Sampdoria 3-2 Werder Bremen (AET): Pazzini puts Sampdoria in charge, but subs prove crucial

The starting line-ups
An amazing second leg of a superb tie sees Bremen progress thanks to a dramatic late show, whilst Sampdoria must settle for the Europa League.
Both teams changed shape from the first leg, with plenty of personnel changes too. Sampdoria set out with a strange formation vaguely resembling a 4-4-2 diamond (more on that later), with Stefano Guberti and Daniele Dessena starting in midfield, and Marius Stankevicius replacing the suspended Stefano Lucchini.
Bremen had severe injury problems – to the extent that they only named five substitutes. The star of the first leg, Aaron Hunt, was injured along with striker Hugo Almeida. Therefore, with no central creative player, Thomas Schaaf dropped Claudio Pizarro deeper and switched to something 4-4-2 / 4-2-3-1ish, with Marko Marin on the left playing a much more attack-minded role than Tim Borowski on the right.
There was barely time to consider the formations, as Sampdoria made a flying start with two quick goals from Giampaolo Pazzini. He picked up from where he left off in the first leg, being a constant danger when the ball was wide, generally taking up positions at the far post, and showing excellent movement to beat his man to the ball. He had already threatened once from this situation even before his eighth minute goal, a decent header from a left-wing Antonio Cassano cross that Tim Wiese should have kept out.
Main threat from crosses
Sampdoria were keen to get the ball as quickly as possible into wide areas, with long, diagonal balls from right to left towards Cassano a key feature of their play. On the other side, Franco Semioli and Stankevicius combined well, with the Lithuanian making surging runs on the overlap to provide a different outlet, forcing Marin into defensive positions, and opening up space for Semioli.
The second goal came on 15 minutes – again from Pazzini, and again after he was lurking at the far post. This time the goal was spectacular – a long, deep free-kick from the right was met with a stunning volley into the top of the net, and with a quarter of an hour gone, Sampdoria were heading through.
Sampdoria system
With that in mind, they slowed the tempo, and the rest of the half was slightly more even. Here, we had a better chance to take a look at Sampdoria’s unusual formation. There was no left-winger – instead Guberti played as a trequartista, behind the front two. This required positional changes from Cassano – who moved left, up against the right-back, and Andrea Dessena, who shuttled from a central midfield position alongside Angelo Palombo, into a leftish position when in possession.

Sampdoria's unusual formation - the back four in red, the midfield diamond in yellow, and the wide front two in blue
All things considered, it was not entirely dissimilar to the formation Dunga used with Brazil. Either way, it shows that Domenico di Carlo is looking past the Gigi Delneri 4-4-2 / 4-2-2-2, and is planning on something slightly more unique.
The final chance of the first half fell to – guess who – Pazzini, when his header from a left-wing corner was cleared off the line by the Bremen defender on the far post, and the German side were slightly fortunate to go in at half-time just 2-0 down.
Second half
Bremen came out for the second half with the same eleven players and broadly the same shape, but a seemingly a completely different state of mind. In basic terms, they were simply braver in getting forward – Clemens Fritz was more attack-minded and took advantage of the lack of a Sampdoria left-sided midfielder, whilst Marin saw more of the ball and looked far more dangerous.
Pazzini was the key figure in the first half, but after half-time it was unquestionably Marin, who ensured Stankevicius had a torrid time trying to defend against him. Martin had the ability both to cut inside and shoot, or go down the outside and get a cross into the box, and Stankevicius couldn’t get the better of him. The situation became so grave that it was surprising Di Carlo did not address the issue with a substitution – not necessarily to get Stankevicius off the pitch, but at least to give him some protection, as Semioli is not a particularly talented player in a defensive sense.
Substitutions
Indeed, it was substitutions which were key in turning the game around. Sampdoria did little with theirs – first Fernando Tissone replaced Guberti (who had played well, and was clearly unhappy to be withdrawn) but then injured himself after seven minutes, meaning Daniele Mannini was introduced, seemingly unsure of what he was supposed to be doing. Their other substitution was withdrawing Cassano after he had scored what he thought was the clinching goal in the 90th minute, giving him an ovation, and putting on Nicola Pozzi, a fairly limited striker.
