Barcelona 2-1 Valencia: Barca outmanoeuvred early on, but stage second half fightback

The starting line-ups - Barca's front three rotated throughout
Unai Emery’s tactics worked a treat, but pure quality shone through and Barcelona were rampant in the second half.
Xavi returned to action to boost Barcelona’s central midfield zone, so Andres Iniesta played in the forward three. Maxwell started at left-back, and Seydou Keita on the left of midfield.
Valencia surprisingly omitted Juan Mata and instead used Ever Banega in an advanced midfield role, with Pablo Hernandez on the right. On the left, they pushed nominal left-back Jeremy Mathieu forward onto the left of midfield, with Jordi Alba playing at left-back. Roberto Soldado got the nod ahead of Aritz Aduriz.
So, a few surprises from Emery, and the slightly peculiar team selection indicated that he had a particular gameplan in mind. And indeed he did – whereas Inter and Hercules have had success at the Nou Camp by sitting back in the final third, Valencia had the opposite plan – they pressed high up the pitch, and Barcelona couldn’t get into a passing rhythm.
Valencia dominate left
The situation on Valencia’s left side was particularly interesting, especially as Lionel Messi had such a quiet first half, and indeed a quiet game overall. The use of two left-backs in tandem meant they doubled up easily on Messi when he got the ball, as well as providing a solid duo for dealing with the persistent charging runs from Daniel Alves down that side. The two happily switched round briefly if Alba saw an opportunity to get forward, but in general it was Mathieu who exploited the space in behind Alves with powerful runs, and one excellent cross very nearly resulted in a goal.
Elsewhere, Banega played high up the pitch in support of Aduriz, whilst on the right Pablo Hernandez had slightly more of a ‘free’ role, starting from the right but drifting into the centre of the pitch to provide a goal threat. Sometimes he became the centre-forward and Soldado went out to the right. In all, it wasn’t entirely different from Valencia’s usual 4-2-3-1, but the modifications in wide areas were making life very difficult for Barcelona.
Valencia slow

The Valencia goal was the second time Mathieu (pink) had broken past Dani Alves, leaving the left side of Barcelona's defence (blue) exposed, and Pablo (red) came in unmarked to tap home
Despite the heavy pressing and quick passing to the front players, Valencia were actually trying to slow the game at every opportunity. The Barcelona fans were whistling in protest at perceived time-wasting within the first twenty minutes, and it was a notable strategy from the away side – seeking to both prevent Barca from keeping the tempo high, but also giving themselves a breather to recover from the tiring pressing.
That pressing also resulted in a different overall strategy. Valencia have long been regarded as a predominantly counter-attacking side, but here they weren’t sitting back at all – they were playing high up the pitch and trying to take the game to Barcelona. After half an hour, they had more than 50% of possession – almost unthinkable for an away side at the Nou Camp.
High lines
Another notable feature of Valencia’s play was a high offside line, that kept catching out their ex-talisman David Villa. It was the same situation at the other end with Barcelona’s traditionally high line, and it was strange how open the game was, considering both sides were squeezing it into the central third of the pitch.
Mathieu had threatened earlier by getting in behind Alves and putting a ball into the area, and that’s exactly how Valencia took the lead. Gerard Pique was dragged across to cover for the right-back and left Barcelona exposed in the centre, allowing Pablo to steam in and tap home. He could have had a second a couple of minutes later, when he sidefooted straight at Valdes after Barcelona’s centre-backs were again out on the flanks, this time in their left-back position.
Second half
Barcelona changed completely after the break – they were more direct and much quicker with their passing, going towards goal immediately rather than building up play casually. This was summed up by Andres Iniesta’s goal three minutes after the break – he picked the ball up 50 yards from goal and made a bee-line for Cesar Sanchez, swapping passes with Xavi on the way before beating five players to the ball and passing it past the goalkeeper.

Barcelona work an (extended) short corner - three men against two. Working a pass into a crossing position in a 3 v 2 situation is not difficult, and when the players involved are Xavi, Iniesta and Messi, it was suicidal defending from Valencia
After that, they were rampant, and Valencia seemed to tire quickly. Alves became even more of a threat down the right, creating a great chance for Villa, but another key was Maxwell moving higher up the pitch, pushing back Pablo into his own half, and often finding himself in plenty of space once Pablo got drawn into the centre of the pitch.
