Argentina 4-1 Spain: good audition for Batista

The starting line-ups
Argentina beat Spain at their own game – passing them off the pitch, and finishing chances ruthlessly.
Sergio Batista has replaced Diego Maradona as manager, but is not yet certain of the position on a full-time basis. He chose a 4-3-3 system, bringing back Javier Zanetti and Esteban Cambiasso, who had both been omitted from the World Cup squad. Ever Banega played in a tight midfield three, whilst the Messi-Tevez-Higuain trio was retained, in a different format.
Vicente del Bosque continued with the 4-2-3-1 system that served him so well in South Africa, with a few notable changes. Only Gerard Pique was retained from the first-choice back five, whilst Cesc Fabregas – who only appeared as a substitute at the World Cup – was in for Xavi.
First, Argentina were defensively stronger than they ever looked under Maradona. The key was not the combination of the back four, but the fact they defended better from further, with two classic holding players in Cambiasso and Javier Mascherano, and another relatively solid mdifielder in Banega. That trio makes the Mascherano-Di Maria-Rodriguez midfield used at the World Cup extremely lightweight, and it was noticeable how much better Argentina were at winning the ball.
Spain below-bar
They were assisted by an uncharacteristic sloppy passing performance from the World Champions. They lifted the trophy after playing a precise, neat, close passing game that sometimes didn’t appear to be going anywhere, but eventually found a way through, whilst tiring the opposition. In this game they looked to play a killer pass too soon, and appeared too keen to force the ball forward through Argentina’s seven defensive players.
Fabregas was partly to blame for this – he was playing in the Xavi role, but is clearly a very different type of player to Xavi. The Barcelona player drops very deep and is happy to play backwards passes to Xabi Alonso and Sergio Busquets, but Fabregas’ usual game at Arsenal these days is play high up the pitch, and to drive forward to link up with Robin van Persie. That worked well as a substitute in South Africa, but today he needed to start with a more low-tempo, patient approach to help keep the ball – maybe he was too keen to make an impression, given a rare start. Then again, replacing Xavi is not easy.
Width for Argentina
Argentina’s three forwards were giving Spain’s back four a torrid time. At the World Cup, Lionel Messi played behind Carlos Tevez and Gonzalo Higuain, and there was little width or variation in Argentina’s build-up play. Today, they were spread out across the pitch, with license to interchange. “The tactics of the Argentine national team are now similar or the same as those of Barcelona, and that’s how I like it”, said Messi last week. He generally started from the right, with Tevez and Higuain taking it in turns to move to the left. Not only did they pin back Spain’s full-backs, they also stretched the defence and found more gaps to play passes through.
Those through passes were constantly catching Spain’s defence out. All too often, the backline was far too square – one simple pass was beating three players, and their pressing game meant they were high up the pitch, with Tevez and Messi outpacing the defenders to the ball in behind. Also, if tiki-taka is effective as a defensive tactic, Spain’s surprisingly poor ball retention can be blamed for exposing their defence too often.

Spain shifted David Villa out to the left, meaning David Silva had to go upfront
The first two goals came in the opening 12 minutes – first Messi was left free on the left and brilliantly chipped Pepe Reina, in a finish that is becoming his trademark. Higuain also had a free run on goal, with his preferred finish being to round Reina before finished from a tight angle. The third was comical – Reina slipped when attempting a clearance, and Tevez slid in to grab himself a goal. 3-0 probably flattered Argentina, but they were by far the better side, and their forward trio getting a goal apiece summed up how effective they were.
Villa positioning
One of the few problems del Bosque had at the World Cup was how to deploy David Villa. He performed excellently in the opening games when he drifted in from the left (despite Fernando Torres, the striker, playing poorly), but when Torres was eventually dropped for Pedro Rodriguez, Villa moved upfront and struggled to become involved in the game.
