Chelsea 4-1 Spartak Moscow: a stuttering start, but Chelsea eventually power past the Russians

CHELSEA: 1 Cech; 19 Ferreira, 33 Alex, 2 Ivanovic, 3 Cole; 12 Mikel, 7 Ramires, 18 Zhirkov; 21 Kalou, 39 Anelka, 11 Drogba. SPARTAK: 81 Dikan; 16 Makeev, 19 Pareja, 17 Suchy, 18 Ivanov; 5 Sheshukov, 7 Ibson; 64 McGeady, 99 Kombarov, 12 Alex; 11 Welliton. Usual diagrams back soon.
Chelsea took longer than usual to get into their stride, but recorded a familiar comfortable victory.
Chelsea rested John Terry and Michael Essien, so Branislav Ivanovic moved to the centre of the defence, and Ramires came in on the right side of midfield. Saloman Kalou replaced Florent Malouda.
Spartak moved Yevgeni Makeev to right-back and brought in Andrei Ivanov on the left. Alex returned, so Ari dropped to the bench.
Spartak were much better defensively than in the first leg. The presence of Alex made them more solid in the centre of midfield – although he is a playmaker rather than a tackler, he played deeper than Ari did, forming a five-man barrier which Chelsea’s midfield struggled to pass through.
Spartak were notable for their fluidity when defending – Dmitri Kombarov worked hard and defended in deep positions against Ashley Cole, but on other occasions he stayed upfront and Welliton came over to the right flank. Alex got through his share of defensive work, and also showed a couple of good attacking moments, though he was marshalled well by Jon Obi Mikel.
Zhirkov less of a threat
Spartak also dealt with Yuri Zhirkov much better than in the first game. Ibson was fielded further forward and slightly to the right to prevent Zhirkov getting too much time and space on the ball (in the previous game Zhirkov completed the most number of passes of any player on the pitch, and also got the crucial first goal).
Spartak were not sitting back completely, however – in fact they were pressing quite well when the ball was played in midfield. Ramires and Zhirkov were both closed down quickly, whilst Mikel generally had a little more time on the ball when Alex moved deeper towards Ramires in the 4-5-1.
No link
The problem Chelsea had for much of the game was the gap between the midfield and attack – they sometimes looked like a broken team in this area, with no clear link player between the two lines. That can sometimes be a problem with a 4-3-3, and Chelsea were missing the two players who act as that ‘link’ very well – Frank Lampard, who offers driving runs from midfield, and Florent Malouda, who drops deep from the forward three and takes up positions in between the lines.

With no real creator in midfield, it was notable how many of Chelsea's successful passes to Didier Drogba were long balls
This was one area that Spartak actually looked more proficient than Chelsea in – Alex didn’t have a spectacular game, but he did drop into interesting positions and when he got free from Mikel, threatened to create, though Spartak’s main threat came from long shots, from he and Kombarov.
Aiden McGeady and Kombarov were able to take on the two Chelsea full-backs immediately, but were not consistent enough with their crossing and delivery to cause Alex or Ivanovic problems, and Welliton was quiet.
Second half
What Chelsea do, famously, is get results even when not playing brilliant football. They did struggle for creativity in this game – rarely did they find a player free in the box, or work a 2 v 1 situation in the final third.
The frustration for Valery Karpin will be that his side were well-stocked for both of Chelsea’s two goals – they were maybe slightly narrow for Anelka’s goal, but it was only a wonderful finish from a tight angle that resulted in the goal. There were also plenty of defenders back for the second goal, where Drogba won a penalty he converted himself, but a clumsy tackle let Spartak down.
At 2-0 Chelsea were out of sight and their wide players took up much deeper positions, looking more like 4-5-1 and playing on the counter. Spartak had done rather well until then, but the quality of Anelka and Drogba shone through to put the home side in charge.
Conclusion
Spartak held out for a while because they defended well as a team – when one player got drawn out of position, a teammate would drop in and cover. The defensive line was just right – neither so deep that Drogba was on top of the goalkeeper, nor too high that Anelka was a threat over the top. In the end the Frenchman did break the deadlock, but sometimes you have to give credit for a good goal rather than question the defending.
Chelsea did lack creativity with no Lampard or Malouda, though credit should go to the underrated Kalou for his through ball for Anelka’s crucial first goal. The Ivorian is rarely held up as a star player for Carlo Ancelotti’s side, but consistently comes up with goals and assists to justify his manager’s faith in him.
Chelsea 4-1 Spartak Moscow: a stuttering start, but Chelsea eventually power past the Russians




