Spartak Moscow 0-1 Rubin Kazan: Rubin’s early strike and brilliant defence gets them the win

The starting line-ups
You thought football had stopped for a month, didn’t you?
Well, not in the Russian Premier League, which has restarted after a brief break over the World Cup. This match between Spartak and Rubin is something of a glamour tie – 2nd v 1st from last season, and these two clubs have therefore both qualified for the group stages of the 2010/11 Champions League.
Both sides set out in 4-2-3-1 shapes, and both had made changes. Spartak were without Welliton and had to move Ari into an unfamiliar lone striking role, supported by an interchangeable line of three, with Jano Ananidze and Alex taking it in turns to drift from the left.
Rubin welcomed back Cristian Ansaldi after injury, and also had to change their left-back, where Lasha Salukvadze came in for Evgeni Balyaikin.
It seems strange to say that a game was ruined by a goal, but Cristian Noboa’s fortunate strike after just three minutes was the worst thing that could have happened for the game as a spectacle. His cross-shot following a corner evaded everyone and sneaked inside the near post to give Rubin the advantage before the game had even settled down. Rubin immediately sat back, defended and looked to play on the break – they do that anyway, but here they had even less attacking intent than usual for the vast majority of the game.
That’s not to say that this wasn’t an interesting game, but it became a situation we’ve seen so regularly in recent months – one side attacks but has no penetration, the other defends deep and narrow with eight players in two banks of four.
Spartak show sparks
The most interesting battle was in the inside-left position for Spartak, where Alex and Ananidze were causing problems, and getting into positions for long-range shots. Alex was drifting all over the pitch, even popping up at left-back to get things going, whilst Ananidze looked threatening but his final delivery was often poor. They were tempting Lasha Salukvadze high up the pitch and forcing Rubin’s otherwise positionally perfect defence to shuffle across, creating gaps, but they couldn’t exploit this enough to create many significant chances.
Rubin were quiet going forward. Their main tactic was to play long balls towards Bukharov, who either held it up or flicked it on for the onrushing veteran Sergei Semak, and their only other shot of the first half was through this approach – but Semak’s shot when one-on-one with Soslan Dyharayev was pitifully weak. Those two essentially played as a front two despite playing in a 4-2-3-1 – think Steven Gerrard and Fernando Torres at Liverpool.
Rubin defend brilliantly – as usual
Defensively, however, they are fantastic. With only three goals conceded in their thirteen league games so far, they are superbly organised, defending from the front – the forward two started by closing down quite aggressively, but in the intense heat they ended up dropping into their own half and making it difficult for Spartak to play through them. The two banks of four play reasonably narrow and keep it tight between the lines.
The Rubin centre-backs and central midfielders play particularly close together, creating that impenetrable defensive ’square’ that has made the 4-2-3-1 so popular. Every time Spartak got the ball into the final third, the player in possession generally found themselves up against two Rubin players, as the situation was often 8 v 4 in Rubin’s favour in that area of the pitch.
Spartak send others forward
Spartak only threatened when they tried to address this numerical disadvantage. Their better chances came when the full-backs provided overlaps, stretching the defence (who were set up to play against four rather central Spartak attackers) and providing crosses into the box. The other route of attack was when Ibson got himself forward, as one of Rubin’s midfielders were forced to move out of position and come towards the Brazilian, breaking the two banks of four.
It was no surprise that the closest Spartak got to scoring was when these two approaches combined. Sergei Parshivlyuk motored forward down the right and chipped in an excellent cross towards the near post, where Ibson glanced a header across goal, and off the crossbar. That, towards the end of the first half, demonstrated how Spartak might break through in the second.
Despite the full-backs increasingly getting forward, however, they couldn’t manage a goal. Semak dropped deeper and deeper until the system became more like a 4-5-1, and Ibson’s runs forward were less effective. Little changed tactically until Spartak brought on their bright young winger Aleksandr Kozlov, who started from the right and provided a direct threat with his pace and trickery – he had an effort that was narrowly deflected over the bar.