That was what happened when he was used as a centre-forward here – he was kept quiet by Gabriel Milito and Martin Demichelis. Halfway through the opening period, he decided he’d had enough of that, and instead moved out to the left, where he almost immediately hit the bar with a superb long-range drive. He was in the game more, but the knock-on effect was that Andres Iniesta switched to the right and David Silva was upfront – where he looked completely uncomfortable.
Second half changes
As so often happens in international friendlies, the second half was less interesting after so many substitutions. Jesus Navas made a very good impact on the right wing, and there’s still a feeling that his natural width is important for Spain – even if not as a starter, his ability to get to the byline and swing crosses in gives Spain something of a plan B. He should have created a goal through this very method, but Fernando Llorente nodded wide from point-blank range.
Despite this, Llorente played well, creating a focal point for Spain’s attacks, as he did against Portgual, and it would have been interesting to see him and Villa together – one had replaced the other at half-time. Del Bosque clearly wanted to get back in the game – bringing on Pedro for Alonso was an attacking move – and Llorente grabbed a consolation with a well-taken spin and shot. Sergio Aguero wrapped up the win with a stoppage time header.
Conclusion
We should be cautious when considering the significance of the result – it was a friendly, after all. It was also a game where Argentina had more to play for – they were trying to impress a new manager, who himself was desperate for a positive result. Therefore, Argentina’s performance is of more interest than Spain’s.
Batista should still take great credit, although some would say decisions such as playing a forward trio wide across the pitch, and using Zanetti and Cambiasso were rather obvious choices that Maradona got wildly wrong. Nevertheless, beating the newly-crowned World Champions doesn’t come about through simply picking the right XI – Argentina were compact, disciplined and patient in their passing approach. There was not such a reliance on Messi for creativity, and the strong midfield trio protected what is, in fairness, still quite a weak back four. One concern was how many free-kicks they gave away in dangerous areas, but overall it was an extremely positive performance.
Argentina 4-1 Spain: good audition for Batista




Marchena seemed to be playing the offside trap on his own. I’m not sure why he plays and they don’t bring in someone who is better and younger.
Well, their 3rd choice centre back is normally Raul Albiol (who is younger and better), but he was injured, as was Puyol. In the past year, those three players, along with Pique, are the only central defenders Spain has used. They do have some young players, like Alvaro Dominguez who was a regular starter for Atletico last season – I guess del Bosque just relies on the experienced players. He doesn’t seem to experiment a lot, even in friendlies.
I disagree here, as Albiol was the only unused player in Spain’s WC campaign, making him 4th choice behind Marchena. Alvaro Dominguez is a top class defender who should be fast-tracked into the A team soon after the U21’s in Denmark (2011) because Marchena & Puyol are getting old, and Albiol has lost it since joining Real.
Del Bosque needs to seriously start considering his alternative options. The left-back position seems to be the major weakness in my opinion. Also, either a plan B without Xavi, or again, fast-track Thiago/Canales/Matilla/Martinez. Hope he doesn’t make Lippi’s error and stick with the golden oldies
Albiol was unusued in the World Cup because he was already injured.
Also Marchena came on in a holding midfield role, not in defence
@Football Farrago
Well, to tell the truth, he once substituted Puyol. That was his longest occurence on the pitch at recent World Cup.
Regarding Albiol – what anonimo said. I’ll just add that Marchena played 8 (eight) minutes last World Cup, replacing Xabi Alonso twice, and Puyol once.
Oh and what do you mean by having problem with left-back? Spain has Capdevila there, no? It was Monreal that I believe did play against Argentina.
LOL Pepe Reina, still say he is best goalkeeper?
I hope you mean his general poor performance, since a flop happens to everyone from time to time and is never conclusive.
I had never seen Banega play before he looked really fantastic.
