Roma 1-0 Inter: Roma win it from the bench

The starting line-ups
Substitute Mirko Vucinic scored a superb last minute header to record a crucial win for Roma.
Claudio Ranieri lined up with a 4-4-2 / 4-2-3-1 formation that saw Francesco Totti playing off Marco Borriello. Simone Perrotta was naturally more defensive on the left than Jeremy Menez was on the right.
Rafael Benitez played the usual 4-2-3-1 system. Their side was also slightly lopsided, as Goran Pandev was both deeper and more central than Samuel Eto’o. Dejan Stankovic played as a deep-lying regista.
The game was, for the most part, extremely frustrating to watch. Neither side were able to manufacture clear-cut chances – both defences sat relatively deep, meaning there was often a huge amount of space in the midfield but little space in behind, and neither side attacked with more than three or four players at once.
The two main threats from full-back, Maicon and John Arne Riise, were well marshalled by Simone Perrotta and Pandev respectively – whilst the midfield area was relatively static. David Pizarro and Dejan Stankovic acted as the two playmakers – Stankovic in particular had a good game – but both were unable to play the killer pass, partially as the two defences sat so deep and therefore deep midfield positions were difficult to create from.
Lack of goalmouth action
Roma’s forwards started by getting goalside of Stankovic and Esteban Cambiasso when they were without the ball, meaning Inter found it difficult to keep possession in the centre of midfield. This was an improvement on Roma’s defensive performance from the front compared to the Bayern Munich game – where Roma allowed Mark van Bommel and Bastian Schweinsteiger too much time on the ball.
With plenty of room in the midfield, long shots became a preferred route of attack for Inter. Wesley Sneijder had five shots, Stankovic had ten – one of which was the closest we got to a goal in the first half, when his long-range drive hit the crossbar.
Second half
Into the second half, the defences were still on top. Essentially, both sides were attacking with four players and defending with six, meaning the defensive sides generally had two spare men when defending. There was an element of a ‘broken team’ about both sides (this can often be a problem with 4-2-3-1s) – none of the four full-backs had any impact on the game in an attacking sense, and none of the four deep-lying midfielders were attempting to make driving runs towards goal.

The run Vucinic made to score his header was remarkable - as Daniele de Rossi gets the ball, Vucinic (pink) is practically level with him on the opposite wing, but beats three Inter plays (red) to De Rossi's excellent ball (blue) played in behind Chivu
Eventually the game opened out slightly, more players became dragged out of position, the tempo was higher – and the two paciest attacking players on the pitch became the key man. Inter’s was Eto’o, who picked up the ball and drove towards goal powerfully, and he had two good chances when he moved upfront after Diego Milito’s departure. Roma looked to Jeremy Menez, who also started wide and ran with the ball, though he rarely provided an end product.
Vucinic winner
It seemed like the only chance of getting a breakthrough would come from the substitute’s bench, and here Roma had the stronger attacking options. Inter turned to the youngster Coutinho and Sulley Muntari, but Roma were able to call on two experienced forwards, Julio Baptista and Vucinic.
Vucinic went onto win the game with an excellent header. In the space of a few seconds he showed tremendous centre-forward play in three different ways – by having the intelligence to make a run across the defenders towards the near post, the bravery to put his head in against Lucio’s raised foot, and the technical quality to angle his header across Julio Cesar and into the far post. It was a very rare moment of attacking quality in an otherwise underwhelming game.
Conclusion
A tight, cagey game but not an overwhelmingly ‘tactical’ one – both sides set up as expected, the battles across the pitch were all won by the defensive parties, and neither side looked to change their shape – with the arguable exception of Vucinic starting from the left and making runs inside.
Inter were disappointing – they seem to rely on individuals more than last year, when they were a tighter unit and more cohesive. The role of Sneijder is strange at the moment – last year he was excellent as a playmaker, but this year he seems to be in the side almost purely to shoot at goal, rather than to create (similar to his role for Holland at the World Cup). His World Cup performance has exaggerated his goalscoring ability, however – last season he only netted once from open play.
