Newcastle 6-0 Aston Villa: Carroll the main man as Newcastle run riot

The starting line-ups
A huge win for Newcastle thanks to two main factors – they won the midfield battle, and had a clear gameplan when they had the ball.
Chris Hughton kept faith with the eleven players that started well but faded badly against Manchester United last Monday, whilst Kevin MacDonald made the one expected change – with James Milner leaving, his replacement Stephen Ireland came into the side in the centre of midfield.
Villa started the better side, and looked more likely to score thanks to Newcastle’s suicidally high defensive line that Ashley Young constantly looked to take advantage of. He won a penalty after just eight minutes by sprinting in behind Newcastle’s backline to meet a curled through ball from Stiliyan Petrov, but John Carew blazed the spot kick well over the bar.
Newcastle grew into the contest by getting the better of the midfield battle. Alan Smith and Joey Barton simply outfought Petrov and debutant Stephen Ireland, winning the 50-50 balls, and taking it in turns to break towards goal. Barton was playing slightly higher up the pitch, and was the most creative of these four players – and less than five minutes after the missed penalty, fired a tremendous strike past Brad Friedel, and into the net.
No cohesion from Villa
Villa were playing a more possession-based approach than the counter-attacking style they favoured under Martin O’Neill, although the space in behind the Newcastle defence was also prompting their central midfielders to look for quick balls over the top. They struggled to get their wingers involved – Marc Albrighton, so impressive in his first two games of the season, was outclassed by Jose Enrique and Stewart Downing did little. Villa switched their wingers around, but their main problem was still in the centre of the pitch.
Judging Ireland by his debut is rather harsh, but it seems unlikely that his preferred role is in a midfield four, even when playing alongside the defensive-minded Petrov. Today he played very deep, unable to influence the game going forward, and showing defensive weaknesses when up against Smith (both in losing too many tackles, and not tracking him when Smith made a run into the box, where he was upended by Richard Dunne). Ireland’s best position is at the top of a midfield three, and whilst the cash-plus-Ireland deal was good in terms of monetary gain and simple player ability, they now have the problem that Milner and Ireland are quite different players, and replacing one with the other might not work particularly well.
As against Manchester United, Newcastle’s wingers were slightly too keen to come inside early on – particularly Wayne Routledge, who seemed inclined to cut in onto his left foot, only to then discover that he wasn’t confident enough to actually use it. On the other side, Enrique started to get forward more, and his excellent cross found Carroll at the back post, who nodded down for Kevin Nolan to score at the second time of asking.
Carroll runs the show
Carroll was superb all day, with his obvious aerial ability complimented by his general link-up play, and his precise finishing. His first goal arrived after a Dunne miskick following a corner, and Newcastle were 3-0 up at half-time.
The second half was played at a much gentler pace. Newcastle were intelligent enough to slow the pace down when in possession in midfield – the Premier League experience of Smith, Barton and Nolan is not something many newly-promoted sides can draw upon. Their attitude was to sit back, and see what Villa had to offer. Which was very little – as the Chalkboard below shows, they didn’t manage a single shot on target.
MacDonald changed nothing at half-time , then experimented with Emile Heskey in a right-wing position in the second half, still with the 4-4-1-1. Petrov was the next player to get some rare experience on the right following Nigel Reo-Coker’s introduction, but in truth, Villa had given up. Carroll volleyed home a fine goal midway through the second half, then Nolan poked home in the last five minutes, before Carroll grabbed his hattrick in stoppage time. But the second half was a non-event in tactical terms.
Conclusion
You suspect that Kevin MacDonald has blown his chance of being given the Aston Villa job on a full-time basis after this display, especially with Bob Bradley making positive noises in response to being linked with the job. Villa started well, but were absolutely terrible after going 3-0 down. MacDonald’s changes in the second half hardly suggested he has the tactical nous to deserve the job, and whoever does take over will have to mould a cohesive team with some players that don’t really seem to fit together after Ireland’s arrival.
Newcastle were excellent – combative in midfield, intelligent and patient in their build-up play, and clinical upfront. Carroll’s goals gets the headlines, but his overall game was excellent throughout. He wins almost everything in the air, and is well aware of his job in holding the ball up and laying it off for others.