Puyol winner
The winning goal, however, came simply as Valencia didn’t act quickly enough to close down a short corner. It was thirteen seconds between Xavi taking the corner and putting the eventual cross in, but by working a 3 v 2 with Messi and Iniesta against two Valencia defenders, Barcelona easily played it back out to Xavi, who had time to line up a cross and put it perfectly on Carles Puyol’s head, who powered it into the net.
Valencia replaced three of the front four but found it difficult to change the nature of the game – it continued in frantic fashion – Messi almost scored a great goal, Alves had to make a last-ditch tackle to stop Aritz Aduriz, whilst Villa finally broke the offside trap but was foiled by Cesar Sanchez.
Conclusion
“In the first half we were passed out of the game, in the second we were much better. We were able to make adjustments because of the versatility of the squad”, said Guardiola. “I told them at half time that if we see more of the ball, we can enjoy ourselves a little.” Guardiola’s adjustments were relatively minor – moving the full-backs further forward was the most obvious change, whilst Iniesta dropped deeper. It was not as spectacular as last year’s brilliant half-time switch in this fixture, but Barca certainly transformed the game.
Emery’s side showed that sitting deep is not the only way to stifle Barcelona, although as so often with sides who play a heavy pressing game (see Barcelona away at Arsenal) tiredness comes into play at the end.
Barcelona 2-1 Valencia: Barca outmanoeuvred early on, but stage second half fightback




Has your headline got the score wrong?
Just want to point out the error in the headline: The score is reversed
EDIT: Late to the party.
Indeed cheers for that ^^
It appears to me that with Barca’s system, players having off-days will often result in losses instead of draws like most other systems used by the “big teams” (I don’t really have stats to back that up, so I may be wrong). When it clicks, the Barcelona system is beautiful and devastating, but this season they appear to be rather shaky compared to previous seasons.
Does the Barca system only work if you are playing the best football, and outclass your opposition? Or have other teams figured out their system?
I won’t say ‘outclass’, but Barca’s system definitely only works if the players are technically superior to the opponent.
It works if some players are having off-days too, take this game for an example. Villa and Messi didn’t have particularly good games, but Barcelona still steamrolled Valencia in the second half and won.
They probably appear shaky this season because they have a really thin squad and key players like Xavi and Iniesta have been playing football non-stop for the past few seasons.
I don’t know about other teams figuring Barcelona’s system out, it was never a secret, just whether or not you can stop them even if you know what they are gonna do.
I think the main reason Barca is off form is cause they are tired. There is a consequence for advancing in the zillions of tournaments they are involved in.
6 titles + full season last year (CL semis) + World Cup + post World Cup banquet tour
=>
tiredness
=>
injury
Currently, Barca’s best player is the one that was injured much of last year. Iniesta is the only player that looks truly fresh on the pitch right now.
I guess ZM was cheering for Valencia!
Congrats to Valencia for brining out the best footballing display by any team against Barcelona (in the first half) during the presnet and last season. Pressing high up the pitch they didnt let Barca to have a smooth start for their passing game. A team playing real attacking football against Barcelona !!! But Barca came back brilliantly in the second half and it was definitely their best display at home, this season. It is commendable that they did this without much help from Messi and only a half fit Xavi. Iniesta was their best player. How I wish Messi’s chest goal was allowed. It was a beauty. Considering the fact that Barca’s win percentage after international breaks is very poor this was a good win indeed.
ZM, do you think what Cruff wrote some weeks back is coming true, about how all their board room politics would affect the team performance. Isnt it to be noted that,except for that second half performance, Barca’s performance at home this season has been really poor compared to their away days. Rosells’ Vendetta can prove expensive for Barca, I am afraid.
Barça’s current shaky form has nothing to do with politics – Cruyff might said that but he is part of the politics. He raised that up as an argument against a guy he is in opposition to, but there’s no merit to that whatsoever, it’s just a part of a game, a populist slogan to show people how bad Rosells is. The true reason is post-World Cup tiredness and a short bench (for which Guardiola is to be blamed).
Plus, it’s only beginning of the season and while struggling a bit, FCB is still there, 2nd in the league standing with only one point less than Real.
Disclaimer: I’m not for or against Rosells, I don’t really care.
I disagree that club politics won’t affect the team on the pitch. I’m afraid that as this vendetta boils over it will start to affect the concentration of some key players, the ones who are 100% Barça (Xavi, Puyol, Piqué, etc.) and Guardiola. Not only were these guys close to Laporta, who presided over the club’s best era on the pitch, but they are truly part of the club in it’s larger sense and so bad times for the club will definitely add unwanted stress.
hi ZM… excellent site..
