Northern Ireland 0-0 Italy: Pirlo a class above, but poor finishing from both sides

The starting line-ups
Both sides had chances to win the game, but Northern Ireland emerge with a well-earned point.
Northern Ireland made one change from their previous qualification game, bringing in Jonny Evans at left-back in place of Craig Cathcart. They played a 4-4-2 shape that often looked like 4-4-1-1 when Warren Feeney dropped deep into midfield when Northern Ireland lost the ball.
Italy played an unusual 4-4-2 / 4-3-3 shape that had Antonio Cassano as a wide attacker (a role he plays well at Sampdoria), Simone Pepe as a more orthodox winger (although he too cut inside) and Stefano Mauri shuttling in a left-sided midfield role.
There was a clear contrast between the approach of the two sides. Italy were playing short passes through the midfield area, where they had a nominal 3 v 2 advantage, with Andrea Pirlo being the best player on the pitch by a long way, and orchestrating the game from the centre of the pitch. Northern Ireland’s approach was more basic, hitting long, direct balls towards the forward two, and in particular towards Chris Brunt on the right-hand side.
Feeney drops in
Northern Ireland’s strategy for dealing with Italy’s extra midfield was to drop Feeney back to help out, often picking up Pirlo, since Northern Ireland’s other two midfielders were playing very deep. This worked reasonably well but Feeney’s determination to chase across the pitch often left Pirlo free – it may have worked better had he near-man-marked Pirlo. The knock-on effect was that Giorgio Chiellini was happy to step forward and start hitting accurate passes with his left foot.
The other impact of Italy’s 3 v 2 in the midfield was that Northern Ireland’s wide players tended to be sucked into the midfield battle, leaving Italy’s full-backs free to get forward, and Italy switched play between the two flanks. Both Domenico Criscito and Mattia Cassani got forward well, with Criscito firing a cross-shot across the six-yard box. In contrast, Northern Ireland’s full-backs stayed at home – pegged back by Cassano and Pepe. In any case, Evans and Gareth McAuley are both centre-backs naturally, and this was evident as Northern Ireland defended across the width of the penalty area. Italy didn’tstretch them enough, with Pepe coming inside rather than holding width and getting down the line.
Northern Ireland crosses
Italy did have problems with Northern Ireland at the other end – Emiliano Viviano didn’t look confident in goal, especially from crosses. Indeed, Brunt’s excellent ball into the box for David Healy was the game’s best chance – Healy somehow contrived to miss a simple header from within the six-yard box, right infront of the goal.
There also seemed to be the possibility of getting in behind Italy – Chiellini’s tendency to stick very closely to his man means a striker making a run away from goal can often open up his defence, but with Feeney dropping deep and Northern Ireland’s direct play meaning midfield runners found it difficult to get forward, there was little chance of this happening. Brunt was the best outlet for the home side, cutting onto his stronger left foot and whipping balls in.
Italy then started to threaten by simple balls played over the top, with Borriello getting to these lofted passes by using strength rather than pace, and Northern Ireland’s defensive line was surprisingly high considering they were playing so narrow, as narrowness is often combined with deeper defensive positioning to good effect.
Second half
Indeed, Northern Ireland did drop deeper in the second period, which prevented balls over the top being an obvious approach, but opened up the midfield zone for Pirlo to dominate even more. The game was more stretched and there were more goalscoring chances and promising situations for both teams.
Still, the game overall kept the same pattern, with Italy dominating the ball but Northern Ireland still threatening. Despite plenty of substitutions in attacking areas for both teams, the formations stayed the same, though Italy looked much more threatening with Claudio Marchisio, Giuseppe Rossi and Giampaolo Pazzini on in place of Mauri, Pepe and Borriello. Ireland also improved with the introduction of Kyle Lafferty, who did an excellent job of holding the ball up and letting midfield runners join him.
It essentially came down to who could put their chances away – and the answer was no-one. Healy’s header remained the game’s best chance but Pepe, Pazzini, Boriello and Davis all should have produced at least one goal between them.
Conclusion
Lafferty and Nigel Worthington both punched the air at full-time – not often you see that the end of a 0-0 at home – but that showed what a good result this was for Northern Ireland, especially considering the opening day 1-0 win over World Cup finalists Slovenia.