No further goals
In truth, what they lacked was a real goal-poacher, in the absence of their main striker. Ari failed to convince as a lone striker – seemingly not sure whether he was meant to drop deep as a false nine, drift to the wings to draw the centre-backs out of position, or stay central and look for goals. He missed his one chance.
Despite seeing little of the ball, Rubin looked equally likely to score on a counter-attack. It was one of these moves that resulted in Spartak’s Fedor Kudryashov getting a second yellow card for a cynical shirt pull in the final moments, but it mattered little.
Conclusion
Valery Karpin remains under huge pressure, and may well not be in a job by the time Spartak kick off their Champions League campaign. The basic ingredients for success are there – they keep creating chances and dominating games, but seventh place in the league tells its own story.
The major story from Rubin’s point of view was not the win, but the fact it was the last game before Alexander Bukharov leaves for Zenit St Petersburg. Losing your main forward is not advisable when you play with a lone striker system that uses him as the focal point, and it will be interesting to see how Gurban Berdiyew adapts. The signing of Obafemi Martins could be seen as a straight replacement, but they are completely different players, and the Nigerian’s arrival will surely see Rubin forced to change the way they play.
Spartak Moscow 0-1 Rubin Kazan: Rubin’s early strike and brilliant defence gets them the win




Thanks for this. The other interesting game this weekend was a high-quality encounter between FC Basel and FC Zurich that matched two 4-4-2 (double 6) sides against each other with plenty of great scoring chances and some exciting young players from the Swiss U-17 side that won the world championship.
BTW: Stranzl not Stranzil.
stranzl and ibson, just to point out, ZM.
Thank you very for this analisys. I´m absolutely agree. And i think that Berdyev will sign another forward to replace Bukharov, cause -as you say- Obafemi Martins is totally diferent player, and they need a real striker. Let´s see what happen when RPL transfer window will be opened. And about Karpin.. I don´t know. Of course he is under a lot of preassure, but Spartak president support him, and he talks about sign 3-4 veteran and high-level player on august intead replaced Valery. After all, two absolutely differents kind of teams and styles… the win have gone to the most experienced and executed side. The Rubin default idea (1:0).
Kasaev can play a more involved role in the final third, and Ryazantsev is more of an attacking centre-midfield option. Rubin benefited here from Parshivlyuk and Ari having some of their worst showings in a Spartak shirt. But Rubin look a better bet than CSKA to challenge Zenit. Did you see them against Krylia? Lacklustre doesn’t do the performance justice. Though Oliseh was good value!
Rubin welcomed back Cristian Ansaldi after injury, and also had to change their left-back, where Lasha Salukvadze came in for Evgeni Balyaikin.
I assume you mean Rubin had to change their right-back, as your diagram shows Ansaldi at left-back and Lasha Salukvadze in at right-back.
The above commentary shows, I think, why I’m not at all excited about this fairly quick shift to 4-2-3-1. It can be brilliant to watch a defensive team play well in this formation (think Brazil against Chile), but it can also be so boring.
Thanks again for the Russian review. It might get less comments but the fans of the game in Russia really appreciate it!
:toppa:
Personally, I would like Berdiyew to manage in a league with more visibility. Or failing that, have an European run the upcoming season.
Football is at full motion here in Brazil, btw. hahahahaha
Honestly I didn’t watch the game (russian league only airs here at weekends), so if you could tell me ZM, how was Alex? A lot of Inter fans miss him (including me), so I have this curiosity.
By no means his greatest showing in a Spartak shirt. Spartak’s coach, Karpin, was on the verge of leaving/being sacked before this game. Unable to break down a resolute Rubin, Alex was the main culprit for wasting the ball with aimless long rangers. Hardly helping his coach’s position…
But generally, he’s one of the league’s most gifted playmakers, and has played on either wing in a 4-4-2, or in any of the positions in the ‘3′ in 4-2-3-1. He functions better in the latter, feeding the last-shoulder striker Welliton, and working well with Ibson.
