Werder Bremen 2-2 Tottenham: Schaaf’s early tactical shift rescues a point for Bremen

The starting line-ups
A frantic game that Spurs looked set to win at a canter, only to be pegged back in the second half.
Harry Redknapp went with a fairly basic 4-2-3-1 shape, with Rafael van der Vaart in behind Peter Crouch. Jermaine Jenas was a surprise starter in the centre of midfield alongside Tom Huddlestone, whilst the rest of the side was as expected.
Werder Bremen played a lopsided shape at the start; Aaron Hunt was left out, so Marko Arnautovic drifted to the left, and Marko Marin was given the freedom to roam across the pitch.
The home side looked extremely disjointed early on – both Arnautovic and Hugo Almedia looked to work the left-hand side, but there were few driving runs from the three central midfielders, whilst Marin found it difficult to find space despite having the freedom to drift where he liked. Often Bremen had no attacking players in their right-hand half of the pitch – Clemens Fritz was presumably supposed to make an overlapping run, but he was reluctant to venture forward as he was concerned with Bale’s driving runs.
Spurs start well, Bremen disjointed
Spurs were also helping to disrupt Bremen’s game – they pushed high up the pitch when Tim Wiese had the ball, preventing him playing out to his defenders, and he instead had to hit the ball long towards Almeida – Bremen weren’t able to settle.
Bremen’s shape was clearly intended to be flexible at the top end of the pitch, but unfortunately for them, their formation was too fluid in the centre of midfield as well. Torsten Frings wasn’t disciplined enough and let van der Vaart control the game. The Dutchman found plenty of room in the hole and always seemed to be in space – happy to go past Crouch to get on the end of his flick-ons, but equally likely to be found deep in midfield, helping Tottenham keep the ball, and play at a slower, more sophisticated pace than they often play in the Premier League.
Pillip Bargfrede’s role was slightly confusing – he was neither supporting Frings in the centre of midfield, nor helping combat Bale after his 2nd minute trip on the Welshman. As in the second leg against Sampdoria, Bremen’s central midfield didn’t seem solid enough, and they invited Tottenham onto them in the opening half hour.
Left-wing crosses
Bale enjoyed his freedom on the left, with no opposition right-winger to help Benoit Assou-Ekotto with, and equally this meant that Fritz had no support when Bale attacked him directly. It was no surprise when the opening goal came from a simple ball over the top into Bale’s path – Fritz got too tight, Bale’s cross acros the six-yard box was excellent, and Petri Pasanen put into his own net. It was also notable that van der Vaart had made completely untracked run into the area, ready for the pull-back.
Not long after, another cross from the left found Crouch, and Spurs were 2-0 up without having to do anything spectacular. The period between the second goal and Bremen’s tactical shift was when Spurs were most impressive – they worked the ball across their defence and into midfield intelligently, looking to retain possession in non-threatening areas. Bremen’s lopsided shape meant they found it difficult to press Spurs – they were closing down in ones and twos – and Spurs were able to pass around them easily.
Tactical shift

Bremen's 37th minute switch to a 4-2-3-1 shape, with the three attacking players behind Almeida rotating
Bargfrede was the obvious candidate to be withdrawn when Thomas Schaaf made a tactical switch before half-time, and Aaron Hunt was the equally inevitable replacement. Despite removing a defensive midfielder and bringong on a creative player, Bremen were actually more solid defensively. The Brazilian Wesley dropped in alongside Fritz to give a stronger base to the midfield, with Frings moving slightly more naturally onto van der Vaart, whilst Wesley suddenly became the game’s central player, dictating play and distributing the ball methodically into wide positions.
Meanwhile, the fact Bremen were effectively now ‘matching’ Tottenham’s 4-2-3-1 meant they found it easier to press and close down – wingers on full-backs, and the central two attacking players on the centre-backs. They won the ball back higher up the pitch, Tottenham found it difficult to adapt to the sudden situation, and quickly Bremen gained the upper hand. Nothing could outline Spurs’ sudden panic in possession more than Assou-Ekotto’s ludicrous clearance to concede a silly throw-in on the opposite side of the pitch. From that, Wesley’s lofted cross was converted by Hugo Almeida.
