North Korea: a better side than you might expect
For obvious reasons, there hasn’t been a great deal of media coverage about the North Korean national team, making a re-appearance in the World Cup for the first time since their famous adventure in the north of England in 1966.
Of course, this has only contributed to a sense of anticipation about their side; there were suggestions that throughout the qualification campaign, North Korea played the most defensive game imaginable – telling their strikers to drop back into defence when out of possession. That seems doubtful, but regardless, they have new coach anyway
This week, they played their final warm-up friendly against Greece. The game ended in a 2-2 draw, with Korea twice conceding poor goals from set-pieces, and twice hitting back with stunning strikes from Jong Tae-Se – seemingly nicknamed either the “Rooney of North Korea” or the “Rooney of Asia”, presumably according to how well he’s playing at the time.
Reports from qualification suggested that they played with a six-man defence, but in truth their formation is fairly close to a 3-5-2, albeit in a very defensive manner that could be interpreted as a 3-3-2-2 or even 3-3-2-1-1, and with some important modifications.
Defending in numbers
The back three act as conventional centre-halves – it was difficult to judge whether a sweeper will be in action, because Greece fielded a central three-man attack that was relatively easy for the Korean three to pick up. There was no thought from any of the three to bring the ball out of defence, instead calm, short passes were played to the wing-backs.
The wing-backs were fairly far from the rampaging wing-backs we are used to in Europe -typified by the current Lazio side, who rely on theirs for most of their attacking moves. Instead, they rarely pass the halfway line, looking for passes to one of the front four before taking up their defensive roles again. The left-wing back, Yun-Nam, seemed slightly more interested in attacking and boasts both good pace and crossing ability.

This is how Korea's defence and midfield line up. The three centre-backs (marked in pink) stay central at all times. The two wing-backs (marked in yellow) close down when the ball is on their side, and drop in when it is on the opposite side. In front of the centre-backs lies a defensive centre-half in Yong Hak-An (marked in blue), whilst ahead of him are the two central midfielders (marked in green). The front two remain upfield.
Between the wing-backs sits Yong Hak-An, who is the midfield destroyer, but also seems to drop into the backline if one of the centre-backs are moved up the pitch when marking an opposition forward. He plays a fairly static, defensive-minded role – in fact, he is closer to a centre-back than a central midfielder in terms of the role he plays, just 15 yards further up the pitch.
In open play, North Korea defend frantically – multiple players pressure the man in the ball, and with six purely defensive-minded players, they seem reasonably happy for their centre-backs to be drawn up the pitch, knowing there is generally another player covering.
At set-pieces though, they were woeful – defending with a bizarrely high line and twice conceding when Karagounis free-kicks found someone unmarked infront of the goalkeeper at the far post. They’re also not the tallest side, so set-pieces might be a real problem for them in South Africa.

Closing down in numbers...
Midfield
The main movement comes from the two central midfield players, who are also charged with finding attacking width when in possession. The onus upon them to take up more advanced positions means that North Korea find it relatively difficult to counter-attack through these players – they are generally met by opposition central midfielders, and then still have a defence to get past.
Their best moves on the counter came from direct balls to the front two from the defence, but when they managed to keep possession and build up play steadily through the wing-backs, North Korea were often very impressive with their movement and interplay around the penalty area. When the midfielders take up wide positions, they are attacking with four players in not a dissimilar way to how a 4-2-3-1 would, although they lack support from the centre of midfield, and need the full-backs to get forward to provide overloads in wide positions.
Quality in attack
If you expected them to be well-organised at the back but lacking technical quality upfront, think again. Their front two are the two best players in the side – Hong Yong-Jo plays a classic trequartista role, playing between defence and midfield and looking to play through balls for the striker. And what a striker he is – Jong Tae-Se makes intelligent runs starting from wide positions and has a lethal shot on him. In this game, his first goal was a tremendous dipping strike from 25 yards, in off the crossbar, and his second was arguably even better – he controlled a long, diagonal ball, took it past the defender and then smashed it into the top of the net. North Korea may be a defensive side, but they also offer a goal threat.

