Bayern 2-1 Wolfsburg: Heartbreak for McClaren as Schweinsteiger strikes late

The starting line-ups
A tremendous fixture to open the new Bundesliga season – the champions from the last two seasons going head-to-head – and it turned out to be a wonderful game.
Bayern continued to use their 4-2-3-1 formation that brought them such success last season, with some notable modifications. Holger Bastuber moved to centre-back, with the promising Diego Contento starting at left-back. Toni Kroos has returned from a loan spell at Leverkusen and played behind Miroslav Klose, meaning Thomas Mueller played the right-wing role he thrived in at the World Cup.
Steve McClaren left out Zvjezdan Misimovic, the player with the second-highest number of assists in the Bundesliga last season, because of disciplinary reasons and opted for a defensive-minded 4-1-4-1 system, that saw Josue acting as the holding player, and debutant Cicero Santos ahead of him alongside Sascha Riehter. Another new signing, Mario Mandzukic, played on the left wing.
It’s difficult to emphasise how much Bayern dominated the first half. Wolfsburg spent most of the opening period simply trying to get out of their own half, as the home side were content to keep the ball, Spain-style, without looking to penetrate the Wolfsburg defence too often.
Bayern’s double pivot of Mark van Bommel and Bastian Schweingsteiger was the main reason for their dominance – they took it in turns to drop deep, and always made themselves available for a pass. The Bayern full-backs pushed on well in advance of the central midfielders, whilst Daniel van Buyten often stepped up to become an additional option in midfield.
Wolfsburg midfield problems
McClaren clearly wanted to ‘match’ Bayern in midfield – not in terms of matching their formation, but in deploying his midfield in the ‘inverse’ shape to Bayern’s, so each Bayern midfield was tracked closely. Josue took care of Toni Kroos, who had a quiet game, whilst Cicero and Riether looked to track van Bommel and Schweinsteiger if either attempted a forward run.
This worked reasonably well defensively, because despite Bayern having around 70-80% possession for much of the first half, they had few chances, and only scored one goal. When it came, it was wonderful – Mueller drifted in from his right-sided position to exchange passes with Kroos, before taking the ball on with his first touch, and volleying left-footed across Diego Benaglio into the far corner. It was a good, subtle example of how full-backs can be effective going forward – Philip Lahm’s movement forward was not a rampaging run, but he took up a right-wing position, allowing Mueller infield to strike.
That was an exquisite goal, but Wolfsburg were weathering the storm at the back. Their problem was that their ‘matching’ in the centre midfield was a problem when they tried to have a spell of possession themselves, because each of their midfielders was in close proximity to a Bayern player. They struggled to break forward with any real conviction and didn’t create a single meaningful chance in the opening period.
Bayern were defending well with a highish defensive line – not wanting to let Dzeko get into the penalty area to receive crosses, and van Buyten could be seen enthusiastically telling his fellow defenders to push up quickly whenever they cleared the ball. Their possession football was wonderful to watch – in the five minutes before half-time they had 89.1% of the ball – and Wolfsburg stood off in their own half and hoped for half-time, but they only had a one-goal lead.

The second half sides, after Wolfsburg's change in shape
Wolfsburg change shape
McClaren changed his shape completely at half-time, withdrawing Peter Pekarik (who had an awful first half against Franck Ribery, and was on a booking) and introducing Misimovic behind Dzeko. This meant that Riether dropped in at right-back, and Wolfsburg’s shape changed from 4-1-4-1 to 4-4-1-1, with Josue and Cicero playing roughly alongside one another.
This changed the game completely. Dzeko, who cut a dejected figure in the first half, was more lively and happier to be supported closely by Misimovic. Wolfsburg had five very good opportunities within the first ten minutes of the second period, with the new front two both guilty of missing presentable chances. Bayern’s full-backs had become so used to playing exclusively attacking roles in the first half that they left their centre-backs exposed, and Wolfsburg had 2 v 2 and even 3 v 2 situations that they didn’t make the most of.
The theoretical problem with shifting to a 4-4-1-1, with Misimovic very high up the pitch, is that it gives you one less player in the midfield zone. But the change in shape helped Wolfsburg retain possession more easily for two reasons. Firstly, it meant that they had something more like a double pivot themselves, and one of the two holding players was always available for a pass (compared to the first half, where van Bommel was always on Cicero). This shift from McClaren is similar to how Arsene Wenger moved Abou Diaby deeper in Arsenal’s game against Liverpool in February, which moved him away from Lucas, and allowed Arsenal to retain the ball more easily.
