularly wastes posession, and alot of the time it’s very basic, he’ll give the ball away under little or no pressure. Having said that, he’s an extremely effective player, his goals and assists ratio is extremely impressive, and isn’t that really mainly what we should be judging him on…?
One thing I find terribly frustrating with Wenger is his unwillingness to play anything other than 4-2-3-1.
While I do agree it’s the formation that suits our squad best, and it should definitely be our plan A, I don’t understand why he never moves away from it, not even when desperately chasing an equaliser (like yesterday) or a winner (like against Man City).
For example, when Theo came on for Chamakh, why not move to 4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1 with Bendtner up front and Arshavin playing off him, with Rosicky left, Theo right and Cesc-Song in the middle? Doesn’t Arshavin always say playing off the striker is his favourite position? And didn’t Rosicky always play as left/attacking mid at Dortmund and for the Czech Republic?
When Bendtner and Chamakh are both playing, why not have both up front, with Walcott wide right or Vela on the left to provide crosses? Bendtner on the right makes no sense!
Against City, we were clearly pushing forward, and while I felt the changes made were all reasonable, City’s back 4 and midfield were clearly comfortable with our 2-3-1 (extra man at the back, same numbers in midfield), so why not change it up?
Surely the decision to play 5-4-1 from Leeds wasn’t the best idea. Surely bringing on another holding midfielder to harass Fabregas would be the better option. Also, if you get an interception in midfield with Fabregas in an advanced role, Denilson and Song aren’t able to catch anyone.
Maybe I missed it, but I thought that change in formation gave Fabregas too much time on the ball to pick passes. I thought Arsenal benefited immensely by Leeds bolstering the backline rather than the midfield.
Not to forget that Leeds then played an inexplicably high line which Walcott exposed several times.
Grayson got his tactics spot on until the last 10 minutes and then it all fell apart. Playing 5-4-1 would have made more sense if the 3rd CB had moved slightly left to help his LB against Walcott.
When you have half the team in the box with Bendtner and Chamakh winning so many headers, that would have been risky too.
Think they just needed a bit more possession in the opposition half
Bentner is another Arsenal striker who has suffered since the change of formation last season. Vela and Eduardo have also suffered greatly from being shunted out onto the wing.