Bologna 0-0 Inter: Benitez starts with bore draw

The starting line-ups
A low-key game with few goalscoring opportunities – the result was celebrated by managerless Bologna like a win.
The home side included new signings Andrea Esposito, Matteo Rubin, Gyorgy Garics and Albin Ekdal in a 4-1-4-1 system that saw Belgian midfielder Gaby Mudingayi sitting very deep in front of his defence, with Marco di Vaio isolated upfront.
Rafael Benitez used the 4-2-3-1 formation that Inter played towards the end of last season, and the system Benitez favoured at Liverpool. Maicon was unavailable so Javier Zanetti started at right-back. The only surprise was McDonald Mariga starting in the centre of midfield, with more license to get forward than Esteban Cambiasso. Samuel Eto’o continued on the wing.
Inter had 67% of possession in the game, and dominated throughout. In the first half they found it difficult to create any clear goalscoring chances, though, with their wide players struggling to become involved. Their build-up play was slow and laboured, and they seemed to lack a creative spark.
Bologna’s defenders were tracking Inter’s wide players closely, meaning that when Eto’o and Goran Pandev came inside, space opened up on the wings for Inter’s full-backs to exploit. But Cristian Chivu and Javier Zanetti seemed reluctant to get forward and hit the byline – whether this is the Benitez influence, or if Inter were simply missing Maicon, it’s difficult to say.
Reliance on Sneijder
Eto’o, Pandev and Diego Milito all had poor games, and Inter’s main goal threat came from Wesley Sneijder. There seemed to be a plan to get him running at goal past Milito – the striker would come deep and attract a defender up the pitch, and Sneijder would spin off the back of Mudingayi and sprint into space. Bologna made good use of their spare man at the back, however, and these moves came to nothing.
Sneijder was more dangerous with his long-range shooting – in all he had seven attempts at goal in the game. It’s interesting that Inter relied on Sneijder so much for shooting – he may have scored five goals at the World Cup (some of which were rather fortunate) but he was far from prolific for Inter last season (despite being brilliant as a whole), only scoring four goals in Serie A all season, three of which were free-kicks.
Bologna created a couple of decent chances in the first half, but overall it was difficult to see them scoring – Marco di Vaio is a fine player but not built for a lone striker role up against Lucio and Walter Samuel, and Bologna didn’t help his cause much by hitting too many long balls for him to contest in the air. His main support came from Henry Giminez, who wasted a presentable opportunity when he lofted a shot over the crossbar with Julio Cesar in a poor position.
The second half continued in much the same pattern as the first, although Inter were more dangerous when they had the ball. There was more movement from the flanks – Pandev, anonymous in the first half, came off the touchline and dragged the full-back across the pitch, although he did little on the ball. Milito was also showing good movement but produced similarly little when played in.
Bologna defensive shift
The main tactical point about Bologna was how they shifted from a four- to a five-man defence when they came under sustained pressure, and when Samuel Eto’o drifted inside into a striking position. Bologna wanted to retain their spare man in defence, so rather than Esposito passing Eto’o across to Daniele Portanova, he instead tracked him all the way into the centre, leaving Garics to drop in at right-back, creating a five-man defence and retaining the spare man in the centre, 3 v 2.

Eto'o started from the left, but often ended up in the centre of the pitch. This meant the right, back, Esposito (in green) moved into the centre of the pitch, close to the rest of his back four (in yellow). In turn the right-sided midfielder, Garics (in blue) dropped in at right-back, rather than being in his natural position (on the orange cross) alongside the other players in Bologna's line of four. The holding player, Mudingayi, is in pink.
Pandev was replaced by young Brazilian Philippe Coutinho. He looked nervous but still created a good opportunity for Eto’o, who had sprinted to the near post but couldn’t beat Emiliano Viviano. Despite Bologna defending well, their young goalkeeper Viviano (part-owned by Inter) was their best player by some distance.
Conclusion
A disappointing performance from Inter, although the result is far from a disaster – Inter have drawn their opening-day fixture for the past three seasons and still gone on to win the title, so there’s no need for Nerazzurri fans to panic.
Bologna’s organisation was superb considering they were without a manager, and stand-in coach Paolo Magnani didn’t seem to have much authority with substitutions – one of his planned changes was overruled by captain Marco di Vaio. Still, someone came up with a decent plan to beat Inter, with Esposito and Garics’ roles. Even when one side has no coach, Serie A still manages to throw up interest in terms of tactics.
Bologna 0-0 Inter: Benitez starts with bore draw