Secondly, the introduction of Misimovic means that Bayern’s central midfielders had someone to worry about behind them, and Schweinsteiger, the game’s best player in the first half, had less room to manoeuvre and played deeper, in a more defensive role.
Wolfsburg scored in the 55th minute with their sixth chance of the second half – six more than they’d had in the first. It was a simple goal – Misimovic sent in a corner, Dzeko rose highest and nodded in. Wolfsburg more than deserved their point.
In the later stages of the second half, the game was much more conservative and scrappy – Wolfsburg broke up the play with 25 fouls in the match (compared to Bayern’s six) and there was relatively little in the way of goalscoring chances. Bayern kept their formation, Wolfsburg kept theirs, and tactically there was little of interest – though van Buyten’s moves forward stopped thanks to the presence of Misimovic.
A point seemed a fair result, but Bayern stole the points in stoppage time – Ribery, quieter in the second half, cut inside onto his right foot and sent a beautiful deep cross into the penalty area, which Benaglio misjudged, and Schweinsteiger steered in at the far post from a narrow angle.
Conclusion
An interesting case study in the midfield, with Wolfsburg’s first half 4-1-4-1 having problems keeping possession, but the 4-4-1-1 giving themselves more time on the ball in deep positions, and worrying Bayern’s central midfielders far more with the use of a central playmaker.
Despite the defeat and the awful first half display, McClaren can take some positives from the way Wolfsburg dominated the start of the second half – and in terms of the ‘clear cut chances’ score, Wolfsbug were well on top.
Bayern’s first half may point towards a Spain-style possession-based game more than last season. Although they kept the ball well, Kroos and Miroslav Klose had disappointing games as Bayern struggled to involve them in build-up play. They were fortunate to get the victory, but it was the sort of last-gasp win that eventual champions always record.
Bayern 2-1 Wolfsburg: Heartbreak for McClaren as Schweinsteiger strikes late




Didn’t get to see this game but interesting that Van Gaal went with a more defined 4-2-3-1 rather than the 4-4-2 or 4-2-4 i’d say they played last year. Do you think that’ll continue with Robben/Olic back in?
Well, Robben will definetly play on the right-wing.
So, van Gall always said he has got 4 strikers fpr one position, that mean he now counts Müller as a striker.
He also said he could imagine playing 4-4-2 but that would meen that Kroos is out, he he would not want that, so he probably want to continue playing 4-2-3-1.
But we have to wait how Müller players as a lone striker. Last season he said “Müller always plays.”, he he probably wouldn´t let him out, so than it could be, that he return to a 4-4-2.
But there isn´t a high possibility.
that’s what i predicted upon the return of kroos from his loan spell. it will be interesting to see what formation they’ll play when robben returns
‘Although they kept the ball well, Kroos and Miroslav Klose had disappointing games as Bayern struggled to involve them in build-up play.’
Very true, but one has to note that Kroos cant have a huge effect on the game as Bayerns buildup (in contrast to that of the german NT for example) happens mostly over the wings, often from longer, often high passes on either Robben or Ribery – and not via the AM (here Kroos, there Özil) distributing the ball to the wingers or the striker (Poldi, Müller, Klose), running onto the ball.
Thats van Gaals choice and it makes perfect sense as he has totally different wingers available as the german NT. Robben and Ribery have the skills to touch the complicated long ball with ease and dribble past their opponent(s), creating space and opportunities in the center. Müller on the other hand neither has strong touching nor dribbling skills (his strengths are strong anticipation with off the ball movement and a good finish) – thats why he doesnt work out too good for Bayern on the wing, but on the contrast as deep lying forward, where he can abuse the space created by Rib/Rob and score.
Van Gaal seems to think similarly, thats why he probably opted to sub in Pranjic for the right wing (which just isnt his preferred position, which was visible i think) so he can move Müller back to the center in favor of Kroos.
SO the general tendency to buildup wia the wings and Müller being stronger in the center with that tactic imo forces Kroos out of the team, unless van Gaal includes some tactical changes. I however dont think its impossible to field them all with Rib/Rob on the wings, Kroos in the center and Müller as marauding striker. That would give them more flexibility regarding the buildup at least and suit Müllers abilities.
Brilliant article, will there be more Bundesliga match analysis in the future?