Actually thought Chelsea played well for the first 25 mins. Poor 20 after that but second half we were great, stepped it up a gear.
Before people are going to complain again and again, the diagrams are temporary
Thanks for the analysis, that was quick
Hey! Sorry to ask a non-content question around here (the match’s roundup is good as usual, btw):
Where do you get these graphics about passes and chances like the one regarding Drogba tonight?? They are so perfectly fitting for making important points about game-plans and tactics! Do you make them by yourself?
Thx, Greetings
Sorry, I think I just overlooked the mentioning of the “TotalFootball App”. Very nice App indeed.
So keep up the good work!
On Anelka’s goal keeper should stay(even he would turn inside Spartak had enough bodies in the box) and don’t dive legs first.
After that game over.
How will Bosingwa get into this team at the moment..?? Ivanovic is on fire right now and cant do any wrong especially going forward. If Alex slots back in alongside Terry then Ivanovic has to play right back i think. So that leaves the two Portuguese right backs on the bench…
Bosingwa is much better going forward. See MU-Chelsea the previous season; diamond is nullified easily when Cole is pinned back while leaving Ivanovic free, as they know he’s not much of a threat. If Bosingwa play, the outcome would be much different.
Yes, but Chelsea isn’t playing with a diamond now. Their back four are in good form at the moment, Ancelotti probably won’t want to change that.
You certainly have some agreeable opinions and views. Your blog provides a fresh look at the subject.
In the team lineup caption, you have mistakenly put SPARTAK Alex as number 12 instead of number 10.
Chelsea is monstrous for the moment, they look like Europe’s best side. Actually better without Lampard… Good grilling for Spartak, though, teach these players not to draw blanks with Sibir. KTO MY? MYASO!
Actually if you have been following Chelsea for awhile, as ZM even stated, they’ve been missing Lampard in some of the game. In Villa and City games for instance. He makes things look simple.
When u had so many great games to choose from, u always choose the one with an english team in it, typical English behaviour. Seriously, i am shocked u choose to analyse this game instead milan vs madrid
Of the 20 teams on the front page right now, only 6 are English, and the two teams with two reviews are Tottenham and Milan. A better accusation would be favouring major European leagues – apart from one Turkish match, the rest are English, Spanish, Italian, German, or Champion’s League. It would be nice to see more of the other European leagues (which do get occaisional coverage), and very nice to see non-European club matches, but the man only has so much time, and only so much access to broadcasts.
Good review, as always. I’m sure I’m one of many who found out about ZM during the World Cup, and kept reading.
That was your final comment on here – what a crap way to go out! Your ludicrous opinions can be tolerated but not your whining and your borderline racism. Farewell.
and boy, the other ones did suck. Let’s review the clanger from your Cesena v. Milan review on 9.12.10 (where your retort cracked me up bigtime):
Supermadridsta: I dont understand why u always analyse dull EPL and Seria games, Seria games are still OK but EPL is really boring aesthetically as well as tactically. A newly promoted side Hercules just defeated Barcelona at the camp nou, with a wonderful tactical setup and we have to read about boring everton and Manchester United games
ZonalMarking:
It’s on the way, how many games do you think I can get through in one day?
PS It’s Serie A
PPS This was ALSO a newly-promoted side beating a top side
PPS You don’t “have to read” about anything
So now that we’ve seen the replay, lets go to the match commentators for their perspective
Bob [in a Sportscaster/highlights reviewer voice]: Wow, that must have hurt,
Verne. What kind of person comes back from a body blow like that to continue complaining about the selection of games reviewed?
Verne [in similar tones]: I don’t know, Bob, it was quite a wallop. His pride will be feeling that in the morning. But what I want to know is, who makes a claim like “you always review gamers with english teams in them” when, first off, it’s so easily refuted, and secondly, the man’s english for crying out loud. I’m not surprised he focuses on English games, and I’m American! If Super-doesn’t-know-how-to-keep-his-mouth-shut-just-like-Mourinho-commenter ran a web site you know he’d be covering not just one league but one team!
Well, there you have it folks, the saga of supermadridsta is over. Until next time, this is the Zonal Marking comments section, signing off.
Thanks for this
@ZM , 4-3-3 from chelsea had a gaping hole in the midfield. Unlike spartak other teams will use the chances. Do you think fielding ramires in the mid along with mikel was the right choice given the style of play that the brazilian was known for at benfica??
Yeah I think he can do a good job there, I think he’s quite suited to that position actually…still not convinced about the Chelsea midfield zone though.
I think Ramires is still settling into the English game. as ZM said, he’s playing a similar position to how he played at Benfica. anyway, once Ancelotti decided to rest Essien (or he was injured, or whatever), Ramires – Mikel – Zhirkov was pretty much his only option for a first team midfield. I would think that with everyone fit, the first choice midfield would be Essien – Mikel – Lampard so that will give Ramires more time to adapt. I remember watching the Arsenal game, he had some moments of great quality – including a through ball to Cole that set up the first goal – but in general he seemed overrun by the Arsenal midfielders, Diaby and Wilshere, hardly the best defensive midfield partnership you’ll find in Europe…
Chelsea wouldn’t be playing that exact midfield trio against better teams.
Discount Gucci handbags, 50-70% off all gucci bags. Cheap Gucci outlet, Shopping for Free Shipping, Big discount Designer Gucci shoes! Buy replica bags now.lv is the Designer Handbags online store. As a leading brand gucci handbags wholesaler, we are proud to offer the widest selection of quality replica louis vuitton outlet.
As someone who’s following football only for the last 4/5 yrs, your website is very informative and your ‘2000s’ blog feature was good too. Hats off!!! And I put my hands up i once commented why you don’t cover chelsea’s games cos they are scoring so much these days. You are better than those ‘pun’dits on tv
. good job keep it up