....and again
Conclusion
In all, North Korea look a better side than they have been made out to be, and the defensive nature of their game and constant harrying in numbers will certainly make them difficult to break down. They are, of course, in the toughest group in the competition – up against Brazil, Portugal and the Ivory Coast – and will be expected to leave without a point.
But with Brazil playing mainly on the counter-attack, and Portugal and Ivory Coast playing systems that rely on pace, North Korea’s ultra-defensive style could frustrate teams early on in games – you can imagine one of their opponents struggling to break them down early on, and going in 0-0 at half-time – whether North Korea will be able to defend resolutely for 90 minutes against a top-quality side is doubtful, however.
The best way to beat North Korea is probably by playing 4-3-3 with two high wingers, and getting your full-backs well forward – since North Korea don’t play any wide players ahead of the wing-backs, creating an overload on the flanks should be relatively easy. In that sense, all three of their opponents are fairly nicely set up to defeat them, but they might find scoring goals more difficult than they expect.
Here are the goals from the Greece game – two superb finishes from Jong Tae-Se preceded by awful defending from two free-kicks.
North Korea: a better side than you might expect




Is it possible that Greece’s poor attacking threat flattered to deceive on how good the North Korean defence is?
That said, I can see Jong Tae-Se nicking 1 or 2 goals.
Writing this after the first 45 minutes of the Brazil-PRK game, it seems that ZM got it right – they’re well-organised and cohesive defensively, and their front two are managing to carve themselves the occasional decent chance. Brazil, for all their attacking flair, have yet to really threaten.
A friend of mine has this little booklet with information about all teams at this World Cup. And he asked me: Guess whose national team has no homepage. And i replied: Hmm, … North Korea. (not even knowing that they qualified.)
A little booklet is not an evidence, but it shows that maybe this is a squad even football experts know nearly nothing about.
But this is a great chance for the players and the squad, just remember Greece or other underdogs. They may not win (sure they don’t) but maybe reach the quaterfinals.
Okay, I just looked in my little booklet and they play the group of death. Don’t think they have a great chance to reach the last 16, even with a defensive, counter-attacking system. But it will be interesting to see how they try to beat the big ones.
Greece surely did not play 100 percent in this game. They were merely standing and watching when conceding the goals. Greece is difficult to predict. Either they lose all three games or go through to the next stage. It is kind of Greek mentality I know what I am talking about
But I was impressed from the North Korean striker. I think for some time that Group G will surprise us. It is definitely possible that Brazil will be 2nd or 3rd in this group.
And I expect at least one of the three favorites to lose points against North Korea (0:0 or 1:1), because all teams are going to underestimate them.
I dont think they were not trying for the goals, they just defended poorly for both.
ZM
There is something about this North Korean side. The general perception has been about a team who are punching well above their weight having been drawn into a seriously tough group, of which they will be the whipping boys.
It would be ridiculous to suggest the Asian confederation is on a par with Europe or Africa, but qualifying automatically suggests they aren’t the equivalent of the Dog and Duck – eliminating Saudia Arabia and Iran is not a poor achievement.
Throw into the mix they conceded only 5 goals in 14 qualifiers (2 group stages) perhaps that 80/1 to win the group may be a bit unfair, particularly considering Portugal’s inconsistency and the vastly overrated Ivorians.
To consider an equivalent, South Korea started preparing for the 2002 World Cup several months in advance and were an extremely organised side, and before the argument about home advantage crops up – South Korea got to the semi’s on (dubious) merit – home advantage had very little to do with it. North Korea started preparing several months ago and have a distinct advantage over everyone.
They are vulnerable in the attacking sense, Tae-Se hit the headlines some time ago (East Asian games) and has generated an abundance of speculation in Asia, but there is still a question mark about his ability against quality. Yong-Jo simply hasn’t played enough recently to be relied upon.
Frailties at set-pieces I imagine are a blip, this shouldn’t be a problem for them in the finals. They are not, by any means, the “4th” team in the group/
I watched DPR Korea in the Asian qualifications and was thoroughly unimpressed. They only made it past Saudi Arabia on goal difference (or maybe record) after 8 qualifying games. The entire qualification was Australia/Japan/South Korea versus weak teams from the Middle East and an Uzbekistan that completely imploded.
