Chile 1-0 Switzerland: Chile deserve win but might regret wasting chances

The starting line-ups
A clash of two styles. Attacking v defensive, fluid v rigid, quick v slow, short passing v long ball. Chile emerge victorious, though it should have been a greater victory, and they were helped by a red card.
Chile were able to call on their star striker Humberto Suazo after injury, although he didn’t look 100% and made little impact before he was substituted at half-time. Otherwise, they lined up with the expected players for their 3-3-1-3 shape.
Switzerland brought in Valon Behrami on the right-hand side ahead of Tranquilo Barnetta, and Steve von Bergen replaced Phillipe Senderos at centre-back. Upfront, captain Alexander Frei was fit to start – although, like Suazo, he didn’t make it to the second half.
As in their first game, the Swiss lined up very narrow. They were keen to keep the gap between centre-back and full-back very narrow, because Chile love to play balls through that space. The midfield sat fairly solidly ahead of them – Gelson Fernandes was tucked in on the left, whilst Behrami got up and down the line slightly more, and helped double up with his full-back against the threat from Chile’s left.
Notably, Chile’s front three also played very narrow, up against the full-backs. Often, the wide players (today, Alexis Sanchez and Jean Beausejour) hug the touchline and create gaps in the defence for the full-backs to exploit, but today the front three played across the width of 18-yard box for most of the game. This meant that the two wing-backs, Arturo Vidal and Mauricio Isla, had the flanks to themselves, although they did look to bend their runs and duck inside when they got into the final third.
Although the Swiss continued the narrow defence as they did in the first game against Spain, they defended higher up the pitch, which may have helped the Chilean wide players, but prevented Suazo from operating too close to goal.
Chile pressing causes problems
Chile’s intense pressing high up the pitch caused Switzerland a problem all game. The Swiss centre-backs are not the most technically proficient players and found the pressure difficult whenever they won the ball back. It also interfered with their passing ability. Pressuring the opposition centre-backs is often a tactic associated with disrupting quick, neat build-up play from the back, but it can also cause havoc with teams playing long ball football. For long balls to be effective, they have to be accurate, but the Swiss defence didn’t have any time on the ball to look up and find the two strikers.

Chile's second half average positions
Chile played an incredibly high tempo game, always taking free-kicks and throw-ins immediately and passing the nearest man, so the Swiss defence were under pressure constantly. This was also an attempt to hit Switzerland before their defence and midfield had taken up the optimum positions – Spain were too slow and laboured in their build-up; Chile got into goalscoring positions much more frequently.
They also tried a few long-range shots early on – something Spain rarely did in their defeat, despite often working the ball into shooting positions on the edge of the area.
Red card gives Chile further advantage
The game was changed when Behrami was dismissed for swinging an elbow, and Ottmar Hitzfeld was forced to reorganise in a 4-4-1 shape – at first he tried putting Alexander Frei on the right, but then opted to remove him for Barnetta. Blaise Nkufo, excellent in the first game, again did a good job but found it difficult to hold the ball up with the midfield runners so far away, especially as the Swiss were forced to pass quickly from the defence because of the Chilean pressure, meaning the midfielders didn’t have time to connect with Nkufo. The veteran’s dominance in the air was also wasted, with no-one going for the flick-ons.
From then on, to use the pundits’ favourite expression, “It was like a training ground exercise – attack versus defence”. And defence very nearly prevailed. Switzerland may have lost the game, but they set a new record for the most number of minutes without conceding a goal at the World Cup final. For the second match run, their defensive positioning was excellent, and the two holding midfielders sat solidly ahead of the centre-backs, making it difficult for Mati Fernandez to get space between the lines. The wide midfielders tracked the Chilean wing-backs, and for most of the second half Chile struggled to play a killer pass.
Chile winner
By this stage, Chile had shifted their formation slightly – it remained roughly 3-3-1-3, but with the defence playing to the left-of-centre and Isla being forced to cover a large area on the right. The use of Jean Beausejour and Mark Gonzelez on the left made Chile slightly lopsided, and it was a slight surprise that they didn’t sacrifice a defender for another attacking player.

