Cesena 2-0 Milan: familiar problems for Milan

The starting line-ups
Newly-promoted Cesena have four points from two tough opening games against Roma and Milan after this deserved victory.
The home side were unchanged from the opening, playing a disciplined 4-5-1 system that became 4-3-3 when they had the ball.
Milan gave a debut to Zlatan Ibrahimovic upfront, in a 4-3-3 formation largely similar to the one Leonardo favoured last season. Andrea Pirlo played deep, with Massimo Ambrosini and Rino Gatusso either side.
The game started at a surprisingly high pace for a Serie A contest, which was the first sign that this might not be a match to suit Milan’s ageing stars. It quickly panned out into a fairly standard 4-3-3 v 4-3-3 battle – full-backs against wingers, central midfielders doing battle, and one spare man at the back on either side.
The two players with most time on the ball were the two deep midfielders. Andrea Pirlo was able to dictate play but wasn’t at his best, while Giuseppe Colucci had an excellent game in front of his back four, preventing Milan players finding any space in that position, and distributing the ball effectively and calmly to the flanks.
Wide players key
The main difference between the two sides was in wide areas – Cesena’s widemen were disciplined and hard-working, getting level with their own central midfielders and tracking the runs of the Milan full-backs well. Ronaldinho and Pato stayed high up the pitch, not looking to press.
Ronaldinho looked to drift inside into central positions, so was even less effective defensively than Pato – at least Pato was pinning back Yuto Nagamoto to a certain extent, but Ronaldinho was watched by Colucci or the spare centre-back, and the excellent Luca Ceccarelli bombed forward to great effect, as he did against Roma.
Milan lack mobility
Three men upfront doing nothing when they lose the ball is always going to be an issue, but Milan’s problem here is amplified because of the lack of pace and mobility amongst the seven players behind them. Those seven men were being asked to do the job of nine or ten, and they simply didn’t have the capacity to. Ambrosini and Gatusso were playing as box-to-box midfielders, getting well in advance of Pirlo into attacking positions, but at 33 and 32 respectively they no longer have the energy to match their reputations. Pirlo has never been a particularly mobile player, and certainly not a good tackler, and he was often exposed deep in midfield.
The nature of Milan dominating possession, and the fact the midfielders’ ‘zones’ extended forward because of the lack of defensive awareness from the forwards, meant that Cesena had too much space to break into behind the Milan midfield. Their transitions from defence to attack were so easy, and with the pace and direct running of their wide players they were always a threat on the counter-attack.
Predictable goals
The first goal came because Ronaldinho didn’t even try and track one of Ceccarelli’s runs. Ezequiel Schelotto drifted inside to take Luca Antonini into the centre, whilst Emanuele Giaccherini floated a ball out towards the unmarked Ceccarelli. The right-back took the ball on the chest before volleying a cross towards Erjon Bogdani, who made a dart across the centre-backs to the near post, flicking the ball into the far corner. It was an excellent goal – and not one Milan would have scored, because their full-backs would have been tracked by Cesena’s wingers.
The second came soon after, from the type of simple counter-attack Milan were always vulnerable to. Gattuso and Ambrosini were in the box, Pirlo couldn’t win the ball, and then Bogdani and Giaccherini utterly outpaced Milan’s defenders. The ball went from Cesena’s box to Milan’s goal in just six touches.
Milan were not out of the game. Their best chances came from Pato, who was by far the brightest of their three attacking players. Quick left-to-right passes were their best bet – Ibrahimovic drifted towards that side, and his partnership with Pato was promising. There were an incredible number of tight offside decisions that didn’t go Milan’s way (and this was even before Pippo Inzaghi came on) but Cesena used their spare man very well, constantly getting last-ditch tackles and blocks in.
Second half
Milan improved in the second half when Ignazio Abate came on for Thiago Silva and Daniele Bonera moved into the centre of defence – Milan needed more buccaneering full-backs, and Bonera is not a great attacking right-back. The pattern of the game continued into the second half, though Cesena started to tire and were less dangerous on the counter.
