Barcelona 0-2 Hercules: Valdez beats Valdes twice to give Hercules shock victory

The starting line-ups
Barcelona were defeated by a two-goal margin in La Liga for the first time under Pep Guardiola, at the hands of newly-promoted Hercules.
Guardiola’s side were without Carles Puyol through injury, whilst Sergio Busquets, Daniel Alves and Xavi Hernandez all started on the bench. Bojan was the central striker, whilst Javier Mascherano made his debut in the deep-lying midfield position.
Esteban Vigo introduced a new striking partnership of David Trezeguet and Nelson Valdez upfront, with the Paraguayan dropping off Trezeguet into a midfield role, where he tirelessly battled to help win the ball back. The midfield was a flattish diamond, with the outside players as shuttlers, and Abel Aguilar generally ahead of Matias Fritzler, who patrolled the zone in front of his defence.
The most immediate thing to notice about the match was the poor state of the pitch – dry as a whole, and cutting up in some parts. Barcelona can’t use this as an excuse for the defeat as a whole (and it is their pitch, in any case) but it did explain why their passing was so slow in the opening period.
Hercules diamond
Hercules’ midfield acted as a diamond when the ball was with one of the Barcelona full-backs. The carrilero on that side would shift across to close him down, Aguilar would occupy the central midfielder closest to the ball, Valdez would drop in and pick up Mascherano, whilst the carrilero on the opposite side would shut down the third central midfielder. This left Fritzler generally free ready to sweep up anything missed by the other midfielders, whilst retaining a spare man at the back.
It did, however, mean that one of Barcelona’s full-backs was always free, and the home side didn’t switch the ball from flank to flank quickly enough to exploit this weakness. Nevertheless, their most promising opportunities were coming when Maxwell and Adriano got forward into advanced positions – Bojan should have tapped home from a left-wing cross, whilst Adriano put in some decent crosses from the right.

This shows Hercules' near-diamond shape (in red). When a Barcelona player had the ball, the near carrilero (here, Drenthe) would come to meet him, whilst the one on the opposite side would come inside to pick up the relevant central midfielder. Aguilar would drop in on Iniesta as the play progressed, leaving Fritzler as a spare man ahead of the defence. One of the Hercules forwards (generally Valdez) would pick up Mascherano (in blue). So Hercules' midfield diamond was always outnumber Iniesta and Keita (in purple), but the full-back on the opposite side to play (here Maxwell, in green) was always free.
Barca below-par
The most surprising thing from Barcelona was how poor the movement was from the attacking players, and the side as a whole didn’t look right physically. Andres Iniesta struggled to stamp any kind of authority on the game from the centre of the pitch, since he was almost always marked by one of the opposing midfielders, in addition to Fritzler making sure to remain in the space ‘in the hole’ that Iniesta looks to work in. Messi dropped deep to get possession of the ball, but at one point was visibly frustrated with the lack of movement from his teammates.
This should have been a gentle introduction for Javier Mascherano, but he was booked after just twenty minutes for a cynical shirt pull to stop a Hercules counter-attack down the centre of the pitch. Seven minutes later he tripped Royston Drenthe in a similar situation, and was fortunate not to pick up a second yellow. Further punishment for the indiscretion did come, however, as the resulting free-kick created Valdez’s first goal.
Barcelona’s biggest goal threat towards the end of the first half came not from Messi, Villa or Bojan, but from Gerard Pique. The centre-back popped up in the area three times in a ten-minute spell and should have scored.

The second half line-ups
Second half
At half-time, Guardiola made two changes, withdrawing Mascherano and Bojan, and introducing Xavi and Pedro. They moved into their usual positions, with Seydou Keita dropping back into the holding role.
The formation didn’t change, however, and therefore Barcelona essentially had the same problems as in the first period. Xavi controlled the game more than Iniesta had in the first half, but he was still unable to find a killer pass through the defence, as Hercules dropped deeper with the midfield becoming something more like a flat four, and through balls generally trickled through to the goalkeeper.
To Hercules’ immense credit, however, they didn’t completely shut up shop. They continued to be a threat on the counter-attack, and the second goal arrived when the right-back David Cortes combined with the right-winger Tiago Gomes, and the eventual cross found Valdez, who swept the ball high into the net.