Bayern seem to have adopted the basic 4-2-3-1 of the rest of Europe, rather than operate the innovative 4-2-2-2 that they did last year. The key last year was that Schweinsteiger and Van Bommel could match up with a midfield three by themselves, leaving most back fours helpless against the assault of Olic, Muller, Ribery and especially Robben. Maybe they are looking for a more possession based approach to protect their less than airtight backline? I think the direct and bold attacking of last year caught a lot of teams in the Champions League off guard, but i guess a back up plan is needed for tough away fixtures.
I have no scientific evidence to back this up, but ZM do you think that the bundesliga is currently the most tactically interesting league in europe ? I watched this game and also HSV v Schalke right now, and i think german teams always seem to have a clearly defined shape to their play, whether it is a possession game (bayern, werder) or counterattack (Schalke). Definitely more tactical than the epl or the spl here in scotland!
I think the reason why Bayern were so weak, and Wolfsburh so strong at the beginning of the second half was htat none of Bayerns holding mitfielders dropped deep to support Bayerns full-backs when Bayerns was in possession.
In the first half it was okay with Lahm and Contento pushing forward, but still having a 2-1 against Dzeko.
But with Misimovic on the field, the suddenly had a 2-2 and sometimes even a 2-3 against Dzeko, Misimovic and Manzukic.
Either van Bommel or Schweinsteiger should have dropped deep when in possession to have a one man majority in the centre of the defense when in possession.
Its just to risky to leave the two centre-back alone against two offensive players, you saw that when Wolfsburg had all those chances with Misimovic and Dzeko(and also Manzukic).
They could still easily dominate possession because WOlfsburh now just had two players in the centre of mitfield.
Ya, I really think one of Bayerns hoding players should have dropped deep.
Or They could have brought Anatolyi to drop deep so that they still have Schweinsteiger and Van Bommel in the mitfield when in possession.
As to the formation, I don’t think Bayern will stay by the 4-2-3-1 for the season, at least not if Ribéry and Robben are available. Van Gaal even said himself that he was going to change the formation especially for Kroos, as he’s a central midfielder, who prefers to be somewhat of a playmaker or at the wing in a diamond midfield, but not a “true” winger.
I can’t really see Kroos and Müller as the two “ones” in a 4-4-1-1, for I think Müller is suited better to play behind someone and linking up midfield and attacker by his smart running, but if Villa does something like that for Spain, it would be possible if it wasn’t for the fact that Olic simply has to have a place on the pitch.
As to Wolfsburg and McClaren: I don’t really know what happened between him and Misimovic, but in my opinion he is just an indispensable player in central midfield since Wolfsburg don’t have another player who can create at the moment. The price for that is that you have two players (including Džeko) who won’t work too much defensively but they have the menace to keep their opponent’s defenders back.
By the way, thanks for this site, ZonalMarking, I love it. And personally, apart from having no clue in general, find it extremely difficult to recognize formations when watching games on TV.
Sorry, I have to correct you at one thing. Kroos prefers to play as a playmaker, but not on the wing in a diamond, he never played tht. Last season at Leverkusen he played on the left wing in a 4-2-2-2. That was actually not a real “winger-position” as he like to go in into the centre to shoot and make great passes, but in and diamond the only position he really can play is as a playmaker.
You may be right that Muellers best position ist behind one striker(though I also liked him on the right wing at Germany) but van Gaal really said he has 4 strikers(Olic, Klose, Gomez and Mueller) and that he doesn´t plan to play in a 4-4-2 because that would mean no Toni Kroos.
That means, that he wants to continue playing 4-2-3-1(though he always calls it 4-4-1-1) with Müller upfront and Toni as a playmaker.
We will see if Mueller can play this postion and it would we very interisting to see what happens if not.
So the main competition for the last starting spot on the team is basically between Toni Kroos and Klose? I wonder which player adds more to the team. If Klose is a starter, Muller will be moved into Kroos’ playmaking position, but if Toni Kroos starts, Muller will be moved to the Striker position. I think that Toni can play better than Muller in a central playmaking position, and I think Muller can play just as well as Klose in the Striking position with a little practice there, so I will say the starting 11 should be this: (they need a new goalie); Lahm-Demichellis/Van Buyten (they could also use a new CB)-Badstuber-Contento; Schweinsteiger-Van Bommel; Robben-Kroos-Ribery; Muller. With a new goalie (Adler, Nuer), and a new CB (Subotic), and some time to gell, they could become just as good as any team in Europe.