I think in the second paragraph of ‘Valencia dominate left’, it should be Banega playing high up the pitch in support of Soldado…? (not Aduriz)
Cheers
Jayanth
In my opinion, if Valencia did continue to play high up the pitch in the second half, they would create more ˝bad time˝ for Barcelona. They tried to play zone-4 4 1 1 or 4 2 3 1 in the second half and gave Barcelona too much time on the ball, in adition, Barcelona wide attackers played more in the middle, and Keita made runs to 16-yard box without the ball, that is probably reason why Barca got more depth in second half, at least I think so. But, perfect first half form Valencia, if they did put the other chance in, who knows? Maybe they would win.
Were Barcelona really playing that narrow? I thought their style was to make the field as wide as possible?
In my opinion, they were narrow in the second half. They were playing some sorth of rombhus in the middle, Sergio, Keita, Xavi, and Iniesta between the lines, Messi and Villa came closer to the middle and wing backs went up front. Important factor was Keita runs without the ball in the 16. yard box. In that way one of 4 players playing in the defensive line of Valencia needed to take care of him, allowing space for wing backs. But, like Stephen said, it was Valencia who gave space to Barcelona. They switched of pressing game and I think that cost them a game.
That is awesome that Johannes Cruijff reads this blog.
and Diego Maradona
me three
Barcelona may have picked it up a bit in the second half, but it was Valencia who really switched off. They seemed uncertain as to what their intentions were when coming back out with a goal-lead: they certainly didn’t take a deeper line and try to protect it but neither did they show much impetus with the ball. Tiredness is the obvious reason, but after only 45 mins this may have been a problem with their mentality.
Although they were able to press high during the first half, a stronger defensive approach was needed in the second. A mourinho-esque effort could have frustrated an off-form Barca attack and stifled the game. This would have given Valencia time to cement their position and try to find the gaps to threaten through Mathieu or Pablo Hernandez on the break. As it was they conceded a soft goal quickly and didn’t look very comfortable.
Did anyone think it was strange that Fernandes so often collected the ball? A very willing performance and he showed a good touch and turn of pace, but his vision was lacking.
Keita was really strong through the middle for Barca. The width they missed may have been from D Alves, who had a quiet game due to Mathieu trying to get in behind. I agree with Tomek: a few barca players are struggling with fatigue; Messi had very few touches in the first half.
I might be wrong but now and then I’ve been thinking that a number of coaches in La Liga make a point of honor not parking the bus, or train, or whatever it is called to play strict defensive/counterattacking football against Barcelona, in Barcelona. Seems like it pays better to come back to their teams’ hometown saying “We lost (usually big, ed.) but we played to win” than “We scrapped one point…playing (cowardly, ed.) after our premises”. This came to my mind watching the second half. Not that Emery’s tactics were all wrong, Valencia played brilliantly in the first half. But a more pragmatic approach after the break could have made the (wimpy, ed.) difference.
I think you meant Soldado in both situations but you wrote Aduriz.
I take it that the “16 yard box” is the “18 yard box” and therefore about a “16 metre box”? But that’s just a nit-pick: carry on, chaps.
My mistake, metric system
What a game it was beautiful, even Barca spectators were enjoying it, congrats to Valencia for attacking instead of the usually parking a train. Reminded me of Athletico M. (although their tempo is a bit higher)
Kind of game Valencia tried “High intensity pressing” is only stop gap with barca, because by the 80 min you’ll be so tired that Barca will score like 3 goals in last 10 minutes, You can only get a draw like that and had Pablo scored in 1st half it might well have been that.
Also Alba is damn quick he matched Alves on full sprints, i was amazed.
Tiredness is definitely my biggest worry this season, Xavi has played like 200+ games in last 4 seasons.
Small squad not that much, Barca under Pep has always had small squad.
(forgive me, I didn’t watch the game)
So was Benega’s high position focused more on pressing Busquets than supporting Soldado (à la Park Ji-Sung on Pirlo blah blah)? Or is Benega just a more advanced playmaker these days?
CAME TO THIS SITE THROUGH ESPNSTAR.COM THEY MENTIONED ABOUT THIS SITE IN ONE OF THEIR ARTICLE..THANKX FOR THE PROVIDING US WITH USEFUL INFORMATION
Was there any reason given as to why Mata was dropped for this game; was he injured or something..??
he could have caused havoc down the flanks for Valencia, maybe he could have been the difference for Valencia to take something out of this game…
Arcand buy xanax online, loiter, generic levitra, advanced, cheap tramadol, bums, ULTRAM, 18th, SOMA, frisky, Agruareos