Valdez grabs a second
Vigo also used his substitutes very well – taking off the two carrileros, who got through an awful lot of running, as did Valdez, who also departed. As soon as Guardiola introduced Alves at right-back, Vigo immediately withdrew Drenthe, knowing he would need some fresh legs to deal with Alves for the final half hour. On the other side he introduced Kiko, whose pace caused Barcelona problems and forced Maxwell (who himself look very tired late on, as he did at the Emirates last season) into a more defensive role than he would have liked.
Barcelona created chances, of course, with Messi, Villa and Pedro all forcing saves out of Juan Calatayud – but the goalkeeper hardly needed to play a blinder, he just made some fairly routine stops from decent efforts.
Vigo later admitted he drew upon Jose Mourinho’s tactics at the Nou Camp in the Champions League semi-final last season, and just as in that game, Pique went upfront to become the focal point for attacks, picking up a nasty head wound in the process. But it was all in vain – Hercules’ defending was certainly last-ditch, but they held on for a deserved victory.
Conclusion
It is a worrying situation for Barcelona: in their first home game of the season, a manager openly admits to those Inter-inspired tactics, and walks away from the Nou Camp with all three points. If this really is a flaw in Barcelona’s system – that their combination of pace, movement and slick passing is futile against a side that defends extremely deep – then this will be a serious issue in their quest for a third successive title.

Hercules' back four is deep and extremely narrow (pink) meaning Villa was forced to play with his back to goal, far from at his best
In reality, things will rarely be as bad as this. On another day, Messi, Villa or Iniesta would have stepped up to produce a moment of genius, and Barcelona might have won at a canter. There won’t be too many days this season when all three of them are below-par.
But regardless of that, it’s impossible to predict anything other than tactics like this becoming commonplace at the Nou Camp this season, and Barcelona might well find themselves wishing they had someone with a more physical presence than their current forwards. Even if we ignore Ibrahimovic’s personality clash with Guardiola, the common criticism that he “didn’t fit into Barcelona’s system” last season entirely missed the point. Of course he didn’t – that was the point, he offered something different, an alternative approach. He’s far from a basic target man, but he did have a knack of scoring slightly scrappy goals from high balls into the box – take this header against Sporting Gijon, this crucial away goal in Stuttgart, or his volley against Real Madrid.
Even the best teams in the world need something approaching a ‘plan B’, and if Ibrahimovic was not the man to do that in Guardiola’s eyes, Barcelona surely should have tried to recruit someone who could act as a focal point for their attacks, a Fernando Llorente figure, for example. Since they did not, they have invited teams to come and play ultra-defensive football, and frankly Barcelona may as well have played Pique as a permanent striker from the start, such was the increased threat when he went upfront.
But this probably exaggerates Hercules’ defensiveness, and certainly doesn’t do justice to how well they played. They weren’t as defensive as Inter were – they kept two nominal strikers on for most of the game, and their tactics involved tracking runners across the final third rather than an overwhelming emphasis upon getting men behind the ball. The biggest shock was not the win, but the fact that Hercules overwhelmingly deserved the win.
Barcelona 0-2 Hercules: Valdez beats Valdes twice to give Hercules shock victory





Sorry ZM. I dont think at all Ibra will be missed by Barca. In fact in most of the games last season he looked like a liability upfront, most of the time slowing down their attacking flow and Messi being the sufferer mostly.
This defeat rather might work well for Barca, like it did in the 08-09 season. They would analyze better and would come back strongly. Seems the players where not just ready for the match. Like Pep always says, there is no excuse for a Barca defeat. The man who didnt even think the long journey to Milan was negative for his team, hasnt blamed the poor state of the Pitch.
I think you’re missing the point a bit, I agree wit hwhat you’re saying, but the question is surely not about Ibrahimovic as an individual but about the need for someone who is different to their existing striker, hence “if Ibrahimovic was not the man to do that in Guardiola’s eyes, Barcelona surely should have tried to recruit someone who could act as a focal point for their attacks”
It needn’t be a regular starter, but having that option wouldn’t do any harm. It’s not like Barca’s squad is overcrowded.
