Benfica – the most attractive side in Europe?
Is there a side in Europe at the moment that plays more attacking, exciting football than this Benfica side? With two forwards, three attacking midfielders and two extremely offensive full-backs, the side is packed with creativity and energetic runners, making them extremely difficult to defend against.
The best thing about the side is that it features two of World football’s forgotten talents, in Javier Saviola and Pablo Aimar; two slender, skilful No 10s from River Plate, who never went onto achieve what they promised upon their initial arrival in Europe. Portugal is probably the best league to play in if you’re this sort of player – it’s open, attacking and features a lot of poor defences.
The side essentially plays with a diamond in midfield, although with the carrileros so attacking, and with Javi Garcia sitting very deep in front of the back four in a role similar to the one Pep Guardiola played at Barcelona, the side is perhaps best described as a 4-1-3-2, and in that respect is relatively similar to the great Czech side of Euro 2004. Like that side, the offensive slant of the midfielders is compensated for by the fact that the two carrileros are very energetic, and work hard to get goalside when Benfica are not in possession. Indeed, this is a good example of how to play the diamond shape – Di Maria and Ramires play from inside to out, and are comfortable scrapping in midfield as well as getting to the byline and getting crosses in.
Cardozo plays as a classic prima punta – he likes recieving crosses and he’s a physical presence, whereas Saviola tends to play ‘around’ him, either dropping deep or drifting to the wing. When he does the former, and links up with the midfield, he and Aimar create a double trequartista threat that is extremely difficult to defend against, and effectively becomes a Christmas Tree formation similar to when Milan used two playmakers.
The attacking intent is summed up by the players who play at full-back, as both positions are filled by players who started as wide midfielders. On the right, Maxi Pereira lacks the pace or skill required to be a constant attacking threat, but is more comfortable at full-back than on the right of midfield where he played last season. The opposite side sees more technical quality – the two Portuguese players, Cesar Peixoto and Fabio Coentrao are both listed on most squad lists as midfielders, but fill in well at left-back.
As ever in attacking sides, the holding midfielder is crucial, and Javi Garcia’s first season in Portuguese football has been a huge success. A classic Iberian midfielder, his passing is excellent and his defensive ability owes more to intelligent positioning and reading of the game rather than crunching tackles.
Credit should go to both the manager, Jorge Jesus, for getting the team to play well in such an adventurous shape, as well as Benfica legend Manuel Rui Costa, now Director of Football, and responsible for the transfer policy which brought in such great players.
The one criticism of the side, which may be their downfall in the Europa League, would be the lack of flexibility. They do have a decent squad, but one wonders if two upfront will continue to work away from home. Playing Carlos Martins, another central midfielder, may be a useful tactic – but which of the forwards would you drop? Perhaps Aimar would be the one to make way. Nevertheless, they remain well-suited to the Liga Sagres – interestingly, every player in their squad is either Iberian or South American.
As always with Portuguese sides, there’s a threat of the team being broken up in the next transfer window, with Angel Di Maria looking to leave and Ramires set to be on show at the World Cup. Let’s hope this side wins at least one trophy this season, because they are a great demonstration of how football should be played.
This 4-0 win against Academia was a particular highlight. Superb link-up play for the first goal, a wonderful piece of skill for the second, and the sheer number of players in the box for the third goal is astonishing.
Benfica – the most attractive side in Europe?





Were and are my dark horses for the Europa League – which by the way is actually very entertaining this season. Di Maria didn’t come to Arsenal which is a shame and he’s showing what we are missing.
A fantastic side to watch, and they also boast some phenomenal stats this season:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/europe/portugal_results/tables/default.stm
56 goals in 21 league games at an average of 2.66 goals per game, just 11 goals conceded (giving them a goal difference of +45) and only one defeat all season. I’m amazed Braga have managed to keep up with them.
I just hope Benfica can hold it together and put on a decent Champion’s League campaign next year.
It will be interesting to see who if any of Luiz, Cardozo, Di Maria and Ramires are still around in September!
I think they probably are the most attractive team to watch in Europe – am not sure how they’ll manage to keep all their players.
RCM
http://leftbackinthechangingroom.blogspot.com
Hey ZM and Victor (I’d love to hear your opinion on this…),
I don’t know if you’ve noticed this already, but in terms of assymetrical structure the Benfica set-up is very similar to Dunga’s Brazil; albeit one with greater passing fluidity in midfield (compare Javi Garcia to Gilberto Silva as a holding midfielder) and the fact that the ‘third midfielder’ in Brazil’s side (Ramires) is considered strong enough to assist as the ’second volante’ with Benfica; all of which means that Benfica’s third midfielder (Di Maria) is liberated a genuine offensive-midfielder (some would even argue a forward).
The rest is pretty logical: Aimar as No.10 (like Kaka, although more deliberative and less incisive than the great Brazilian), Saviola as outside-forward/mobile second-striker (similar to Robinho, though perhaps with more liberty to switch flanks) and Cardozo (Luis Fabiano)as a No.9. Please rememeber, I am talking in terms of style and not in comparative quality.
Whilst I appreciate the mechanical coherence of Dunga’s system (excellently organised), I just wish they could incorporate a more distributive holding midfielder in there (in place of Gilberto or Felipe Mello); that way, Brazil could preserve the same structure, whilst adding more variety to their movement especially when needing to break down more defensive teams or even for maximising possession against teams who are technically excellent (Spain, Holland). Of course; then they would be unstoppable in every aspect of their game.
[...] of a front five too good for the Portuguese league. But the gentleman over at Zonal Marking.net said Benfica’s quality in Portugal stems in part from the namby-pamby style of play in Portugal [...]
Quality.