Second half
There were no changes at half-time – Schaaf was clearly happy with Bremen’s improvement after Hunt’s introduction. It seemed inevitable that the same systems in the second half would result in the home side dominating, so it was slightly surprising Redknapp didn’t change his formation slightly – perhaps by bringing on a natural ball-winner like Wilson Palacios. In fact, the most obvious change came from Bremen, who defended much deeper – an effective tactic to deny Bale space in behind Fritz, and he was less of a threat in the second period.
Bremen’s three attacking players supporting Almeida were happy to interchange, with the dangerman Marin popping up on both flanks as well as in the centre of the pitch – and it was from the centre that he scored an excellent goal to make it 2-2, although it was terrible defending from Spurs, backing off as he lined up a shot.
There were further chances in the game – Almeida had a good opportunity from a long ball forward, Crouch wasted a one-on-one, and Bale delivered a superb low cross that was begging to be converted. But whilst woth managers are famed for their attack-minded approach, both seemed fairly content to take a draw – the introduction of holding players like Tim Borowski and Palacios showed that. In the end, 2-2 was a fair result for a good game, and an excellent tactical battle.
Conclusion
In many ways this was a reverse of Spurs’ trip to Young Boys last month, and whilst Redknapp will be disappointed to have conceded a two-goal advantage, both the result and performance were good. A point away from home in the Champions League should be regarded as a positive, but more promising is the fact that Spurs kept possession well and were able to control the tempo of the game – at least until Bremen made their switch. The addition of van der Vaart looks like a superb transfer.
Whilst Redknapp’s lack of a ball-winner could be identified as a reason for the collapse, equally it stemmed from basic defensive errors. The first goal was a calamity – Assou-Ekotto’s ludicrous clearance resulting in a throw-in and Jenas standing off Wesley’s cross – not to mention poor marking. Marin’s goal also could have been prevented – the Spurs defence backed off and let him get a shot in.
But credit should go to Schaaf for his early substitution – removing a defensive player for an attacking player in order to press higher and win the ball early worked extremely well.
Werder Bremen 2-2 Tottenham: Schaaf’s early tactical shift rescues a point for Bremen





Thomas Schaaf is a great manager and a fantastic tactitian in my eyes. He reads the game very well. However I always feel that he puts the team at a disadvantage at the start of games then makes the change to put Werder back in it (the 2nd leg against Sampidoria comes to mind).
the second leg against Sampdoria was difficult because the Italians pushed from the start and were totaly tired after an hour. But you are right Schaaf has problems to analyse the opponent and choose the right starting formation.
He has problems analysing before the game but during the game almost every substitution I’ve seen him make has somehow improved his side.
I see him more as a reactive manager than a proactive one.
Also it must be said that he was playing an understrength back line.
I knew that with the backline. Don’t think he is a reactive manager. Bremen is always an attacking team, but Schaaf is awful in doing his homework.
They played great against Bayern on Saturday, they have no problem to switch between a midfield diamond (what they play for more then 10 years now) and a 4-2-3-1 (and this season a 4-3-3). Their problems have nothing to do with the system or the players (they played great and awful games with their best squad).
Bremen has problems to perform every game on the same level (for years), and Allofs and Schaaf have no idea why (elsewise they would have changed it).
They have a great team but one day Borowski is underperforming, the next day Frings or Bargfrede…
it’s always a fight, a struggle .. never easy. maybe they lose 0:3, maybe they destroy the opponent, or they play this entertaining 4:4 games in Europe. For Schaaf it must be pure horror.
Thomas Schaaf seems to be the opposite of Joachim Löw – good reader, not quite-so-good “preparator”.
And he seems very similiar to Bob Bradley- Always gets his starting tactics wrong, but fixes everything at half-time.
One surprise was that Werder played somthing like a diamond without Hunt in the starting line-up. Marin is not a good No. 10, but he played well in the last games and Schaaf would have made a better choise playing 4-2-3-1 from the start and not a 4-4-2 / 4-3-3 mixture. especially when it comes to width and defence.
I personally thought that the decision to leave Hunt out of the starting line up was an awful one. He was heavily missed at Sampdoria and they tend to be a much better side when he plays.
Fair play to Schaaf for recognizing the mistake and correcting it early enough though
Wasn’t Marin playing on the left and Arnautovic on the right?
Marin was given a free role so he drifted from left to right. He probably found more joy on Corluka’s side so I’m surprised why he didn’t just stick there.