Yes, you’re right, of course, Leverkusen didn’t play with a diamond midfield, but, as you said, Kroos didn’t play as a true winger. I’m not convinced he couldn’t play left in a diamond, but that’s really a moot point, as if you’re going to have a playmaker, then it should be Kroos anyway.
We agree that van Gaal wants to field a 4-4-1-1 aka 4-2-3-1 (it’s just a question how high up the pitch the wingers are, and with Bayern, they’re rather attacking); I know that van Gaal likes to have an attacking midfielder behind a lone striker but I’m surprised to learn that he pretty much commited himself to fielding Kroos. I’d thought it was either Müller behind Olic/Klose/Gomez or Kroos behind Müller (Olic/Klose/Gomez).
Müller is maybe more a false nine (well, instead of dropping deep he’s rather moving wide, as far as I can tell, but still …) than a playmaker so, even though theoretically it doesn’t make much sense, I’d say with Müller behind Olic the system is rather a 4-4-1-1 and with Kroos behind Müller it’s a 4-2-3-1.
Well, I think there won’t be a tactical revolution in Bayern’s team this season, but somehow I think it’s Müller’s movement and positioning that might be the most interesting tactical points in Bayern’s line-up through the season.
Can you write something about the Barcelona 4-0 Sevilla game?
I really like your commentary on games since i´ve read it for the first time last season around the quarter finals of CL. I pretty much like your explanation of tactics and formations and have learned a lot about it by simply reading your reviews on several games. Until now I never felt a need for giving further explanations or commentarys to any games, but something in this article really stroke me odd (sorry for bad english, but it´s not my narrative language).
Following your analysis of the games of Munich in last season and this game against Wolfsburg, they seem to have pretty much trouble against sides fielding a 4-4-1-1 formation.
After all, you can discuss, if they are playing a 4-2-3-1, a 4-2-2-2 or a 4-4-1-1 themselves. Basically they always play with 4 men in defense, 2 men in a central defensive role (Schweinsteiger and vBommel) 2 guys in a rather offensive winger position (ribery, müller, robben), a central striker (Olic last season, after his injury right now Klose, Müller or Gomez) and someone behind this one (Müller last season, right now Kroos). So basically I would call it a 4-2-3-1 with fluiding positions for everyone in an offensive role.
What I wanna say or ask by this: After comparing several games of Munich fielding a 4-2-3-1 in general, do you think, that a 4-4-1-1 is a good formation to play against a team playing a 4-2-3-1? Munich seemed to have a lot of trouble with playing this against Inter in last season CL Final, playing a 4-4-1-1, and now having much more trouble against Wolfsburg playing this formation in second half, then in first half, when they played a more 4-1-4-1.
Do you think, a 4-4-1-1 formation is the best solution against a 4-2-3-1 or do you think, it simply comes down to the individual quality of the players? Was Inter just individually stronger than Munich (Wolfsburg with Misimovic in the second half…) or might the 4-4-1-1 be a great solution to a side playing 4-2-3-1? If you think it might mainly come down to the question of the formation played, why do you think the 4-4-1-1 is a great counter against 4-2-3-1? I for myself wasn´t able to find a reasonable explanation for this and i´d really like to know your analysis of it… Thank you already now for a really great analysis of games!
Even if you ask zonal-marking, i try to answer, too.
The key, I think, could have been that both, Inter and Wolfsburg, defended very well and diciplined with 8 man( not with 9 as usual) so that Sneijder respectively Misimovic could have something like a free role.
It struck me while watching the game that Misimovic is one of the laziest players I have seen. Even though he was only playing half the match, he barely closed down opposition players or tracked midfield runners at all. Obviously it’s not part of the normal job description of an attacking midfielder, but when you’re playing against a team like Bayern, and a lot of your teammates (eg. Mandzukic, Dzeko) are tired from having run around the entire match… you could hear McClaren yelling “Zvjezdan” on the touchline every 5 seconds to try to get him to actually move around.
Misimovic wants to get away from Wolfsburg, but isn’t allowed to leave, so he might just have been on strike.
Well first off, Misimovic never seemed that happy about participating in defense. But as Aaron pointed out, Misimovic is pretty much on a semi-strike.
The situation in Wolfsburg is that new manager Hoeness (brother of Bayern’s Hoeness) was gunning to get Diego from Juventus. Which obviously didn’t fair so well with Misimovic. Meanwhile Schalke coach/manager Magath was trying to sign Misimovic as new playmaker to feed Raul.