The scene for Chile's winner - although the defence was high up the pitch, the lack of pressure on the ball was probably more of a crucial factor
The Swiss eventually conceded to a goal that emerged partly because of their high defensive line – Esteban Paredes broke through, and crosses for Gonzalez to head home. But the bigger factor was tiredness – Chile are extremely fit and often outlast opponents that have eleven men, let alone opponents with only ten. The high defensive line was not the problem as such, it was more than the Swiss midfielders were so tired that they were unable to exert enough pressure on the man on the ball – the Chilean midfielders often had time and space to thread a pass through the defence. The forwards could have scored three or four, and the wastefulness in both games could come back to haunt them, with a decent chance of Chile, Switzerland and Spain all finishing on six points.
Conclusion
It was a fascinating game, but one spoilt slightly by a red card that decimated Switzerland. It probably didn’t change their mentality or strategy too much (a point would have been a good result for them regardless of how many players they had) but it did mean they never looked likely to break through and score themselves – apart from one golden chance wasted by Eren Derdiyok in the final minute.
Chile deserved the win and again impressed with their attacking, exciting brand of football. But just as in their first match, they scored in slightly fortunate circumstances (Gonzalez’s header was poor) and struggled to extend their advantage, despite clear superiority in both possession and territory. It would be astonishingly unlucky if they went out after recording two wins from their first two games, but they will probably need a result against Spain. A sharper-looking Suazo could make the difference.
Chile 1-0 Switzerland: Chile deserve win but might regret wasting chances




It would indeed be a shame if Chile was eliminated on goal difference. Very fun side to watch.
More than that, it would be a tragedy.
Chile are setting an exemplary lesson for relatively small nations on how to take a pro-active approach. And to think that there are some sides such as France and Italy who could still qualify to the next round having done so much less!
Chile aren’t taking their chances, that’s the whole problem… They are wasteful with the many chances that they make, and it could haunt them… Late in the game, it seemed as if everyone that got onto the ball close to Swiss goal just wanted to score for himself… This caused them to often lose possession, and more crucially perhaps, nearly their 1-0 lead… A lot depends on how many the Swiss manage to bang past Honduras (I predict a 2-0 win for the Swiss with a goal in each half)
even more than that, it would be a huge injustice.
does anyone know why goal difference decides who goes through between two teams on equal points, rather than the result of the match between them?
Wewps, diagram has Inler on twice. Great read as always though.
You have Inler twice on the diagram. You missed Nkufo.
Fantastic watching Chile play and really pleased to see them get the points, nothing on their minds when they get the ball other than getting to the opponent’s penalty area as quickly as possible which is very refreshing. They created the chances to get a large goal difference, but failed to capitalise on it as the graphic shows: http://totalfootball2010.posterous.com/suis-high-line-did-win-a-number-of-offsides-b
Still, great to see the Swiss get their defensive record at least (just about!). Had Derdiyok converted his chance it really would have been an undeserved point.
Agree that “El Chupete” Suazo’s return to sharp form will be crucial. Paredes is just not good enough – missed three clear cut chances, plus falls offside too easily. In addition, Bielsa won’t have the option to play “El Mago” Valdivia as false nine (as against Honduras) because in Mati’s absence Valdivia should become the trequartista.
Also, am I the only one slightly disappointed in Alexis Sanchez so far? The technique is clearly there, but his positioning is sometimes weird – he looks free, but in fact is too wide and “hidden” from the playmaker. And his decision-making with the ball in the flanks was a bit erratic. Or maybe it was just good covering by the resilient Swiss banks of 4 (no pun intended…).
An exciting player to watch though, at an only 21 a bright future ahead
yeah would be a pity to see them go out..but yeah by the looks of it they will have to get a result against Spain. Swiss has an easier task on hand to thump Honduras in last game and go through.. Nice review. Thanks.
I think the match can be divided in 3 parts. The first one from 0 to 15 minutes, in which Chile controlled the ball in the swiss half-pitch, but deepless and causing any danger at all because of the excellent defensive disposal of the swiss.
The second was from minute 15 until Behrami’s red card in which Switerland took the control and dominated the match, pressing high-up the pitch, avoiding Chile to play short passing, and urging the defenders to play long balls with no destiny.
Til there, the match was really equal, and the draw seemed very fair.
And the third part began with the red card (minute 30). Thenceforward Chile dominated every single moment. They attacked from the left, the center, the right side, with 4, 5, 6 or 7 players. I don’t know how many goals ocassion Chile had, I only can tell that they controlled the ball all around the Swiss box… But…. the same wasting chances than against Honduras.