Yes, after they changed to 4-2-3-1 that’s how they played. Even before Hunt came on Marin was drifting towards the left side while Arnautovic played something between a right winger and a second striker. It’s quite clear if you look at the heat maps at uefa.com.
I don’t understand why Schaaf keeps on trying to employ Marin as a playmaker in his diamond formation. He’s not tactically disciplined enough and his movement off the ball is way worse than Hunt’s. Marin is so much stronger playing on the left (or right) wing and he only started making an impact on the game after the switch.
I’m still wondering if the diamond formation would have worked with Hunt playing instead of Marin, but it seems it would have been better to start the game 4-2-3-1, bringing on a second striker later in the match if they needed to.
Hi ZM, amazing article, really good read as usual.
I tweeted you this, so apologies if you read it twice, I’m just really interested to hear your views on the subject.
What are your thoughts on the decision to bring on Robbie Keane for the injured van der Vaart, rather than an attacking midfielder like Kranjcar? It meant Spurs reverted to 4-4-2, rather than stick with the successful 4-2-3-1 that they’d played previously, especially as 4-4-2 is very susceptible to 4-2-3-1?
Think I replied on twitter (sorry for delay) but Keane was effectively level with Lenno nand bale without the ball, wasn’t he? So still 4-2-3-1 really, despite him bein a striker usually.
@ZM question:
If we look at the first round (or 50%) of the ChampionsLeague and compare it with the World Cup (and this defensive football). can we give Blatter any advice concerning his ‘plans’ about banishng the draw etc. at the World Cup?
was this world cup just an exception in terms of low scoring games at the start or are ’smaller teams’ like Werder, Twente the exception in the Champions League and we will see more defensive football from minor sides?
I don’t know about Twente, but Bremen usually plays offensive. Maybe it has to do with the fact that they have a crappy defense, so that they always score more goals than their opponents.
tend to disagree on the crappy defense part. or at least in a general sense.
in my opinion the combination mertesacker/naldo is the best one in the bundesliga. the current replacements, proedl/pasanen have also shown to be reasonably good (for instance they won 93% and 90% of their tackles in the bundesliga game against Bayern Munich, respectively)
it seems to be more a problem of lacking good fullbacks (Fritz having superb games sometimes, but just not constant enough; on the left side lacking a good fullback for several years now, maybe Silvestre will be able to close that gap) and defensive midfielders (frings having had his best season a couple of years ago)
Having watched and enjoyed very much the Twente – Inter game last night, I can say that Twente are not a defensive side, at least not in the ‘parking the bus’ sense. Twente played(tried)a sophisticated possession game and only fielded five defensive minded players.
Is there any defensive minded team in the Netherlands?
what I wanted to ask was: Are Bremen and Twente “normal” Champions League Teams? if they are, why the teams in the world cup try to “park the bus” and the smaller club teams in europe have a different style?
Is it just because clubs play every week and know what they can and teams like Switzerland or Portugal don’t know where they stand?
Maybe it is also related to player material? Clubs can try to change philosophy in the off season each year. A national team coach could theoretically do this any game, but practically this sounds like a sure way to get fired. Sounds a lot harder to adjust your tactics when you cannot practice with your team much.
I cannot back this up with any stats, but I doubt teams that switch coaches a few weeks before a tournament will go very far with their new coach if he makes a major tactic/formation change.
As far as Switzerland and Portugal are concerned at least to some degree I think both countries lack a deep pool of ace strikers.
Also, Werder a ’smaller’ team? They may not be CL winners yet, but come on ;=)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~kassiesa/bert/uefa/data/method4/trank2011.html
Of course Werder is not a small team. but at the world cup we have seen a lot of 1:0 games and this first CL day? 2x 2:2, and Arsenal or Barca? is it coz the big european teams (Barca etc.) are so much better than the smaller teams (Tottenham is a top 4-6 in England, Bremen is top 3 in Germany so they are medium)?
Ajax and Roma had nearly no chance against Real and Bayern and they are better than Switzerland or Japan.
Is the tactical difference so big between club football and a world cup?
I don’t think you can compare one national team tournament with club football in that way.
I’ve heard (read) i number of people claiming that the defensive oriented football at the WC is a prelude to the same philosophy at club level but this is not based on any fact, and i think you simply see this in the current CL-results.