@ papyrus Craig Burley’s commentry was amazing last night “Reina’s better than Casillas”, “I don’t understand why Spain have travelled to Argentina” as a huge banner ad promoting Spain’s 2018/22 WC bid scrolls past.
yeah banega was excellent. i thought what argentina did particularly well was to have faith in their ability to keep the ball under the pressure of spain’s immense pressing high up the pitch, and banega, along with cambiasso, did this best of all.
cambiasso himself showed a great deal offensively, which he never had the chance to do under mourinho, and sadly probably won’t under benitez either. but the vision and creativity he showed was really impressive.
it seems to me that spain terrify the opposition into giving the ball away. they press so high up that the opposition player with the ball sees all his passing options being closed down, and feels forced to clear long and inaccurately so as not to give a ‘hospital pass’. but argentina were so calm, starting from romero, and their ability to keep the ball seemed to shock spain. i think this is the only way to beat them, but there aren’t many international teams with the required technique, especially amongst the more defensive minded players, to keep the ball under such pressure
Cambiasso is a good creator, too, it’s just that he’s never asked to play that role as of late.
Cambiasso has been one of the more underrated players over the last decade. He’s an extremely intelligent player, and has the technical and tactical ability to play in a more attacking role when paired with a pure defensive midfielder like Mascherano, and his goal scoring record for Inter isn’t half bad. It was disastrous for Argentina that Maradona didn’t rate him – there few clubs or national teams in the world that wouldn’t be improved with Cambiasso in the side.
Benitez has said that he wants Cambiasso to venture forward a bit more with Inter this season. Whether with Mascherano for Argentina or Motta/Zanetti for Inter, he really should.
Benitez making a player more attacking? I’m not having that…
Well, bear in mind that these were Rafa’s words spoken during his first fortnight in Italy. Methinks he was on a charm offensive (translated: desperately trying to communicate to the Italian media that he was not a pale imitation of Mourinho, that his football would offer something different etc).
Ah, he also said in the same interview that he wanted his Inter to play like “the Barcelona of Serie A”, so……….
it quite cleary was in Argentina, perhaps the fact that it was bright and sunny through out the game despite it being played at at 9 pm gmt, amd the fact that river plate insigna was every where plus, argentian flags, ticker tape and the big graphic saying live from Buenos Aires. but i quess you know best.
Foolish, yes I got that. It was more that Burley kept questioning why Spain had agreed to travel there as adverts for their WC bid which Argentina have a vote on scrolled past. The joke was that it was a fairly obvious political/lobbying decision (like Eng playing Trinidad) but if I have to explain it I obviously phrased my original message really poorly. Sorry.
Have a faith in your English, I’m sure others got what you meant perfectly right. At least I did. Cheers.
havn’t seen the game but sounds like Spain was underperforming and Argentina doing well. What first came to my mind when I saw the line-ups: Is Argentina still a broken team with 7 defenders?
On the other side: If Spain’s pressing and ball retention don’t work, their strategy looks suicidal.
But, one game …
I would say they are definitely not a broken team with 7 defenders. Banega is very good, maybe great, at bringing the ball from midfield to the attack, both with dribbling and passing. Cambiasso is also not totally helpless going forward.
Incredible the difference a good coach can make. (with all respect to the great player Maradona was). I had the feeling Tevez was usually dropping a little bit deeper then in your diagram though, but like you said, the front 3 trio was very fluid.
It will be very interesting how this side will play in the 2011 Copa América.
hi ZM, thanks for writing this article. i didn’t see the game and was wondering what went wrong with the spanish team.
great article as usual. keep up the good work mate
I think this has ramifications for Barcelona, well obviously it does with all their players involved, in that Villa seems more and more comfortable from the left, and Messi feels completely at home as the central striker.
I think Villa will often start from the left with either Messi or Bojan central, or at least a lot of interchange where Villa may start from the center and move to the left for Messi to go central.