Their general outlook was cautious and playing for a point was the idea from the outset, but that’s not to say they didn’t push men forward and attempt to find a goal themselves – Healy’s miss was quite incredible, and it came from Brunt, who provided some great crosses from the right.
Northern Ireland coped very well with Italy’s front three (or four) by getting two banks of four behind the ball, and defending very narrow which made through balls very tricky for Italy. They slightly left themselves exposed to the threat of full-backs but generally adjusted well, and the one criticism would be that Pirlo was given too much time on the ball, although he is a player that is very, very difficult to stop when he’s on form.
Italian fans will regard this as disappointing result but the performance was not bad – the forward players simply failed to perform, and a change of personnel ahead of the game against Serbia on Tuesday might be on the cards.
Northern Ireland 0-0 Italy: Pirlo a class above, but poor finishing from both sides


Just discovered this website and really enjoy reading the tactical analysis of matches. Having watched the game last night, I was surprised at how much room Pirlo was given. Worthington seemed to have given Feeney the job of picking up Pirlo when Italy were in possession. However, asking a League One centre forward to track a player who in my opinion is the best deep-lying playmaker in world football was perhaps asking a bit much.
Pirlo dominated the game and Italy had enough half-chances to have won the match comfortably. Their failings in my opinion stem from a lack of quality rather than any tactical failings. Cassano has technical ability but a lack of athleticism and pace (a common trait throughout the whole Italian side) means that he falls short of being a truly world class player. The likes of Boriello and Pepe are not international class (Pepe in particular is an extremely ordinary player who is barely good enough for Serie A let alone international football.)
Apart from a raw Balotelli, I do not see any young talent coming through and I think Italy are destined for a period of time in the international wilderness.
Pepe looked good at the world cup, showed some really nice touches and looked like an old-fashioned right winger, which Italy aren’t known for producing. Why do you think he’s not good enough? I’ve only seen him a bit, would be interested to know why you don’t rate him, I was hoping he’d be a good player.
FootballFarrago
Great analysis. Any chance we’ll get a Japan/Argentina breakdown? The new Japan coach seems to have completely changed their style.
Yeah a look at Japan would be great. Isn’t there a South Korea/Japan friendly on Tuesday?
I’d tend to disagree; Japan’s game is still based on defending deep and denying space between the lines and hitting quick counter-attacks. There is not much difference from their World Cup style. It was a very good display nevertheless.
The players who impress me most are Hasebe, the full-backs Uchida and Nagatomo, and Okazaki. Hasebe isn’t flashy but he does his job very well, denying space between the lines that Messi and Tevez like to work in. Okazaki’s tireless running (usually on the right side) helps alleviate the problem that is Kagawa and Honda’s lack of tracking back.
True true, but I would argue bringing in another playmaker (Kagawa) and putting him next to Honda behind a proper striker (morimoto) has changed their look to a certain degree. Honda and Kagawa are such interesting talents, playing them at their proper positions changes the way Japan executes its offense. Okazaki’s workrate provides balance, as you say, but I still think it would be worth a look by ZM. The South Korea/Japan game might be a good opportunity.
@Kevin. Looks like it. In particular Pirlo will leave a big gap behind once he retires. Pazzini might be a good option for the Serbia match, I was very impressed during our matches against Sampdoria.
I thought Italy played well; I liked our shape, made us quite flexible between 4-4-2 and 4-3-3. Credit to Prandelli for recognising Mauri deserved a place in the team – he looked quite good, and is one of very few Italian players comfortable on the left of midfield.
Up front, we looked poor though – Borriello was disappointing, and Cassano is just too slow for international football, although he had an ok game.
The less said about Pepe the better… I understand we have no wingers in Italy, but surely there must be someone better? Hopefully, now that he’s playing in Serie A and developing well, Prandelli will start calling up Schelotto? He’s very young, but surely he can’t do worse than Pepe.
why did you pick this game to review with much more interesting clashes on the same night such as
germany vs turkey
republic of ireland vs russia
portugal vs denmark
Because it was a notably good result for Northern Ireland, Italy played an interesting hybrid system, and most importantly this is the game he watched?
asdf why do you assume that Zonal Marking is “he” and not a “she” ?
Because if you ever listened to guardian football weekly,you would have definitely known ZM is a he,he’s guested on the podcast
Or “it”?
WeaponofChoice im not from UK so i can’t watch guardian football weekly.
YAWN
Also, there is a ROI v Russia report…
ZM — it would be easy to just ignore this game & write it off as a boring 0-0. But you didn’t, so thank you.