Schaaf used his changes very well. Marko Arnautovic replaced the invisible Borowski and immediately offered creativity in the final third from central positions, going close to scoring with a dipping shot over the crossbar. But Markus Rosenberg made the most crucial impact from the bench – in the 93rd minute, he received the ball in an inside-right position on the edge of the box, and drilled a superb low shot into the far corner to take the tie to extra-time. Just as Bremen had switched off in the first leg, Sampdoria had done in this game – their full-backs were still trying to get forward when they should have been solid and disciplined, and that was partly what cost them.
Extra-time
The body language of the two sides after the 90 minutes was fascinating. Sampdoria were down and out – literally – their players were collapsed on the floor receiving massages and treatment to various knocks, whilst the Bremen players were on their feet, rejuvenated and energised after Rosenberg’s late strike. The home side had spent the final period of the game trying to take the sting out of the game, the away side were playing at a high tempo trying to get back in it.
It was no surprise, therefore, that Bremen won the extra-time period. Marin continued to be brilliant and hit the woodwork twice (he deserved a goal), but the winning strike came from Pizarro – a low shot into the corner in similar fashion to Bremen’s first goal. And that was that – Sampdoria looked too tired and disorganised to create anything at the other end, and Bremen were through.
Conclusion
An extraordinary tie that featured two very similar games – the home side dominating and deservedly being 3-0 up going into stoppage time, and then conceding a crucial late goal. The pattern of play – as well as the difference in substitutions – meant that Bremen were always likely to go on and win the game, despite the fact they played very, very poorly in the first half of this game.
Credit should go to Schaaf for getting his side in shape despite the loss of Mesut Oezil (permanently) and Aaron Hunt (temporarily), although it’s hard to imagine he’ll ever again choose the XI with which he started this match, as there was no cohesion or creativity until the substitutions.
Sampdoria’s opening was sensational and their formation was fascinating – but on balance, they were narrowly second best.
Sampdoria 3-2 Werder Bremen (AET): Pazzini puts Sampdoria in charge, but subs prove crucial


Superb game. Marin was absolutely sensational in the second half. He’s like a cross between Lionel Messi and Alexander Hleb (in a good way).
Shame that two such interesting teams were drawn together at this stage of the competition. The fact the Bundesliga began last weekend – a full week before Serie A – gave Bremen a clear advantage in terms of fitness as well. Can’t help but think that the major European leagues will all kick off on the same weekend in future, if only to avoid this kind of physical mismatch in such massively important early-season games.
Very good point about the start times…
Seeing that these games are so important – it is not beyond any team to time their physical build up to these games rather than the start of their league. Especially when we are talking about just one or two weeks of difference. I find the issue of starting times a plausible explanation for physical mismatches, but a sorry excuse none the less.
are you going to write about “braga the underdog story”?
Afraid not…will hopefully cover them in the group stage.
ZM – Speaking of Portuguese teams, you might also want to take a look at what’s happening at Sporting. You mentioned Paulo Sergio in your Managers to Watch column, but the man can’t settle on a tactic. He’s trying to find a tactic through trial and error. In 4 official games, I think he’s used 5 different formations!
I was going to ask the same question.
Brilliant article for an equally exciting game. After reading the first paragraph I was ready to compare Sampdoria to Brazil’s team under Dunga but it seem’s you’ve done that already.
Top marks
Yeah, same after looking at the chalkboard
That’s what ZM thought us, I think!
You and I seemed to notice the same things, although I though Sampdoria’s fatigue played a much larger role in their demise maybe. There is no way Rosenberg and Pizarro are not closed down in the first half. I am also surprised you didn’t mention how Guberti was directly pressing Frings which gave Bremen no easy outlet. Anyway, I just posted my review of the game, it was a really fantastic tactical match to watch!
P.S. I have never seen a player run so much but do so little as Bargfrede. I am unsure what to make of him.
Bargfrede is one to watch, at the Euro 2012 he should be on the national team if things go well. This wasn’t his best performance, and he’s certainly about more than running.