Roma 1-0 Inter: Roma win it from the bench




To put it simply, Inter will be nothing without Mourinho.
About Inter: Benitez has said that he wants his Inter to be more attacking than Mourinho’s: possibly just PR-talk.
Etoo’s position renders this more of a 4-2-2-2; moreso than Pandev he is truly playing as an outside-forward, albeit on his weaker left foot a la Robinho under Dunga’s Brazil.
I wouldn’t exactly call Stankovic a regista, even when playing deep; his game was always more box-to-box.
ZM, from reading your articles, I get the impression that you think Sneijder is a little over-rated. Is this just me, or do you genuinely believe he is not as good as the likes of Xavi, Iniesta, Fabregas etc?
I’m more certain ZM doesn’t like Benitez very much.
I didn’t think he did a good job at Liverpool (although can’t be bothered with that discussion again, if you don’t mind) but was a fan at Valencia – http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/01/29/teams-of-the-decade-11-valencia-2001-04/
Not really a case of ‘liking’ or ‘not liking’ him to be honest (same goes with Sneijder) – just saying what happens. Sneijder didn’t have a good game, Benitez didn’t really change anything (although I sympathise with him as he doesn’t have a great squad, especially going forward, considering Inter are Euro Champions)
No, I’m a huge fan. See comments on him in here – http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/16/chelsea-0-1-inter-the-classic-smash-and-grab-0-1-from-mourinho/ or the fact that I put him in my Euro XI of the season for last season.
His World Cup brilliance was overstated, I thought, and the two games I’ve covered Inter on ZM so far this season, he’s insisted on shooting from absolutely anywhere, rather than playing predominantly as a playmaker, as he did so well last season.
Fair enough, to be honest I formed that opinion mainly on reading your WC reports, so that explains that.
I’d personally prefer Iniesta in my team over him, but thats just me haha
Actually, Sneijder scored three goals from open play (albeit two in the CL).
Going on league stats, innit.
Thats not opinion, thats fact. Sneijder is not, and never will be, in the same league as Xavi
Unfair comparison to start with; Sneijder’s ‘natural habitat’ begins a few metres ahead of Xavi’s anyway.
ZM, just wondering what your thoughts are on Totti, both in this match and in general. Is it just me or are his performances decreasing to a point where Raineri should consider benching him? As a super sub I think he’d be much more effective.
I reluctantly agree. He at least needs to be dropped for a little while, his performances against Bayern and Inter were terrible. He just walks around looking distinterested, then tries a fancy flick that comes to nothing. I’m even more reluctant to write him off completely but Vucinic not starting is a bad situation.
I also was very unimpressed with Totti. The backheel in traffic when he should have held the ball up or laid it back was simply ghastly. I’d be curious on his passing stats for the game, my impression was that he had to be around 20% with all the errant balls forward he was putting out, especially towards Menez.
It seemed in long stretches of the game that Roma really weren’t looking for goal at all. Their subs really changed the dynamic (The Beast shooting on first touch) from the way the starters really danced around trying to get something perfect. They will need that kind of spirit out of their forwards in the future, so it was good to see it coming off the bench.
I was shocked- he had at least 2 backheels that were totally misplaced. Those used to be his specialty but he’s really not been in good form as of late.
TBH wasn’t sure what to call it. Your description is equally valid, looking at the diagram, especially if you place Menez where his arrow ends up.
I really do love a good diving header.
Me too. A dying art.
A few questions.
1. Do you think (as I do) Perotta and Pandev’s roles as #defensive attackers’ was pre-determined rather than something that occurred in the flow of the game.