In all, Newcastle look to be a decent side. Their formation can shift easily; a 4-4-1-1 when defending, and a 4-2-3-1 (or even 4-1-4-1) when in possession of the ball. They also have a clear gameplan – get the ball to Carroll in the air, and get runners to contest the second ball. If there’s one thing they need to change, it’s simply to utilize Carroll even more -with his aerial dominance, there’s no reason for the wingers to be cutting in rather than going outside and whipping balls in.
Newcastle 6-0 Aston Villa: Carroll the main man as Newcastle run riot




Jonas as good as Rooney!
Nice and quick one, ZM. Decent as always =D
ีumm it may be too fast
but we have got 6-0 for 3 matches
Is that aginst what ZM has predicted?
and if it is, what should be the main reson for those 6-0
(sorry about my english)
It is just statistical variance. Or, to put it another way, unlikely things sometimes happen.
Perhaps those managers also read this blog and decide to make a it different lol ^_^
Yes, it is strange, as apparently 6-0 had happened only 17 times in Prem history before this weekend, and now it’s 20…I think it’s too easy to take anything from that!
Well, two of these results were the expression of the ever increasing gap between the haves and have-nots in the Premier League rather than some global tactical development. The one match remaining doesn’t allow for any conclusions either, as MON’s sudden departure and the caretaker coach seemingly not being up to the task probably had higher stakes in the embarrassing loss than the admittedly very good performance by Newcastle.
One tactical nugget I noticed was that Barton should take every corner that Newcastle win. Once Ryan Taylor came on, he immediately smashed two corners against the first man. I think Barton then takes the corner for the 5th goal (Nolan’s second). I’m pretty sure it is Barton, because it’s exactly the same, looping, ballooned style to the back post that caused Villa so many problems.
is the gap between the top and bottom sides wider than ever in epl? chelsea won both matches by 6 0 and arsenal followed the trend.
Defend seems to become worse after world cup =0
Anyway, by your logic, I hope you doesn’t mean Aston Villa is a bottom side..
nah, if 6 0 is the current “trend” then villa’s result is just an outlier. i guess o’neil’s departure and the caretaker’s inability to conjure the correct tactical situation explains the villa situation. i actually think that villa is a decent side.
no I don’t think so. last season Arsenal scored 6 goals against Everton and Blackburn, both solid mid-table teams. Chelsea put 7 past Sunderland and Aston Villa (mid-table side), as well as Stoke and 8 against Wigan; the latter isn’t too surprising seeing as they scored 7 of their goals after Wigan had Gary Caldwell sent off. I even remember a game back when Everton finished 4th (must have been 2004-05 or so); on the last day of the season Arsenal beat them 7-0.
the big teams don’t usually score tons of goals against relegation candidates (the Blackpool game was obviously an exception, but they also had a player sent off early) – it’s the mid-table teams they often demolish. the reason is that relegation candidates will play extremely defensively against top teams, who will enjoy a lot of possession but often have trouble breaking them down. but a team like Everton or Villa is unlikely to set the stall out to defend, so on a bad day (and a good day for their opposition), they can get crushed.
and, of course, the Newcastle-Villa result is just a complete fluke.
Good to see Andy Carroll have a good game, hope it continues; not only for Newcastle’s success but for England’s. Its not very often in the modern game you get a good ‘Old Fashioned’ forward like this coming through the ranks. In a day when ‘Pace is Power’, it was very refreshing to see what a player with brute force, work rate & good finishing can do.
It will be very interesting to see him alongside an intelligent player who will benefit from the knock ons and link up play.
I was at the game and as a Newcastle fan was delighted with the result
) … a couple of tactical observations ..
1. Agree entirely with your comment on our ’suicical’ high defensive line. None of Newcastle’s centre backs have any pace and we were lucky to get away with this on a few occasions
2. With the personnel on show I think a Chelsea style 4-3-3 would be better suited to get the best out of that group of players. A number of times Carroll won headers and flick ons and he only had Nolan (no pace, not a forward) trying to get in behind. I’d like to see Routledge and Gutierrez play higher up and try to get in behind Carroll looking for flick on’s, with Barton and Nolan supporting from behind with the midfield anchored by Smith or the new boy Tiote.