Indeed it’s no excuse, as stated in the report, but it definitely slowed their passing
Well, we really dont know what is going on in Peps mind. To be diplomatic, even if he has said Ibra was good etc, but its sure that he was very disappointed with Ibra. As you said, he might be even considering Pique as a plan C. And in due course we will see how he will use Villa.
And we must also account for the fact that Ibra deal was done really late that they couldnt find anybody else. For the moment we have to wait and see for a few weeks to know how the team will come out. In between all this Cruff has made a very valid point that what has happened outside the field and training sessions, with Rosell team, might affect the team performance. If that happens we fans would suffer this season irrespective of who Barca plays with or what tactics Pep use.
hope this is beggining of the end for this bunch of divers – barca:D
this talking about plan b is the wrong way. Barca don’t need a 2 meter tower for the last 10 minutes. what they need is a player like David Villa who’s also able to score with the head (and is ~1,85m high). the last thing Barca need is a second strategy for the last minutes, they need an extra weapon in their normal game (plan a).
if the opponent don’t knows if Messi plays a pass into the box, runs into the box, or plays a high cross for the striker, than Barca becomes more dangerous.
i don’t think Barca need plan b, they just have to upgrade plan a.
Its not necessarily about size, its about having someone in the mould of Henrik Larrson, who has never been adequately replaced (this was never going to be an easy task). It was attempted with Gudjohnsen, and now with Ibrahimovic. I think Dzeko is the kind of player they should be looking at right now to fulfill that role.
In Germany it’s a lot about Dzeko moving to Bayern (don’t know if that will ever happen). But when you look at Gomez not playing in Munich I don’t understand why they talk about Dzeko.
Okay, they are different players but not the total opposite. If Gomez is not good enough, Dzeko could be a good choise. If Gomez is the wrong type of player for the Bayern style, Dzeko will also fail.
It’s alwasy the question how a team adapts to the player and vice versa.
Dont you think they shld have actually kept Ibra for atleast another season, playing him as a target-man and Villa cutting in from the left?
Yes, but with problems between Pep and Ibra this became impossible.
I always thought this manager-player bust up’s ruin a team. Remember, Fergie and Becks. Why does it become so diffucult for top players and Managers to keep their massive egos aside and think foremost about their countries and clubs. Guess it will never happen.
@Don
I don’t know what the problem between Pep and Ibra or Fergie and Becks was. Maybe, they don’t know it themselves. and as long as they are not married they have no reason to think about this anymore.
A manager is like a captain on a boat. As captain you can talk with your crew, but the captain decides what to do and what is the best for the boat. What is the best for the boat is also the best for the crew, maybe not the best for every single crew member, maybe not the the best for the captain. but this is not democracy! it doesn’t matter what Beckham wants, he is not the one to decide. The captain is responsible for the success and if an owner (club or boat) is not satisfied, he can fire the captain.
If a manager talks with his players, the player have to accept the manager going a different way (they have to trust him). of course it is not that easy, with group dynamics, leadership and constructing a ‘Mannschaft’, that are all duties for a good manager. (you don’t have to be an a** to be a good manager, but you have to lead your players and they have to accept you. if a player has a problem with that, he has to go.)
I don’t know what happend between Becks and Fergie or between Ibra and Pep. I can understand a player being disappointet when he doesn’t play well or doesn’t play at all. But what i don’t understand are players and managers talking about this stuff in the media, that’s nonprofessional and nonloyal (even after you left the club).
But I know nothing about the egos of one of the four mentioned persons.
ZM i disagree also with the Ibra part of your analysis..
Ibra was bought for that reason, ok, BUT:
1)as he proved the whole season, he failed to play the target man role in our plan B.. Remember both games with Inter? If Pique is more dangerous when going upfront than your 60 million signing, best frwd of the world, Zlatan Ibrahimovic, then what’s the reason to keep the guy in your squad, concerning also that :
-He didnt fit to our system
-He was selfish, and the most lazy guy on the pitch, always refusing to press even when losing the ball..
2)I think that Pep came to another conclusion with Ibra.. And that conclusion is not only that Ibra is not suitable, but that playing a big man as a target upfront and putting crosses maybe not the right Plan B….
Have you ever think of that?
I believe he is still troubling himself what the right plan B would be..