Thanks for the analysis. It is excellent as usual.
Chivu and Zanetti are both much more defensive-minded than other fullbacks, Maicon and Santon. Chivu had a bad game last Friday against Athletico, and his speed is nothing to write home about. Benitez is understandably concerned about the LB getting exploited. Zanetti is known for his forward driving runs, but usually tends to stay back (to let Maicon bomb forward). I think the fullbacks could have exploited the space left by Eto’o and Pandev when they go inside, but I can understand why they did not.
May be it’s the World Cup, or may be it’s the treble and the player awards. Milito seems to have lost his sharpness. With Balotelli gone, Inter’s bench suddenly looks shallow in the forward department. This will be a problem for Inter in the coming season.
Agree about the lack of attacking options…seemed very bare. Coutinho might be promising, but tough to task him to step up since he’s so young.
Just following up on the point about the full backs. If Santon comes in to play left back do you think inter will continue to use Eto’o as an inverted winger? With Santon being a right footed left back, this could lead to a serious lack of width for Inter IMHO. Is Zonal Marking aware of any teams that regularly set up with an inverted winger and inverted full back?
Good question. If Arbeloa right-footed? He sometimes plays on the left with Ronaldo for Real Madrid.
Another example would be when Zambrotta and Nedved played on the left for Juve.
Bayern did in 2008 with Lahm and Ribery playing on the left side. Did not work too good, they got thrashed by zenit in the UEFA Cup semifinals
Yes, Arbeloa is right-footed but he only plats at left-back when Marcelo is injured/suspended.
Lahm + Schweinsteiger at the 2006 WC?
Inter usually plays with Eto’o and Zanetti, both righ-footed
Cambiasso and Sneijder switched positions often, I think in the anticipation that Sneijder would be man marked. That was how Inter initiated their attacks, with Sneijder checking back and Cambiasso surging into the space Sneijder vacated.
last 2 games Inter oponent play man marking/constant pressing on Wesley Sneijder, in friday it was Paulo Assusnao and yesterday it was Mudingayi. Snejider is missing more space to show his magic (thoug against Bologna he was more proactive cause of 4-2-3-1; different from 4-3-2-1 against Atletico where he just couldn`t find space and had no players to bring in attacking play).
Either bringing another creative player (like Van der Vaart) or Inter must find another way to make space for their playmaker (maybe adding more attacking role to Mariga or Pandev).
It will be really long season for treble holders.
And Benitez will have painfull headaches all season.
So… you don’t watch any Spanish league matches?
I have to ask the same question. Every week you have Premier League analysis, sometimes Serie A analysis and a few German or Russian games now and then. But almost never a Spanish game? I remember you doing an El Clásico analysis but it didn’t get nearly as much attention as many other games even though it’s probably the biggest league game in the world.
While all leagues boast a few top teams that have a legitimate chance at actually winning a championship, La Liga is without question just a 2-horse race. I can’t comprehend how anyone can really get into any game not involving these 2 teams. I guess for this site, on a tactical basis, there is always the opportunity for a situation where a coach throws out an off the wall formation that seems interesting. Granted my opinion comes from a perspective of a general fan of the top leagues and huge fan of the ‘Tournaments’ (Champions League/ Europa League etc.).
Please write in your analysis on the Real Madrid – Mallorca.
“Serie A still manages to throw up interest in terms of tactics”.No doubt about it it offers a lot more variety in formations and tactics than the EPL,which we all love so much!
I don’t want to insult the Serie A, but it is probably because in the EPL most teams would be crucified using some of these tactics for the entire game at home.
its because of how financially poor a lot of Italian clubs have become. Everyone has re-shaped their ambition, so when Juve think they’re good enough to compete, they end up in Europa League positions. It’s unfortunate that Calcio can no longer attract the same caliber of players as back in the day, but at least there’s more equality and tactical inovations
Have to disagree on all your points here. Juve were bad because they fielded poor players.
Poor defenders like Grosso, midfielders that can’t pass like Poulsen, Melo, and Sissoko, and a lack of a real goal scorer. Combine those factors with massive pressure and poor management and their Champions League exit wasn’t shocking. Remember that Bayern stole it from that in the final game of the group.
Also, Stoke, Blackburn, and Bolton never provide classic tactical games simply because tactics take a back seat to “giving it a go”.
Serie A and the Bundesliga have been the most exciting leagues in the last two years.
Neck and neck finishes and the diversity of of the top four and top eight really stand out.
I think teams like Lazio, Udinese, Genoa and Napoli are pretty talented teams.
Yes, there is a tactical naievete about “giving it ago” but the flip side is that even sides like Blackpool, WBA, Stoke, Wigan, Wolves, etc., all try to win at home, and the home fans expect positive performances.
Away, on the other hand….
I was really impressed by Esposito–did quite well against Etoo, even in one-on-one situations where Etoo’s speed usually serves him so well. I thought Esposito really took advantage of his freedom to come inside with Etoo’s cut-ins due to Garics dropping. The result, so often, was a backwards pass from Etoo.
although i agree that la liga is essentially a two horse race, i must bemoan the relative lack of coverage here. are barcelona not the premier tactical innovators in modern football? especially considering their surprising lack of depth now after the uncomfortable departure of ibrahimovic, there is going to be some serious tactical shifting happening this season. it will also be interesting to see if they are sustained by their youths or if the graduates from la masia fail to rise to the occasion.
maybe some feel bored by their perceived dominance, but why avoid the masterclass?