2. Shouldn’t the space in midfield created by the deep lines of both defences mean the deep lying playmaker becomes more apparent? This is why I thought Stankovic actually was quite average given the amount of time he had Sneijder’s space was compressed so couldn’t link as effectively. However, I completely agree re Sneijder’s shooting, he also shot a lot unsuccessfully last year but throught the WC it seems to have become an obseession and most of his WC goals were lucky (either deflections of Goalkeeing mistakes).
3. On Sneijder’s role do you think it would help to go for more of a traditional 4-3-3. Thus pushing Eto’o and Pandev further u the field whilst droping Sneijder deeper and allowing him to dictate more. So far this season I feel teams have targeted Sneijder as the danger man and tried to isolate him (Roma game a perfect examle). Dropping him deeper would make him harder to nullify and allow Stankovic or Cambiasso to make more runs from deep.
Good stuff as always though!
Sneijder sometimes played deeper – almost as a central midfielder in a 4-3-3 for Ajax, whereas Van der Vaart, if I’m not mistake, was always the one who was afforded the 3/4 role.
I have to ask even though it’s unrelated, how do you rate Marcelo? I think he’s grown so much in the last year, he’s like a new player. He makes very few errors nowadays, his offensive game is tremendous as always (he might be the best attacking left-back in the world in my opinion, yes, better than ineffective Alves). This season he’s played better than Ramos in every single game. I think he’s one of the five best left-backs in the world at the moment. Just wondering, what do you think?
Quite a big fan actually. Interested to see how he does this season – but must admit have only seen one Real game s ofar.
Sneijder’s positional discipline was so good under Mourinho.
Perhaps it is a case of losing that discipline, starting to fancy himself too much as a goal threat (he seems to have a rather fat ego) and carrying on where he left off for the Netherlands during the world cup.
I thought he was fairly average and unrecognisable for the Dutch during the world cup but he wasn’t criticised because he has undoubted class and scored those goals. In some of the early games I actually thought he came either too deep (right next to De Jong and van Bommel) because the two holding players have so little creative talent, or too high up the pitch, for us to see him at his best.
It was a strange world cup and I was left thinking he was a bit of a **** after he tried that shot from the kick-off in the final. As for that thing with van Persie he is just pathetic. Van Persie actually laid the ball off to him a few times for shots, but Sneijder never seemed to look for the other player in reverse. I thought Sneijder was magnificent on the transition to start the counter-attacks for Inter but was left thinking he wasn’t quite as good as he thinks he is after the world cup.
I love the work that you have put into this blog but I am a little bit saddened that you didnt highlight Chivu’s outburst at Rafa because he wasnt getting enough protection from Cambiasso and Eto’o (primarly).
I must admit I only found out about this today. Saw Chivu having a go but didn’t have a clue what he was saying.
Fair criticism, but let’s be careful before assigning Totti a place on the bench He’s having a poor start to this season, but he scored 25 karl season (w/6 assists) and he can’t have lost it in 5 months. Regardless,Vuc has to start, and I really like Boriello for the extra dimension he brings to their attack.He’ll take some of the physical pressure off the other attacker, and the man can score a different kind of goal, something Roma haven’t had for many years. Having a lot of different options can only help Roma.
So, are Roma now a better team without their talisman, Totti, on the pitch? he is certainly looking a pit more podgy and a lot less mobile than in previous years.
Pudgy or not, he’s been injured about 50% the last
few seasons. Not sure he can play a regular schedule
whether he wants to or not…
Menez rarely provides the end product like Alexis Sanchez and its his biggest weakness,but this time he was simply the MOTM,Chivu had a nightmare against him and Rafa’s comments after the game proved that his dominance on the right was the main reason why he removed Milito and brought Muntari to help Chivu. After that Inter had more possession but without a target man(even though Milito was terrible) their attacks were less dangerous and Roma had even more men at the back,so stubborn Ranieri finally decided to make some changes and his substitution won the game
@ZM: could you elaborate more on ‘broken team’ formation of a 4-2-3-1 system. Inter were quite goood with the same system last year so where has it gone wrong