First of all, people seem to forget that, at the Camp Nou, Inter played with 10 men almost the whole match, so of course they needed to shut up shop, especially when considering that it was a two legged encounter. This match was very different. Hercules had nothing to lose.
Secondly, I like the point about Pique. As a manager, seeing that things don’t go as planed, you have to have a backup and Pique would be an instant option. He would do a good job for a plan B until they get a goal, so throw him in there, 20-30 minutes into the game, if things are bad tactically.
If Piqué goes up front, the back is a nightmare.
Nice analysis.
As a culé I was deeply troubled by that match. No one expected what happened. This was the second failure this season (after the first leg on Supercopa de España).
Guardiola received some criticism for the starting 11. What I can’t possibly understand is his insistence in putting Abidal as a central defender. He probably wasn’t among the main responsibles for the loss, but he brings a huge level of fear for Barça in that position. He’s a good left back, never a stopper. Too anarchic for that.
Barça will face serious problems everytime Piqué and Puyol can’t play together. And Puyol has already a certain age. He’ll miss more games, and not just for injuries.
This is a complicated season ahead, for sure.
While I don’t want to take any credit away from a great Hercules performance, it might have been worth mentioning much of the Barcelona squad travelled to Argentina for the friendly prior to the match – and this may have affected Pique, Iniesta, Villa, Xavi and Pedro. Okay Fabregas and Reina played marvellously for their sides, but Torres looked damn jaded for Liverpool.
Brilliant article though, and it will be interesting to see whether Real Madrid do anything similar in El Clasico with Jose Mourinho in charge – and if Guardiola will preempt him and come up with an alternative.
Oh, and Messi, Mascherano and Milito of course.
Nice article. However, I miss one important point in the analysis: the physical preapration. Due to different circumstances (mostly coupled to the players to have to play for the national team), Barcelona has had a very unusual preseason. After Spain winning the WC, it has been quite short for part of its key players, like Xavi, Puyol, Piqué, Iniesta or Busquets. Besides, most of them (including also Messi and Mascherano) had to play transoceanic matches with their national teams. All together makes that despite the championship is already running, most of the players are still in a “preseason” low physical form. This could have made easier for Hercules to carry its clever tactical plan all through the match. Barcelona has also shown in past games that when confronted to “minor” teams with good tactical dispositions, they are able to overcome them during the second half, when their physical shape prevails.
Ironically the player in the opposite team who scored both goals and covered Mascherano, Valdez, was at the WC as well so it’s all little more than an excuse. It’s the job of the manager to adapt to the circumstances regardless of what they are.
I tried to do an analysis of Hercules’s defense on my blog but you pointed some things I missed. On top of scoring the two goals Valdez did an excellent job of shadowing Barcelona’s deepest midfielder so they couldn’t switch the point of attack as quickly as they usually do. The two holding midfielders did not allow Messi and Villa to cut into their stronger foot as they like to. Hercules was definitely picking its poison by giving Maxwell and Adriano so much space but it worked out because they were crossing to a tiny forward line.
Barcelona went to the Pique strategy way too early and they seemed to panic when just a goal down. No team is just going to hand them a victory so they have to be ready to fight instead of resorting to desperate strategies.
Pique scored against as Inter as well didn’t he..he has good control, decent finish..not a bad idea..
You had pointed out in your earlier article about counter-attacking, why couldn’t barca do it?
And Well barca’s defence wasn’t up to the task and Hercules’ had three players of quality- Trezequet, Valdez and Drenthe..what will happy against stronger attacks?
Good analysis. I believe Barcelona lost the match in the second half, not the first. It is true that they conceded in the first but they were dominating and Hercules barely created a threat. In the second half the team collapsed defensively and didnt improve it’s offense.
The problem was not the defense nor the midfield but the offense. Same troubles of last season but this time without an Ibra to put all the responsibilities on his shoulders. Since Messi started to move more often to the midfield “to touch the ball more often” as Pep put it, the offense lost the urgency needed. If you cant trust the likes of Busquets, Xavi, Iniesta and alves to move the ball forward while you -Messi and offense players- move as forwards unsettling defenders and creating spaces then dont expect to catch any team by surprise. That was the case last season when the offense often played in the midfield, and it was the case in the two games the team played so far in the liga (yea…they won the first…).