But with the Diego deal falling through, and Wolfsburg now needing Misimovic themselves, they are pretty much in a bad spot now. Any chemistry with Misimovic is pretty much destroyed for now as was shown in Misimovic post-game interview.
My guess is that Wolfsburg is looking around closely what other play makers could be available in order to resolve the situation, while Misimovic will continue to look unhappy in order to force that move to Schalke.
Schalke desperately needs more offensive talent to play along with Raul & Farfan, so if they cannot score Misimovic they might look for another top player elsewhere.
Wolfsburg appears to be also still looking for another winger (to play instead of Ziani), with lots of names being thrown around (Hamburg supposedly just turned down a big offer for Eljero Elia, smart decision).
one answer to the issue of Mueller/Kroos is to drop van Bommel. Schweinsteiger holds deeper, and Kroos is given a freer role to operate behind Mueller. To use a slightly tired analogy, have Schweinsteiger as Xavi, the holder and distributer, and have Kroos as Iniesta, with more license to dribble and push forward. That leaves Mueller in the deep forward role he worked so well in last season, Rib/Rob on the wings, and (in my opinion) Olic as striker.Maybe a little dangerous, as Kroos doesn’t seem to be anywhere near van Bommel defensively, but if they’re going to dominate possession, i think that this formation gives them the most offensive skill and creativity while sacrificing very little in defense and ball retention.
with two differences
1. Xavi and Iniesta have someone like Busquets (and three strikers in front),
2. Schweinsteiger is not Xavi and Kroos is not Iniesta.
but when vBommel leaves, Kroos will be one option to take his place. with Mueller playing the striker, Bayern will need a new playmaker.
maybe vGaal also leaves (or a year later) and the follower has new ideas.
I wouldnt expect van Bommel to go anywhere. He is the teams captain and the toughest guy in the midfield when it comes to marking, tackling, interception … and often the one pulling the panic button if necessary. Seeing that part done from Kroos on a similar level is very unlikely. VB on the other hand also isnt a sole destroyer but has his qualities in the buildup as well. Finally, he and Schweinsteiger are very used to each other … so no reason to split them apart.
To use your Barca-analogy, Schweinsteiger is already playing the role Xavi inhabits and Kroos could very well play a similar role as Iniesta. But note that both need their Busquets (former Toure) as failsafe and passing station as well.
The decisive factor about making Kroos function in that team is the bias towards doing the buildup through the middle, i.e. the willingness from ‘Schwommel’ to play the ball to Kroos in the center, in order for him to create sth, basically setting up for Rib/Rob or the striker (perhaps Müller) or trying to score by himself. Nowadays they give the ball to Rib/Rob and let them gain the momentum by outdribbling/outpacing mulitple opponents. Thats how they currently gain an advantage over their opposition, creating space and outnumbering them in the center to be able to score. Unless they dont change that basic tactic, i dont see a reason for them to sport Kroos over Müller as the man behind the striker, b/c Müller much more suits that style.
If you consider the fact, that van Bommel just recently said he will quit his career when van Gaal leaves, it just sounds like he wants to get old in Munich. And throughing out van Bommel doesn’t fit to Munich, because he has played at Munich for about nearly 6 years now.
I think, Munich will change their playing stile in the next games. Van Gaal often mentioned his players will need some time to play well, because most of them played at the world cup and because the preperation time was so short.
Surely at the moment, van Bommel is more deserving of a place than Kroos?
For me there is no doubt that van Bommel has a guaranteed starting spot. Apart from him there are basically (the disappointing) Tymoshshuk, (the limited) Ottl and the (very young) Alaba left as midfielders with proper defensive capabilities – i dont see Kroos being able to fulfill that role, and it would deprive Schweinsteigers strengths if he had to take over that role (he is too slow and lacks aggression anyway imo). So van Bommel and Schweinsteiger are set in stone as the midfield tandem in front of the defense line, as they complement each other nicely.
Then vB is in his final year of his contract. Apparently Bayern had a precontract with Khedira for next year, but thats done now that he moved to RM. And if vB has a good year, i easily see him and Bayern agree on an extension. Besides i recently heard from a die-hard Bayern supporter that van Gaal plans with the talented Alaba as long term replacement for vB (which would be kinda typical for him tbh).
So Kroos taking over for van Bommel is totally out of question for me. But then … you never know … but it would be a major surprise
van Bommel said a few month ago, that this is his last season at Bayern because he want to play one or two years in the Netherlands. I don’t know if that is still his plan, but a few years ago when Klinsmann was the coach Bayern and van Bommel were talking about a new contract and vB wanted two more years but Bayern only one year (the every-player-over-30-gets-only-one-year policy). I think they made one year and a feww month later with van Gaal as the new coach they gave him one extra year on top.