Their players’ lack of training against quality sides is completely obvious: how do you learn to defend set pieces against decent strikers unless your players actually encounter decent strikers? On that note, I’m sure my hometown club’s gaffer would spill a few million US Dollars (wink, nudge) into Kim Jong Il’s expense account for the services of those front two…
It isn’t just the three teams you mentioned, Iran are a good side and the traditionally weaker middle east sides are improving (Jordan, Qatar, Bahrain). Asia can’t compete in terms of strength in depth against Europe or Africa but they have probably overtaken North America in terms of quality.
Tea-Se plays for Frontale in Japan and Yong-Jo is a periphery squad player in the Russian top division. However Tae-Se’s value might already be on the increase.
I expect Ivory Coast and Portugal to be incredibly frustrated by this side, Brazil will edge through though. Probably 2-0.
Here a nice set-piece of North Korea against Iran.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDKBl4x_Z_8
Your boy Jong Tae-Se is pretty useful, isn’t he?
But I can’t really see any upsets in that group, barring another Portugal off-day. The defending looked utterly woeful.
I haven’t seen the game, but this clip really seems like it was taken from a lower-league game. Static defending, awful goalkeeping…
What a tough group Brazil will face, ha?!
If you didn’t read, Tae-Se said he is practicing hard every day and will try to score 3 goals each game! And he also says North Korea will qualify with no doubt at all. I’ll say – That’s sounded funnier before the game yesterday which I also watched.
But imagine a tall player such as P. Crouch against them. It would be so funny. Squads qith so many small players on their back like Mexico and North Korea shouldn’t go uch further. Luis Fabiano, Liedson and Drogba should have some fun against them in the air.
ZM, are you going to post analysis of the Argentinian side? I’m kind of confused about Maradona’s formation. I’m not sure if that extremely offensive side is a 4-4-2 or a 4-1-3-2 or 4-1-2-3 or all above or just a mess with lots of good players. My favorite guess is it is a unresponsible 4-4-2 diamond formation.
Yes, will have something up today/tomorrow based upon the Argentina v Canada game. Not so sure how to read that game since there were so many important unavailable players.
Also Cameroon, Mexico, Greece, USA and Paraguay in the next couple of days..
Ireland – Paraguay was very interesting, even with Cardozo missing. I did a small report on my blog but I’m not sure how much we can really take away from it given that they played 3-4-3 rather than their usual 4-4-2/5-3-2 and he rested some big players. Cardozo for example.
Look forward to hearing your take on it though.
Cardozo never was a starter in this team. No surprise if Barrios takes the spot left by Cabanas.
In response to an observation you made, I think the North Korean holding midfielder, Yong Hak-An, is both a midfield destroyer and sweeper. With a passive playing position in front of defense and ability to drop back to cover for a forward center back, he plays a libero’s role at the back.
I like such profiles of the invisibles, teams like North Korea that can easily end up as tourney dark horses. About their group, how will the easily frustrated Iberian mentality of Portugal fare against a stubborn opponent that plays anti-football? Ivory Coast hasn’t impressed much continentally, despite boasting immoral amount of talent. They’re still gifted individuals more than a team in my observation. Their friendlies haven’t shown much to be impressed about – actually, that would easily apply to just about all our African reps (South Africa, Cameroon, Nigeria and Cote d’Ivoire; Algeria and Ghana are a bit of an unknown quantity).
The problem with this Korean team won’t be work ethic but quality in all positions. Can defensive firmness, which lacked in this friendly, be the foundation for quality in attack? Unfortunately, it still looks like this team will impress but run out of ideas. Still I can’t wait.
Can a profile of Otto Rehhagel’s Greece be availed too?
I wonder about Portugal too against North Korea, given how much they’ve struggled to score. Didn’t see much of their last match, but 0-0 against Cape Verde with Ronaldo, Deco and Nani playing is not the best result.
This was a great article, as were the analysis of Brazil, England and Ivory Coast. I am really looking forward for the next ones, congratulations on this amazing site!
Thanks for this write up. They come across as a very reclusive team, even reading this article feels ‘forbidden’!