In the second half, the only player who can run to the box and get advantage of the full backs crosses was withdrawn to play as a holding midfielder leaving only short skillful players in front. Pep should have known better. Busquets instead of Mascherano and Xavi instead of Bojan with Iniesta and Xavi playing behind Keita not in front of him would have helped more. Especially If Messi and Villa received instructions to keep working on the defenders rather than contributing in the buildup. No surprise Pique was the main threat throughout the game and soom Pep may have to use him, or busquets as a forward. Crazy? Maybe…
And I definitely agree that Ibra will be missed, though I am not sure yet if Pep was the actual reason behind his departure (Pep never said he want to sell him, but the opposite). Never mind the comments followed the transfer. Each party was doing his commitment toward the transfer (Parties directly involved in it. Figure!).
ZM, is this an intentional change in tactics?
Was this game analysed only in the interests of populism because the mighty Barca lost? Because it surely cannot be due to anything that happened interesting tactically.
This is, of course, absolutely fine – it’s your site and you can cover whichever games you effing well like – it’s just that I was under the impression that you only covered games that at least had something tactically stimulating to ponder.
Errrr not really sure what to say to this, as I thought it was tactically interesting, as outlined in the 1500 words above
But no, no change in tactics whatsoever…
This seems like typical fan-boy knee-jerk hypersensitivity any perceived “selling out”.
Lots of people wanted this game to be covered and naturally, when it was covered it was because of popular pressure; certainly not because the game was, in fact, interesting.
I dare say this match was tactically interesting. Barca have been among the more difficult teams to beat due to their synergy, and although it has been easy to say defending in numbers will work, it is interesting to read about a team that has actually implemented that successfully.
Watched the game and immediately knew that it would be analysed. Barcelona, one of the top teams in the world beaten at home by a team worth less than Messi’s left foot. How do you think they managed to beat Barca? Better players? Ah, no. This was a complete tactical victory against a super power of world football. Thats what this website does. Analyses tactically interesting games.
can the freaks complaining about what does/doesn’t get covered maybe give it a rest… it’s just one bloke (i think) posting on his website about the football matches he happens to have watched and found interesting enough to comment on. dude’s not claiming to be some almighty authority on every football match that occurs
I still don’t understand the Mascherano move. Why get rid of Y. Toure only to pay more for Mascherano? Surely Busquets is still the better option for Barca, so why does a club with financial issues pay so much for a player they don’t need?
Mascherano is good player to have no doubt, but Barca seems like one of the teams that needed him the least. It’s just hard to imagine how adding a midfield destroyer would have made them more successful last year. Comparatively, Liverpool needs him more than perhaps any team at that level and the premier league provided the perfect arena for Mascherano to showcase his talents.
A Bizarre move which is seemingly a step back for all 3 parties involved.
Regardless of how we evaluate the qualities of Mascherano and Yaya, Pep cut his vacation to convince Yaya to stay.
Yaya’s mind was already in England beside his brother since last year, which is one of the reasons why he was disappointing in his last season. Selling Yaya was not a choice, but buying Mascherano was. And it has nothing to do with Yaya because Pep wanted him one a year ago even when Yaya was still in the club. And I agree with him.
That’s missing the point entirely. Mascherano doesn’t become a better purchase just because they didn’t want to let Toure go.
Barca still overpaid for a player they don’t need.
Mascherano still won’t be a first choice starter and still will be playing in a role/team/league that doesn’t suit his playstyle.
Liverpool is still significantly weaker without their best midfield destroyer.
If villa plays as an inside left, Messi must be the man in the middle as center forward, not Bojan or Pedro (or Pique). Messi worked on being more of a conventional box striker (his right foot is much improved), but still retains the unmatched ability to drop deep and run at defenders. In the middle, Messi can worry both the Center backs and the defensive midfielders, while Villa and Pedro can attack the space behind any overaggressive back line.
Barcleona needs to create its mismatches in the hole, so with Villa and Pedro threatening the center backs from the wings and Messi drawing the defensive midfielders deep, Iniesta and Xavi will have space to make runs and overloads. This draws the fullbacks in, allowing Alves and Maxwell free rein on the wings.