I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt, I’ve barely seen him and he must have done something right to break into the Bremen XI at such a young age. To be fair to him Borowski had an invisible game as well, Sampdoria did a good job of shackling their Bremen midfield.
Thought Marin looked excellent, another one of Germany’s rising stars…
a low shot into the corner!
….indeed!
Just noticed this… “and Andrea Dessena, who shuttled from a central midfield…”
You must have gotten Daniele Dessena confused with Andrea Dossena.
You’re right, thanks…
The lack of depth in the squad became shockingly obvious yet again. I would not go so easy on Bremen: had it not been for a freakish twist of fate (the goal scorer coming on because there was no substitute jersey at hand for the blood stained Wagner) every one would be all over the abysmal performance that they put on. With Mertesacker out of form and Frings showing his age, the phlegma of Borowski can not be compensated. The problems of Bremens back four and especially the left fullback have been haunting them for years now.
Thank god for the austrian astronaut who put all the pundits to shame in actually giving his all for the team in spite of accusations of being “difficult”. His was the only substitution that had substantial impact on the squad. There is good reason the other two don’t make the first eleven. I mean – starting Wagner? That is almost a sign of desperation.
Bremen has a potential for pace that few teams can match, but lately have shown more and more of their notoriously erratic performances. In this game the pace only came to bear after Sampdoria caved in. Whether this was due to physical fitness of league preparation is a very interesting question, but I have no doubt that it was the deciding factor in this game, far more so than the subs. In how many of his runs did Marin beat his man in the first 70 minutes?
I agree, I thought the impact of the subs was really only due to their freshness. Bremen were much fitter, probably a combination of Sampdoria chasing the game, their need to press, and Bremen starting the season earlier.
Wagner put in one of the worst CL performances I have ever seen. I am not exaggerating.
ZM, being a long-time observer of Schaaf, I don’t think he used his substitutions well – I’d say it took him way too long to merely correct his obvious mistakes when chosing the team. He didn’t draw any lessons at all from our cup final nightmare, when turning Borowski into a winger didn’t work at all. Also Pizarro does not possess the right type of movements off the ball to fill in for Hunt (that’s something for which Borowski would have been suited much better for instance).
I totally agree.
Really? Two of his subs had a big impact, and he only had five to choose from too…
Come on, ZM, goals are overrated. Don’t let Schaaf off the hook just because he got plain lucky with a sub he did not even want to make in the first place (the blood stain incident). He was responsibe for the lack of pace in putting Borowski next to Frings and dropping Pizarro behind Wagner, effectively rendering the midfield immobile.
Then again there really is not much quality to choose from, the problems in the back line and the injuries of some key players are hardly the managers fault. The slow starting eleven however is and thankfully Arnautovic was a remedy to that. I wonder if Frings will finally feel some heat from Wesley (the most recent signing) this season. His build up under pressure is like watching a freaking glacier move.
Aside from his goal I still think that Rosenberg did cause a lot of problems, why don’t you rate him? He was certainly miles better than Wagner. I remember watching him last year and being impressed too, but haven’t seen much of him so I can’t really speak about his overall quality.
I also thought Marin was having a shocker until it was clear than Stankevicius had hit a wall. He lost the ball almost literally every time he touched it, and this was either against Stankevicius or Massimo Volta, two mediocre defenders. (The Lithuanian is not rated amongst Samp fans at all, and Volta was in Serie B or lower his whole career)
That was a typical Werder week. first a great game, then an awful one and the last one was very lucky.
the story with the blood on the shirt fits into it. Bremen is not a very solid team (Schaaf said: ’sometimes I just like to win, even if it’s boring.’), but they showed morals and passion. but in nearly every other game a 1:3 in the 90+ minute would have been nonrelevant.
About Borowski, i think the only position he’s usefull is the left (maybe the right) in the diamond. he’s not a real attacker and not a real defender for a midfielder.
I wonder why Inter decided to offload Arnautovic. He was ten times better that deadweight players like Mancini and Quaresma.
I think the incident with the blood on the shirt was overrated; typical journalists` story. Rosenberg was already warming up, I think it is safe to say,that he would have come anway.
don’t think that. usually 5 players are warming up, maybe he would have come in later, but that would have been a different game.