Do you think they’re capable of pulling “a Greece”? Or is the lack of quality to big a hurdle for them to overcome? I know Greece worked hard on their set pieces in Euro 04 but from what you’ve written it seems this side is quite the opposite in that regard. I watched the video and that 1st goal was ridiculous, 4 Greek players allowed to wander behind the opposition defence unmarked.
thanks for the analysis, to me they are a big unknown
What would happen in case the attack on the south korean ship will turn out to be the beginning of a serious war/conflict with south korea? Would a different team be selected to compete? Who would that be?
I don’t think this is inconceivable
great side btw
side=site
Kim Jong’s tactics are genius. This true Korean team will tread the world under foot.
“Hong Yong-Jo plays a classic trequartista role, playing between defence and midfield and looking to play through balls for the striker.”
Do you mean playing between MIDFIELD and ATTACK…?, not defence and midfield?
No, he means between defence and midfield. The opponents’ defence and midfield.
Yeah, that ^^.
Brazil can rest easy (relatively – they certainly can’t just overlook NK) because set-pieces are one of our greatest strengths at the moment.
I was interested in your claim that the 4-3-3 would be an effective way to deal with NK. I can’t see Brazil lining up in one, nominally at least, but I do hope that Dunga will change his starting line-up from game to game – say Ramires against the Ivory Coast but Elano against Portugal.
Against North Korea I wonder if inserting one of his “joker” full-backs (Daniel Alves or Gilberto/Michel Bastos) into the midfield would be the right way to adjust? Who knows, maybe as the game went on we’d end up seeing all 4 full-backs on the field at once. (Gilberto/Michel Bastos and Daniel Alves as mids, either ahead of Silva/Melo or, since against NK we can probably afford it, ahead of only one d-mid.)
I find it extremely unlikely that Dunga would ever play with only one holding mid. Brazilian national team football has been stuck in this pattern since 1993 at least. However if there was ever a game where the versatility of his bench might demand that he do this I suppose this would be it – then again, the more I think about this the more I realize Elano will be in there to deliver set-pieces.
At this point I’m rambling, but I loved seeing some analysis of NK as I have been extremely curious about this supposed “park the bus” team. I am confident we’ll win on the back of set-pieces even if they do successfully frustrate us otherwise, but would love to see the full-backs employed in the midfield if this game allows us the luxury of dropping a holding mid (at least during the game if not in the starting line-up).
Great report on Korea, where abouts are you able to watch all these games. Are you planning to do any analysis on Netherlands seeing as they seem to have a fairly good squad with Sneijder and Robben coming into the tournament in good form
That sounds like a more defensive version of the Bielsa/ Van Gaal 3-3-1-3. Chol and Guk are expected to provide the attacking width (and presumably track as oppossed to pin back rampaging full backs in this particular system) so you have wing backs that are not expected to cover the entire flank, thus negating the usual criticism of 3 at the back systems.
Van Gal and Bielsa are both seen as extremely attacking coaches. Chol and Gok would be much further up the pitch in their systems and central defenders encouraged to join the midfield so as to not isolate the number 10, will be interested to see a similarish shape with much more defensive principles.
Insightful. Greece played N Korea thinking that they would be similar to the S. Korean team. But, one thing Greece ignored is the fact that S. Korean players are much taller and more physical and they also have several players with European and previous World Cup experiences. So, while the betting odds seem to favour Greece for the first group match. I am going to bet my money on S. Korea to beat Greece.
just remind a slight error, the holding midfielder is surnamed Yong-Hak and the last name is An
Insightful. Greece played N Korea thinking that they would be similar to the S. Korean team. But, one thing Greece ignored is the fact that S. Korean players are much taller and more physical and they also have several players with European and previous World Cup experiences. So, while the betting odds seem to favour Greece for the first group match. I am going to bet my money on S. Korea to beat Greece.
great job ZM. Just as most have mentioned above, very few know anything about North Korea. Their form of defending (more like holding imo) is quite interesting. I like the way the full backs control the pace of the game. The basically dictate the team performance. Shut down the 2 FBs, lock down the team, problem is their seeming discline (short pasess) and knowing when to “climb”, maintaining a diagonal across the pitch, makes it hard to lock them down…a tactic that can sure lead to opposition frustration (think of Inter-Barca) and sweet counter attacks
Just having watched first half of BRA vs PRK, must say your assessment of PRK was spot on, especially regarding offensive capabilities of Hong & Jong.