I think we’ll see a lopsided formation with Villa starting centrally-left, with Mesi playing deeper and centrally-right, Pedro on the right wing with the ability to run down the wing and cut inside, Alves playing advanced to fill the space on the right wing wihen Pedro goes inside, Iniesta playing an attacking mid who also likes to drift to the left side to combine with Villa, Xavi playing deeper and shaded to the right side, with Mascherano as a dedicated holding mid in the center, and the modern “three-man” defence with Pique and Puyol in the center with whomever (Abidal?) on the left playing much deeper than Alves on the right side.
yep.
david villa is just the perfect fit for that barcelona team. its seemless. i have no idea why they went for ibrahimovic
Agree with all this.
i think tevez is the best player before he get injured.
a really hardworking guy
;D
I think on the issue of Villa, I have only really experience of watching him for Spain in the World Cup. He relishes the space that he has out wide. Like many players who have found that slightly withdrawn role much better when they haven’t got two defenders right on top of them. While Torres didn’t have a good World Cup he was enough of a threat to keep two defenders occupied allowing Space for Villa to get involved in the game and run with the ball at these players making chances for himself. It was no surprise that he failed to score in those games in which Torres didn’t start.
Villa has been doing that since Luis Aragones has been in charge. If you lok at it this way, Del Bosque is limiting Villa by playing him alone upfront and moving Iniesta wide left. In 2008, Iniesta played more where Xavi is right now, with Xavi partnering Senna further behind. Silva provided with on the other side, and as you correctly say, Torres occupies the 2 centrals. When Villa got injured in 2008, Iniesta Moved wider, still cutting inside (as Villa always does), while Cesc entered the frame to provide the killer pass and keep the ball ticking with Xavi.
I’d hate to say Del Bosque got it wrong, but I think Luis was closer to the ideal way of using his players’ qualities
I think the key difference is that Senna in 08 was able to control the midfield defensively by himself, while Busquets needs a defensive partner to be effective. That knocked-on and caused the issues with Iniesta being used as a winger instead on the most advanced of three midfielders.
Agree here about Villa and Torres, Torres did not get nearly enough credit for his role in the Spanish win and perhaps they missed him more than they did Xavi. Still, just a friendly…
…Torres was rather bad. Hence why he got dropped.
I fully agree Torres deserved to be dropped, he didnt play at all well. But his presence alone was enough to occupy two defenders and give Villa room when he cut in the middle from AML, this works very well for Villa but does it work well for Spain? I think they play such good football at the moment that they are able to carry his poor form. As long as Spain keep winning its hard to say that they are wrong for having Villa up front as the lone striker as well.
There was plenty of things that I would have liked to have seen played differently by Spain at the World Cup, such as seeing more of Navas add that width. But hard to suggest thats what should be done when the team has just won the World Cup.
Well, using Silva as a false 9 was crazy.
Villa’s success starting from the wing during the WC came always with the presence of a stronger striker in the area, Torres or Llorente. Just as Brazil in 1982 had the fleet-footed Eder drifting wide whilst the battering-ram No.9 Serginho bothered the central defenders.
1)
“Batista should still take great credit, although some would say decisions such as playing a forward trio wide across the pitch, and using Zanetti and Cambiasso were rather obvious choices that Maradona got wildly wrong.” -ZM
So obvious even I suggested them. From the Argentina preview on this site:
Argentina should be easy to coach. Mascherano and Cambiasso keeping things solid, Banega distributing and giving them numerical superiority in midfield and then Messi and whichever 2 offensive players he gels with best, whether that be Di Maria, Aguero, Milito, Higuain or Tevez up front.
You can’t tell me this isn’t a stronger, more fluid team:
—-Higuain—–
———–Messi
DiMaria———
—–Banega——
-Mascherano-Cambiasso
Heinze———Zanetti
–Samuel–Demichelis
——Romero———
2)
Argentina could definitely have won the World Cup, instead of merely the group stage.