Robinho replaced Ronaldinho and was a much more willing runner, whilst Inzaghi’s introduction for Gattuso meant Milan went 4-2-4. But Cesena kept their starting tactics, only swapping Bogdani for Dominique Malonga, another striker, in the final ten minutes. Pato should have grabbed a goal and Ibrahimovic missed a penalty – Milan didn’t take their chances, but credit should go to Cesena for a great defensive display.
Conclusion
It was plain that Milan were open to being attacked in two distinct ways – firstly by Cesena getting their full-backs forward, who would always be unmarked, and secondly by hitting Milan on the counter-attack and exploiting their lack of pace at the back. Tactical flaws are rarely exposed as plainly at this, and a goal apiece came from either approach.
But rather than focusing on Milan’s failings, Massimo Ficcadenti’s side should be applauded for their organisation, their work rate and their technical quality. Having signed no fewer than 19 players over the summer, Cesena are equipped with some excellent footballers, particularly in the centre of midfield. Colucci and Stephen Appiah broke the play up and played intelligent passes, while Marco Parolo acted as a link between midfield and attack.
But their star performers were the wingers, who were very aware defensively and had the pace and energy to construct quick attacks. If they continue to play like this, Cesena’s ambitions might extend beyond mere survival.
Cesena 2-0 Milan: familiar problems for Milan




These problems have been a long time in coming, but are accentuated by this particular combination of personnel and formation. If Milan persists with the 4-3-3 with orthodox wingers playing high up the pitch, the personnel must change. I am a little surprised that Ambrosini (granted, the captain) and Gattuso weren’t replaced by Flamini, who did no little work behind Fabregas at Arsenal, and KP Boateng, who demonstrated a combination of flair and muscle at the WC that Gattuso no longer is able to maintain. The lack of attacking fullbacks (a hallmark of previous successful Milan teams, they have never replaced Cafu) is a great point, but the greatest attacking fullback is a liability without a wide player tracking back or a DM slotting in.
This Milan setup actually reminded me a lot of Maradona’s “broken team” this summer, with the magical talent up front expected to overcome a lack of speed at the back and a lack of team defending. The curious result is that Milan are outnumbered at both ends of the pitch when it counts, much as Argentina were against Germany. Pirlo’s withdrawn role (which he excels in) means that support for the front three is expected to come from the other two midfielders, whose characteristics are primarily defensive. Without defending from the front, surely it is better to have the playmaker higher up the pitch with two players shielding the back four. Either Milan’s wings must track back, the formation must be tweaked, or personnel changes must be made, preferably 2 of the 3….they still maintained possession well, but there are plenty of other teams in Serie A, not to mention Europe, that know how to counterattack.
Ibrahimovic’s presence provides the same effect he did for Inter and Barcelona–his height and skill offer a passing,possession-oriented team the option of hoofing it to the big man, and Milan did this quite often near the end of the game. Yet it is his understanding with the other forwards that is the key to success in Milan’s attack, and hopefully his arrogance will result in goals rather than the overwrought penalty which he missed when Milan could have gotten something out of the game.
Sam, I couldn’t agree more.
The Gattuso and Ambrosini of 4-5 years ago would have run all day to do Pirlo’s dirty work. If you want to preserve Pirlo (or the deep-lying playmaker figure), then at least one supremely athletic midfielder is needed. KPBoateng and Flamini would be ideal on either side of Pirlo in order for Milan not to snap in half.
As for the political difficulties with dropping Gattuso and Ambro perhaps it’s related to Milan’s financial strategy for the 2011-12 season, when they’ll offload many old players in order to balance the books. Now, given the iconic status of both Gattuso and Ambrosini, and given that Milan famously is run with a family ethos, perhaps the club don’t want these two players to leave the club on a sour note. So, consider this a testimonial season for the two veterans.
Still, though. They could still be offered minutes coming off the bench. The need to field energetic players is paramount.
Curious what you think about the division I suggest below: 3 midfield roles each with 2 players who can fill that role: Pirlo and Seedorf creating; Flamini and KPB running; Ambrosini and Gattuso defending. Would those have the right mix of energy, heft, awareness and creativity? Any possible combination seem particularly good or bad?