Thanks Martyn
In his career, Alex played in every left position of the field basically. Started in midfield for Guarani, then became wing-back/full-back starting at Inter, returned to midfield in 2006 (one of his best career moves), then became a forward/winger just before he moved to Spartak.
Ironically he was sold because, obviously, we needed the money (all brazilian teams need) and because he was “hampering the development of a new star”, which is Taison, who now plays in the exact same position. But Alex is twice the player Taison is…well, bad luck for us.
Good God, I cannot picture him at full-back! He’s grumpy even when in possession, so the indignity of being forced to see less of it AND having to defend… torture!
That he was sold because his club needed the money is interesting. With wealth starting to creep into the Brazilian economy and game, might a move never have materialised were Internacional as secure then as they are (?) now?
Even the wealthiest teams around here (São Paulo, Inter, Cruzeiro) need to sell at least one big player every year to keep finances up. If it weren’t Alex, it would be other.
And the next one is Sandro…he’s already Tottenham’s new signing.
Zonal Marking are you by chance also watching the U19 Euro? It’s fascinating to see the Spanish youth already playing the same tika taka football as the adult team.
That is. A bunch of youth FC Barcelona players (7) again. You’ll see almost two or three playing @ La Liga and taking minutes in Champions League this season. Don’t miss Thiago and Jonatan (evolution clones of Xavi/Iniesta saga) and Muniesa (natural Carles Puyol’s replacement). The new Pep Guardiola diamonds at all.
ZM, am surprised you say the 3rd minute goal ruined this game. Surprising because you didnt say this for the Germany Argentina game. I really thought that goal was too early for the match which was supposed to be a classic, but killed the game.
Hi, great article, you don’t see much written about the RUssian leageue elsewhere.
Do you plan to write about any new leagues this season – maybe French, or Turkish? I guess there are only so many football matches one can watch!
I am a celtic fan and was interested to see spartak bidding £10 million for aiden mcgeady. How do you think someone like him would cope in russian football ZM ?
I can’t see him moving to Russia. Aston Villa’s the most likely destination, IMO. I was annoyed to see him not being played against Braga, anyway – probably to avoid being cup-tied or injured :/
a little off-topic, but have you thought about using a flattr button? I’d like to chip in for zonal marking from time to time.
I support Tom’s idea. I’d be glad to support Your great analyses by a few pennies.
I would also contribute to a flattr…
Seconded!
After reading the match report and checking his recent games online, I am back to wondering whether Martin Stranzl might again be Austria’s best central defender. Any thoughts, Mr. Schaffer?
Rubin Kazan will miss Alexander Bukharov. It’s like if Liverpool sell F.Torres and play with Ngog.
@Rubin Kazan fans
Where does Obefemi Martins fit into your squad?
Embarassing Soslan Dzhanaev must go! Alex n Ibson are great, Yakovlev hasnt been given time since Saenko return. I understand that Karpin is acting manager, he is still looking to hire since sacking Lauprup. He is the one running the club n I don’t know if he gave up that position. Can’t do everything on his own, though. UCL will be too much for the Pigs. But I’d like Karpin to stay. We’ve changed managers mid season and it never worked for 7 years now. Thanks for covering Pigs n RuPL, ZM
Interesting that Semak is now playing as an AM again. If I’m not wrong he played deeper last season and was voted into the RPL Best 11 as a DM.
Xavi seems to settle new trends
Alan Kasaev is a quality player for defending champions Rubin. He scored twice in their victory over Dynamo Moscow yesterday. Nevertheless, now that Zenit have Bukharov and a 7 point gap it is hard to look past them for the RPL this season.
CSKA v Spartak Nalchik will be an interesting game today. For me, Nalchik’s manager Yuri Krasnozhan is the best in the league.
Time for a new article? Perhaps EPL previews…. or you on a holiday after WC?
Just want to say you did a great job of reporting during the World Cup! Will you do some Euro Qualification too?