With this system, At least one of Xavi, Messi, and Villa are guaranteed to have a good matchup (Xavi gets too much space in the middle, defensive midfielders try to close him down, opening space for Messi in the hole, center backs try to close him down, opening space for Villa in the box)
Plans A, B, and C.
is this really plan A, B, C or just option A.1, A.2, A.3 and all plan A?
I agree, it seems that as much of Guardiolas success comes from a preestablished method he cannot entirely change that method.
Mourinho knows that even if the world goes upside down Barcelona will always try to go forward with possession.
this ‘preestablished method’ is the blood of the Barca body and Guardiola is part of that blood. I think Barca should never consider to change their style or overall strategy. everything else will be a natural development within this system. of course you need smart managers to make the right moves. but a lot of things depend on the players coming from La Masia. If the next generation has an Ibrahimovic or Dzeko (or a van Basten) the style will change.
Of course opponents will learn how to play good against Barca and Pep has to learn how to change his team / style to be more variable and more dangerous.
Barca will always be enrooted in Cruijff and Michels.
And that’s exactly where Ibra wld have have come handy. If Villa plays as an inside left, Ibra wld have been an ideal CF. They shouldnt have loaned him. Maybe another season, and a partnership wid Villa wld have actually worked for Barcelona.
I think the last two games have justified this point. Barca are very difficult to stop if Messi plays as a false nine, as he can worry four players at once without being the exclusive province of one man.
excellent excellent excellent review. I think the point about Ibra is especially relevant.
I don’t think you’ll see Pique become a striker. My guess is that when the defense packs the box and leaves space on the wing Pique crashes the box to gain numerical and aerial superiority, such as for a corner.
I think Pep toyed with the idea of a plan B last year, but changed his mind. I think he only wants to play one way. To attack relentlessly with a forward line of midgets. Pep believes in the system and is willing to die with it. As long as the team has the football alien Messi, however, there is a good chance of succeeding.
I think the important thing about a Plan B type forward– he will have to be satisfied with being Plan B. With Ibrahimovic, that was/is impossible.
I think you nailed it. Anyone who’s a physically strong, mobile forward who’s decent in the air, holds up the ball, and gets on the end of crosses won’t settle for being Plan B. There’s many teams out there where he would be plan A (or should I say, route 1?).
Anyone feel like playing fantasy manager and throwing out names? Who out there would like the role of knocking down balls for Messi and Villa?
Emile Heskey
I completely agree with the Ibra point. It doesn’t necessarily be a tall pivotal forward. It can also be Eto’o like forward qho can keep balls while his back is turned againt the goal. But Villa is far from that. He is strong, but while he’s in motion. But when it comes to putting his body between the defenders and the ball staticly, it becomes very hard.
Puyol’s absence was also a very big problem. He is not just a prolific defender but also he is the Andrea Pirlo of the defensive line, maestro of the defense.
Despite Abidal looked okay in the middle, there was definitely a lack of communication between the defenders and Victor Valdes.
Even Barça will need to pump the ball into the box when they are not able to create the effective through balls or complete their vital one-two’s. Pique or Keita should be placed right in the middle of the Hercules.
I really don’t like Ibra. And I’m beginning to hate after his offensive words against Sacchi. But until the last season’s Zaragoza match, he seemed like he’s trying to overcome his überego. And he was serving to Messi and Iniesta/Pedro. Keeping the ball, turning around and finding the right place. But only when he keeps is ego down.
At this point, Llorente would be a great choice. He also has a good technique, soft ankles.
Barcelone could have many problems if they cannot open up the oppositions defenders. If the teams play 11 men behind the ball, stay close/deep in the defensive line and keep the middle crowded, Barça will have dozens of problems.
But Pique can have a key role. He has the ability to be striker
Great analysis. I totally agree with every single word of it.
By the way, sorry for my English
I’m from Turkey and it’s hard to keep an eye on football as a 19-year-old girl in here. It’s great to find out a site like that.
Tiffany jewelry
Tiffany
Tiffany and co
Tiffany Bracelets
tiffany co jewelry
Tiffany jewellery
Tiffany Necklaces
Tiffany Rings
Tiffany Watches
Tiffany jewelry
Tiffany jewelry
Spain Travel Guide
Spain Travel