I’m also intrigued by the idea of a 4213 with Seedorf as the one, Ibra, Pato and Robinho or ‘Dinho spread across the front.
Great play by Cesena… AC Milan has so many aging warhorses… Time they bought or developed some fresh faces… In this aspect Arsenal is the team to follow… So many young kids developed there… Anyways Ibrahimovic and Ronaldinho always keep forgetting that they should try to win the ball back.. The ball will not always be delivered to them… Typical alpha male behaviour… Lets see how the season pans out for Milan..
I don’t get why Allergri started with Ambrosini AND Gattuso. Pirlo, Ambrosini, and Gattuso CANNOT play at the same time. Allegri has been asking for a midfielder the whole summer, yet he still doesn’t use KPB. He should have started either Seedorf or KPB. We were missing a player that linked Defense/Pirlo with the forwards. I can’t believe I’m saying this, but we missed Seedorf. We should have played KPB, who is the closest replacement to Seedorf. I also wanted Flamini, but he was injured.
Milan needs to stop playing with Pirlo and 2 defensive mids (Ambro and Gattuso). That is the exact midfield that Italy played and got battered by the Dutch in Euro 2008. We need two energetic, young box-to-box midfielders; Flamini and KPB.
Without Nesta, our defense looked so unorganized. Sokratis had a good pre-season, but he was daydreaming when Cesena scored their opening goal. Although Bonera is a far better RB than he’ll ever be at center, he simply isn’t good enough to be a starter.
I hope during the winter transfer market we buy Poli and Ganso, and during next summer a new RB (VDW). If Ronaldinho doesn’t step up and stay consistent, I don’t mind him leaving in the winter transfer.
Lastly, I want our youth getting some play time, especially Merkel! Merkel and Strasser would be far better than Gattuso. Gattuso was great, but he just isn’t the same anymore.
“I can’t believe I’m saying this, but we missed Seedorf.”
Seedorf is one of the best players in the world, he’d improve almost any team even at his current age. OF course Milan miss him. If he could play every game at peak readiness it’d be great for Milan.
You are correct that Ambrosini and Gattuso can’t play together any more, though. One or the other can complement one of KPB and Flamini, I think, with Seedorf and Pirlo also alternating. Thus the midfield three for each game will be 1 creator, one defender and one energetic runner.
I think that
“Seedorf is one of the best players in the world, he’d improve almost any team even at his current age.”
Completely agree 100%. He is a class act. Surround Seedorf with a couple of players that can run and tackle (flamini? KPB?) and watch him run the show.
You’re right. Seedorf is class, and we missed him. However, he has been the weak link in the past games for Milan.
It’s sort of a joke among Milan fans now. We love Seedorf, but he isn’t really the player he was. He still links up decently with Ronaldinho though.
Ha milan are sshittt
Milan made some decent signings over summer, and I thought they would be strong this year, doesn’t look like they’ve made a very good start though.
In all honesty, I don’t know too much about there defence. Thiago Silva I am aware of, seems like a good athlete, but he had all kinds of problems dealing with Rooney when Milan got obliterated by United in the CL last year. What I am sure of, is that Milan should be a threat going forward, as they do have some good midfielders and attacking players.
Although Ronaldinho shouldn’t be playing out on the wing, as is mentioned in the article, he won’t carry out his defensive responsiblities, which is becoming key to a wide midfielders role these days. He should be given a free role just off of the striker, like Ozil does for Germany, or closer to home, a good example would be QPR. QPR play a 4-2-3-1 system, two players who sit deep and allow Adel Taarabt to have a free role. Taarabt has had this free role all season. QPR are top of the league, and Taarabt has just picked up Player of the Month because he has been playing so well.
Pirlo–Flamini
Pato–Ronaldinho–Robinho
Ibrahimovich
Ronaldinho doesn’t play well in the center. We’ve already tried playing him through the middle and it did not work.