There could be several reasons for the defensive minded football at the WC. First of all, the lack of training and cohesion and therefor lack of quality team play. Also, the fact that it’s just one month of seriously playing for a prize (or at least reaching a certain stage), instead of a drawn out season where it is more acceptable to lose a game (for instance, there are six games in the CL, but if you finish third you’ll still play European football).
But some WC-tournaments the results are more spectacular so maybe a number of the coaches at this WC just happen to suck, or happen to have a defensive mentality. Also things like heat, humidity, the height and other geographical reasons why the style of play is different as well as getting used to a ball that many have complained about.
Speaking as a Dutchman, i can state that the reason Holland was so “dry” and boring at the WC (relatively speaking) is simply because we have a “dry” and boring coach who puts results first and doesn’t care about entertainment, whereas the coaches at, let’s say FC Twente follow the club culture of playing forward thinking football usually with 4-3-3 and the central midfielder being a shadow striker or playmaker. It doesn’t matter if the coach is English (Steve McLaren) or Belgian (Michel Preud’Homme), it’s just how many Dutch clubs want to play football.
What i’m trying to say is: i think the WC – at least this year – tends/tended to attract result-oriented coaches more than the much more prolonged European Club football season.
Didn’t see the game but will have to watch the highlights now I’ve read this, seems interesting. Also intriguing is van der Vaart – where is he going to play when Modric is in the team too? Can they field the two in the same team, as well as attacking wingers Bale and Lennon? What about Kranjcar? I see him as a ‘good option’ kind of player, one who can be a good sub or stand in but not regular starter.
My first eleven (obviously these things are always hypothetical because they do not take into consideration players’ fitness, bans etc… but anyway!)
Gomes
Corluka, King, Dawson, Assou-Ekotto
Lennon, Huddlestone, Modric, Bale
van der Vaart
Defoe
I don’t know why people rave about Palacios, for me he is too rash, too intent on ’smashing’ people and has little tactical awareness. Rushes to close the ball down when he should hold his ground, and gets booked every time he plays. Huddlestone is a much more cultured, intelligent player who compliments the creative talents like Modric and VDV. Still, they probably would need a bit more bite in midfield away from home….
Any thoughts?
Jude Ellery
Editor, http://www.footballafarrago.com
What spurs ran when they had both Modders and VDV fit was
Cud
Corluka – Kaboul – Gallas – Bale
Hudd – Palacios
Lennon – VDV – Modric
Pavyluworthlessfuckingchenko
this way, bale gives width in attack (with palacios or hudd covering) while modric drifts inside… the key with palacios is that he hasn’t been in form for more than a year now… he used to seem much better at distributing, but it will be interesting to see how and when spurs employ sandro, who could provide steel but also passing..
Bale is a horrid left-back. He simply cant defend.
I would go for a team like this-
———-Gomes———-
Corluka-Kaboul-Gallas-BAE
———-Hudd———–
——Modric————-
Lennon——–VDV—-Bale
———Crouch———-
If Spurs need something more defensive, drop one of VDV or Modric and play Sandro or Palacios.
Horrid is really not the right word… Inexperienced is more like it. Fullbacks these days have tremendous attacking and defending responsibilities, and at 20, Bale still has a lot to learn about positioning and marking. But he’s not horrid at all… he’s a great tackler, and obviously has loads of pace. He could very well be a LB for much of his career, it remains to be seen.
Palacios has been really off his game for the last year since his brother was kidnapped and murdered in Honduras.
When VDV and Modric play together, Modric will be in the midfield 2 as usual and VDV the central attacking midfielder.
Something like:
Gomes
Corluka King/Gallas Kaboul BAE
Huddlestone Modric
Lennon VDV Bale
Crouch/Pav
Hej ZM, thank you once more. Ever thought about Flattr? I´d like to push the button for this article and others (on Werder – although I´m afraid you can´t be bought, at least not by micropayment).
Would love to see an analysis on the Madrid and Milan games
Tiffany jewelry
Tiffany
Tiffany and co
Tiffany Bracelets
tiffany co jewelry
Tiffany jewellery
Tiffany Necklaces
Tiffany Rings
Tiffany Watches
Tiffany jewelry
Tiffany jewelry
Spain Travel Guide
Spain Travel