Finally, I quote: “It would be astonishingly unlucky if they went out after recording two wins from their first two games, but they will probably need a result against Spain”.
Thank you, ZM.
Regards.
I see things slightly different. A point for Switzerland would not have been undeserved at all. Their fighting spirit was remarkable especially givin the referee’s very poor performance that left them with 10 men for 60 minutes. The red card was no way justified but changed the game considerably as it prevented Switzerland from holding the ball upfront and running decent counterattacks – I am sure they would have caused serious problems for Chile’s defence otherwise. Chile is certainly great to watch but it was tremendous to see how many times they were catched by the Swiss offside trap (the 1-0 seemed too be offside too). It will be interesting to watch them against Spain whitout superiority of possesion, and forced to react rather than ACTING. Finally the sad thing today was that a poor referee prevented us from seeing the tactical clash we hoped for.
Rinus;
against Spain, Chile will press like madmen and launch lightning counter-attacks.
I’ll disclose my bias here; in the hope that both Chile and Spain qualify, a high-scoring draw or a marginal victory to Spain would be welcome (in the event that Switzerland were to draw with Honduras).
I don’t think the Swiss will draw with Honduras. I think they’ll play very aggressively. Honduras are a bit toothless in attack for all their nice triangles. Swiss to win, but they won’t destroy them. It will, however, probably be a comfortable performance in the end.
Chile don’t need to care about the score if Switzerland is to draw with Honduras. The point is Swiss will win and that’s why goals matter
.
agree, it should be beyond dispute that 1 man down is not really an advantage ….. taking this into account and the constellation of the last games I also expect that Chile will be out and wouldn’t call it astonishing: Spain will win against Chile and the Swiss will win against Honduras (assuming a good referee perfomance for both games
)..
Honduras is already out so they spirit will be much lower…should be not too difficult for the Swiss to get the goals they need…..
Referee ruin the game…
Red card, too harsh
Goal, ofside
Shame for two very good teams… we could watch more balanced and more interesting game!
the goal wasnt offside, the replay show that the player offside do not interact in the play. so is a valid goal.
On the other hand, the swiss were praised by a shameless tatics, and never until last 15th minutes of the game found any chance of score.
60 minutes playing with 10 players… shameless tactics?
and about ofside goal:
http://i883.photobucket.com/albums/ac33/ArditHashaniii/Chile-1.jpg
please clarify.
(just look at linesman… his position is totally wrong)
It seems that the feet(the closest part of his body towards the goalpost) of the SUI defender are either at the same vertical plane or behind CHI attacker’s head(the closest part of his body towards the goalpost), but it was tight.
Red card was clearly a wrong call, not just harsh, it was just a yellow or a warning.
I’m afraid to say the red card was legitimate. The referee had set the precedent by booking players left right and centre from the start so Behrami should have taken that into consideration. I felt his elbow was slightly high and although he didnt make much contact it is still an intentional attempt to strike the man (whether it is to protect the ball or (unlikely) to hurt his opponent).
A few points i had to make is that Switzerland didnt really have a go at the game til they went down. It is true they were down but they didnt show enough (despite having a fantastic chance at the end).
However, i suspect this wont be enough for Chile’s goal difference as Switzerland should be able to beat Honduras by 2 or more goals and (i suspect) Spain will beat chile.
Personally I would be disappointed to see Chile out because they have brought the most exciting play so far. I’d love to see Bielsa manage a top side (like my beloved AC Milan)
Behrami’s elbow was stupid, but the ref was simply ridiculous with the cards. While the red card was arguably legitimate, without question it changed a very close contest into a one sided attack vs defence game. Just before the red card, Switzerland pressed very well into Chile’s own half. They packed the midfield and forced the ball to go wide or go long. On the other hand, Chile had terrible deliveries with the ball and did not truly threaten the goal for first half an hour. I think Chile had a small edge over Switzerland, but with their poor deliveries and finishing, I can’t help but think Switzerland had a decent chance to at least hold out a draw with 11.
Counterargument: When refs refuse to give red cards, the game gets out of hand and players get hurt.
My thought was it should have been a yellow, not a straight red. I didn’t see intent to hurt.
That said, I have a very nice scar on my left cheek right below the eye from an elbow raised to “shield” the ball from my attempted tackle. In general I think anytime an elbow or hand comes up higher than a shoulder to try and “shield” the ball from the defender any contact with the defender’s face that results should be penalized.