If Milan had a hard time trying to play with three of the ‘fantastic four’ sharing the pitch, then imagine indroducing the fourth member of the quartet.
You’d have to say, based on age and tenancy at the club, that Dinho is the most viable candidate to be benched; he could be phased out (giving his place of Robinho, or even Seedorf if this means a central 3/4 role).
Towards the end of the 2006 Champions League and in the run-up to the World Cup in Germany, Ronaldinho’s performances were already started to wane; Rijkaard voiced his concerns over Dinho’s lack of professionalism to the board. That is why for the final vs Arsenal, Dinho was played as a false striker with Etoo and Giuly out wide; not so much an instance of proactive tactical thinking (as was the case in the 2009 final), rather that up front was the one area where Dinho’s lethargy would be the least damaging to the team’s defensive organisation.
So maybe Milan could use him as a sub for Ibra in the No.9 role?
ZM’s writeup on Madrid-Osasuna mentions how Mourinho got Eto’o (and Pandev too, though he’s not mentioned) to play defense out wide and now he might be trying the same with Benzema. Can anyone make ‘Dinho, or Robinho for that matter, play that kind of role on the flanks? I think Pato could do it, though it seems a shame to use his energy like that.
Calm down this was the first game after a long national team break. We saw at the same time Barcelona lose to Hercules. Cesena played one of the best games, including a really well placed header and a counter attack seconds afterwards. Pato got two goals denied (right decision by the reff), and Ibra missed a penalty – That happens. Even though I agree with ZM that the counter attack was almost expected since both Ambro and Rino was down in the box.
But still a good one ZM – appreciated
Hi really like your work at this site.Has some really useful information.I’m a from Greece,could you quickly sum up Papastathopoulos’ game?Thank you in advance.
I dont understand why u always analyse dull EPL and Seria games, Seria games are still OK but EPL is really boring aesthetically as well as tactically. A newly promoted side Hercules just defeated Barcelona at the camp nou, with a wonderful tactical setup and we have to read about boring everton and Manchester United games
It’s on the way, how many games do you think I can get through in one day?
PS It’s Serie A
PPS This was ALSO a newly-promoted side beating a top side
PPS You don’t “have to read” about anything
ZM can you write about the Hercules vs. Barcelona game?
The weekend EPL line-ups according to the Telegraph:-
5: 4-2-3-1 Bolton, Liverpool, Man C, Man U, W Brom
5: 4-4-1-1 Brum, Newcastle, Spurs, (Villa), W Ham
4: 4-4-2 Blackpool, Fulham, (Stoke), Wolves
3: 4-5-1 Everton, Sunderland, Wigan
2: 4-3-3 Arsenal, Chelsea
1: 4-1-4-1 Blackburn
What does this have to do with AC Milan vs Cesena?
Honestly, I don’t see why we need either Robinho or Ronaldinho anymore. Can’t we just go back to Carlo’s diamond?
——–Abbiati
Bonera-Nesta-Silva-Antonini
——–Pirlo
–Boateng—–Flamini
——–Seedorf
—-Pato—–Ibra
Lord knows we all loved Ambro-Pirlo-Rino, but it’s over. Even scarier is the prospect of no Pirlo and no Seedorf in the side in a couple of seasons.
great blog thank you
As bad as the forwards were, and they were bad, the main culprit was Gattuso. What exactly was he doing in the opposition half? His passing is awful, his technique limited and he rarely scores. Every time he went up he lost the ball and Cesena countered. There was simply no need for him to support the attack. At this stage in his career Gattuso should be nothing more than a squad player irrespective of how many times he cries wolf at the end of the season threatening a move.
remarkably utilitarian garnering perception you
ЎHola!
No estб seguro de que esto es verdad:), pero gracias a un cargo.
Nicolas
Tiffany jewelry
Tiffany
Tiffany and co
Tiffany Bracelets
tiffany co jewelry
Tiffany jewellery
Tiffany Necklaces
Tiffany Rings
Tiffany Watches
Tiffany jewelry
Tiffany jewelry
Spain Travel Guide
Spain Travel