If it is still vB plan to end his career with his home club, I think he will leave after this season.
In the unlikely event that van Bommel does leave next season, Pranjic would definitely be able be able to play along Schweinsteiger, while Alaba will get increased playing time to grow into the role. By then, van Gaal will also know better how to fit both Kroos & Müller into the system while bringing out their best.
Danijel Pranjic originally was labeled as ideal as left full-back/left wing when joining Bayern last season. He ended up being tested in many different positions last season. He played pretty well as a holding midfield then, and did so again in this years pre-season games. Van Gaal swapped him in against Wolfsburg, albeit in a different position again (apparently van Gaal sees him as a back-up on the right wing as well with Robben out and Müller still being shuffled around to see where he fits best while missing Robben and also Olic).
Personally, I rate Pranjic highly as sort of an ideal back up. No complaints about the bench, always ready to step in when needed, doesn’t mind playing out of preferred position. And as mentioned above, very capable of good performances.
For now the main problem is a center-back (we will see how the Demichelis issue resolves). Van Gaal likely has currently injured, young Brazilian defender Breno in mind for the future. But with him still out for a few months, a back-up to Badstuber/van Buyten will be needed given the Demichelis situation. Additionally, Bayern still needs a back-up for Lahm.
Although I would have loved to see Coentrao with Bayern, van Gaal’s track record with integrating youngsters means he might just be right to give Diego Contento a fair shot until the next transfer period and see how he pans out. Contento did well in his few games last season, and did so in the season opener, which gives much confident he can grow into the role.
Either way, one can still expect 1-2 new players this transfer period depending on whether manager Nerlinger can move the players deemed not needed. (Van Gaal does not want a big roster)
@ZM
Thanks for the mail back, was on vacation. Good luck with the idea, hope it works out!
And of course, glad to see your latest articles, especially this one =)
Regarding jersey numbers/stats, I am not quite sure how fast they do get uploaded/updated, but there are some in English on the Bundesliga’s official website: http://www.bundesliga.de/en/liga/matches/2010/index.php
Clicking on the match, and then on the player participating will give a couple of statistics I did not find elsewhere.
e.g.: Schweinsteiger
4 out of 6 duels won (tackles)
113 touches
1 shot
97% pass completion (95 out of 98)
2 chances created
Cheers for that website, very very useful.
Agree with what you say about Pranjic – he’s the kind of backup every successful side needs. And I like Contento too, he looks very promising.
I think Bayern could adopt Barca’s alternate formation of 4-2-4, with Muller playing in the Messi role, Klose or Olic playing in the Henry role, Robben playing high and wide right, and Ribery playing left but cutting infield. Van Bommel and Schwiensteiger are more dynamic but less technical versions of Xavi and Busquets.
I don’t think they should try something like this.
München is not Barcelona and Müller is not Messi.
I think last year they played a 4-2-3-1, that sometimes became a 4-4-1-1. with Kroos they are now able to play a more 4-2-1-3 system with Kroos as playmaker, Ribery and Robben even more as forwards, and Müller (or whoever else is playing the 9) in a very fluit role.
lets wait a few games and we will see how their style will change.
they will play against Freiburg and Mainz, but also against Bremen or Hamburg, or in the Champions League against smaller and bigger european clubs.
So van Bommel, as capain, leader and also very important player, will definetly play when hes fit this season. And he deserves his place.
When everybody is avaliable there ist just a contest between the three players Mueller, Kroos and Olic, two of them play.
Favorites are in my opinion Kroos and Mueller, with Mueller as a striker.
If it turns out he cant play this position, Olic will play upfront and Mueller and Kroos will batte for the position behind the striker, and probably Mueller will win.
Theres no way Kroos will play for van Bommel, but in al lot of cases either Ribery or Robben is injured whtich bmeans both, Kroos and Mueller would play.
When van Bommel end his carreer or leaves, either Kroos will play there or they will buy another one. I think Vidal would be great, but I dont think tehi´ll buy him.
Right now, I still think they need a new left-full-back and another good centre-back.
Why do english managers seem to mistrust a diamond midfield so much?
Jokes about Louis van Gaal leaving Bayern Munich are not funny in the remotest sense. Seriously, this guy is Bayern’s best chance to win the champions league in a decade.