3. Barton was excellent and is finally starting to look like the player that practically carried Man City under Pearce. If he stays fit he can be a big player for Newcastle this year
4. Finally Villa’s lack of intensity in the 2nd half was a major surprise. We all expected them to come out flying after the expected usual half time ‘rollicking’ but they barely turned up. Young threatened in behind but other than him they were suprisingly poor
Great site ZM, keep up the good work!
Thanks! Any idea where Tiote might play, or rather, who he might replace?
Agree on Barton. His off-field problems have overshadowed the fact that, for a couple of seasons at City, he was excellent.
I don’t know much about Tiote to be honest but from what I gather he’s a defensive midfielder so in the XI that played today he’d replace Smith as the more defensive part of a double pivot …
To put a caveat on that however Smith wasn’t a regular towards the end of last season when Hughton preferred a Guthrie/Nolan combination in central midfield. Guthrie would act as a deep lying playmaker and Nolan would get forward and support the central strikers in an pretty straightforward 4-4-2. I’m a big fan of Guthrie but I can’t see him fulfilling that role in the Premier League where we’ll have much less control of games so maybe Hughton is looking for a better ‘destroyer’ than Smith to play in central mid.
Not sure how much you’ve seen of Smith but I don’t rate him at all, especially as a defensive midfielder. He is brave, strong in the air and will throw himself into blocks and tackles which can galvanise the team but he’s positionally weak, poor in posession and when we have the ball his movement to create space for himself and others is really poor. I know the club were actively trying to sell him in the summer, partly because he’s on big money but his omission from the team towards the end of last year, despite being captain in the first half of the season, was telling.
p.s. Barton was a one-man band at City for a couple of years, but whether he’ll ever escape controversy is questionable … he had an ill-advised ‘hitler’ type salute after his goal today, presumably referring to his dodgy moustache
1) I’d think that Tiote was signed to replace Smith. If Ben Arfa is ever brought on board, I’d like to see him replace Nolan slotting in behind Carroll.
2) Barton’s celebration was more of a “Shearer” than a fascist salute.
Yeah, have heard Smith hasn’t been great for Newcastle. He did well in this game, though.
Point 4 is spot on, I couldn’t believe Villa’s reaction. I was worried that we’d throw away the lead but only A Young seemed to be trying.
Very good article ZM! I hope to see a few more Newcastle ones this season.
I think it’s interesting seeing Hughton’s evolution as a manager. At first it seemed he was a extremely pragmatic manager which resulted in lots of 1-0 wins during the first half of last season. Many fans (judging from online forums etc.) were skeptical of Hughton and seemed to think the team was winning in spite of him rather than because of him, the second of the season completely changed that though. The Routledge signing showed that the cautious pragmatism was as a result of personnel rather than preference and we began to dominate teams. It’s only been one home game but it appears (so probably to early to tell) but it seems that we haven’t reverted back to the cautious style of the late 2009.
The question is whether Hughton’s bottle will go after a couple of home defeats and if we will revert back to those almost fearful tactics. I hope he succeeds though, most fans really like Hughton now and aren’t desperate to see Shearer in the dugout despite the myths that are perpetuated in the media.
I’m looking forward to seeing more of Jose and Carroll this season, both exciting players to watch, nice to see both get praised on here as Jose has been slated by the press a lot despite probably being our best player for a while now.
Great to see another Newcastle article in quick succession! Hopefully we’ll continue to be covered on this website for the right reasons.
Jose Enrique, Mike Williamson, Joey Barton and Andy Carroll really stepped up to the plate today, I can’t remember the last time a game of football gave me such a wide grin on my face! Carroll in particular was brilliant, his aerial dominance was bordering on ridiculous at times, if he can keep finishing like he did today then he’ll be some player.
The high line was probably ill-advised, but I can see why Hughton went ahead with it – our full-backs are both quite pacy, and Coloccini is no slouch either, so you can see the logic there even if it didn’t work out in practice.
Anyway, there are some occasions you just have to enjoy as a football fan – and this is one of them!
I’m really won over by Hughton, I think pragmatic is a good word to describe him.
When he needs to battle and get results, he’s prepared to do it. When it becomes clear that the best thing to do is keep attacking (as yesterday), he allows the players to do so.
As other people have said, he’s also good at realising the abilities and the limitations of the players and the team – and setting out his tactics accordingly. No more players out of position, no more messing about with odd formations, just getting the best out of the team as a unit.