What should frustrate Argentina fans even more is that they were a bit ropey against Mexico and Germany ripped England apart in the previous matches. Maradona could have looked at this and brought in Bolatti and Pastore for the two carilleros and played a normal midfield 3. With Cambiasso and Zanetti discarded options were limited and it’s possible Otamendi and Bolatti would not have proved able enough replacements to get past Germany. But it would not have been 4-0. Definitely not.
Argentina is the only team that can play the possession game back to Spain and that was evident in this game. But when they do this, they are more dangerous than Spain because of their forward line – Messi, Tevez, Higuain, Aguero, De Maria what an attacking talent.
It was a good game to watch. But the two most beautiful moments were two moments with Messi, the 70meter plus sprint of Messi for the first goal and his genius dribbling run through the Spanish defence around the 62nd minute. If that goal had gone in legitimate, it would have been the most beautiful assist by Messi for Argentina.
It was a friendly game, and Spain travelled half the globe there. Give them a break.
Good display from Argentina nevertheless. Timely boost.
Actually, why did they play in Argentina when everyone on both teams plays in Europe?
This game really makes me sad though. If only Argentina fielded the right players in WC, it would have been a more exciting tournament.
it was a friendly and spain was promoting its bid as world cup host.
As a Spanish guy, I completely agree with this review.
I just found amazing that Maradona didn’t call Cambiasso (CL winner with Inter and excellent season), Zanetti (the same, old but always solid and accomplished in different positions) and Banega, who completed an excellent season in Valencia and was in my opinion the player called to establish the tempo in the Argentinian team in the World Cup. Meanwhile we saw how he counted on Martin Palermo despite the fact that he already had 5 natural forwards (Messi, Higuaín, Agüero, Tévez and Milito) plus offensive wide players like Di María, Maxi Rodríguez, etc.
It all just didn’t make sense to me in the World Cup, he was basically trying to play football without midfielders, which resulted in Messi being forced to drop so deep that he was hardly Messi anymore (and lots of Argentinian fans were still blaming Leo and not Diego… ?).
About Spain, well, I hate to blame it on individual players but this is my opinion:
a) Spain has never been Spain without Xavi, and we will miss him tremendously when he’s gone. As a R. Madrid supporter this hurts even more… hehe.
b) The four back were a complete joke yesterday. Arbeloa, who usually performs great at R. Madrid when he’s needed, made a terrible, terrible game last night. I don’t think Sergio Ramos is the best right back in the world, as in my opinion his true quality and talent truly shine when he plays as a center back, but boy did I miss him yesterday. Then it seems like the lack of gelling between all four of them (Monreal, Marchena and Arbeloa have hardly played any minutes with Spain lately) caused them to constantly get the offside trap wrong again and again, which lead to most of the chances that Argentina had (except Reina’s unfortunate slip, that’s just bad luck). Also, they made lots of simple marking mistakes that are unacceptable at this level.
So all in all, I think the result is too exaggerated (Spain could’ve easily slotted 1 or 2 more goals in), but the win was completely deserved for Argentina if only for the terrible first half by Spain and the disastrous defending they displayed.
The best news for Spain is that yesterday’s team wasn’t really Spain… or otherwise we’re doomed
P.S.: Silva as a center forward Vicente? Seriously? If he didn’t have anybody available to play in that role, why not put Villa upfront and use Silva in a more natural wide position, and not the opposite? He was completely unable to fight for any of the long balls thrown at him for completely obvious resons, and furthermore, Llorente was on the bench… I don’t know if Llorente was not physically fit to play in the starting eleven, but still, why not swap Villa and Silva’s positions then? Anyway, a match to forget.
From the text I understood that Villa wanted to play on the left and there he moved, so his spot had to be filled by someone else. Choosing from Iniesta and Silva, it ended up to be Silva. The question you should ask is rather “why not substitute Silva for Llorente earlier than during the half time”.