So I think it probably should have been yellow, but don’t feel too bad about the straight red.
And I’m not sure the red helped Chile that much. I think the Swiss would have been caught alot more with a high defensive line if they were playing with all 11 men.
Gutted that Chile have worked so hard to win both games and yet still don’t find themselves in as strong a position in the group as their effort deserves – or more to the point, I’m slightly annoyed that Switzerland are probably going to qualify ahead of either Spain or Chile. Obviously its their prerogative to play whatever way works for them, but I can’t stand the way they played football in this World Cup or the last. The Switzerland vs Ukraine game in 2006 last 16 was amongst the most torturous World Cup (or flat out football) games I’ve ever watched.
Chile’s profligacy in front of goal will most likely haunt them. They had ample chances to put away Honduras and Switzerland by bigger margins but didn’t take them. Presuming that three teams in the group end up on 6 points it will be extra galling to the unlucky team, given that so many other teams, even group winners, will qualify with less points!
Second place is also a bit of a booby trap. Can’t see any team from this group beating a Brazilian team likely to win their group.
Everyone’s talking about Spain like they’re a dominant force that cannot be overcome. But Chile has already played Spain in a friendly, and I think they only lost 2-0 or something. They don’t call Bielsa “el Loco” for no reason, as he has that game in mind, as well as how Spain played against Switzerland & Honduras.
In my opinion, Del Bosque has got a few things wrong with his squad selections and tactics, that it may play into Chile’s hand. Busquets and Alonso almost cancel each other out. Busquets is the closest Spanish player to what Senna has been doing up until his glorious 2008. Alonso, although a quality player, is too much of a deep-lying playmaker that he limits Xavi’s role and pushes him too far forward in an uncomfortable position. With Chile’s raiding wingbacks and tricky wingers, will Spain play the funny shape they deployed against Honduras? or will they play genuine wingers to track back? Silva,Mata, Villa and/or Navas? I dont think so. If they do, they will still need a 3 man midfield. Alonso & Xavi almost always need a big man (think Yaya Toure, Lass Diarra, Mascherano, Davids) to cover their backs, so Busqets might be emploed in that role. This leaves us with 1 striker upfront, thus playing straight into Chile’s hand.
I’m afraid I’m sounding a touch too optimistic, but this WC has shown us many surprises, and I won’t count on a another (rather unfortunate) one occuring in group H. Switzerland are probably the ugliest footballing nation, but however you win you won, respect to them. And Spain won’t have an easy day at te office with Chile. They’re no Honduras and will not be pushed over. They have all the “right” ingredients, class, dogedness, fantasy, trickery, workload, it’s just a shame they haven’t yet secured their passage to the last 16
Mati,
I too am distraught about Del Bosque’s peristing with the double-pivot.
Spain never played this way at Euro 2008.
Could it be Del Bosque trying to stamp his own legacy on the team; to make it less of an Aragones team. It would be out of character for Del Bosque to be so narcissitic.
Even more worrying would be if Del Bosque actually thinks that this double-holding partnership improves Spain’s play.
Chile have scored one more goal than Switzerland. Switzerland will not score more than Spain did against them surely. So we’ll go for 2-0. That means if Chile score 2 they go through. Maybe not likely but 1 goal is not beyond them. Spain will have to be less wasteful (Villa scored twice but should have had at least another couple) and play far better than in their last two games to guarantee a victory.
It could well go down to goal difference though. In this case Switzerland are currently on 0 and Chile on 2. Given that Switzerland will probably put a couple away without reply that means Chile would need to draw with Spain… which would put them through anyway.
It looks like either Chile or Spain is going out. Great shame!
Watching Chile is like seeing chaos theory in action. Their players are buzzing around everywhere. I lost count of the amount of time Medel and Jara spent bombing forward – and they are meant to be centre-backs. They basically play with two wingers on each side. It’s a terrific spectacle, but I could see someone in this tournament ripping them to pieces. They look weak from set plays, they don’t really have a holding midfielder – not a good one anyway – and they play with no composure at all. And, fatally, they lack a cutting edge. They should have scored four or five against Switzerland, but frittered away chances. When you play with that many people that far forward, you have to keep the ball. To do that, you need good passing midfielders – which again, they don’t seem to have. When they lose the ball to a clinical team, they could be left stranded. Everyone is raving about their attack, but they’ve only scored two goals in this tournament. I like them, but I wonder how long they will be sticking around.