Let’s not underestimate how difficult it is to get three points at Windsor Park. A few big boys have been punched in the nose there recently, and I don’t see any other team in the group getting more than a point there, if that.
Having said that, Italy could’ve done with a bit more urgency in their play. Maybe Prandelli was satisfied with a draw, because they seemed to play as if they were up 1-0. Despite the difficulty of playing at NI, their defenders, apart from Evans, who was playing out of position, are average at best.
With two center backs playing at fullback, they really were there for the taking. Perhaps Prandelli isn’t convinced his defense is up to the task yet, as they could’ve committed an extra man to attack, betting that the NI counterattack could be contained.
So I’m surprised/disappointed Italy didn’t create more chances. The other teams in the group aren’t exactly going to open up for them so, unless they learn how to unlock these defenses, they’re gonna have problems. Maybe Balotelli is the missing ingredient.
There is nothing average about Aaron Hughes, he’s been criminally underrated for years. He is every bit as important to Fulham as Hangeland.
I don’t think either of them are great players, which is why they haven’t been bought by a better team. They play in a team who defend well, as a team, which includes wingers who track back to help their very average full backs. Sometimes it’s not about the individuals. I still think one on one against a quality player Hughes is not amazing. But yes, he is underrated, like many players who play for ’small’ teams (even though these teams finish in comfortable mid-table positions).
Well played for picking this game, having watched both this game and the Germany v Turkey (re-run) this was the most interesting tactically for sure.
As a Norwich fan, I follow Worthington’s NI side. At Norwich Worthington made us very difficult to beat at home, but on the road we were to open especially in the Premiership which cost us our place there.
It seems that Worthington is continuing Northern Ireland’s very good form at home this is mainly due to a very well organised side defensively. There were many moments in the game where Cassano had the ball in the box but just couldn’t pick the right pass as he was closed down by the NI defence. Defenders can be average individually but as we have seen many times (Greece – Euro 2004 the best example) collectively in a well organised system, defenders can win you games at any level.
Anyway nice review, don’t disagree with much said.
Good stuff as usual ZM. Interesting tactical match last Friday between Czech Republic and Scotland. Czechs played a narrow 4-4-2 with width being supplied by the full backs. Scotland played a 4-2-4-0 system with the two wide players in the 4, both of whom are usually strikers at club level, tracking the Czech full backs. In the second half the Czech centre backs split a little, the holding midfielder dropped back further to make almost a 3 and the two full backs played even higher up the pitch. Once they went behind Scotland made substitutions and went to a 4-4-2.
Craig Levein, the Scotland manager, is being heavily criticised for the system employed. Before the match, the media expressed disbelief at the system to be used, now fans are after his head for playing a strikerless formation.
Interesting analysis but marks off for using the ‘two banks of four’ cliche! Aside from the tactics which seemed to do a job I felt we (NI) should have had several penalties in the match for blatant handballs.
Tactically I’m not sure Worthington’s reliance on wing play serves us best – under Sanchez we were much more direct playing the early ball to the front two and although under the cosh for large periods it seemed to get better results. We made a lot of crosses into their box last night that were easy for the Italians to deal with. And besides, if crossing is to be our game why not have Lafferty with his height difference on from the start?
What are your thoughts on Criscito? I’ve heard he’s the next big thing as far as Italian defenders go, although I am basing this largely on how good he gets on a certain football management game…
Jude Ellery
Editor, FootballFarrago
Are you going to trudge through Scotland’s 0-0 draw away to the Czech Republic? Despite the abysmalness of the game, Craig Levein’s suicidal 4-6-0 is probably the tactical talking point of the weekend.
Suicidial? It almost worked didn’t it?? Suicidal would have been playing 4-4-2. Too much emphasis is put on formations, or to put it a better way, what the pundits label formations as. Chelsea play 4-3-3, while Blackburn play 4-5-1. In reality, they play the same formation. But because Chelsea have more possession we see them in an attacking sense more, and they are given the credit for playing an ‘attacking’ formation.
Are you one that thinks Holland’s tactics in the WC final were ’suicidal’ too then? Should they have played a nice, open, possession-based 4-3-3?
Did you watch the game?
This phrase is simply matchless
, it is pleasant to me)))
Greetings from the Speedy DNS
It’s a podcast, and available worldwide.