Arsenal 1-3 Manchester United: Wayne Rooney brilliantly demonstrates the value of a ‘false nine’
It’s one thing to go out, play to your manager’s orders and get results. It’s an entirely separate thing to go out and score great goals.
And when those two come together, you have perfect football. This doesn’t happen too often – playing to your manager’s orders is often associated with defensive, negative football – the term “X came with a gameplan” has been used in the past few years as a euphemism for “X played for a draw and didn’t look to score themselves”. And great goals are often moments of individual brilliance – a mazy run ending in a fine finish, or a powerful shot from miles out that deceives the goalkeeper and goes in.
But when you combine the two, it’s wonderful to watch. And that’s what United did today, simply by having two plans. Plan one, get the ball to Nani and tell him to run at Clichy. Plan two, tell Rooney to drop deep, pull the centre-backs out of position, and exploit the space with extra runners. The first plan led to the first goal, the second plan led to the third goal, and the second goal was a combination of the two.
This display probably won’t get the praise it deserves, because United were happy to switch off after the third goal, on 52 minutes, and coast to victory. Had they kept on playing, one gets the feeling they could have scored five or six, such was their dominance in wide areas (particularly against Clichy), and the more Arsenal pressed forward, the more United would have been able to exploit their weaknesses.
United dominated the midfield department because, whilst they had a triangle similar to Arsenal’s, United can switch their three players to meet the needs of the game (and the particular stage in the game). As Andy Gray made a big deal of, after about 2o minutes, United swapped Scholes and Carrick, and after that United had the better of the midfield battle. For Arsenal, the three midfield players are clearly-defined: Song is the destroyer, Denilson is the passer, Fabregas provides the driving runs. United’s three do a bit of everything, which created a more compact, solid three today. Ferguson doesn’t deserve a huge amount of credit for the switch – because it was utterly bizarre to have lined up with Scholes as the deepest midfield player. He tried this against Birmingham a few weeks back, and it didn’t work then – so to do so against Arsenal, when Scholes was going to be up against Fabregas, was very odd. Nevertheless, Ferguson understood his mistake and rectified it.

Here, the traditional striker holds the ball up, but the defence is well-stocked against two or three runners

Here, the 'false nine' drags one centre-back out of position, leaving the other covering too large an area in the centre of the pitch
But the real brilliance from United was Wayne Rooney, playing upfront on his own in a positive which us tactical obsessives now call the ‘false nine‘ – a player who is not an ‘out-and-out striker’ playing as a lone forward. In fact, with Arsenal deploying Arshavin similarly, this game demonstrated quite how far the role of the ‘false nine’ has come in a short space of time since Luciano Spalletti’s Roma side began playing without a striker in 2006. Only three years ago, it would be unthinkable to have a Premiership game where the two sides fielding such small, slender players as a lone strikers.
Arshavin had a poor game today, despite having the measure of Wes Brown, and is perhaps too concerned with direct running when he has the ball – as a lone forward this often means he has no teammates within 20m, and certainly not within sight. Rooney, however, understands the role brilliantly – coming deep to collect the ball, laying it off to runners exploiting the space the centre-backs have left vacant after following Rooney. The diagrams above left demonstrate this.
This worked perfectly for the second and third goals, both involved Rooney retreating deep into his own half, laying the ball off, and suddenly United had a huge amount of space to exploit.
The first goal is so brilliant because Rooney is the one who finishes the move, but also because Park’s initial ball from inside his own penalty area is so precise. Many players in his position would hoof the ball clear, but Park understands that even 90 metres from the opposition goal, a delicate chip here could set off an attack.
Arsenal didn’t learn from the first half. For Park’s goal, William Gallas had made a mad dash up the pitch – and so when Vermaelen followed Rooney, Arsenal were left without any centre-backs whatsoever, and Clichy was overloaded with players.
And it’s incredibly similar to the goal United scored against Arsenal at the Emirates last season, except with Cristiano Ronaldo operating as the frontman and Rooney operating as a wide player:
The short-term impact of this game will be the probably death of Arsenal’s title hopes, the long-term effect is that it is yet more convincing evidence for the imminent death of the traditional striker at top clubs.
Arsenal 1-3 Manchester United: Wayne Rooney brilliantly demonstrates the value of a ‘false nine’