I think this match lacked a certain element of thrill because of 2 major reasons:
1-Checho had a job at stake and would therefore do anything to ensure success, so I guess if he does get the job (eventually, as he rightfully should) he’ll be starting from zero all over again. In other words, I don’t see a (long-term) future for any of the back 4, or Cambiasso. Since Ayala, Argentina have struggled to produce defenders (especially centrebacks) with strong personalities and leadership qualities. I believe in the potential of Garay, Forlin, Ansaldi, Parejo, Fazio & co, but when will they be tested? Thank God Checo can see Banega’s quality, and I hope he’ll give other worthy young players their chance (Perotti, Pastore, Defederico, Licha Lopez, etc)
2-Saying “I always had my doubts over Del Bosque” before the WC would have been accepted, but how can you judge a world champion? Honestly, I prefer the Euro 08 winning side, as it seemed to have more fluidity and played effortlessly. Not that the current side doesn’t, but Luis’ team made more sense to me. It’s a long discussion I don’t want to take too much space talking about, unless ZM publishes a Spain 2008 vs 2010 article (hint hint*). Anyhow, Spain have always shown us that they can rebound stronger than before, as they did after losing to France (WC’06), USA (CONFED’09) and hopefully after this game, the first time they lose with Marchena in the starting XI (time for change?)
I’m still not convinced about Argentina’s defensive organisation though, it’s defenitively not a touch on the class of 2006/7 under Pekerman and Coco Basile. Playing the (obvious) number game at the back worked this time, but again, it’s only a friendly. I wont judge Checo’s work until after the Copa. I trust he’l field in some more capable youngsters, rejuvenate the defensive aspect of the team and find an enganche (Pastore!!!!). He did say he prefers playing with an enganche afterall.
But isn’t there some bad blood between Batista and Pastore over the latters perceived snub of the U-20s years ago? I hate these player-v-coach stand-offs; either Batista will back down or else keep on calling up enganches elsewhere, such as D’Alessandro.
Rob’
I have been in England for a while and completely missed out on D’Alessandro’s performanaces with both San Lorenzo and Internacional. I could only catch a glimpse of the Libertadores final, in which D’ale looked OK, much healthier football than his last days in Europe. Is he back to his best, and thus deserving a place in the national squad? or have Argentina stopped producing high quality 10’s?
Well, he’s certainly more focused. No more training ground scuffles, no more red-cards.He seems content with his wife and two little sons in Porto Alegre, a city which is culturally quite similar to Buenos Aires.
But interestingly, since the emergence of Giuliano (a similar kind of player ) and the appointment of Celso Roth as coach, Inter adopted two formations; gone is the diamond, the 4-2-2-2 and the 3-4-2-1 of the last two seasons and in came 4-3-2-1 and 4-2-3-1. Obviously D’Alessandro plays in the advanced band behind the striker but he has been happy to start from a wide-right berth whenever they’ve played 4-2-3-1, and it has made him more difficult to mark by opposing defensive midfielders.
With Pastore, for now, being ignored by Batista, D’Ale should really take advantage of these call-ups to become the go-to man for the enganche role, a role, I might add, that Batista wisely sees as another tactical variation rather than a fulcrum for building the team around. Which translates into the enganche probably coming on later in games to open up stubborn defences.
Argentina stopped producing high quality 10s? Um… Messi?
To be fair they don’t seem to have many others apart from him, the rest are more like second strikers or wingers – Aguero, Di Maria etc. I miss players like Riquelme and, oh man I’ve forgotten his name, the little guy who looked like a hobbit, played with Ortega, Crespo, Batituta etc in 2002, Valencia at the time…
D’Alessandro was quality when he was at Birmingham, just a pity they weren’t a better team or he could have shone more. Be nice to see him back at a top club.
Aimar?
Messi is hardly a classic number 10, he’s much closer to a winger with superb passing qualities than an intelligent number 10 who doesn’t need to run much in order to create chances (Riquelme). I think this was fairly obvious in the WC with Maradona trying to play Messi as the enganche.