Everton was one of their victims this season, benfica 7-0 everton agg.
benfica is very entertaining this season, great team who plays total football.
Thhis time was Marseille who tasted 90 min of attacking football; Benfica sent the French to the ropes and kept them there with flair and speed! Tactically and technically a huge performance by the Portuguese.
[...] season already, also we got the best defense in europe. be scared, be very scared xD ask everton http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/…ide-in-europe/ __________________ Last edited by Miccoli30SLB; Today at 02:36 [...]
Interesting draw today then – Beauty and the Beast!
Liverpool’s holding midfielders to stifle the double trequartista threat? (although I see Pablo Aimar was on bench Thursday?)
Not to nitpick here, but are they an “attactive” side or an “attractive” side?
That’s a fair point
For some reason the URL still says “attactive” even though the headline’s been edited.
Other than that little bit of semantics, excellent write up. Been a fan of Aimar and Saviola since their River Plate days. I can still fondly recall an old Championship Manager game where I had Aimar, Saviola, Ortega and D’Alessandro at River Plate. It was the most awesome team I’ve ever seen.
Pity I never actually got to see the River side back then. That team must’ve been something special.
[...] always-informative Zonal Marking lays it out a whole lot better than I ever could, so I’ll stick to the simple analysis. They stormed through the group stage with a 5-0-1 [...]
After watching Benfica hack and foul Torres for the entire night, it is clear to me that they are anything but attractive (attactive as it was spelled for 3 weeks on this site). How Luisao was not sent off immediately – despite being given a yellow for his punt into Torres’s calf, and another for the squabble with Babel – is ludicrous. The two penalties they got were deserved, but they also deserved probably 5 yellow cards this match. Their anti-football, dirty, flopping-like-a-fish teams should not garner any type of praise or adulation from pundits of any level.
Plus, their fans have twice now thrown some sort of explosive missile onto the pitch. It speaks to the class of the supporters and the Benfica players on the pitch tonight.
o cry me a river! Gerrard is known for his diving antics and it seemed to me Torres was doing a little diving throughout this match. Perhaps if you weren’t so busy guzzling down so many pints down that fat hole of yours,you would have witnessed your club getting outshot, outplayed, and ultimately; out scored! O what’s the matter? Can’t except the fact that a club from a small, poor nation, from an inferior league, beat your club?
I just get sick and tired of how these pretentious, “We have the best players, league, clubs..blah blah” English or wanna be English Ass-hats think nobody else is better than them. Face it, your team lost fair and square and your billion dollar club playing in your billion dollar league sucks this year!
So go “walk alone” crying to someone who gives a damn …and, o yeah…Forca Benfica!
Cheers!
Wow… now that’s talking.
Well said. Besides, Benfica are hardly a “small” club as many English fans seem to think. They’re giants of the European game. During the 60s they were in three successive European Cup finals and and a total of five in the decade. From 1960-68 they were awesome.
I do not agree with the article in one aspect. The assertion that Saviola and Aimar are somehow ‘failed’ players who did not ‘make it’ when they first came over to europe. Saviola was scoring goals for fun at Barca and Valencia were title contenders and champions league regulars with aimar in the team. With aimar maybe there is a case that he had a dp in form but thats more because teams changed around him and he had to play in teams with sub standard players (e.g. Zaragoza). As far as Saviola is concerned he has scored everywhere he’s gone and his general play has always helped teams. Is it a co-incidence that Saviola’s first season in Sevilla ended up making them UEFA cup champions and made a platform for them to enter the champions league. Juande Ramos might like to claim that he had a great team even without Saviola but can he possibly quantify the psychological boost the players got in beating Real Madrid that season and guess who scored the goals that day..that washed out and below par striker who only scores against weak portugese defences..SAVIOLA!!Just look at the goals on the video above..who was involved in most of the moves. The huge win against everton that sent shockwaves around europe..who had a hand in most of the goals and even managed to score a few himself..yes you guessed it..El Conejo!!
They’re certainly not ‘failed players’, that isn’t suggested anywhere. But there’s no doubt that neither have fulfilled their potential. More on that here http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/26/trequartista-engance-classic-no-10sstruggle/
That is precisely my point..what does it mean when people say that they ‘haven’t fulfilled their potential’..Well what did people expect them to do. As far as the Maradona label is concerned it is the media that puts every young argentinian player on the pedestal as being the new Maradona..not the players themselves. Saviola is a great player but i think the problem is that he is not that good at selling himself like Christiano Ronaldo,for example. He is a humble player which makes him seem ordinary in a world of football full of big ego’s and even bigger paychecks. Now if someone asked me..Saviola and Aimar have fulfilled their potential and in the case of Saviola, most of the time wasn’t allowed to show it because coaches never gave him the chance, claiming to have ‘better’ players than him. I have watched football for years and in my opinion there is only a couple of players who i rated above Saviola..namely Zidane and Ronaldo. And that said, i don’t even like Brazilian or French Footballers or their way of playing football!!
I just want to say that FCPORTO is the best club in Portugal!
FCP is a football club dominated by the corruption and hate. Won many
titles and has grown over the last thirty years because of the “fruit” and “latte”, or the referees paid travel to Brazil. Corruption. Mafia! All this is evidence (search on YouTube), but the evidence can not be used because they were obtained without official authorization.
Justice in Portugal is dominated by interests and influences. The FCP is the shame of Portugal.
bla bla bla, all the same story about something every club has done… FCP is the best Portuguese team from the last 15 years, just because some guy payed some other guy to make things easy for about 3 or 4 games in a season doesnt make FCP a shame… For your own sake we had Mourinho back then. How do you think the defense got Porto out of trouble? That’s right!… – Excuse me mister judge hmm FCP had Mourinho as a coach back then – Oh!, ok then, case closed