Very interesting especailyl the link to the Jonathan Wilson article. I think Rooney plays the role well becuase his work rate is so good….Berbatov has the skills to play the role but not the right mentality!!
Manchester United were superb today. I think this game was further evidence that Arsenal are really struggling without van Persie to lead the line. Rosicky, Nasri and Arshavin are all very good players, but are more supportive, creative forward types rather than natural nines, or indeed natural false-nines. Arshavin and Nasri in particular seem to struggle playing together – the communication simply isn’t there yet.
On a slightly different note: is there an argument perhaps for England to employ Rooney is such a false-none role, or is it imperative that a big man (in the Heskey mould) is played in front of him? With, say, two of Lennon/Gerrard/J.Cole flanking him as Park and Nani did today.
Or, is the 4-2-3-1 that Capello employs so essential because English players on the whole aren’t versatile enough to cope with anything that isn’t similiar to a 4-4-2?
Rooney is playing absolutely superbly at the moment. If England are to get anywhere near a World Cup Final, he’s going to have to maintain his form – he is the only (IMO) world class player that England have.
Fantastic breakdown of the game. I love the way SAF is using Rooney, especially because it seems a more natural fit for his skills than playing out wide.
Being a fairly avid Serie A follower as well, I have to wonder if AC Milan could use a similar player as their lone striker. With Borriello in the game, the offense is left to be generated through Ronaldinho’s creativity or long balls to Pato (when healthy). Otherwise they seem to have no option other than to fire crosses into the box.
Any thoughts?
Hi, great analysis!
I think Fergie got it spot on with the team selection. Instead of Giggs who was usually the creative outlet to give balls to Rooney, he chose Park who is more of an industrious runner. Both are half wingers but park added a new dimension to United. Wenger would have anticipated Giggs to start like everyone else. The midfield three of United is very versatile. All three can play the different roles required.
The second goal is a thing of beauty. Vermaelen shouldn’t have followed Rooney as he should have known that there was only Sagna behind him. Song is nowhere in the scene. United showed great intelligence, awareness to pull off this one. And I thought Bendtner should have started. Gutted we lost so badly…
Great blog.
Wenger could see what Ferguson had in mind when he replaced Giggs with more industrious Park, put extra man in midfield (4-5-1) and droped deeper. This way a huge space was created for Rooney et al to move into and for counter attacks. Simple but brilliant.
But that’s the real difference between Wenger and Ferguson, Wenger always sticks to his usual play and never learns or reacts.
The match could had gone the other way, if Arshavin scored those chances initially.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by Zonal_Marking: Arsenal 1-3 Manchester United – Wayne Rooney brilliantly demonstrates the value of a ‘false nine’ http://bit.ly/byIu7N...
Rooney, small and slender?!
“Slender” was certainly the wrong word in Rooney’s case, must have been thinking more about Arshavin went I wrote that….
I think there’s a definite case for England switching to a 4-5-1 with Rooney up top on his own, supporting by midfield runners. That’s not to underestimate the job Heskey did in qualifying, but we might need to be a bit cleverer against the World Cup, and I think it would mean more players playing in a role they’re comfortable in.
Ronaldinho as a false nine? He’s certainly got the attributes for it, but whether he’s got the mentality is questionable – you do have to work hard in that role, and I’m not sure that Ronaldinho would do it. That said, I agree about how predictable Milan can be, just pinging in crosses expecting Boriello to try and beat two centre-backs…
I agree that Vermaelen made a big error in following Rooney for the third. Part of the advantage of having Song in the side is that he should be occupying that space, and if Rooney makes a clear run towards his own goal, there’s no need to follow him. Especially considering Gallas had suddenly motored forward to join the attack. Vermaelen’s had a great first season, and he hasn’t made any massive errors, but there have been a few positional errors when he comes too high up the pitch. I think that might be an Ajax thing.
And Park…what a great player. Hard-working and versatile but also a really good technical player. He’s exactly the kind of player Arsenal need – unfussy and happy to play a squad game.
Whilst I admire Rooney’s play to create the third goal he like Arshavin, struggled to create any real openings. After 20 minutes as Arsenal started to get into it did he get a bit more joy and United switched Carrick deeper. The biggest plus of using a false nine is the space they create and with Man United profiting mostly on the break, their was more space to exploit and more indecision in the Arsenal defence. But the real breaker is the support you get and Manchester United did that well with Park and Fletcher in particular tireless.
Rooney created the third goal with his movement, and had a hand in the creation of his own goal too, though.
I don’t think Ronaldinho would work as a false 9. That said, with the pickup of Mancini, I think Milan could play with Dinho and Mancini on the wings and Pato as the false 9. He’s got the pace to make defenses respect him for the through ball and the stamina to drop off frequently.
Interesting, the signing of Mancini (not least because Berlusconi has criticised it) as there’s some speculation he’ll play at full-back, which would be interesting. Remember him coming to Roma as a right-back, but don’t think they ever fielded him there…
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Cox, Michael Cox, Michael Cox, Jamie Smith, Jamie Smith and others. Jamie Smith said: RT @MichaelCox: Arsenal 1-3 Manchester United – Wayne Rooney brilliantly demonstrates the value of a 'false nine' http://bit.ly/byIu7N G … [...]
[...] The use of a 3-man back with a sweeper may also be an interesting way of dealing with the False 9, as explained here , by designating the sweeper to cover space behind the marker when the False 9 drops off, or [...]