And yes, being Argentinian, I can tell you that good classic number 10s don’t exist anymore, or they’re being offloaded way too quickly to European teams. The only promises of good classic enganches for now seem to be 17 yo Manuel Lanzini from River Plate and Cañete from Boca Juniors.
let’s not forget that spain’s players were overwhelmingly barca and chose not to tackle messi. the first goal would have been stopped much earlier (and was offsides) while the third should have never happened. spain also hit hte bar 3 times and were unlucky with some of the shot stopping on other occasions.
Any1 thinks this is the real Spain?
Vicente just played it as it is. A friendly.
He was testing Fabregas as a deep lying playmaker, where he doesnt shine, he’s more a box-to-box midfielder without a good physical strength, thats why in arsenal he plays as a trequartista. In fact, sometimes it was more a 4-3-2-1 with the “2″ being Wide players than a 4-2-3-1.
He was testing near the whole defense, just pique was in the first XI in the WC.
He gave minutes to Reina and Valdes.
I just can’t see how he didn’t put Torres, yes, he’s out of form in Spain, but this game should have been enough to boost his self-confidence if he did get a goal in one of the 2-3 balls that hit the wood.
I agree that, we’re going to miss Xavi, we don’t have any other deep lying playmaker as him, Alonso doesn’t have his creativity and his killer pass, and even if he has his ball posession, spain just isn’t the same without Xavi. Since Valeron i didn’t see another player with such creativity.
I just keep thinking that Spain is way ahead of Argentina, Argentina threw Spain all that they had, maybe their best XI and their best subs and played like it was an official match, and they were lucky to score 4 and just receive 1, this match played 2 months ago, in the WC, with Batista as Manager, should have finished 1-0 or 2-0 to Spain.
I personally thought that, the way the Spanish were flying in with some bad tackles, and getting yellow cards, they really were not treating it as a “friendly” match at all.
But obviously a far from full strength Spanish team.
Argentina has to find a good replacement for Zanetti soon. He’s already 37 and probably would not make the team in 2014. Any thoughts guys?
On the other end, Reina has probably lost his place to Valdes after this display and the blunder with Liverpool earlier. Not a bad thing really, serves him a wake up call since he has been rather not focused enough lately.
Anyhow, I’m sure Spain players had good time there doing salsa
Now let’s get Torres back into BPL games! We need him more now that Kuyt has made a fool of himself.
Brillian blog, just found it from a link on http://www.defensiveminded.wordpress.com (thought he deserved a plug). So good to read articles about tactics and things that go on in matches, instead of the tabloidesque journalism we see everywhere that focusses so much on individuals you almost forget football is a team game.
Good teams like Spain (maybe not in this match, but in general) are good because of their tactics, not because of their individuals. We see with teams like England, France and Argentina (in the World Cup) that you can have a quality squad on paper, but if they don’t play as a team and don’t have the right system it just won’t get you anywhere.
Also, players like Dirk Kuyt prove how only about 50% of being a good footballer is about ability – the other 50% is what you actually do in a game… I think it was the Guardian who described Germany as a team with decent players, but players who ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING. Mueller was the best example of this.
If you ever fancy writing and article for http://www.footballfarrago.com I’d be honoured – but conversely, if there’s any chance I could do a piece for you that’d be great, it’d be nice to write something that gets read for once!
Jude Ellery (FootballFarrago)
Thanks for very interesting article. Can I translate your article into ukrainian and publish at my webblog? I will back here and check your answer. Keep up the good work.
the result shows that had brazil made it to the final they would have defeated spain quite handsomly but then they just imploded themselves out of the world cup.
Tiffany jewelry
Tiffany
Tiffany and co
Tiffany Bracelets
tiffany co jewelry
Tiffany jewellery
Tiffany Necklaces
Tiffany Rings
Tiffany Watches
Tiffany jewelry
Tiffany jewelry
Spain Travel Guide
Spain Travel